ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย This is an email regarding threats you received on 22/05/2025.ย MM Response: I have no record I reported any threats on the 22/05/2025. This backs up my arguments that there is a plot to DESTROY ME USING MY MENTAL HEALTH AS DISCRIMINATION. Crime Number: 01/7510235/25 is my record that Henry Furlong Police Constable – 1584AS/ C Relief… I have sent a letter via royal mail to you previously tried calling you and sent a text message.ย MM Response: Without Prejudice I will state that HENRY FURLONG is just another LYING IGNORANT Metropolitan Police who will be charged for GROSS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT based on the fact I have no information about reporting an incident on the 22/5/2025. I was online recording my tribute when the call came through https://www.youtube.com/live/3kirqQ6IOa0?si=ZzfaiOfKpKgNAGvihttps://www.youtube.com/live/3kirqQ6IOa0?si=ZzfaiOfKpKgNAGvi On 29/05/2025 I managed to speak to you on the phone and we discussed the case.ย MM Response: WE could not discuss a CASE that does not exist as far as I am concerned. You mentioned there are ongoing issues dating back to 2017.ย MM Response: Yes, there is and the world is aware of this because the information is online. I must point out at this time before I forget that I called your attention to Debbie Gilchrist outside my window shouting and you confirmed that you heard. At this point in time I am only dealing with the incident on the 22ndย of May 2025 MM Response: There is/was no INCIDENT on the 22/5/2025, this reminds me of DJ Sara Elizabeth Beecham saying she will not be dealing with any other issues than the Housing for Women UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION. I will therefore, have to go back to Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 when WALFORD BYRON ALBURNEY NEMBHARD died of COLON CANCER age 56 years old. I will also be contacting your local safer neighbourhoods team as I believe this may need a more multi agency approach going forwards. MM Response: I will hold Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley responsible for the HATE CRIMES by the Metropolitan Police from 30th October 2017 to 28 May 2025 when once again I was the victim of Debbie Gilchrist when the Open Reach Engineer came to fix the internet. CAD 2080/28MAY25 2479AS PS ALI 2254AS PC CLARK 1921AS PC DOVBAUE 2890AS PC BROWN PC 3438 when those who showed up are on record continuing the SYSTEMC DISCRIMINATION.
I need you to clarify what you remember of the incident with your neighbour on the 22nd.ย MM Respponse: I am on record saying I have no memory of making a report about any incident on the 22/5/2025. Therefore, we must go back to 26th January 2023 when I was home celerating my mother’s birthday. As a result, I had to attend Croydon Magistrates 3 times. Attend interview at Walworth Police Station when my husband and I got separated. The case is still under investigation whilst I was taken through the HMCTS systems again, EVICTED and on a SUSPENDED SENTENCE after HHJ Richard Roberts imposed a General Restraint Order on the 31 January 2025. Are there any witnesses?ย MM Response: There can be no WITNESS to an INCIDENT that I did not REPORT. How about US using the INCIDENTS that are DOCUMENTED and some are going VIRAL online? Do you have any recordings of the incident? MM Response: Considering the Met Police sent 6 Officers with battering RAM to my home on the 27th February 2024 whilst I was stressed out collecting the equipment for my HUSBAND to come home to TRANSITION. Without these any sort of prosecution will be problematic.ย MM Response: Metropolitan Police will be charged for attempts to SECTION, MURDER, KIDNAP me. When we spoke you said that you wanted your neighbour to get help and I will be looking to put a safeguarding report on if I can get sufficient details. MM Response: The WORLD will know why I am without a NHS GP.
You stated to me that you are going through a traumatic time at the moment and you have my condolences, as you said to me a lot has gone on so giving me specifics right now was difficult. MM Response: You will be charged EXTRA for this.
You mentioned a list of officer shoulder numbers from an incident yesterday and that you are unhappy with how you were dealt with, I advised then as now if you have a complaint this can be raised via 101 or online. MM Response: Mark Rowley HEAD will roll based on his signing of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE page 11 to a STRONG JAMAICAN WOMAN. I know that I am STRONG.
If you can reply to me with answers to the questions I have asked about the 22ndย as soon as possible so I can progress the investigation. MM Response: You will be charged and our conversation was captured when I was preparing my AUNTIE’S funeral tributes.
Henry Furlong | Police Constable โ 1584AS | C Relief
Metropolitan Police Service| Central South Operational Command Unit
Brixton Police Station | 367 Brixton Road | London | SW9 7DDNOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Thank you for completing the form, your reference is: TAA-17576-25-0101-IR.
This is the receipt code for your report.
Please note: this is not a crime reference number.
What happens next?
We’ll investigate your report based on the information youโve provided and get back to you within 48 hours, either with a crime reference number or, if we canโt take action, an explanation as to why and further advice.
โWe won’t call you unless we need more information, to clarify something in your report or if there might be an opportunity to collect forensic evidence.
If you need to update your report
If you think of more information to add to your report or something happens which you need to tell us about that’s related to it, you can do this online here.
What happens after you report a crime and how to get support
Tell us what you think of our online reporting service
Feedback on your experience of using our online services genuinely helps us to make sure they work as well as possible for people in your situation.
If you have a couple of minutes, please complete a quick feedback survey.
—
We understand how distressing being affected by crime or anti-social behaviour can be and we are committed to bringing offenders to justice and ensuring that victims of crime receive the support they need from us and from others.
Consider our environment – please do not print this email unless absolutely necessary.
NOTICE – This email and any attachments may be confidential, subject to copyright and/or legal privilege and are intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. To avoid incurring legal liabilities, you must not distribute or copy the information in this email without the permission of the sender. MPS communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law. Consequently, any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of the MPS by email. The MPS accepts no responsibility for unauthorised agreements reached with other employees or agents. The security of this email and any attachments cannot be guaranteed. Email messages are routinely scanned but malicious software infection and corruption of content can still occur during transmission over the Internet. Any views or opinions expressed in this communication are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS).
22 April 2025 Met Police Attempts To Section Murder Kidnap Racism
Mrs Mervelee Myers SENT BY EMAIL ONLY ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com Dear Mrs Myers, How we have considered your complaint Professional Standards Unit Central South BCU 177 Peckham High Street London SE15 5SL Email: Feedback@met.police.uk Our Reference: PC/1514/25 Date: 16/04/2025 I am writing in relation to the complaint you made on 11/02/2025 in relation to the police response when you called on 03/01/2025, 18/01/2025, 20/01/2025 and 30/01/2025. The report attached with this letter outlines the actions I have taken to deal with your concerns and explains how I have considered each aspect of your complaint. I hope the report attached addresses your concerns but if you remain unsatisfied you may apply to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) for a review; full details of how to request a review and the timescales involved are contained within the report. Further information about the handling of police complaints can be found in the guidance document attached – โOur Guide To Your Complaintโ. We are committed to developing a learning culture and your complaint has been fully documented and catalogued with the Directorate of Professional Standards as part of the Metropolitan Policeโs organisational learning. A survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another personโs behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers. We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete. Survey link: https://www.londonvoice.org.uk/cru In addition to learning from individual cases, we use complaint information from our police complaints system to monitor performance and to identify opportunities for learning and improvement. Thank you again for taking the time to raise your concerns with us. Yours sincerely, Inspector Matt Hume Appropriate Authority AS Central South Command For more information on the Metropolitan Police Service visit our website at http://www.met.police.uk GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used to provide an outcome to that complaint. Any right to Review will mean that the MPS will provide that data to the Relevant Review Body for the purpose of conducting that review. Directorate of Professional Standards Complaint Report Protective Marking Official No Disclosure under FOIA 2000 Complaint Reference Person dealing with complaint PC/1514/25 PC Kate Willoughby-Parsons Organisation / Department / Strand Appropriate Authority PSU โ AS Inspector Matt Hume How we have recorded and dealt with your complaint Recorded under Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 – Handled proportionately otherwise than by investigation Date Created 08/04/2025 Summary of Incident You have an ongoing dispute with your neighbour which has lasted multiple years, as documented on police indices and has been subject to multiple complaints, including most recently on PC/2268/24. Recently, throughout January 2025, you have called police on a number of occasions, which you have provided CAD numbers for. You are generally dissatisfied with the police response to these calls. Your concerns The concerns listed below set out the nature of your complaint, which I have put together following a comprehensive review of your complaint submission dated 11/02/2025 alongside previous complaints that you have made to police. I offered to speak to you on the phone to discuss your concerns in further detail, however, you did not respond. You sent an email to the Commissionerโs Office on 01/04/2025 which I considered to be of a similar nature to your concerns submitted on 11/02/2025. I suggested the wording of your concern to you on 07/04/2025, explaining to you that I could not re-investigate concerns already addressed by other complaints, or concerns which related to organisations outside of the MPS, such as the LAS or NHS. Your response was unintelligible and repeated those concerns I mentioned I could not re-address within this complaint. I have therefore continued to investigate based on the new concern that I believe to be correct, which is: โข Concern 1 I am dissatisfied with the police response on 03/01/2025, 18/01/2025, 20/01/2025 and 30/01/2025 Actions taken to address your complaint I have taken the following steps to address your concerns, which I consider to be both reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances, to address the matters described above. Where I have not pursued a particular line of enquiry, this is because I believe this would not be reasonable or proportionate, taking into consideration all of the circumstances. To address all aspects of your complaint I have taken the following actions: โข I read your complaint submission dated 11/02/2025 โข I read your email to the Commissionerโs Office dated 01/04/2025 โข I reviewed the document you attached named โMyers Mervelee โ Chronology of police Harassment in Conspiracyโ to identify any additional concerns โข I viewed the youtube video you uploaded relating to police attendance on 03/01/2025 โข I viewed the following Computer Aided Despatch (CAD) records: o 2358/03JAN25 o 2824/03JAN25 o 4349/20JAN25 o 4455/20JAN25 โข I viewed CONNECT safeguarding report 01/7062029/25 โข I considered obtaining accounts from officersโ those who attended on the above dates however found it was not reasonable or proportionate to do so, as their attendances have appropriately been recorded on either the above CADs or corresponding CONNECT safeguarding reports. โข I conducted searches on the MPS Body Worn Video (BWV) system for the dates mentioned in your concern. I did not find any relevant saved BWV that was necessary for me to view in order to answer your concern. A reflection on the service we provided: Concern number 1 Nature of complaint I am dissatisfied with the police response on 03/01/2025, 18/01/2025, 20/01/2025 and 30/01/2025 Officer(s) Members of Staff Identified Not specified โ Organisational Our consideration (Our Determination) I have considered all of the material gathered and consider that the service provided was acceptable. Rationale I understand that there is a long history of issues with your neighbour to which police are constantly being called to attempt to resolve. I also understand from looking in to your complaint history in order to extract new concerns, that the police and other agencies have significant concerns about your mental health. I am really sorry that you are going through a tough time. In order to answer your concern, I reviewed a number of CADs to your address, some of which you provided within your submission documents. I will address each date in turn. 03/01/2025 This date is mentioned in your letter to the Commissionerโs Office, where you say: PC 2924AS & PC 24299AS – Two male constables pushed me (assault) following staged provocation by Debbie Gilchrist, refused to provide names. I read the relevant CADs and safeguarding reports. I searched the BWV database however no footage has been saved. Helpfully, you recorded the entire interaction and uploaded it to youtube so I have been able to view the officersโ attendance that way. I watched all 7 minutes 16 seconds of the video you took, which shows officers arrive and speak to you, stood approximately 3 metres away from you. They do not approach or touch you. They gave you a piece of paper with the CAD number, their shoulder numbers on your strong request. You ask them to leave, they ask you to stop shouting at your neighbours, and they leave. You try to shake the officers hand, he declines, and you call him a racist for not doing so. In my opinion the officers were polite throughout, have warned you about your behaviour towards your neighbours, and have not assaulted, touched, or threatened you in any way. I have not found it reasonable or proportionate to obtain accounts from the attending officers as the footage provided clearly disproves your allegation. The service provided was acceptable. 18/01/2025 This date is mentioned in your original complaint submission dated 11/02/2025, where you say: Met Police acted unprofessionally 18/1/2025 get the London Ambulance Service to threaten me that I was SCREAMING and SHOUTING when the Police came because I told them I know my RIGHTS inside of my HOME. I have checked police indices and reviewed the safeguarding report 01/7062029/25 created by PC West. They record concerns around your mental health. It looks as though officersโ felt you had mental health concerns and referred your call to the LAS. Again, I am sorry that you are going through a hard time with your mental health, however officers acted appropriately on this date. The service provided was acceptable. 20/01/2025 This date is mentioned in your letter to the Commissionerโs Office, where you say: 20th Jan 2025 CAD 4455/20Jan25 – Constable came to my home and his intention was thwarted by my CCTV. 20th Jan 2025 CAD 4349/20Jany25 – The Operator could hear Ms Gilchrist outside my window and outside my door making violent threats. You also mention LAS attendance on that date โ as previously explained; I cannot investigate complaints relating to those who work for the LAS. I have reviewed the CADs you have mentioned. CAD 4349/20JAN25 โ I can confirm the Operator noted that they could hear someone constantly shouting to you calling you a โLIARโ. Thus, the operator has noted your call about your neighbour, and confirmed they could hear someone shouting. The operator has correctly dispatched a unit, who have attended your address and updated a previous investigation report. CAD 4455/20JAN25 was linked to the above CAD for the same result. The service provided was acceptable. 30/01/2025 This date is mentioned in your letter to the Commissionerโs Office, where you say: Jan 30th 2025 2547AS Potter 10:14/30/Jan25 โ Failed to produce injunction on which I will be allegedly jailed for breaching I have searched police indices for any calls on 30/01/2025. I cannot find any trace of what incident you are referring to. I conducted an evidence trawl of PC Potter 2547AS however cannot see any BWV saved for 30/01/2025. I conducted a general evidence trawl of any BWV from your address on 30/01/2025 and it does not appear any officer recorded any BWV on that date. I can see however that PC Potter was at your address on 11/12/2024 which I believe is part of PC/2268/24 as is tagged with the subject โComplaintโ. I therefore believe this concern has already been addressed and will not be taking any further action. Overall, having reviewed the above evidence in a reasonable and proportionate manner, I believe the police response to a number of your calls throughout January have been appropriate in the circumstances. I am very sorry that you are going through a difficult time health wise. Ultimately I have found that the service provided to you was acceptable. Action Taken I have investigated this concern and I believe that all reasonable and proportionate lines of enquiry have been pursued. Action Taken Recording Category Learning Explanation Provided None identified Your right to a review If you are unhappy with the way your complaint was handled, or with the final outcome, you can apply for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayorโs Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and we have listed the review body for your complaint below. Relevant Review Body Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) Ways to make a review request โข Email – NorthCasework@policeconduct.gov.uk โข Online Form โ Via the IOPCโs website using the following link: http://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/complaints-reviews-and appeals โข By post โ IOPC, PO Box 473, Sale. M33 0BW Review to be received by 15/05/2025 Thank you for raising your concerns We understand that the outcome of your complaint may not be to your satisfaction, but we would like to thank you for taking the time to raise your concerns. GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used to provide an outcome to that complaint. Any right to Review will mean that the MPS will provide that data to the Relevant Review Body for the purpose of conducting that review.
