Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Do A Hit Job On Garfield Robinson Promoting Out Heritage Removed From Email List After I Told Him I Was Using His Book Keepers Of The Flame Saluting 100 Black Authors Volume 2 Page 134-5 Am Left Struggling To Understand Why My Intellectual Property Copyright Pedagogy Images CPPDP Build Brands Then Am Abandoned I Meet Mimi Owusu At Event Where I Was Invited To Be In The Project I Was At 2 Events At Tower Bridge I Signed Up For The International Book Show I Called I Was Told He’d Call Me Back Kevin Bennett Wants Me To Make Video For His App If I Didn’t Reach Out Dr Aboo Rahtata I Would Probably Give Up Already Some Black People Wicked Fi True 9/5/2025

Refer to

Adressee Only Reg Post WM 1407 5376 6GB
Althea Loderick Acting as CEO Althea.Loderick@southwark.gov.uk
Southwark London Borough Council False Court Nos –K02CL827 and K05EC530
The Local Authority Resolver 10179943
160 Tooley St, London SE1 2QH Crime No 4221169/23100
NOTICE AND DEMAND For Disclosure – 29-04-2025
NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT NOTICE GO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE
Althea Loderick Acting as CEO,
I am in receipt of your reply dated , and must again place on record my unequivocal objection to the evasion,
delay, and diversionary tactics exhibited in response to my formal demand for disclosure. Your failure to
acknowledge the serious criminal offences involved — or the statutory obligations arising from them —
now compounds the Local Authority’s liability.
Let me be clear: what is occurring is not a simple error or delay, but a coordinated abuse of the legal
process in which mock proceedings have been initiated for the sole purpose of covering up criminal acts,
namely:
· Gender-based discrimination
· Torture and inhuman treatment
· Child abuse
· Malicious concealment of evidence and obstruction of justice
Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Conducted in a County Court
You are reminded that criminal prosecutions cannot be lawfully conducted in a County Court. These
courts are limited to civil jurisdiction. Therefore, any alleged “injunction”, “committal”, or possession
proceedings being pursued under the guise of criminal enforcement — especially where no sealed court
orders exist — are, by legal definition, mock proceedings. This is a clear attempt to:
· Circumvent due process;
· Mislead the court;
· Pervert the course of justice.
Ongoing Concealment Since 14 June 2022
This is not a recent issue. The original enquiry was submitted via Resolver on 14 June 2022 and was
ignored, despite multiple follow-ups. This sustained concealment, over nearly two years, reflects a wilful
and knowing effort by public officials to shield unlawful conduct and criminal wrongdoing from legal
scrutiny.
Relevant Offences and Legal Consequences

  1. Misfeasance in Public Office
    Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No. 3) [2003] 2 AC 1
  2. Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice
    R v Cotter and Others [2000] EWCA Crim 88
    – Maximum life imprisonment
    mervelee.nemhard10179943@email.resolver.co.uk
  3. Fraud by Abuse of Position
    Section 4, Fraud Act 2006
    – Maximum 10 years’ imprisonment
  4. Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
    Article 3, Human Rights Act 1998 and Criminal Justice Act 1988 s.134
    – Torture and mental cruelty by public officers is criminal.
  5. Direct and Indirect Discrimination
    Equality Act 2010, ss.13, 19, 26
    – Ongoing harassment and systemic discrimination.
  6. Failure to Prevent and Report Child Abuse
    Children Act 1989, Children Act 2004, and Criminal Law Act 1967 s.4
    – Wilful failure to protect children or disclose offences is itself criminal.
    Formal Demands
    You are now required to provide:
  7. A formal statement confirming that no criminal proceedings were ever lawfully issued or
    prosecuted in a County Court — as required under the Criminal Procedure Rules.
  8. Copies of any and all sealed court orders you claim to rely upon — if they exist — along with proof
    of lawful service and filing.
  9. Confirmation of whether the Local Authority is commencing criminal referrals against those
    responsible for falsifying legal records and abusing judicial process.
  10. Disclosure of records from 14 June 2022 onward, including all communications via Resolver and
    internal discussions related to my case.
    Escalation & Consequences
    Continued concealment, collusion, or silence will be taken as implied admission of wrongdoing, and I will
    pursue the matter with:
    · The Local Government Ombudsman
    · The Equality and Human Rights Commission
    · The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
    · The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO)
    · The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)
    · The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)
    · The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture
    Time is of the essence. You have seven (7) days from the date of this notice to respond in full. Your failure
    to comply will result in the immediate filing of regulatory complaints, judicial review proceedings, and
    public exposure of the Local Authority’s systemic abuse.
    Regards
    :Mervelee :Myers
    cc To Whom it may Concern – All Rights Reserved
    Join Boris Johnson, Chris Evans and Lord Prem Sika against Court Order Scams http://www.scambuster.t

