Right Honourable Ms Louise Bennett-Coverley a Jamaican Icon
In Decolonisation in Reverse
EMPOWERMENT of STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE
In HONOUR of my PARENTS
Good afternoon Mervelee,
I hope you’re having a great week so far.
Iโm reaching out on behalf of a college that is currently looking for a Nursery Practitioner to join their team.
Please find the job details below: Title: Nursery Practitioner Hours: Full-Time & Bank Salary: ยฃ25,800 Location: KT17
The college is seeking a Level 3 qualified professional in Childcare with some industry experience.
If this role is of interest and aligns with your qualifications, please send me an updated CV along with a suitable time for a quick, informal chat. If this opportunity isn’t relevant to your experience, please feel free to disregard this email.
I look forward to hearing from you!
Best wishes,
Martyna Gorka
Associate Recruitment Consultant
Mobile: 07929670626
Region: 0117 4404 777
Office: 0300 124 5777
Email: Martyna.Gorka@dovetailslate.co.uk
First Floor, Braebourne House Woodlands Bradley Stoke Bristol BS32 4JT
Dovetail and Slate is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 11351060. Registered office: First Floor, Braebourne House Woodlands, Bradley Stoke, Bristol, England, BS32 4JT
Dovetail and Slate is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and young people and expects all staff, applicants and clients to share this commitment. This role may involve work with under 18’s or vulnerable adults. Any appointment will be made subject to strict vetting and screening checks and receipt of a satisfactory enhanced DBS check. Dovetail and Slate ltd acts as an Employment Agency (perm) and an Employment Business (temp/contract).
This email was sent to rattynem@btinternet.com, by Martyna Gorka. To remove your email address permanently from future mailings, please click here.
Osiorenua John Itsagwedeacting as ceo 27-02-2025
FakeClaim Number K05EC530
J I Solicitors Ltd False Injunction No โK02CL827
1-3 Atwell Road Crime No 4221169/23100
London SE15 4TW
Subject: Formal Demand for Disclosure of Court-Issued Documents & Notice of Potential Fraud Investigation
Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as CEO,
I write concerning your refusal, alongside your staff member Sola Obajuluwa, to provide copies of key court documents that were lawfully requested on 9th December 2024 and again on 23rd December 2024. Despite these formal requests, I have received only a single document via post, which bears a forged signature and still lacks the materials I specifically requested.
It is my understanding that you claim to be acting on my behalf, defending alleged possession proceedings and a Sealed Injunction Order issued by the court. However, the court itself has been unable to produce these items and has subsequently opened Investigation Reference 67009789 into allegations of fraud and counterfeiting in conspiracy, which are criminal offences under the Fraud Act 2006 and Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981.
This follows 27th January 2023 โ Croydon Court confirm FAKE Community Order – 2200933233 โ No information was laid โ No Sealed Order โ No Case Management Records- Discontinue Proceedings.
Given the serious nature of this matter, take this as formal notice to attend as a witness and provide the requested documents under oath, with the penalty of perjury as prescribed under Perjury Act 1911, Section 5, should any false statements be made.
Formal Demand for Documents
Pursuant to your legal and professional obligations under the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct and relevant case law, I hereby demand the immediate disclosure of the following:
A copy of the Sealed Lay of Information and Injunction Orderย allegedly issued by the court.
The claim form for possession proceedings, issued by the court, along with the requested Case Management documents, originally sought since 9th December 2024.
Evidence of payment receiptsย for court fees paid by H4W for issuing the alleged possession proceedings, as well as receipts for any public funds or legal aid received in relation to this matter.
A copy of your firmโs indemnity insurance certificate, verifying coverageย in excess of ยฃ5 million, againstย negligence, malpractice, and fraud, in line with your professional obligations.
Failure to comply with this request may result in further civil and criminal proceedings. Your obligations in matters concerning malfeasance, abuse of public office, and professional negligence are underscored in Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29, which establishes liability for misfeasance in public office. Should it be found that you have deliberately withheld documents or engaged in fraudulent activity, potential criminal charges under Section 2 (Fraud by False Representation) and Section 4 (Fraud by Abuse of Position) of the Fraud Act 2006 may apply.
Please provide the requested documents by [insert reasonable deadline, e.g., 7 days from the date of this letter]. If you fail to do so, I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Legal Ombudsman, the police, and other relevant regulatory bodies.