Our Guide To Your Complaint What will this guide tell you? This guide explains the principles of our complaints system, how we handle complaints, and the possible outcomes. What can I complain about? If you think you have been treated unfairly by the police or the standard of service you received was unacceptable you have the right to make a complaint. A complaint can be made about the conduct of any person serving with the police, i.e. a police officer, police staff member, special constable, designated volunteer or a person contracted to provide services to the Met Police. You can also complain about how a police force is run. For example, you can complain about force-wide crime initiatives, the organisation of policing resources and general policing standards. There is no time limit for making a complaint. However, if you complain about something that happened more than 12 months ago, you should explain why you didnโt complain sooner. Who can make a complaint? You can make a complaint if: ๏ท You were directly affected by the behaviour of our police officers, special constables, members of police staff, volunteers or contractors. ๏ท Witnessed an incident โ for example, you were present when an incident took place or were close enough to see or hear the incident (you cannot claim to have witnessed an incident if you have seen it on television or social media). ๏ท Have been adversely affected by the conduct or matter complained about โ this means that the actions of the police have indirectly affected you, for example you have suffered any form of loss, damage, distress or inconvenience as a result of the matter complained about, or you have been put in danger or otherwise put at risk of being adversely affected. 1 You could be acting on behalf of someone in any of the people listed above โ for example, a family member, friend, legal representative or any other person of their choosing. You may be able to make a complaint if you are a parent or guardian. Persons serving with the police force cannot make a complaint about incidents and officers in their own force. This does not mean they are unable to raise concerns, there are other ways to do this such as internal conduct investigations and the staff resolution process. This just means that they will not have the statutory rights of a complainant. What can you expect when you complain? You can expect: ๏ท Contact from us to get some further details ๏ท To be asked what you would like to happen ๏ท To be listened to and treated fairly ๏ท To be updated about the progress of your complaint ๏ท To be told the outcome of your complaint when it has been finalised ๏ท If your complaint has been formally recorded and you are not happy with the outcome, you can request an independent review How will my complaint be handled? By law all complaints against the police must be logged. We make an initial assessment of how your complaint may be dealt with and we will contact you to find out what you would like to happen. Your complaint may be dealt with in one of the following ways: ๏ท Early contact โ A complaint handler will make contact with you as soon as possible after you raised your concerns. They may be able to provide an explanation or an apology, or other information to assure you that appropriate action is being taken. Their aim is to try and resolve your issues and create an environment for learning where people learn from mistakes made. ๏ท By investigation – If the complaint is serious enough to warrant disciplinary action then it will be investigated and an investigator will be appointed. ๏ท In some circumstances, no further action may be taken. 2 We’ll ask you how you’d like to be contacted, keep you informed on the progress, write to you to tell you the outcome and explain your right to an independent review. However we deal with your complaint, it is important to us. Will my complaint be referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)? When we receive your complaint, we consider whether it should be referred to the IOPC. The most serious incidents must be referred to the IOPC โ whether someone has made a complaint or not. For example, if police actions result in a member of the public being seriously injured or dying: ๏ท while in custody ๏ท after theyโve had contact with the police ๏ท as a result of a police shooting ๏ท in a road accident involving the police We can also refer incidents to the IOPC if we have concerns, for instance about the conduct of our officers or staff. The IOPC can direct us to record incidents and then โcall them inโ. The IOPC may choose to investigate these cases themselves, independently of us. Further information regarding referrals to the IOPC can be found in the IOPCโs Statutory Guidance. How often will I be updated? Keeping you informed is one of our key priorities; our updates should be regular and meaningful. Our first update will be provided promptly, in writing, and, at the latest, within four weeks of the start of the handling of your complaint. Further updates will be provided at least every four weeks. How long will my complaint take to deal with? We aim to deal with complaints in timely a manner, however there is no time limit on how long we will take to deal with your complaint. The person dealing with your complaint should be able to tell you how long it is likely to take. 3 Who will be involved in dealing with my complaint? This depends on how your complaint will be handled. Your point of contact will be either a: ๏ท Complaint handler โ if your complaint is being dealt with through early contact, or ๏ท Investigator โ if your complaint is being investigated as there is an indication a criminal offence may have been committed or the behaviour may justify disciplinary proceedings. You may also see the role, โappropriate authorityโ used in your complaint report. This is the person who assesses and makes decisions about your complaint at various stages in the complaint process. What are the possible outcomes? We will send you a report to explain how we have dealt with your complaint. If our service didnโt meet the standards expected, we will inform you of the action we are taking. Possible outcomes could include: ๏ท An explanation or apology for what has happened ๏ท Training to further develop our officers and staff ๏ท Making changes to our policies or procedures ๏ท Giving advice to the officer or person you have complained about so that their performance improves ๏ท Referring your case to the Crown Prosecution Service. The CPS is responsible for deciding if criminal charges should be brought. ๏ท Referring the case for misconduct proceedings. ๏ท There may not be enough information to take action over your complaint. If this happens it may just mean there is not enough evidence available ๏ท In some cases, we may agree with you that something went wrong, but decide that no other action is appropriate How do we learn from complaints and dissatisfaction? Learning from complaints helps to improve the way we do things and stop the same thing from happening again. As well as learning from individual cases, we use information from our complaints system to monitor performance and identify potential learning for us as an organisation. 4 What if I am still unhappy? If we were dealing with your concerns through early resolution and you arenโt happy, we will record your complaint and appoint a complaint handler. If you are still unhappy after we have handled your complaint, you can ask for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayorโs Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). The report we send you when we have finished dealing with your complaint tells you the review body for your complaint. You need to apply within 28 days or your application won’t be accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances for the delay. The review will consider whether or not the handling of your complaint was reasonable and proportionate. Did you know? ๏ท The police complaints process has no means by which to deal with financial claims for compensation against the Met. Money cannot be awarded via the complaints procedure, regardless of the outcome. If you wish to seek compensation for something the police have done, please write to: Directorate of Legal Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 10 Lambs Conduit Street, London WC1N 3NR. Please be sure to include your full name and contact details, your case or report number (if applicable), the name or shoulder number of any Met officer, staff or volunteer involved and your reasons for claiming compensation. ๏ท The majority of complaints where mistakes are identified are resolved with learning and development after the complainantโs feedback has been taken on board. This is even more important under the new complaint legislation and the introduction of the Reflective Practice Review Process. ๏ท Legislation in relation to police complaints has changed from 1 February 2020 with the implementation of the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020. This allows for police complaints to be dealt with in a reasonable and proportionate manner and at the appropriate level. This supports both the efficiency and fairness of the complaints system. 5 How can I find out more information? Further information can be found in the following documents: ๏ท The IOPC Statutory Guidance https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/statutoryguidance /2020_statutory_guidance_english.pdf ๏ท Police Reform Action 2002 ๏ท Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020
Complaints Resolution Unit Satisfaction Survey
This survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another personโs behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers.
We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete
The information you give us will be used for analysis purposes, and may be published in anonymised form. We will never publish the comments you make or any other information you give us in a way that can be used to identify you.
Before completing the survey please note that:
We are unable to alter the outcome of the investigation into your complaint. We are also unable to respond to any specific comments about the handling of individual complaint cases submitted by respondents in the course of completing this survey.
Completing the survey does not constitute an application for an independent review of the Met Police handling of your complaint.
Privacy note Whenever you press ‘Next’, the answers that you have provided will be submitted and may be included in the results. If at any stage you decide that you do not want your answers to be included in the results, you can press ‘Exit and clear survey’. This will clear all answers you have submitted up to that point.
Questions
* How easy was it to access the complaints system?
Choose one of the following answers
1 – Very easy
2 – Easy
3 – Neither difficult or easy
4 – Difficult
5 – Very difficult
* How satisfied were you in how your complaint was dealt with?
Choose one of the following answers
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
* How satisfied were you with the outcome of your complaint?
Choose one of the following answers
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Do you have any comments about how the complaints process could be improved?
* Your feedback has the potential to help improve the quality of service for all. Would you be happy to provide your complaints reference number? This means we will be able to identify you and link your survey response to your complaint.
Your receipt code is below. Weโve also emailed it to you. If you need to contact us about this again, please use this code.
If you haven’t received your receipt code within 24 hours please check your junk folder.
Please note: this is not a crime reference number.
TAA-17584-25-0101-IR
What happens next?
We’ll investigate your report based on the information youโve provided and get back to you within 48 hours, either with a crime reference number or, if we canโt take action, an explanation as to why and further advice.
We won’t call you unless we need more information, to clarify something in your report or if there might be an opportunity to collect forensic evidence.
For security reasons we havenโt emailed your report to you. You can download a copy of it, using the button below.