Without Prejudice Mothering Sunday UK Perfect Time To Name The Judiciary Of England Wales Criminal Justice System Crown Prosecution Service Violent Nuisances Criminals Need ERT UURICA-LE As I Revoke Mother Hood Status Sharing Stories Of How Hearing Perline Louise Chambers-Nembhard Life Of Sacrifices Change My Perspectives About Burdens Of Disabilities Poverty Continue Generational Curses Of Dysfunctional Families Impacting On Females Blamed For Traumas We Had No Control Over I Invested In Fight4justice To Give Vulnerable Children Young People Adults A Voice To Be Heard 30/3/2025

Refer to

14-Nov-2022

https://mervelee.com/2025/03/30/without-prejudice-mervelee-myers-focusing-on-housing-for-women-failures-after-zaiba-qureshi-be-ceo-ban-customer-scrutiny-panel-hony-premial-started-was-minute-taker-ms-h-presley-found-me-on-twitter-h/
14-Nov-2022
MsMervelee Myers
16 Alma Grove
London
SE1 5PY
Dear Ms Mervelee Myers
Stage 1 response to your complaint ref: 2022000052
Myreference: 2022000052
Please ask for: A.Watson
I have reviewed your complaint at stage 1 of our internal complaint procedure and am writing to provide you
with HfW’s response.
You complained to HfW about:
· Lengthoftimetoreplace the broken radiator
· Handlingofyour external door repairs
· Lackofcommunicationregarding the tree removal
· Outstanding repairs to the broken fence
· Lengthoftimetoreplace the glass to the communal door
· Reportsofanti-social behaviour regarding your neighbour
I understand that to resolve your complaint you are seeking:
· Thefencetoberepaired
· Apologyregarding complaint handling
· Clearcommunication regarding who is responsible for the tree removal
· ForH4Wtoacceptnegligence
· Apologyforamemberofstaffhanging up the phone
· Complainttoberesolved amicably
In investigating your complaint, I have considered the following:
· Reviewedourpolicy
· Spokewithourcontractors
· Reviewedourcontractors’ systems
· Reviewedourservice standards
I spoke with our heating contractor Watret with regards to the broken radiator. They advised there were no
repairs reported with regards to a broken radiator in the last six months but there have been repairs raised
regarding the heating not working. A heating engineer attended on the 27th October 2022 and advised there
was nofault found and gave you a demonstration on how to use the Honeywell wireless room stat. He also
wrote down instructions on how to operate it.
I therefore deem this part of your complaint not upheld.
I reviewed our contractor, MCP’s portal to investigate the repairs reported regarding your front door. There
are no reports in the past year, of a repair being raised regarding a fault to the lock on the front door.
I therefore deem this part of the complaint not upheld.
Oninvestigating the communication between H4W and yourself, I was unable to find evidence that
demonstrated we had been clear with a decision regarding the tree removal. I can confirm that it is the
resident’s responsibility to maintain the garden. This will include the removal of a tree.
Wearesorry we were not clear in our communication and for the delay in responding back to you.
This section of the complaint is upheld.
It was reported on the 23rd February 2022 a repair to the gate and fence was required. A make safe was
carried out but inline with our policy, it is the resident’s responsibility to repair/replace a fence that divides
two gardens. After reviewing the photos held on the contractor’s portal that the fence in question divides
two gardens. We therefore are unable to fulfil your request by repairing/replacing the fence.
Onthe 22nd May 2022 it was reported to our repairs contractor, the communal door had a smashed pane of
glass. A board up was completed to the broken glass on the 22/05/2022. The glass was replaced on the 18th
July 2022 which is outside of our standard timescales.
I therefore deem this section of the complaint upheld.
I have requested an anti-social behaviour case is opened on your behalf. My colleague from the complaints
department will contact you with the case reference number.
I was unable to find any evidence of a complaint being logged relating to the above issues you have raised
with us. Therefore, I am unable to review the complaint handling.
I amsorry you had to report a staff member terminating your call when you contacted us. We take reports of
poor conduct by our inhouse staff and contractors very seriously. We appreciate that you found this
experience unpleasant, and we assure you that it was not representative of the services we aim to deliver.
This concludes Stage 1 of our internal complaints process. I am sorry that you had cause to complain to HfW.
I hope that this letter shows that your feedback has been fully considered and hope that you are satisfied
with this response.
If you are dissatisfied with our response, you should reply within 20 working days explaining why you remain
dissatisfied and what you are seeking as an outcome. This reply should be addressed to:
complaints@h4w.co.uk or by hard copy to:
HfWComplaints Team
Sixth Floor, Blue Star House
234-244 Stockwell Road
London
SW99SP
Your complaint will then be reviewed by the Director of Operations at stage 2 of our internal complaint
procedure as outlined in our Complaints Policy. A copy of this policy can be viewed online at:
https://hfw.org.uk/media/70234/complaints-policy-sept-2021.pdf
As a registered social landlord, we strive to adhere to the principles outlined in the Housing Ombudsman’s
Complaint Handling Code, which can be viewed online a