This letter serves as formal notice of my concerns and my intent to pursue all necessary legal avenues should you fail to comply.
On Monday 23 December 2024 at 14:19:22 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr Sola,
I noticed a missed call from your office number. Unfortunately, I have been very busy with the Christmas festivities and other matters. Please send me an email regarding your update, as I have not had any response to my email of 9th December, which is peculiar.
I shall take this opportunity to wish you and your family a great festive period.
Kindest Regard
Mervelee
On Monday 9 December 2024 at 08:28:13 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:
Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as ceo
Mrs Mervelee Myers
J I Solicitors Ltd 16 Alma Grove
1-3 Atwell Road Bermondsey
London SE15 4TW London [SE1 5PY]
Subject: Grave Concerns Regarding Procedural Irregularities and Potential Criminal Breaches
Dear CEO
Further to your call on Friday, 7th December 2024, informing me of a “criminal trial” to take place at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court on Monday, 9th December 2024, I must raise serious concerns regarding procedural breaches and potential criminal misconduct.
Grave Procedural Concerns
Failure of Proper Service: ย I have not been served with any proceedings issued by the court, as required byย Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 6.3. The absence of service constitutes a breach of due process and undermines the fairness of the proceedings, in violation ofย Article 6ย of theย European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees a right to a fair trial.
Case Law:
Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC [2003] EWCA Civ 1406: Establishes that parties must be properly informed of proceedings affecting their rights. Failure to do so invalidates the legitimacy of any such proceedings.
Jurisdictional Error: ย It is procedurally and legally flawed to claim that a “criminal trial” can occur in a County Court, as County Courts do not have jurisdiction over criminal matters. This raises questions of judicial propriety and adherence to statutory functions.
Case Law:
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP [1993] 1 WLR 1524:ย Clarifies the specific jurisdictional boundaries of courts and the necessity of proper venue for proceedings.
Questionable Claimant Identity: ย The documents list the claimant as โH4W,โ an entity that I cannot identify as a legal person or corporate body capable of initiating legal proceedings. Furthermore, I have no contractual relationship with this entity, rendering any claim invalid.
Case Law:
MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 1169:ย A defective claim by an entity without standing is a nullity and cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court.
Breaches of the Companies Act 2006: ย Your companyโs website lacks a registered address and company number, which are mandatory underย Sections 82 and 1200 of the Companies Act 2006. These omissions constitute a criminal offence underย Section 1112, which criminalizes the failure to comply with disclosure obligations.
Negligence and Indemnity Insurance: ย Given the potential for negligence, malpractice, and fraud in conspiracy, I request a copy of your companyโs indemnity insurance certificate to verify coverage of at least ยฃ5,000,000, as required byย Regulation 3 of the Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 1998.
Formal Requests
Pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1999, I formally request:
A copy of theย Lay of Information, Issued by the court, to substantiate the basis for the alleged committal proceedings.
A copy of your indemnity insurance certificate.
Clear documentation evidencing the legitimacy of “H4W” as a legal entity capable of making claims.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failure to address the above concerns may constitute:
Fraud by false representation (Fraud Act 2006, Section 2), given the misrepresentation of the courtโs jurisdiction and procedural validity.
Failure to disclose information (Fraud Act 2006, Section 3), particularly if material facts are knowingly withheld.
Abuse of process, as perย Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, where proceedings are used for an improper purpose.
I require your written response and all requested documents by return. Failure to respond adequately will leave me no choice but to escalate this matter to the relevant regulatory and criminal enforcement authorities.
J I Solicitors Ltd False Injunction No โK02CL827
1-3 Atwell Road Crime No 4221169/23100
London SE15 4TW
Subject: Formal Demand for Disclosure of Court-Issued Documents & Notice of Potential Fraud Investigation
Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as CEO,
I write concerning your refusal, alongside your staff member Sola Obajuluwa, to provide copies of key court documents that were lawfully requested on 9th December 2024 and again on 23rd December 2024. Despite these formal requests, I have received only a single document via post, which bears a forged signature and still lacks the materials I specifically requested.