If you need to update your report
If you think of more information to add to your report or something happens which you need to tell us about that’s related to it, you can do this online here.
What happens after you report a crime and how to get support
4th February 4, 2025 Met Police 2025 02 04 16 OUT PC/2268/24 Raquel Lovekin
Good afternoon, Mrs Myers,
My name is Police Constable Raquel Lovekin and I have been appointed to handle the concerns, you submitted to the MPS on the 03/03/2024. MM Response: Itโs nearly a year since this report and as I have been the victim of the ongoing HATE CRIMES to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me from 30th October 2017 to 22 January 2025, by the Metropolitan Police and London Ambulance Service I will consult my documents to refresh my memory. There is the matter of the DEFAMATION making the rounds.
22 January 2025 HMCTS Complaint H4W
Claim Number: K05EC530
HOUSING FOR WOMEN โ 1st Claimant
MERVELEE MYERS โ 1st Defendant
End HMCTS Misogyny against Mervelee Myers
Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Victim Of Judiciary England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Service, HMCTS Miscarriages Of Justice from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London Early Years Foundation, CCMCC, SRA, BSB, IOPC, JCIO, HMPPS, MOPAC, CLCC, Croydon Magistrates Court, County Court Clerkenwell Shoreditch, Housing For Women, Devonshires Solicitors LLP, DJs Greenidge, Swan, Sterlini, Richard Hayes, Pigram, Bell, Naidoo, Beecham, Stephen Agera, Sola Obajuwa, Miranda Grell, Dr Joanna Pennack, Housing Ombudsman Service, Dr Phil Gregory, Gayle Lewis, Silverlock Medical Centre must be included in the End HMCTS Misogyny against Mervelee Myers. Refer To RADAR-CNS Kings College London Dr Faith Matcham Why I Must Cut Ties From Generational Curse Of Chambers-Nembhard Clans Left Me To Die Slowly Of Torture Myrna Nembhard Died On Her Own, Icylyn Powell Aka Tilyn Nembhard Age 91 Hungry, Her Business Rented Stripped Of Fittings Same As How Am Target Of Breaches Equality Act Protected Characteristic In UK 1992 To Date Prisoner At 16 Alma Grove London SE1 5PY When I Did Not Be HCT Group 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Are Associated With Unemployment my Husband and I become 600,000 Older People In The UK Say They Get Out Of The House Once A Week Or Less, Am A Prisoner Like My Aunt Anita Who Used To Spent Time In A Cave. I am Abandoned Rejected By Families Friends To Be Imprisoned Evicted To Silence My Voice. Now my son Kevin Donovan Murray is in hospital in Jamaica with High Blood Pressure.
Please can you confirm via return of this email that you still wish me to explore these concerns for you and, if so, have I understood your concerns correctly with the below heading: MM Response: I will try and accommodate you as best I can since you mention matters going back to 2017.
The Paedophile Ring of Richard Harty
I Stumble on Richard Harty MIC Paedophile Rings Operating out of the HOC Across from UEL and Moonshot New Cross Home of IRIE where Ras Happa Drumology Group has Sessions. Therefore, Caribbean Take Over Greenwich Is My Record of performing with Leroy Logan former Metropolitan Police, Rudolph Walker actor and Shawn Wallace from ITV the CHASE. Sir Mark Rowley Strong Jamaican Womanโs Mission Honour Strong Women Everywhere as my Husband 100 Birthday CARD from the King and Queen will be my Updated EVIDENCE about the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION used to entrap me IMPRISON and EVICT me to become the HCT GROUP IMPACT REPORT 2016 statistics in 2025.
Concern 1: Discrimination against you by 6 officers when they attended your address. MM Response: I am assuming this is the visit to 16 Alma Grove London SE1 5PY on the 27th February 2024 by Officers with BATTERING RAM.
CAD 6297/27Feb24 –
Could you also provide me with the date and why the officers came to your address if you know please, as you mention 2017 and 2024. MM Response: I will have to also add January 2025 as well. I will provide this in a separate DOCUMENT if I think this can help with the INVESTIGATION.
They came because of a video they see on YouTube.
I note your complaint refers to a discrimination concern/allegation, with this in mind, please can you provide as much detail as possible to the following 9 IOPC discrimination questions: MM Response: I will go even further and provide information about my CLAIMS against the IOPC.
6. Ratna Khanam Casework Manager 19 June – 08 September 2019.
7. Reference: TAA-40775-19-0101-IR.
8. Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19.
9. 01 – 24 May 2019 Tammie Tebboth PC 2774AS.
10. Directorate of Professional Standards Pages 1- 12.
11. Date: 23/6/2021 DBS Certificate 001506438948
12. Report a Problem CRB Check or Barring Decision
Directorate of Professional Standards Complaint Support Team, 23rd Floor, Empress State Building, Empress Approach, Lille Road, London, SW6 1TR. Email DPSMailbox-,CST@met.police.uk. Reference: PC/7911/20. Neil Solliss PC2449AS. Nikki Babb.
1. What was it that made you believe that any officersโ words or actions were discriminatory? MM Response: You can listen and decide for yourself. YouTube.
2. Do you feel that that any officer has made assumptions because of your protected characteristic? MM Response: Yes. YouTube.
3. What were these assumptions? How did they in your view impact upon the actions of the officers involved? MM Response: Out of the mouth of the IGNORANT.
4. Did you notice any differences in the way you were treated compared with others? MM Response: Yes. YouTube. EVIDENCE for the following can be viewed on YouTube
10. CAD 2358/03Jany25 – The impacts of BEREAVEMENT and LOSSES will be examined as I was celebrating my brother WALFORD BYRON ALBURNEY NEMBHARD Birthday.
Attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me to Cover for LEYF
This happened between 30 October 2017 to 20 January 2025 at 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey the results of MALICIOUS REPORTS about my MENTAL HEALTH. HCT Group Impact Report 2016 statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with UNEMPLOYMENT was used by Barrister Ryan Clement who groomed Winsome Duncan to send the Police to SECTION me despite refusing to act about verbal threats. When I did not commit SUICIDE my husband and I became 600.000 older people in the UK say they get out of the house once a week or less. The past 10 years since the death of my MOTHER I have been excluded and the final straw that breaks the camel’s back is how I was excluded from the DRUMOLOGY at Moonshot after meeting the Artistic Director of IRIE. The only reasons I can think of is the same way I was kicked out of the University of East London after I was called by Richard Harty. The fact that Dr Phil Gregory mention the UEL in his DEFAMATORY Medical Report that is not FACTUAL must be taken into EVIDENCE.
Nye Bevan Founder of the NHS 1948
โNo SOCIETY can LEGITIMATELY call itself CIVILISED if a SICK person is DENIED MEDICAL AID because of LACK of MEANSโ.
5. Did you note any differences in the way that any officer behaved compared with other officers (either on this or other occasions)? MM Response: YES. YouTube with Nigel Pearce at Elim House August 2023. A New Met for London launch 2 September 2023 a month after DJ Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE.
6. Was there anything about an officerโs language that added to your concern? MM Response: Yes. YouTube.
7. Were there any witnesses to the behaviour? MM Response: Refer to YouTube.
8. What was the impact upon you? How did it make you feel? MM Response: Reference HMCTS CPS CJS SRA BSB IOPC JCIO CCMCC MOPAC HMPPS CLCC NHS Housing for Womenโฆ
9. What would you see as a good outcome from the complaints process? MM Response: Too many to write here. Please get a copy of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley.
Updated EVIDENCE
Based on the following ENGAGEMENTS with the Metropolitan Police and the NHS Ambulance Service the following must be considered as MERVELEE MYERS’ updated EVIDENCE Claim K05EC530 listed for the 7 March 2025 at 10:00, time estimate 1 day, reserved to DJ Beecham. I also want to put on record about the unprofessional conduct of the Solicitors Sola Obajuluwa and Barrister Miranda Grell representing me. I received the 2 letters via emails on the 24 January 2025 after complaints were raised, but the complaints have not been addressed. The date he told for the case is 10 March 2025 and I got the COURT ORDER on 26 December 2024 with INACURRACIES.
It is obvious that the Counsel for Mervelee Myers is misleading me about the case and doing everything to make me a VICTIM of Housing for Women and Devonshires Solicitors LLP. This is the pattern of the Systemic Discrimination leading to HMCTS miscarriages of justice from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 when I had to resign with a NERVOUS BREAKDOWN after the death of my brother with Colon Cancer. Bereavement and losses playing important factors in the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION during July – August 2023. Because I was not informed about the Court Order until after the stages from DJ Greenidge to DJ Sterlini labelling me a VIOLENT NUISANCE. The breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics to be addressed are documented online as social media and YouTube in particular MUST be EVIDENCED.
SOCIAL MEDIA ENSLAVEMENT of MERVELEE MYERS
MM
If I donโt hear from you within the next seven days, I will proceed with handling this matter based on my understanding of your complaint as outlined above. MM Response: You will not be allowed to do anything based on your understanding of the COMPLAINT.
NHS MEDICAL GASLIGHTING TO COVER BREACHES OF EQUALITY ACT
Date: 22 January 2025 NHS Ambulance Service CAD 1804 was sent by the Metropolitan Police re a MALICIOUS REPORT. The pattern of the MR goes back to 30 October 2017 when the Met Police and NHS Ambulance came to SECTION me from Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement MR. Georgina and Dr Ocansey 02032282240 unannounced visit to my home. I am awaiting an invitation to meeting and letter to clarify what STATE I was in when they visited. https://www.youtube.com/live/oLbPBnx9e7o?si=tWRW97jxZgty3grP.
Date: 20 January 2025 the NHS Ambulance Service was let into 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist. I could hear Ms Gilchrist and people outside my door for hours until I fall asleep. When I wake up the next morning a note was pushed under the door. I must put on record the fact that the Met Police and NHS Ambulance Service visited my home on the 30th of October 2017 to SECTION me from a malicious report by Winsome Duncan that I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL is when the fact my photograph was across from a STATISTIC was used to make me a VICTIM. There has been a pattern of breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics since the 30 October 2017 to SECTION, MURDER and KIDNAP me from my home at Alma Grove based on the MALICIOUS reports of INDIVIDUALS from I decided to challenge my former employers http://www.leyf.org.uk.
I will update you every 28 days as per the complaintโs guidance. MM Response: I do not intend to stay in this HELL HOLE longer than necessary.
Call Out To 999
1. 7026/20Jany25 – NHS Ambulance outside trying to break down the door – Refer to note left under door. Marcus Garvey PARDONED in USA Mervelee Myers made a VOICELESS VULNERABLE VICTIM of HMCTS. Marcus Garvey “If we as a people realised the greatness from which we came we would be less likely to disrespect ourselves”. As the Face of ITV News page one of Windrush 70 Mervelee Myers will share my story about why I will use the 100th birthday CARD from the King and Queen to ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON to inform the world about how Housing for Women changed after Zaiba Qureshi changed H4W into a HOLOCAUST LONDON SYNDROME TERROR CELL the same how June O’Sullivan changed Westminster Children Society into LEYF to facilitate Richard Harty MIC into a PAEDOPHILE Ring. Because I did the “A Voice of a Child” research project for LEYF CEO in August 2010. After I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson http://www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers “The Experience of Multiple Discrimination” for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS.
2. CAD 4455/20Jany25 – Police came to my home and left because I am recording – If there were no recording there would be no “BLACK LIVES MATTER” for George Floyd. I was rescued by a BLACK Security at UEL on 5 October 2021. Refer to Dr Phil Gregory FICTITIOUS Medical Report that Counsel presented as the Defendant PSYCHOSIS diagnosis.
3. CAD 4349/20Jany25 – The Operator could hear Ms Gilchrist outside my window and outside my door. Are those responsible for SAFEGUARDING Mervelee Myers waiting for me to become a STATISTIC like the 4 members of the same family MURDERED at Verney Road where Silverlock Medical Centre that made me an INACTIVE PATIENT is located. Leaving me without a GP. “No society can legitimately call itself civilised if a sick person is denied medical aid because of lack of means”. Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948. A disabled pensioner of the NHS I am a VICTIM because I refused taking Dr Phil Gregory prescribed RESPIREDONE to make me unable to FUNCTION to cover up the 10 years of PTSD my husband and I experienced after the death of my MOTHER with DEMENTIA.