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Begged South London Press To Publish My Story 28/5/2004 Barclays Stolen Money Financial Ombudsman Service Colluded Santander 2017 Nationwide 2023 FOS Emma Martin-Hamilton Got Edward Allen Peckham Police To Contact Me Sent Me Email I Call Him Batty Boy Action Fraud Repeat 2021 BB Stolen £1000.00 Locked Me In Close Account 2023 Robbed Of Passports Marriage Certificate CPS Drag Feet Woman Arrested Passport Tried Delay Return Nationwide Hold On To Savings Left From Failure To Put Reasonable Adjustment To Protect Me From Staff Scammers CCMCC Party To Deny Rights To Judgement Of Barrister Ryan Clement £9455.00 Judgement DJ Sterlini Strike Out Winsome Duncan Manuscript Claim DJ Bell Sent 7 Claims County Court Clerkenwell Shoreditch Civil District Judge HHJ Parfitt Replace HHJ Dight Robert Buckland Advice After Misconduct Barrister Samantha Jones Given Reference Grenfell Tower Inquiry Panel DJ Jason Latham Presided ECRO Online HHJ Richard Roberts Civil Restraint Order HMCTS CPS CJS SRA BSB IOPC JCIO MOPAC DBS CLCC HMPPS Criminals Need ERT Violent Nuisances UURICA-LE Documented Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 Sara Elizabeth Beecham Appointment District Judge 2019 Write Detailed Account Of Debbie Gilchrist Hate Crimes Minute Taker H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel Social Media Influencer Whose CPPDP Intellectual Property Copyright Images Harvested Build Brands Must Be Used By Ranting DJ 20 March 2025 Proof That UK Is Most Racist Society That Is Not Civilised When Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Wife Became Target A-Z Of Systemic Discrimination To Cover For Miscarriages Of Justice Misogyny Gaslighting My Online Profile Prove Those Put Children Young People Adults Made Vulnerable At Risk Of Becoming HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Statistics 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Associated With Unemployment When Social Butterfly Cultural Ambassador BRAINS Excluded To Impact On Mental Physical Wellbeing 25/3

Private and Confidential
For Addressee Only
Mrs Mervelee Myers
16 Alma Grove
Bermondsey
London
SE1 5PY
Date:
Our Ref:
Direct:
Email:
21 March 2025
HUNTAY\337671-000158
+44 7881 515168
alistairhunt2@eversheds-sutherland.com
BY E-MAIL AND FIRST CLASS POST: ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com
Dear Mrs Myers
Claim No: 567MC716 (the “Claim”)
Parties: Mervelee Myers v Nationwide Building Society (“Nationwide”)
We continue to act on behalf of Nationwide in the Claim.
Capitalised terms in this letter are references to terms defined in the witness statement of
Samuel Christopher Andrews dated 1 October 2024 in support of Nationwide’s application for
summary judgment and/or to strike out the Claim (the “Application”), unless otherwise
stated.
We write in advance of the hearing of the Application on 9 April 2025 at 2:00PM (the
“Hearing”), following the Court Order dated 22 February 2025. A copy of this Order along
with the sealed Application is enclosed by way of service.
The Claim
As set out in the Application, you issued the Claim on 29 August 2024 in relation to the
Discrimination Complaint and the Fraud Complaint. You also allege in the Claim that
Nationwide: (i) failed to pay an (unspecified) standing order on your behalf; (ii) exhibited
“systematic discrimination” towards you; and (iii) assisted a third party in an alleged scam
against you.
Nationwide denies the Claim in its entirety. In relation to the Discrimination Complaint, in very
short terms, this arose because Nationwide wrote to you on 10 May 2023 about your
unacceptable behaviour towards Nationwide’s staff on 28 April 2023. Nationwide was obliged
to write to you in these terms and notify you that such abusive behaviour may result in the
Account being closed. We understand that there was a further incident on 13 October 2024 in
which you were abusive to Nationwide’s staff. As for the Fraud Complaint, Nationwide
investigated the Payments and concluded that they appeared to be genuine.
You have failed to set out any legal basis or valid cause of action in order to bring the Claim.
You have also failed to provide any evidence to support the Claim. In particular:


    1. you have not provided any evidence to suggest that Nationwide has mistreated you
      or acted in any way that could be construed as defamatory or discriminatory in
      nature, as alleged or at all; and
      you have not identified or particularised any basis of loss recoverable from
      Nationwide (which for the avoidance of doubt, is denied).
      cloud_uk\237481275\3\hainswc
      Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales (number OC304065), registered office One Wood Street, London EC2V 7WS.
      Authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 383181). A list of the members’ names and their professional qualifications is available for inspection at
      the above office.
      Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP is part of a global legal practice, operating through various separate and distinct legal entities under Eversheds Sutherland. For a full
      description of the structure and a list of offices, please visit http://www.eversheds-sutherland.com.
      Date:
      21 March 2025
      Our Ref: HUNTAY\337671-000158
      Page:
      2
      As a result, Nationwide has made the Application with a view to disposing of the Claim at the
      earliest opportunity.
      The Application is made on the basis that you have disclosed no
      reasonable grounds for bringing the Claim and/or that the Claim is an abuse of the Court’s
      process and/or the Claim has no real (or any) prospect of succeeding. In addition, Nationwide
      seeks an order that you pay Nationwide’s costs of the Application in light of your unreasonable
      conduct in pursuing a completely meritless claim.
      Discontinuance
      In light of the above and to avoid incurring the Court’s valuable time and resources, and to
      avoid the parties’ incurring unnecessary costs, Nationwide invites you to discontinue the Claim
      at this stage as it has no real prospect of success. If you agree to do so by no later than 4pm
      on 28 March 2025 then Nationwide agrees not to seek to recover from you the costs that it
      has incurred in respect of the Claim notwithstanding that it has already been forced to file a
      holding Defence and has the Application.
      Please confirm your acceptance of this offer by signing and returning a signed Notice of
      Discontinuance by no later than 4pm on 28 March 2025. A pre-populated form is enclosed
      for ease.
      We invite you to respond via email, by scanning in a signed copy the Notice of Discontinuance
      and sending it to alistairhunt2@eversheds-sutherland.com. If you do not have access to a
      printer/scanner, you can take a photograph of the Notice of Discontinuance, but please ensure
      that the photograph is clear and shows the entirety of the document, not just the signature.
      We have explained to you clearly that Nationwide is not liable to you as you have failed to
      particularise any basis of claim in respect of the Payments, Discrimination Complaint and/or
      the Fraud Complaint. As such, to reject this offer and continue the Claim would in those
      circumstances amount to unreasonable conduct. When a party behaves unreasonably the
      Court can order it to pay the other party’s costs, even on the Small Claims Track. If you
      proceed with the Claim that is the step Nationwide will take. We do not intend to threaten you
      in making this statement, but want to ensure that you understand how Nationwide will proceed
      so that you can make an informed decision, and with a view to you avoiding a costs order
      against you. The Court would expect us to explain that to you.
      We look forward to hearing from you by and no later than 4pm on 28 March 2025.
      Yours faithfully
      Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP
      Enclosure
      Pre-populated Notice of Discontinuance

Notice of discontinuance
Note: Where another party must consent to the
proceedings being discontinued, a copy of their
consent must be attached to, and served with,
this form.
In the
Claim No.
Claimant
(including ref.)
Defendant
(including ref.)
To the court
The claimant (defendant)
(tick only one box)
discontinues all of this (claim) (counterclaim)
discontinues that part of this claim (counterclaim) relating to: (specify which part)
against the (defendant) (following defendants) (claimant) (following claimants)
(…………………………………………………………….. (enter name of Judge) granted permission for the claimant to
discontinue (all) (part) of this (claim)(counterclaim) by order dated ………………………………………………..)
I certify that I have served a copy of this notice on every other party to the proceedings
Signed
(Claimant)(Defendant)(’s solicitor)(Litigation friend)
Position or
office held
(if signing on behalf of firm or company)
Date
The court office at
is open between 10 am and 4 pm Monday to Friday. When corresponding with the court, please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number.
N279 – w3 Notice of discontinuance(6.99) Printed on behalf of The Court Service