It is my understanding that you claim to be acting on my behalf, defending alleged possession proceedings and a Sealed Injunction Order issued by the court. However, the court itself has been unable to produce these items and has subsequently opened Investigation Reference 67009789 into allegations of fraud and counterfeiting in conspiracy, which are criminal offences under the Fraud Act 2006 and Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981.
This follows 27th January 2023 โ Croydon Court confirm FAKE Community Order – 2200933233 โ No information was laid โ No Sealed Order โ No Case Management Records- Discontinue Proceedings.
Given the serious nature of this matter, take this as formal notice to attend as a witness and provide the requested documents under oath, with the penalty of perjury as prescribed under Perjury Act 1911, Section 5, should any false statements be made.
Formal Demand for Documents
Pursuant to your legal and professional obligations under the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct and relevant case law, I hereby demand the immediate disclosure of the following:
A copy of the Sealed Lay of Information and Injunction Orderย allegedly issued by the court.
The claim form for possession proceedings, issued by the court, along with the requested Case Management documents, originally sought since 9th December 2024.
Evidence of payment receiptsย for court fees paid by H4W for issuing the alleged possession proceedings, as well as receipts for any public funds or legal aid received in relation to this matter.
A copy of your firmโs indemnity insurance certificate, verifying coverageย in excess of ยฃ5 million, againstย negligence, malpractice, and fraud, in line with your professional obligations.
Failure to comply with this request may result in further civil and criminal proceedings. Your obligations in matters concerning malfeasance, abuse of public office, and professional negligence are underscored in Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29, which establishes liability for misfeasance in public office. Should it be found that you have deliberately withheld documents or engaged in fraudulent activity, potential criminal charges under Section 2 (Fraud by False Representation) and Section 4 (Fraud by Abuse of Position) of the Fraud Act 2006 may apply.
Please provide the requested documents by [insert reasonable deadline, e.g., 7 days from the date of this letter]. If you fail to do so, I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Legal Ombudsman, the police, and other relevant regulatory bodies.
This letter serves as formal notice of my concerns and my intent to pursue all necessary legal avenues should you fail to comply.
On Monday 23 December 2024 at 14:19:22 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Mr Sola,
I noticed a missed call from your office number. Unfortunately, I have been very busy with the Christmas festivities and other matters. Please send me an email regarding your update, as I have not had any response to my email of 9th December, which is peculiar.
I shall take this opportunity to wish you and your family a great festive period.
Kindest Regard
Mervelee
On Monday 9 December 2024 at 08:28:13 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:
Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as ceo
Mrs Mervelee Myers
J I Solicitors Ltd 16 Alma Grove
1-3 Atwell Road Bermondsey
London SE15 4TW London [SE1 5PY]
Subject: Grave Concerns Regarding Procedural Irregularities and Potential Criminal Breaches
Dear CEO
Further to your call on Friday, 7th December 2024, informing me of a “criminal trial” to take place at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court on Monday, 9th December 2024, I must raise serious concerns regarding procedural breaches and potential criminal misconduct.
Grave Procedural Concerns
Failure of Proper Service: ย I have not been served with any proceedings issued by the court, as required byย Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 6.3. The absence of service constitutes a breach of due process and undermines the fairness of the proceedings, in violation ofย Article 6ย of theย European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees a right to a fair trial.
Case Law:
Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC [2003] EWCA Civ 1406: Establishes that parties must be properly informed of proceedings affecting their rights. Failure to do so invalidates the legitimacy of any such proceedings.
Jurisdictional Error: ย It is procedurally and legally flawed to claim that a “criminal trial” can occur in a County Court, as County Courts do not have jurisdiction over criminal matters. This raises questions of judicial propriety and adherence to statutory functions.
Case Law:
R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP [1993] 1 WLR 1524:ย Clarifies the specific jurisdictional boundaries of courts and the necessity of proper venue for proceedings.
Questionable Claimant Identity: ย The documents list the claimant as โH4W,โ an entity that I cannot identify as a legal person or corporate body capable of initiating legal proceedings. Furthermore, I have no contractual relationship with this entity, rendering any claim invalid.
Case Law:
MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 1169:ย A defective claim by an entity without standing is a nullity and cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court.
Breaches of the Companies Act 2006: ย Your companyโs website lacks a registered address and company number, which are mandatory underย Sections 82 and 1200 of the Companies Act 2006. These omissions constitute a criminal offence underย Section 1112, which criminalizes the failure to comply with disclosure obligations.