4. CAD 469/18Jany25 – PC Frisby 3348AS was searching my home without my consent. I am treated like a CRIMINAL whenever the Police bother to show up at my home. I was on the phone with my SON. PC West 15880AS acted like a BULLY. I was reported to the NHS Ambulance Service and was called by a female who THREATENED to send the Ambulance to get me. Freedom of Information – request. Citizen Advice Bureau. Civil Injunction. I must advise DJ Beecham to get a copy IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE. It was signed by Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the A New Met for London launch. A Month after I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE. I will be using this COMPLAINT and updated EVIDENCE as the TEMPLATE for another BOOK.
HMCTS Miscarriages of Justice Continues
District Judge Swan STRIKE OUT 4 Claims on the 15th January 2025
1. In the County Court at Mayors & City of London Court Devonshires Solicitors LLP Claim Number: 570MC618 Michael Petrick and Narin Masera 566MC567.
2. In the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Nexus Health Group Dr Joanna Pennack 570MC548 and Leigh Kavanah 570MC475. Did DJ Swan appear at the 2 Courts on the 15 January 2025 to conduct the STRIKE OUT of the CLAIMS? This is the same DJ Swan whose name is on Court Order for the 26 July 2023 that I had no knowledge of.
3. I was not informed about any COURT ORDER Proceedings by DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan and DJ Sterlini until after I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE on the 1st August 2023.
4. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, The County Court at Mayors & City Of London Court, The Guildhall Building, Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5AR. Case Number: 570MC482 Mervelee Myers v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Date: 13 December 2024.
Raquel Lovekin
Police Constable
Op Embassy
Directorate of Professional Standards
Metropolitan Police Service
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well. Look forward to speaking on Wednesday.
I’ve attached information sheets and consent forms for both my project and my colleague Ayana’s, who I mentioned will join us. It’s a standard part of the University’s ethics process, to show that people speak to us with informed consent.
Ayana’s main focus is on the role of retrofit in addressing damp and mould for homeowners. But her work, like mine, is also interested in the experiences of tenants and the challenges they face in getting damp and mould problems fixed. Her information sheet indicates a Yorkshire focus, but the work is also looking across England as well.
Have a read and if you could sign or type your name on the attached consent forms to show your are happy to participate, that would be great. If the consent forms don’t open for you, I’ve also copied them below. (Some people who are Mac users, or are using their phone, have had issues).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Pratichi
Pratichi Consent Form
PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Housing Quality in England: Damp Mould and Cold Housing
Thank you for your interest in this research project. Before agreeing to participate, please read the Information Sheet. If you have any questions, please ask a researcher.
โ I have read the information sheet and understand the purpose of the research
โ I understand that my participation is voluntary. If I decide to no longer take part in this research, I can withdraw from the study up to two weeks from the date of the interview or evidence submission by contacting Phil Brown at p.a.brown@hud.ac.uk.
โ I understand that my personal information will be processed only for the purposes of this research. I understand that such information will be treated as confidential, except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel, and handled in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and UK Data Protection Act 2018.
โ I understand that the information I share, including anonymised direct quotes, may be included in any resulting reports, presentations and academic publication.
โ I understand that any identifying information will be kept confidential (except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel), and access limited strictly to staff at the Healthy Housing Initiative, University of Huddersfield, and researchers they collaborate with.
โ I understand that the data collected from the interviews will be audio or video recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams or another appropriate software or professional transcription service.
โ I understand that the transcriptions will be retained for ten years and destroyed after this time.
โ I have read and understood the institutionโs Data Protection Policy and consent to the researchers processing my personal data accordingly.
PRINT NAME: ________________________________
SIGNATURE: _________________________________
DATE: _______________________________________
Ayana Consent Form
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD
PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Title of the research: Involving Homeowners in Developing Climate-Adaptive and Good-quality Residential Housing Retrofitting in Yorkshire, England
Name of researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Participant Identifier Number: NA
I confirm that I have read and understood the participant Information sheet related to this research and have had the opportunity to ask questions.
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I can withdraw at any time without giving any reason.
I understand that all my responses will be anonymised.
I authorise the research team members to access my anonymised responses.
I permit the research team to audio record the interview.
I agree to take part in the above study.
Name of Participant:
Signature of Participant: Date:
Name of Researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Signature of Researcher: Date:
From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 10:24 AM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Anthony Badaloo <admin@church-hill.net> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Hi Mervelee,
Great. I’ll send you a Teams invite for Wednesday the 12th of February, 11:30 am.
Let us know if Teams doesn’t work for you.
Best,
Pratichi
From: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2025 4:29 AM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk>; ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Anthony Badaloo <admin@church-hill.net> Subject: Re: Research
Hi Pratichi,
I am available for all the dates on the list, but I like to get things done and go for the first date on the list.
Thanks for considering me for the interview.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate.
From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2025 4:06 PM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well.
I just wanted to follow up on the below. If you’re still happy to do an interview with myself and Ayana, let us know if any of the dates below work for you
Wednesday 12 February 11:30 am – 2:30 pm
Thursday 13 Feb 11:30 am – 2:30 pm
Monday 17 February 1:00 am – 2:30 pm
Wednesday 19 February 9:30 am -2:30 pm.
Look forward to hearing back from you.
Best,
Pratichi
From: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 5:15 PM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk>; Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Research
Hi Pratichi,
All these are fine with me.
Best,
Ayana
Ayana Ifeorah
From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 5:13:41 PM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Dear Mervelee,
Great, thanks so much. I’ve suggested some slots. Let me know if any of these suit you. The interviews last for about 1 hour.
Wednesday 12 February 9:30 am – 2pm
Thursday 13 Feb 9:30 am – 2 pm
Monday 17 February 1:00 am – 2:30 pm
Ayana – same let me know your availability.
Best,
Pratichi
From: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 10:24 PM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Thanks very much for your prompt response. I am happy to go ahead with the research. Looking forward to receiving the dates to choose from.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers
From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 6:25 PM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Dear Mervelee,
Thanks so much for reaching out. We really appreciate it.
In our research we’re doing interviews with residents and others who have experience of living with and/or responding to damp and mould problems. We’re asking people about its impacts and about what has and hasn’t worked in addressing these problems as well as what they feel needs to change so such issues are dealt with better.
Its usually myself and my colleague Ayana, cc’d in, who carry out the interviews. Ayana is doing a PhD in architecture, on a related but separate project on damp and mould.
The interviews we do are semi-structured, usually online via Teams and they last 45 minutes to 1 hour depending on how much people want to say. They are semi-structured and quite informal. As its a university led project we do give everyone an information sheet about the project and a consent form.
How does that sound to you? I’m not sure if it helps with the experience you want to build. But if you have any questions about research let me know, and I’ll see if I can answer them.
If you are still keen to speak wit us, I can send you some dates/times or let me know if you have any preferences.
Let me know if you have any questions. Look forward to hearing back.
Best,
Pratichi
Dr Pratichi Chatterjee (she/her)
Policy Fellow
p.chatterjee@hud.ac.uk
School of Human and Health Sciences
University of Huddersfield
From: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 1:54 AM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk>; Philip Brown <P.A.Brown@hud.ac.uk>; ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject: Research
My name is Mervelee Myers living in Social Housing since December 2000 and would like to be a participant in the research.
I have experiences participating in research before and would like to gain more experiences to finalise my own research projects.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.
This transmission is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you receive it in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and remove it from your system. If the content of this e-mail does not relate to the business of the University of Huddersfield, then we do not endorse it and will accept no liability.
Reference:
1. Claim Number 570MC618
2. Claim Number: K05EC530
3. Claim Number: K02CL827.
MM
10 February 2025 Civil Restraint Order
Name of Court: Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court
Claim Number: 570MC618
Name of Claimant: MRS MERVELEE MYERS
Name of Defendant: DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP
Date of Issue: 31 JANUARY 2025
MRS MERVELEE MYERS
16 Alma Grove, Bermondsey, London SE1 5PY.
If you do not comply with this ORDER, you may be held in CONTEMPT of COURT and IMPRISONED or FIND your ASSETS maybe SIZED. MM Response: Since this ORDER is unlawful, I will provide EVIDENCE proving that Devonshires Solicitors LLP will be charged with Housing for Women, the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch for K05EC530 and K02CL827. If HHJ Richard Roberts continue the DEFAMATION, he will be made FAMOUS across my social media.
SECTION 1
Date of Order: 31 JANUARY 2025
Name of Judge: HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS, DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR EAST LONDON
Name of Person for whom ORDER is MADE: MERVELEE MYERS
The judge has considered an application by โฆ
OR
The Court has considered, of its own initiative X. MM Response: As a result of the COURT continuing with the miscarriages of justice from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust to www.leyf.org.uk to Small Claims Court to Housing for Women, the Banks and Building Societies and Mimi Owusu who wrote a 12 page Witness Statement for Housing for Women after SCAMMING me ยฃ10,000.00. I have no other alternatives than to lift the lid on LEYF June OโSullivan Drag Queen Storytellers and UEL Richard Harty MIC and Housing for Women party to Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and the Alma Grove HATE MOB. I had no knowledge of Devonshires Solicitors LLP until I was sent a POSSESSION LETTER via POST and I called the number to get information. It might be RELEVANT to know that I was taken to Court for an ECRO before. Reference https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 for more.
And has found that, the above-named person persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate. MM Response: I can end the careers of the CRIMINALS needing Emotional Regulation Treatment and VIOLENT NUISANCES. Details of the previous orders recording that claims and/or applications were totally without merit are set out below. MM Response: DJ Swan is not FIT enough to make the DECISION about whether my CLAIMS have MMERIT.
1. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 570MC618: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
2. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 566MC567: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
3. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC548: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
4. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC475: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
5. MYERS V KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 570MC482: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
SECTION 2
The Order
It is ordered that you be restrained from issuing any claim or making any application in any court specified below without first obtaining permission of
Name of Judge: HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS, DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR EAST LONDON. MM Response: Can this named Judge do a check of the other claims I issued including the 7 that DJ Bell sent from County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch to Central London County Court for Civil District Judge. They included the judgement for Barrister Ryan Clement to pay back my HUSBAND ยฃ9,000.00. I am still waiting to be paid. DJ Sterlini was involved with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan after it reached โTelephone Mediationโ. I applied to go on Judge Rynder, but she refused, and I was advised to use the Small Claims Court.
OR
If unavailable HHJ MARQUAND DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR WEST LONDON. MM Response: I know HHJ Shanks the SHOUTING JUDGE, HHJ Dight with the MISCONDUCT on my birthday, he was advised by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, who I wrote to regarding the Charter of Rights 12 Codes.
X Any County Court.
This Order will remain in effect until 23:59 ON 30 JANUARY 2028. MM Response: There is no ORDER.
1. If you wish to apply for permission-
(a) to make an application in these proceedings; OR
(b) to make an application to amend or discharge this order,
You must first serve notice of your application on the other party. The notice must set out the nature and grounds of the application and provide the other party with at least 7 days within which to respond. You must then apply for permission of the judge identified in the order. The application for permission must be made in writing and include the other partyโs written response, if any, to the notice served. The application will be determined without a hearing. MM Response: Please get a copy of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ. A month after DJ Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE.
2. If you repeatedly make applications for permission under 1 above which are totally without merit, the court may direct that if you make any further application for permission which is totally without merit, the decision to dismiss the application will be final and there will be no right to appeal, unless the judge who refused permission grants permission to appeal. MM Response: Please subscribe to my social media.
3. Any application for permission to appeal a refusal of an application under 1 above must be made in writing and will be determined without a hearing. MM Response: My RESEARCH will be published, and I will forward the link.
SECTION 3
COSTS
X There is no order for costs. MM Response: I will be sending in COST from the time I was contacted by Devonshires Solicitors LLP in July 2023.
Note
If you attempt to make a further application in these proceedings without first obtaining permission of the judge named in the order above, your application will automatically be dismissed without the judge having to make any further order and without the need for the other party to respond to it.
If this order was made in your absence, you may make an application to set aside, vary or stay the order. An application must be made within the period specified, not more than 7 days after service of this order on you. You do not require permission of the court to make such an application.
If you do not understand anything in this order you should go to a Solicitor, Legal Advice Centre or a Citizensโ Advice Bureau. MM Response: I represented myself at 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS and the Small Claims Court. The current SOLICITORS and BARRISTER are CORRUPT.
incident took place at 16 Alma Grove, Bermondsey London SE1 5PY where I lived from I was rescued from Domestic Violence in December 2000 by Housing for Women. On the 13 December 2021 Ms Gilchrist broke the glass to the “Communal Door” and set out on a campaign of hate from then making the life of myself a NIGHTMARE. In May 2022 I was invited to ASB meeting by Samantha Gibbs a new employee of Housing for Women because of malicious reports by Ms Gilchrist. Trina Philbert visited with Candy Smith of Southwark Adult Social Care after she interviewed my husband and realised the extent of the DISCRIMINATION on both of us.
Housing for Women embark on a hate campaign after Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert were employed in 2022 to target me and my husband despite the COMPLAINTS reaching stage 2 of the COMPLAINTS PROCEDURES. I had contacted the Housing Ombudsman Service, the MP Neil Coyle who wrote to Housing for Women twice on my behalf. In the end there were no follow and I was left on my own to STRUGGLE.
The roles of the Met Police in dealing with the DISCRIMINATION left me losing TRUST in the Metropolitan Police. The following are instances of POLICE breaching the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics and treating me like a CRIMINAL needing Emotional Regulation Treatment, a VIOLENT NUISANCE and UURICA-LE I was labelled by my former employers. 1. Visited Alma Grove 13/12/2021 and left accusing me of SHOUTING. 2. Failed to visit Alma Grove in May 2022 when Ms Gilchrist broke the glass again. 3. Takes over an hour to arrive on Christmas eve when I had to barricade myself in my house. 4. Raided my home on 26 January 2023 from Ms Gilchrist MALICIOUS REPORT. 5. Attendance at Croydon Magistrates Court 3 times about reports I breach Community Order 14th and 15th December 2022. 6. Housing for Women claims neighbour call Police to Alma Grove 3 February when HUSBAND and I got SEPARATED after interview at Walworth Police Station. 7. The MALICIOUS REPORT for INTERVIEW at Walworth Police Station 3/2/2023 is still under INVESTIGATION. 8. Samantha Gibbs visit to Alma Grove with MALE tried to ASSAULT me at door 12/1/2023. 9. Failure by Police to act about 6 ASB call out 27 February 2023. 10. 6 Police Officers came to my house on 27/2/2023 about video on YouTube with battering RAM. 11. My Husband was in the Hospital and this could be verified from online DEFENSIVE PRACTICE. 12. Meet Nigel Pearce at Elim House after HMCTS DJ Sterlini label me a VIOLENT NUISANCE reference YOUTUBE. 13. Ask to volunteer at A New Met for London launch where Sir Mark Rowley signed IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE in September 2023 a month after DJ Sterlini labelled me. 14. Seb Adjei-Addoh at Lib Dems Social in Southwark 18/10/2023. 15. Robbed in Peckham 19/10/2023. The Police dragging their feet whilst I am the target of MALICIOUS REPORTS. 16. Met Police visited my home on 25/10/2023 and left HUSBAND going into HYPO. Was lucky to get home from Tony Cealy’s training THEATRE of OPPRESSED to help him. 17. Stephen Agera advised Narin Masera to call the Police. 18. Joe Hooper target me and Met Police refused to act. 19. Mimi Owusu’s 12 pages Witness Statement for Housing for Women. 20. Dr Phil Gregory unannounced visit to Alma Grove 21/11/2024 after I was on Housing Ombudsman Zoom on 20/11/2024. 22. Dr Peter Ocansey and Georgina unannounced visit to Alma Grove on 22/01/2025 after MALICIOUS REPORTS about my MENTAL HEALTH. I was asked not to record and am still waiting for the letter about how I was on their visit and an invitation for a MEETING. 23. London Ambulance Service arrived at my home. Claimed they were sent by the Police. I was told that it was a good thing I opened the door or they would have FORCED ENTRY. Refer to the THREATS by the POLICE who Ms Gilchrist called on 3/1/2025 I was celebrating my brother’s birthday. 24. London Ambulance Service given entry to spend hours outside my door trying to gain entry. ASB with Debbie Gichrist as Met Police and London Ambulance Service use my MENTAL HEALTH to get DRUGS from the SUPPLIER at Alma Grove 20/1/2025. 25. Met Police acted unprofessionally 18/1/2025 get the London Ambulance Service to threaten me that I was SCREAMING and SHOUTING when the Police came because I told them I know my RIGHTS inside of my HOME. 26. ROBERT LEWSLEY is dragging his feet about the complaints of 2 Female Officers who visited my home on 9/8/2024 about a Twitter RACISM post. 27. My son and I were treated like CRIMINALS on 8/8/2024 and him witnessing the DISCRIMINATION by the POLICE is the cause of the High Blood Pressure as he is SCARED they will IMPRISON and EVICT ME.
My problems started at http://www.leyf.org.uk after the death of my mother with dementia and I spent 11 years trying to get my life back together. But the Met Police is working with the A-Z of Abusers to cover their tracks from the time they refused to act about the verbal threats of Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement. But turned up to SECTION me from a MALICIOUS REPORT I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. If the patterns of MALICIOUS REPORTS are considered you can understand why the Police is involved in trying to MURDER me under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture on 30/11/2020.
What they are failing to understand is that I write for therapy when my father was stricken with Parkinson’s. I created Community HUBS on Social Media, my own website, and can be seen on platforms across the internet to the world. Although my Intellectual Property, Copyrights, images and CPPDP have been harvested to make me a VOICELESS VULNERABLE VICTIM. I am getting recognition for my book. I will be a participant in Westminster HUB event 23 April 2025. Type MERVELEE MYERS into Google and I will POP UP.
Dear Mervelee Myers
Thank you for your online enquiry.
The CPS will only consider allegations following an investigation by the police. The CPS plays no part in the investigation and will only advise if a police file is submitted to it. Any evidence that you have to support your allegations should be referred to the police in the first instance, as they have the power to look into the matter further. They will refer the matter to the CPS if necessary.
The Crown Prosecution Service Fake Claim Number K05EC530
Rose Court, 2 Soutwark Bridge False Injunction No โK02CL827
London SE1 9HS Crime No 4221169/23100
NOTICE AND DEMAND – 28-02-2025
NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT NOTICE GO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE
TAKE NOTICE
Dear [Head of CPS’s Name],
I am writing to formally put you on notice regarding what appears to be a series of unlawful legal proceedings and abuses of process involving various public officials, including but not limited to members of your department, the police, HMCTS staff, and Housing for Women.
Background of the Issue
1. Since my unlawful dismissal from my longstanding childcare position due to sexual discrimination under the Men in Childcare policy, I have been subjected to relentless legal attacks. This appears to have been further exacerbated by my refusal to accept a ยฃ58,000 bribe aimed at securing my silence regarding the replacement of staffโincluding myselfโwith cross-dressers in child storytelling roles.
2. Your name and authority were allegedly used to facilitate a false legal case (Case No. 2200933233) against me, which Croydon Magistrates’ Court has confirmed does not exist. Despite this, I continue to face fabricated allegations of breaches of this non-existent “ORDER.”
3. I am now being summoned to an alleged criminal trial at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court on 10th March 2025, under Case Number K05EC30, which is not a criminal case number and appears to be an unlawful misuse of court process.
4. I have never been lawfully served with any court-issued proceedings from Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court or any other court.
5. This failure to provide proper service obstructs my ability to exercise my legal rights, including but not limited to:
ยท Filing an appeal
ยท Challenging the legitimacy of the alleged case
ยท Verifying whether fraud has taken place
LEGAL DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1981, I formally request that you provide the following without delay:
1. An official copy of the information laid before the court that led to the initiation of these alleged proceedings.
2. Concrete evidence that I have been lawfully served with these proceedings in accordance with procedural fairness and due process.
3. If no such valid evidence exists, I demand that the CPS invoke the courtโs Anti-Fraud and Assurance Policy immediately to investigate potential fraudulent activity.
LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Failure to provide the requested documentation or a valid reason for your refusal may result in legal consequences, including potential criminal liability for:
ยท Perverting the Course of Justice โ A serious common law offence carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment (R v Cotter and Others [2000] EWCA Crim 88).
ยท Fraud by False Representation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) โ Up to 10 yearsโ imprisonment if it is established that legal documents or case numbers have been falsified.
ยท Fraud by Abuse of Position (Section 4, Fraud Act 2006) โ Up to 10 yearsโ imprisonment for any public official who knowingly facilitates or allows fraudulent legal action to proceed.
ยท Misfeasance in Public Office โ A tort and criminal offence, holding public officials personally liable for knowingly abusing their legal authority (Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No. 3) [2003] 2 AC 1).
FORMAL NOTICE
ยท If you are unwilling or unable to comply with this lawful request, you must provide a written explanation.
ยท Failure to respond will be taken as an implied admission that no lawful basis exists for these alleged proceedings.
ยท This notice will be used in evidence in any future legal action, regulatory complaint, or judicial review regarding the matter.
I expect your full response within seven (7) days from the date of this letter. If no satisfactory reply is received, I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), HMCTS Senior Presiding Judge, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Legal Ombudsman, and other relevant authorities.