Negligence and Indemnity Insurance: ย Given the potential for negligence, malpractice, and fraud in conspiracy, I request a copy of your companyโs indemnity insurance certificate to verify coverage of at least ยฃ5,000,000, as required byย Regulation 3 of the Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 1998.
Formal Requests
Pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1999, I formally request:
A copy of theย Lay of Information, Issued by the court, to substantiate the basis for the alleged committal proceedings.
A copy of your indemnity insurance certificate.
Clear documentation evidencing the legitimacy of “H4W” as a legal entity capable of making claims.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failure to address the above concerns may constitute:
Fraud by false representation (Fraud Act 2006, Section 2), given the misrepresentation of the courtโs jurisdiction and procedural validity.
Failure to disclose information (Fraud Act 2006, Section 3), particularly if material facts are knowingly withheld.
Abuse of process, as perย Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, where proceedings are used for an improper purpose.
I require your written response and all requested documents by return. Failure to respond adequately will leave me no choice but to escalate this matter to the relevant regulatory and criminal enforcement authorities.
Yours faithfully
Mervelee Myers
Today is 1st March 2025;
Three years ago I started working on my first book and then my second in 2023 and you came along !!
Thanks again.
To celebrate the 3 years I need a little favor from you (no..not money !!)
This can be
1. A photo of you with the book . or
2. A photo of you in the book. or
3. A short video about what being recognized in the book means to you.
PLEASE post on at least ONE platform.
Facebook
Instagram
X (Twitter)
YouTube or
LinkedIn
and please MOST IMPORTANT use the hashtag
#saluting100blackauthors
Please do this RIGHT AWAY, TODAY or latest Sunday night !!
SO #youtube the #paedophiles #terrorists #enablers are #guilty and this goes to #instagram SO #youtube the #enablers of #paedophiles and #terrorists am #monitoring Dear Ms Myers I write further to the above housing proceedings in which we have represented you. I wrote to you on 13 February 2025, a copy of my letter is attached. You acknowledged my letter by email on 18 February 2025 at 09.34am. I also informed you that we had applied to the Court to come off the record as acting for you and you acknowledged receipt of our Application Notice by email on 25th February 2025 at 09.22am. Please note for the avoidance of any doubt that this email is confirmation to you that we no longer act for you in the proceedings and have written to other party that we have ceased acting for you. You will need to either arrange alternative solicitors to represent you at the forthcoming possession trial on 7th March 2025 and committal hearing on 10th March 2025 or you will need to attend in person. — Kind regards, Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor London Office: Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362 Web: http://www.jisolicitors.co.uk Home | J I Solicitors | Legal practice in South London and Kent Welcome to J I Solicitors J I Solicitors is a reputable legal practice located in South London and Kent We are a friendly team of solicitors who specialise in Family Law, Housing Law, Criminal Law, Immigration Law, Conveyancing and Property Law, Company Law, and Personal Injury http://www.jisolicitors.co.uk WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account. Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
Thanks very much. This will be used to expose the Black Solicitors taking Legal Aid to Discriminate against Vulnerable Tenants during CRISIS of Bereavement, Hospital Care and Gaslighting and MISOGYNY
Regards
MERVELEE Myers
Sent from my Galaxy
——– Original message ——–
From: Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk>
Date: 28/02/2025 15:38 (GMT+00:00)
To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>
Subject: Case Numbers: K02CL827 & K05EC530Dear Ms Myers
I write further to the above housing proceedings in which we have represented you.
I wrote to you on 13 February 2025, a copy of my letter is attached.
You acknowledged my letter by email on 18 February 2025 at 09.34am.
I also informed you that we had applied to the Court to come off the record as acting for you and you acknowledged receipt of our Application Notice by email on 25th February 2025 at 09.22am.
Please note for the avoidance of any doubt that this email is confirmation to you that we no longer act for you in the proceedings and have written to other party that we have ceased acting for you.
You will need to either arrange alternative solicitors to represent you at the forthcoming possession trial on 7th March 2025 and committal hearing on 10th March 2025 or you will need to attend in person.