Kind Regards
Mervelee Myers
cc To Whom it may Concern โ All Rights Reserved
Join Boris Johnson, Chris Evans and Lord Prem Sika against Court Order Scams www.scambuster.tv
Make a fair offer for a redress of grievances and invoke the court’s anti-fraud policy
The CPS Privacy Notice explains what data the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will collect about you when you make a complaint or provide feedback, and how we may use that data. You can view the Privacy Notice on our website https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps-contact-scheme-privacy-notice
I want to request a REVIEW based on the following arguments: 1. Raquel Lovekin who contacted me nearly a year after I submitted the COMPLAINT has breached my RIGHTS under the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics, the Mental Health Act 2015, the GDPR 218 and the Charter of Rights Act 2021, the Amended Housing Act 1988 and Eviction Act 1977. 2. The fact that the IOPC is conducting the review is to be accepted as the continuing SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION by the RELEVANT AUTHORITIES’ PARTNERSHIPS denying my RIGHTS not to be treated like a CRIMINAL. 3. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025. 4. MOPAC Reference: PC/7911/20 proves that I am a VICTIM of the Metropolitan Police that are party to breaching my RIGHTS under the Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 and the complaint was not HANDLED proportionately and must be INVESTIGATED. 5. As the STRONG JAMAICAN WOMAN whose book IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by the Commissioner at the launch of “A New Met for London”, I am on record asking to VOLUNTEER to help bring back the TRUST of the BAME Community with the Police. 6. If the Met is committed to developing a learning culture why did Raquel Lovekin believe she can continue to treat me as those who attempted to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me in my HOME from 30 October 2017 to 22 January 2025? 7. I have participated in SURVEYS that were used by BANKS, H4W Social Media to capture my TRUTHS to use to DISCREDIT me. 8. The fact that I have made COMPLAINTS against IOPC and MOPAC must be taken into considerations about how the Metropolitan Police is RACIST, TOKENISTIC, MISOGYNIST, ILLITERATE, INCOMPETENT GASLIGHTERS target VULNERABLE WOMEN in our HOME. 9. By now the Met Police should have learned from MERVELEE MYERS’ cases alone from 2019 with Tammie.Lawrance-Blake@met.police.uk and Owen.Pyle@met.police.uk the outcome of the MEETING was posted on YouTube the A-Z of ABUSERS ENABLERS. 10. Caseworker Ratna Khanam APPEAL Ref: 2019/11249 Email: ratna.khanam@policeconduct.gov.uk is another case. https://mervelee.com/2025/02/07/without-prejudice-mervelee-myers-chart-metropolitan-police-london-ambulance-service-attempts-to-section-murder-kidnap-between-30-october-2017-22-january-2025-16-alma-grove-london-se1-5py-as-commissio/. 11. Reference: 2018/11351 IOPC John Howarth. 12. Why did it take Met Police nearly a year to contact me? I was asked to submit information 7 days of the email. Yet Raquel Lovekin sent me the OUTCOME on 7/2/2025 continuing the breaches of the various laws, legislations, codes of conduct and practices. 12. Based on Raquel Lovekin’s dealing of the complaint it is evident that her REPORT was pre-recorded to continue the DISCRIMINATION started after the death of my MOTHER by those covering up the PAEDOPHILE RINGS I identified at http://www.leyf.org.uk where I worked from 1 September 2009-2015 without knowing. Richard Harty MIC was operating out of the HOC Nursery since the Equality Act 2010 became law. I did the “A Voice of a Child” research project for June O’Sullivan in August 2011. After I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS. 13. IOPC can investigate the reasons for attempts on my life from 30 October 2017 to 22
January 2025 and get back to me before I put the information from RESEARCH about those involved in the REASONS Raquel Lovekin was given a PREPARED outcome for a COMPLAINT to contact me about. 14. Let me list some names for the Met Police to investigate in REVERSE ORDER: (A) Queen Camilla ITV News Domestic Abuse with Housing for Women – I was rescued from DA by H4W in 2000. I will make MONEY from husband 100th birthday card for my Fight4justice campaign. (A) Duchess Kate – Launched Child Mental Health from LEYF Nurseries Stockwell near where I lived when I escaped Domestic Violence, running barefoot on 30 November 2020 after I was assaulted. MOPAC Report by Neil Solliss and Nikki Babb outlines the DISCRIMINATION. (C) June O’Sullivan is/was advisor to the Mayor of London and Holly Sweeney led her MURDERERS to murder me under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture to say I committed SUICIDE. (D) White Dr Phil Gregory turned up unannounced with Black CMN on 21/11/2024 and Black Dr Peter Ocansey and White Georgina turned up on the 22/1/2025. (E) London Ambulance Service tried breaking down my door 20/1/2025 after they were given access to Alma Grove by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper. (F) Housing for Women has given the key to the Communal Door to Devonshires Solicitors LLP and agents to gain access. 15. I am not SAFE at Alma Grove because of the following: 1. Metropolitan Police. 2. London Ambulance Service. 3. Hate Mob in Alma Grove. 4. Devonshires Solicitors LLP. 5. J I Solicitors. 6. NHS. 7. Individuals who played on my VULNERABILITY. 16. A New Met for London” must be used as EVIDENCE that the Metropolitan Police FAILED to SAFEGUARD me as REQUESTED from I had to barricade myself inside on CHRISTMAS eve and waited over an hour before the Police arrived. My brother was with me on the phone from USA. 17. Met Police Safer Neighbourhood Team has not kept appointments to address the matter since. 18. Ms Gilchrist was coerced by H4W after she broke the glass to the Communal Door on the 13/12/2021. The Police came and accused me of locking her out. Ms Gilchrist locked me out on the 23/10/2024. 19. Matters with the H4W when Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert joined H4W in 2022. Ms Gilchrist was coerced to target me. 20. I was a member of H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel as the Minute Taker that was disbanded in 2020. 21. The visit by 6 members of the Met Police on the date I was receiving the bed on 27/2/2024 for my HUSBAND to come home to DIE will be recorded as part of the WINDRUSH SCANDAL and why LEYF must be INVESTIGATED for CHILD ABUSE, NHS for ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT and prevention of TREATMENT to DISABLED NHS PENSIONER made INACTIVE PATIENT twice in 3 months. 22. The video online was posted to warn people about NEGLECT in cases of FAMILY who are in TRANSITION after the death of my husband’s SISTER. My husband was NEGLECTED on BYRON ward Kings College Hospital where I was removed from his bedside on the 6th April 2024 and manhandled. 23. We need to compare notes of PALS Gayle Lewis to understand why MERVELEE MYERS get DISCRIMINATED against DEFAMED and denied ENTITLEMENTS. 24. My husband’s brother died and will be buried on the 16th February 2025. Maybe the IOPC should get my TRIBUTES to understand why the PARTNERS involved with the DISCRIMINATION will not get away with DEFAMATION. 25. Let me share information that will make the world pay attention to the GESTAPO that is the Metropolitan Police: 1. LAS 22/1/25 CAD 1804 turned up after Dr Peter Ocansey & Georgina left. 2. 20/1/25 Record ID 812825221651
left a note under the door after trying to force entry. How many HOURS did they spent whilst people were in need of the AMBULANCE? 3. 469/18Jan25 after leaving my home they filled a REPORT that caused the London Ambulance Service to call ant THREATENED me. 4. Had to call 30 Jany 2025. Who is AS2547 Potter? 5. 2358/03Jany25 are 2924AS and 2499AS captured LIVE YouTube that proves the Met Police is the most RACIST TOKENISTIC MISOGYNISTIC GASLIGHTERS of DISABLED NHS PENSIONER who has been denied MEDICAL AID. 5. CAD 4638/11DEC24 Mike re INTERVIEW. Who is PC CLARKE 2893AS? 26. ADULT SAFETY CONCERNS records MERLIN: 24PAC005902 – Officers worried about my Mental Health. 24PAC047671 – On 27th February 2024, Officers worried about Mental Health after Police Scotland called about video of elderly lady tied up in bedroom. Who was the lady? Where was the video taken? Where was my HUSBAND? 27. The fact that the Met Police are FAILING to address matters impacting on my MENTAL & Physical Health in the cases where 2 Females visited on 9th August 2024 and Robert Lewsley is acting unprofessionally, my son and I were treated like CRIMINALS on 8/8/24, the Police still investigating re 2/2/24 when husband & I got separated, the robbery in Peckham has still not been RESOLVED. 28. I am expecting the IOPC to take all CASES of Metropolitan attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me into account and INVESTIGATE. Because I will be going PUBLIC and the world will be INFORMED about me spending 11 years after I wrote to LEYF Senior HR am DEPRESSED and DYING SLOWLY of TORTURE on the eve of MOTHERING SUNDAY. On the eve of the death of my FATHER I will be known as the STRONG JAMAICAN WOMAN who challenge the GESTAPO that is MARK ROWLEY RACIST GASLIGHTERS in 2025 after he signed my BOOK in 2023.
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2017 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal and destroying my career prospects.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation.
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases.
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions: The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
2. Assumptions: Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders.
3. Differences in Treatment: Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly.
4. Language and Behaviour: Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties.
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence: Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact: The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.
7. Good Outcome: A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2017 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal and destroying my career prospects.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation.
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases.
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions: The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
2. Assumptions: Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders.
3. Differences in Treatment: Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly.
4. Language and Behaviour: Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties.
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence: Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact: The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.
7. Good Outcome: A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
Yours sincerely,
Mervelee Myers
Cc to whom it may concern โ All Rights Reserved
Dear Mrs Myers
Please see attached witness statements of the Claimant.
These include a further witness statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025 and a statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025.
Kindly acknowledge receipt.
Kind regards,
Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor
London Office:Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362Web: www.jisolicitors.co.uk
WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint.Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free.J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
Please find enclosed the following Witness Statements by way of service.
Witness Statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025
Witness Statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025
Please note, you will receive a separate email granting you access to view the video exhibits for each Witness Statement. Please can you download the videos from the shared folder as then you will be able to access them
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert: Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
11 February 2025 Raquel Lovekin Met Police Complaints
Raquel Lovekin acting as Constable,
Professional Standards Department
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise. MM Response: MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW this is Mervelee Myers involved in Kings College London RADAR-CNS after the 12 sessions at the Maudsley NHS with Trainee Counsellor Laura Tinsley. I completed 2 years research and was involved with other projects about Mental Health.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences. MM Response: The evidence about the breaking of the glass to the Communal Door on the 13th December 2021 must be considered. The fact that the Police who was sent as EMERGENCY left claiming I was shouting, and the act was not MALICIOUS because I locked Ms Gilchrist out is key to why Ms Gilchrist continued making MALICIOUS reports resulting in me having to attend Croydon Magistrates 3 times. I also had to attend Walworth Police Station for INTERVIEW when my husband and I got SEPARATED. The Police is still investigating the MATTER.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2015 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal needing Emotional Regulation Treatment and destroying my career prospects. MM Response: I refused LEYF ยฃ58,000.00 NDA.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices. MM Response: As an EYFS Coordinator SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator in my last employment I did training โUNDERSTANDING STATUTORY ASSESSMENTโ in 2009. The fact I was offered the job of SENCO for ยฃ46-55,000.00 by Smart Teachers in 2021 from an old CV from 2015 in proof I continued training despite my ENTITLEMENTS denied.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation. MM Response: District Bell requested the Psychiatric Assessment which I did on the 15th April 2024 after the death of my husband. This is the ASSESSMENT that the court requested. As stated in the conversation between me and Dr Phil Gregory his report is not factual. Why did he want me to meet with him to correct his mistakes to send to the solicitor?
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559). MM Response: I will be relying on my CONTRIBUTIONS to British Values from the time I had the first nervous breakdown at Kings College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and started FUNDRAISING for CHARITIES to prove that Dr Gregoryโs DIAGNOSIS is a DISTORTATION of me. Dr Gregory visited my home on the 21st November 2024 with the nurse Hawah Oweh unannounced and upon inviting him in, demanding that I stopped my RECORDING. He claimed he was concerned about my WELFARE. I was on the Housing Ombudsman Zoom on the 20th November 2024 because I am a member of the โCustomer Panelโ. I was sent email from H4W for opportunity to be on the โCustomer Panelโ recruitment. I was the โMinute Takerโ for the H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel that was disbanded in 2020. That is how Ms H Presley became aware that H4W was discriminating against me because Hermoine Cameron was ADVOCATING on my behalf online. Ms Cameron visited me at home twice. The same way HCT Group Impact Report 2016 statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with unemployment was used by Barrister Ryan Clement and Winsome Duncan to send Police to SECTION me. That I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. I showed Dr Gregory the BOOK and explained how this was misconstrued and used against me. IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE was signed at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ by Sir Mark Rowley. A month after District Judge Sterlini labelled me a โVIOLENT NUISANCEโ without me knowing about the INJUNCTION proceedings started in the court from 24th July 2023. The month I was sent POSSESSION letter, and I was having CRISIS which were posted online as a โContent Creatorโ. DJ Sterlini is listed with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell for striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan that reached โTelephone Conciliationโ.
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). MM Response: Amended Housing Act 1988 & Eviction Act 1977
The Met Police
We further note videos in which she claims to be barricading herself in her property for fear that Police or other organisations will kill her, or where she claims not to be eating or opening curtains. MM Response: The Met Police failed me from they came to SECTION me from a malicious report made by Winsome Duncan. The Police and Ambulance Service turned up at my home on the 30th October 2017. I have proof of the NEGLIGENCE by the POLICE from then to date. Some of these visits can be put in the same category as members of the BAME COMMUNITY who were MURDERED or HARMED as in the case of Cherry Grouse son who I recorded speaking about his experience as a child.
Threatened with EVICTION
I was threatened with EVICTION by Peju Awoye via telephone on 7/6/2022 because Barclays stole my money on the day I was called by Richard Harty who later kicked me out of UEL. My account was closed whilst I was locked in the bank for over an hour waiting for the Police. I was told by Debbie Thomas who since turned against me that Ms Gilchrist told her H4W wanted me out.
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977. MM Response: Elder Abuse & Mental Health Act
Nevertheless, our client has made multiple referrals to adult safeguarding. MM Response: Did Mimi Owusuโs 12 pages โWitness Statementโ the reasons for the REFERRALS to โADULT SAFEGUARDING?โ If so the EQUALITY ASSESSOR for the case will have address because no offer of help was forthcoming from the time, I write to LEYF Senior HR Dilys Epton on the eve of โMothering Sundayโ 14 March 2015 am DERESSED and DYING SLOWLY of TORTURE. My BOOK is just one of the types of evidence I am expecting to be used. I gave copies to the solicitor, barrister, Joseph and Dr Phil Gregory that they should have used as reference about whether I am making up things.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868). MM Response: Carer October 2015 to April 2024
Why were there no support during the 10 years I was struggling with denied ENTITLEMENTS and caring for my HUSBAND. Were there concerns and if they were why did no one help?
Bereavements & Losses
Is the court aware of the impacts of bereavements and losses on me and how the POSSESSION letter triggered my PTSD?
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms: MM Response: Entrapment
Please can you urgently confirm her treatment plan and whether she intends to engage with the same. MM Response: The INJUNCTION is an ENTRAPMENT and to prove this I will mention some facts that can be found in the PUBLIC DOMAIN: 1. Started fundraising with Cancer Research UK after the death of my brother and I had the first Nervous Breakdownโ. I had an appointment on the 5th December 2024 and was turned away from the Surgery. I was laid up with BACK PAINS and am on my own.
2. Started volunteering with Resources for Autism in 2015 after I was sent on Medical Suspension and got myself a โNIGERIAN Familyโ. The mother was pregnant at the time and the child has his own YouTube channel. I was asked to help with the childโs โCare Planโ by the school because of the noticeable progress when I started visiting the family.
3. Started fundraising with Parkinsonโs UK in 2017 and was in their 2018/2019 BROCHURE.
4. I was asked by Southwark Council to do a video to encourage the BAME Community to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
5. I took out a petition during the ET/EAT for an โInquiry in the Early Years Sector that was rejected.
6. My Neighbour TESS was left to die on her own despite my husband cried and ask me to get help for her. I contacted the authorities several times.
7. I averted a Grenfell Tower at Alma Grove because of GREEDY CONTRACTORS. 8. Barrister Samantha Jones bragged to SRA Michael Carter that Judge Freer gave her REFERENCE to be on the Grenfell Tower Panel Inquiry.
9. I was the face of Windrush 70 published across the world 2018.
10. Attended The Guardian Live โIs Modern Slavery Thriving in the UK and sent it to them 2018.
11. Reference Macmillan Cancer Support interviews
12. ยฃ46-55,000.00 SENCO job offer from Smart Teachers 2021 after I was endorsed on LinkedIn by Professors Chris Pascal and Tony Bertram.
13. My http://myvision.org.uk website created from scratch stolen by Guy Lawfull and Mark Upton 2022.
14. My 18 pages Facebook account DISABLED in 2024 after I updated to be on Des OโConnor WOMEN IN BUSINESS in April 2024.
15. Planning Husband 100th Birthday Party 2023.
16. Planning Auntโs 90th birthday 2023.
17. Husbandโs Funeral 2024
18. Psychiatric Assessment requested by DJ Bell.
19. YouTube Channels with 6:11K and 1:08K subscribers where Dr Phil Gregory has gone to deny my RIGHTS to tell my stories and that of the oppressed.
20. Composer of Brixton Market for Border Crossings SONGSTREET App.
21. Narin Masera sent Police to my home on Stephen Ageraโs advice, came home from Tony Cealyโs training to get husband out of HYPO.
22. Prevented from using my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy to start EIS for my grandson with Language and Speech Delay.
23. End Gender Based Violence
Kind regards,
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment. MM Response: Dear Sirs
We refer to the above matter and further to our email of 18/10/2024 below.
Please see attached medical review of Dr Phil Gregory, Consultant Psychiatrist dated 1/11/2024.
Kind Regards,
MM Response: Dr Phil Gregory can be heard accepting that his MEDICAL REVIEW was not factual. I was not aware that Dr Phil Gregory was involved in the Psychiatric ASSESSMENT for the court. I was assessed on the 15th Aril 2024 and that is the TRUTH about who is MERVELEE MYERS. Further evidence can be collected online from my various engagements working, participating in research or from my BLOGS and other social media platforms.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases. MM Research: From: Sola Obajuluwa [mailto:sola@itsagwede.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 at 1:41 PM
To: Lina Amir
Subject: K05EC530 H4W -V- Mervelee Myers
Dear Sirs,
Please see initial assessment report of Joseph Mukuba Community Psychiatric Nurse dated 08/10/2024. Also attached is the letter for an appointment with Dr Phil Gregory Consultant Psychiatrist on 16 October 2024.
We were provided with the same by our client during our appointment with her held yesterday.
Following the appointment with Dr Phil Gregory on Wednesday, he has scheduled a further appointment on 25 October to take place at her home address so that he can factor in her living circumstances and day to day experiences.
While we rely on the initial assessment report we would also seek to rely on any further report prepared by Dr Gregory.
Even on the basis of the initial assessment report we say that it is more likely than not that our client suffers from a disability, consequently we invite you to agree that an Equality Act assessor is required.
We should be grateful for your urgent response as to whether or not you agree so if need be we will apply to Court for an Equality Act assessor to be appointed. MM Response: Based on the continuing DEFAMATION about MERVELEE MYERS during the BEREAVEMENT and LOSS of my husband that has profound impact on my MENTAL and PHYSICAL HEALTH I am requesting that An EQUALITY ACT ASSESSOR is required. This is because Dr Phil Gregoryโs report is not FACTUAL, and he has furthered continued to breach my RIGHTS by calling me to meet with him to fix the errors in the report. He has admitted to knowingly omitting facts and not aware of how to transmit the REPORT to me except by post. Since he only knew it could be sent by posts why is it signed ELECTIONALICAL? Dr Gregory also abused his AUTHORITY when talking to my son. Another glaring mistake is the fact Dr Gregory is using CRB instead of DBS.
London Office:Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362
Festive Season Hours: We will be closed during the festive season from Monday 25 December to Friday 29 December 2023 and will re-open at 9:30am Tuesday 2 January 2024. Wishing you a Happy Christmas and Happy New Year 2024.WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account. Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity. MM Response: Copyright of
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate e
6 December 2024 K05EC530 Assessor
Dear Sirs,
Further to your email below are you able to confirm your clientโs treatment plan further to the diagnosis of a non-organic psychosis? MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW this is Mervelee Myers involved in Kings College London RADAR-CNS after the 12 sessions at the Maudsley NHS with Trainee Counsellor Laura Tinsley. I completed 2 years research and was involved with other projects about Mental Health.
We note a video posted online in which your client appears to be advising her psychiatrist, Dr Phil Gregory, that his diagnosis is โnot herโ and it is her โneighbourโ that needs help, so that she not does not murder MM or โdamageโ her. MM Response: The evidence about the breaking of the glass to the Communal Door on the 13th December 2021 must be considered. The fact that the Police who was sent as EMERGENCY left claiming I was shouting, and the act was not MALICIOUS because I locked Mss Gilchrist out is key to why Ms Gilchrist continued making MALICIOUS reports resulting in me having to attend Croydon Magistrates 3 times. I also had to attend Walworth Police Station for INTERVIEW when my husband and I got SEPARATED. The Police is still investigating the MATTER. I was locked out on the 23 October 2024 and only got entry because Paul Morgan was with me. As an EYFS Coordinator SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator in my last employment I did training โUNDERSTANDING STATUTORY ASSESSMENTโ in 2009. The fact I was offered the job of SENCO for ยฃ46-55,000.00 by Smart Teachers in 2021 from an old CV from 2015 in proof I continued training despite my ENTITLEMENTS denied. District Bell requested the Psychiatric Assessment which I did on the 15th April 2024 after the death of my husband. This is the ASSESSMENT that the court requested. As stated in the conversation between me and Dr Phil Gregory his report is not factual. Why did he want me to meet with him to correct his mistakes to send to the solicitor? I will be relying on my CONTRIBUTIONS to British Values from the time I had the first nervous breakdown at Kings College London and started FUNDRAISING for CHARITIES to prove that Dr Gregoryโs DIAGNOSIS is a DISTORTATION of me. Dr Gregory visited my home on the 21st November 2024 with the nurse unannounced and upon inviting him in, demanding that I stopped my RECORDING. He claimed he was concerned about my WELFARE. I was on the Housing Ombudsman Zoom on the 20th November 2024 because I am a member of the โCustomer Panelโ. I was sent email from H4W for opportunity to be on the โCustomer Panelโ recruitment. I was the โMinute Takerโ for the H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel that was disbanded in 2020. That is how Ms H Presley became aware that H4W was discriminating against me because Hermoine Cameron was ADVOCATING on my behalf online. Ms Cameron visited me at home twice. The same way HCT Group Impact Report 2016 statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with unemployment was used by Barrister Ryan Clement and Winsome Duncan to send Police to SECTION me. That I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. I showed Dr Gregory the BOOK and explained how this was misconstrued and used against me. IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE was signed at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ by Sir Mark Rowley. A month after District Judge Sterlini labelled me a โVIOLENT NUISANCEโ without me knowing about the INJUNCTION proceedings started in the court from 24th July 2023. The month I was sent POSSESSION letter, and I was having CRISIS which were posted online as a โContent Creatorโ. DJ Sterlini is listed with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell for striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan that reached โTelephone Conciliationโ.
She says she will not be taking any medication and considers it an โentrapmentโ to make her โunable to functionโ and that she will edit his report. MM Response: Based on Dr Maria Hudson research paper โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationโ for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS that I was a participant in. The RADAR-CNS MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW at Kings College London. Diabetes HEAL-D research. My Report to The Guardian Is Modern Slavery Thriving in the UK. Endorsed by Professors Chris Pascal and Tony Bertram on LinkedIn after meeting them at Middlesex University. LEYF Big Childcare Conversation when I told them I intend to get my SEND Teacher qualification before returning to Jamaica. I was kicked out of the UEL after Richard Harty called my mobile on the 27th September 2021. We must therefore, link the โSystemic Discriminationโ because when I conducted the โA Voice of a Childโ research project for LEYF CEO June OโSullivan in August 2010 after I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper I had no knowledge who was responsible for them.
Please see the following link to the video: MM Response: EQUALITY ACT 2010 Protected Characteristics.
If you listen carefully, you will understand that I was called by Dr Phil Gregory because I did not attend the appointment, I requested to discuss the information for the recommended MEDICATION. I was unable to attend because I had to call the AMBULANCE out again and was taken to A&E. I am telling Dr Gregory that the neighbours continuing to TRIGGER me with their UNREASONABLE BEHAVIOURS which is the NORM especially when they realised am not well. Dr Gregory always calling on PRIVATE number and because I am getting CYBERBULLYING online and via my home phone and mobile, I do not always answer PRIVATE/WITHHELD calls. If you listen carefully, you will hear me correcting Dr Gregory about some minor mistakes that I would not be expecting from people I MENTORED in my job. Dr Gregory breached the Protected Characteristics. He didnโt just leave it there he got YouTube involved. YouTube is all I have left to share my stories.
The Mental Health Act 2010/2015
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions: The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. MM Response: Copyright of
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
NHS RESPONSIBILITY
The NHS seems to have forgotten their responsibility to me. Maybe NHS need to go back to 2003-2008. And reference the treatment of my husband ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON on BYRON ward.
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well. Look forward to speaking on Wednesday.
I’ve attached information sheets and consent forms for both my project and my colleague Ayana’s, who I mentioned will join us. It’s a standard part of the University’s ethics process, to show that people speak to us with informed consent.
Ayana’s main focus is on the role of retrofit in addressing damp and mould for homeowners. But her work, like mine, is also interested in the experiences of tenants and the challenges they face in getting damp and mould problems fixed. Her information sheet indicates a Yorkshire focus, but the work is also looking across England as well.
Have a read and if you could sign or type your name on the attached consent forms to show your are happy to participate, that would be great. If the consent forms don’t open for you, I’ve also copied them below. (Some people who are Mac users, or are using their phone, have had issues).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Pratichi
2. Assumptions: Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders. MM Response: PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Housing Quality in England: Damp Mould and Cold Housing
Thank you for your interest in this research project. Before agreeing to participate, please read the Information Sheet. If you have any questions, please ask a researcher.
โ I have read the information sheet and understand the purpose of the research
โ I understand that my participation is voluntary. If I decide to no longer take part in this research, I can withdraw from the study up to two weeks from the date of the interview or evidence submission by contacting Phil Brown at p.a.brown@hud.ac.uk.
โ I understand that my personal information will be processed only for the purposes of this research. I understand that such information will be treated as confidential, except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel, and handled in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and UK Data Protection Act 2018.
โ I understand that the information I share, including anonymised direct quotes, may be included in any resulting reports, presentations and academic publication.
โ I understand that any identifying information will be kept confidential (except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel), and access limited strictly to staff at the Healthy Housing Initiative, University of Huddersfield, and researchers they collaborate with.
โ I understand that the data collected from the interviews will be audio or video recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams or another appropriate software or professional transcription service.
โ I understand that the transcriptions will be retained for ten years and destroyed after this time.
โ I have read and understood the institutionโs Data Protection Policy and consent to the researchers processing my personal data accordingly.
PRINT NAME: ________________________________
SIGNATURE: _________________________________
DATE: _______________________________________
Ayana Consent Form
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD
PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Title of the research: Involving Homeowners in Developing Climate-Adaptive and Good-quality Residential Housing Retrofitting in Yorkshire, England
Name of researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Participant Identifier Number: NA
I confirm that I have read and understood the participant Information sheet related to this research and have had the opportunity to ask questions.
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I can withdraw at any time without giving any reason.
I understand that all my responses will be anonymised.
I authorise the research team members to access my anonymised responses.
I permit the research team to audio record the interview.
I agree to take part in the above study.
Name of Participant:
Signature of Participant: Date:
Name of Researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Signature of Researcher: Date:
3. Differences in Treatment: Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly. MM Response: From: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 1:54 AM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk>; Philip Brown <P.A.Brown@hud.ac.uk>; ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject: Research
My name is Mervelee Myers living in Social Housing since December 2000 and would like to be a participant in the research.
I have experiences participating in research before and would like to gain more experiences to finalise my own research projects.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.
4. Language and Behaviour: Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties. MM Response: From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 6:25 PM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Dear Mervelee,
Thanks so much for reaching out. We really appreciate it.
In our research we’re doing interviews with residents and others who have experience of living with and/or responding to damp and mould problems. We’re asking people about its impacts and about what has and hasn’t worked in addressing these problems as well as what they feel needs to change so such issues are dealt with better.
Its usually myself and my colleague Ayana, cc’d in, who carry out the interviews. Ayana is doing a PhD in architecture, on a related but separate project on damp and mould.
The interviews we do are semi-structured, usually online via Teams and they last 45 minutes to 1 hour depending on how much people want to say. They are semi-structured and quite informal. As its a university led project we do give everyone an information sheet about the project and a consent form.
How does that sound to you? I’m not sure if it helps with the experience you want to build. But if you have any questions about research let me know, and I’ll see if I can answer them.
If you are still keen to speak wit us, I can send you some dates/times or let me know if you have any preferences.
Let me know if you have any questions. Look forward to hearing back.
Best,
Pratichi
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence: Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact: The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct. MM Response: NHS RESPONSIBILITY
The NHS seems to have forgotten their responsibility to me. Maybe NHS need to go back to 2003-2008. And reference the treatment of my husband ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON on BYRON ward.
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well. Look forward to speaking on Wednesday.
I’ve attached information sheets and consent forms for both my project and my colleague Ayana’s, who I mentioned will join us. It’s a standard part of the University’s ethics process, to show that people speak to us with informed consent.
Ayana’s main focus is on the role of retrofit in addressing damp and mould for homeowners. But her work, like mine, is also interested in the experiences of tenants and the challenges they face in getting damp and mould problems fixed. Her information sheet indicates a Yorkshire focus, but the work is also looking across England as well.
Have a read and if you could sign or type your name on the attached consent forms to show your are happy to participate, that would be great. If the consent forms don’t open for you, I’ve also copied them below. (Some people who are Mac users, or are using their phone, have had issues).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Pratichi
7. Good Outcome: A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
1. In the County Court at Mayors & City of London Court Devonshires Solicitors LLP Claim Number: 570MC618 Michael Petrick and Narin Masera 566MC567.
2. In the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Nexus Health Group Dr Joanna Pennack 570MC548 and Leigh Kavanah 570MC475. Did DJ Swan appear at the 2 Courts on the 15 January 2025 to conduct the STRIKE OUT of the CLAIMS? This is the same DJ Swan whose name is on Court Order for the 26 July 2023 that I had no knowledge of.
3. I was not informed about any COURT ORDER Proceedings by DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan and DJ Sterlini until after I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE on the 1st August 2023.
4. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, The County Court at Mayors & City Of London Court, The Guildhall Building, Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5AR. Case Number: 570MC482 Mervelee Myers v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Date: 13 December 2024.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would
RDJ Swan is not FIT enough to make the DECISION about whether my CLAIMS have MERIT.
1. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 570MC618: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
2. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 566MC567: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
3. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC548: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
4. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC475: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
5. MYERS V KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 570MC482: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
CAD January 2025
1. Date: 22 January 2025 NHS Ambulance Service CAD 1804 was sent by the Metropolitan Police re a MALICIOUS REPORT. The pattern of the MR goes back to 30 October 2017 when the Met Police and NHS Ambulance came to SECTION me from Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement MR. Georgina and Dr Ocansey 02032282240 unannounced visit to my home. I am awaiting an invitation to meeting and letter to clarify what STATE I was in when they visited. https://www.youtube.com/live/oLbPBnx9e7o?si=tWRW97jxZgty3grP.
2. Date: 20 January 2025 the NHS Ambulance Service was let into 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist.
3. 7026/20Jany25 – NHS Ambulance outside trying to break down the door – Refer to note left under door.
4. CAD 4455/20Jany25 – Police came to my home and left because I am recording
5. CAD 4349/20Jany25 – The Operator could hear Ms Gilchrist outside my window and outside my door
6. CAD 469/18Jany25 – PC Frisby 3348AS was searching my home without my consent. PC West 15880AS acted like a BULLY. I was reported to the NHS Ambulance Service and was called by a female who THREATENED to send the Ambulance to get me.
22. 2712/8JAN24 3452AS & 3435AS CAD 43251/19JAN24 PC LEE 2531AS PC PUTMAN 11J8AS. CRN 746951/10JAN24 CAD 2712/08JAN24 CHS 32186/07JAN24 CAD 2953/07JAN24 CAD 2087/06JAN 2024 PC 343AS PC 1862AS PC 2599AS PC 3030AS
38. Date: 25/12/2023 PC James Murphy P263398 โ Left letter โ Came home to find husband going into HYPO.
39. Date: Crime Reference Number: 3034363/23 โ Robbed in Peckham lost ID.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025.
1. The Catalogue of ABUSE in the reviews are there from I was sent 3 of them by Winsome Duncan who later sent the Police to SECTION me. I applied for Additional Witness Statement during the Adjournment but again this was rejected. Same as https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards in 2017.
Charge authorised by: Name HAWKINS. Officer PC. Collar number P236802.
2. MM Arguments: Refer to IOPC Claim: Number: F21YM135 Andrew Truby Lawyer FOR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Independent Office for Police Conduct Date: 24 October 2019. Claim Number: F45YM082 Date: 29 November 2019. This why the Police came to my house to MURDER me on 30/11/2020. DEAD MAN or MERVELEE MYERS TELLS NO TALE.
3. Mervelee Myers Subject: A caseworker has been assigned to your case CRM: 0055203
You are receiving this email as notification that a caseworker from JCIO has been assigned to your case.
Your caseworkerโs name is Vincent Umeukeje and they will be in contact with you in due course.
Your case reference is โ 33448/20
4. That is why I can get the following:
General Form of Judgment or Order In the County Court at Central London Claim Number: F03CL973 Date: 24 February 2021.
Before His Honour Judge Dight CBE sitting at the County Court at Central London, Central London, R.C.J, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
5. Nursery World Show 2018
I was targeted by a Young White Girl who assaulted me and tried to grab my mobile phone. When I moved away from her, she ran off saying she was going to call Security. This means this was premeditated.
Next day I was targeted because I was attended her Seminar to find out which of my Intellectual Property she was using. What I see happening when she turned up late triggered my PTSD. Throughout the Seminar there was a Security pacing up on down the doorway. I did not return to the NWS since.
Charge Authorised by:
Name: HAWKINS Officer Rank: PC Collar Number: P236802
, Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5AR. Case Number: 570MC482 Mervelee Myers v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Date: 13 December 2024.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025.
4. MOPAC Reference: PC/7911/20 proves that I am a VICTIM of the Metropolitan Police that are party to breaching my RIGHTS under the Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 and the complaint was not HANDLED proportionately and must be INVESTIGATED.
17. Reference: 2018/11351 IOPC John Howarth.
18. Holly Sweeney led her MURDERERS to murder me under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture to say I committed SUICIDE. (D) White Dr Phil Gregory turned up unannounced with Black CMN on 21/11/2024 and Black Dr Peter Ocansey and White Georgina turned up on the 22/1/2025. (E) London Ambulance Service tried breaking down my door 20/1/2025 after they were given access to Alma Grove by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper
19. Ms Gilchrist locked me out on the 23/10/2024.
20. Let me share information that will make the world pay attention to the GESTAPO that is the Metropolitan Police: 1. LAS 22/1/25 CAD 1804 turned up after Dr Peter Ocansey & Georgina left. 2. 20/1/25 Record ID 812825221651 left a note under the door after trying to force entry. How many HOURS did they spent whilst people were in need of the AMBULANCE? 3. 469/18Jan25 after leaving my home they filled a REPORT that caused the London Ambulance Service to call ant THREATENED me. 4. Had to call 30 Jany 2025. Who is AS2547 Potter? 5. 2358/03Jany25 are 2924AS and 2499AS captured LIVE YouTube that proves the Met Police is the most RACIST TOKENISTIC MISOGYNISTIC GASLIGHTERS of DISABLED NHS PENSIONER who has been denied MEDICAL AID. 5. CAD 4638/11DEC24 Mike re INTERVIEW. Who is PC CLARKE 2893AS?
27. ADULT SAFETY CONCERNS records MERLIN: 24PAC005902 – Officers worried about my Mental Health. 24PAC047671 – On 27th February 2024, Officers worried about Mental Health after Police Scotland called about video of elderly lady tied up in bedroom. Who was the lady? Where was the video taken? Where was my HUSBAND?
21. The CAD states Treatment Provided: Assessment Advice Referral to CMHT). If I feel at risk to self, to others or from others call 999 for Police. Now please check how many CALLS I have made about THREATS from OTHERS. For this COMPLAINT alone, there are: 6 CADS (Call to Police) 5481/26Feb24- ASB 6297/27Feb24 – 2825/27Feb24 – 6569/27Feb24 – 1272/27Feb24 – 4990/1Marc24 – ASB that were not attended to. But the Met Police sent 6 Officers to my home about a video on the date I was HOME ALONE sorting out for my HUSBAND to come home to DIE. What did the 6 TERRORISTS PCs expect to find when I was asked if I know ARNOLD TOMLINSON?
22. Assaulted by Trevor Anthony Tomlinson on 9th March 2024 caused HUSBAND to be readmitted to HOSPITAL
23. April 2024 โ (A) 29/04 PC CLARKE with 2 Colleagues recorded at Alma Grove. Letter was left.
Date:
software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
Web: 
Date:
Fight4justice 