— Kind regards,
Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor
London Office:Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362Web: www.jisolicitors.co.ukHome | J I Solicitors | Legal practice in South London and KentWelcome to J I Solicitors J I Solicitors is a reputable legal practice located in South London and Kent We are a friendly team of solicitors who specialise in Family Law, Housing Law, Criminal Law, Immigration Law, Conveyancing and Property Law, Company Law, and Personal Injurywww.jisolicitors.co.uk
WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint.Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free.J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
Housing For Women issue successfully submittedHi Mervelee, Great news! You’ve successfully sent your issue to Housing For Women.
We’ll let you know when you get a response โ or if you need to do anything else.This company is working with Resolver to ensure you get the best possible response to your issue. They will respond as soon as possible.Go to your case How long should I wait for a reply?This depends on the size of the business (and the type of complaint you’re making), but generally you should expect a reply in around a week. There isn’t an official rule that says this, but it’s a good estimate. What do I do if I don’t get a reply?Unfortunately, some businesses are better than others at getting back to you.
If a week passes and you haven’t heard from them, you should use Resolver to send a follow-up email or call them directly. Can I raise another issue via Resolver?Of course! There’s no limit to the number of case files you can create with your Resolver account. It’s very easy to manage multiple cases at the same time โ in fact, some of our users have 10 open at a time! No big deal.
Addressee Only Reg Post WM1407 5381 10GB Zaiba Quershi acting as CEO zaiba.quershi@h4w.co.uk
Housing For Women 00420651 Fake Claim Number K05EC530
Sixth Floor, Blue Star House False Injunction No โK02CL827
234-244 Stockwell Road, Crime No 4221169/23100
London, SW9 9SP Resolver RES10179943
NOTICE AND DEMAND – 28-02-2025
Zaiba Quershi acting as CEO,
I write to you with deep regret, as I have long been grateful for the assistance that both my late husband and I have received from your charity. I also wish to express my sincere intention to always conduct myself in a polite and respectful manner, despite the distressing situation that has arisen regarding my neighbour, Deborah Agnes-Gilchrist, and the purported injunction allegedly issued against me.
However, I am now gravely concerned about a series of court proceedings that appear to be taking place in my name without any lawful basis or verification. This matter is exacerbated by the fact that neither the court staff, the local authority, the police, the solicitors involved, nor yourselfโas the purported claimantโhave been able to provide any substantive evidence of these alleged proceedings.
Furthermore, it is deeply distressing that these false claims are being repeatedly referenced by authority figures and medical personnel as if they were legitimate, despite a clear lack of verification.
Evidence of Fraudulent Proceedings
On 27th January 2023, Croydon Magistratesโ Court confirmed that a false Community Order (Case No. 2200933233) had been recorded in my name. The court explicitly stated that:
ยท No information was laid before the court.
ยท No Sealed Order exists.
ยท No Case Management Records exist.
ยท Proceedings were formally discontinued, and an investigation was opened.
To date, I have never been lawfully served with any court-issued proceedings, and the court itself has failed to verify the existence of any such proceedings. This raises serious concerns of fraudulent misrepresentation and potential criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.
Formal Request for Disclosure
Under the principles established in R v Weir [2016] EWCA Crim 2170, which affirms the requirement for proper legal procedures in criminal and civil cases, I now make a lawful demand for the immediate disclosure of the following:
1. A copy of the Sealed Order of Injunction, along with the original Information that was laid before the court to obtain it.
2. A copy of the receipt for the court fee paid to issue the alleged possession proceedings.
Personal Liability for Fraudulent Conduct
As the CEO of Housing For Women, you hold personal and corporate accountability under the Companies Act 2006 and are legally responsible for ensuring that your organisation does not engage in fraudulent conduct.
Furthermore, under Section 12 of the Fraud Act 2006, a company director or senior officer who knowingly allows fraudulent activity to take place within their organisation can be held personally criminally liable. The penalties for such offences include:
ยท Fraud by false representation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) โ carries a maximum sentence of 10 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Fraud by abuse of position (Section 4, Fraud Act 2006) โ carries a maximum sentence of 10 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Conspiracy to defraud (Common Law, affirmed in R v Cooke [1986] AC 909) โ carries an unlimited prison term depending on the severity of the fraud.
ยท Perverting the course of justice (Common Law, affirmed in R v Cotter and Others [2000] EWCA Crim 88) โ carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in extreme cases, such as this one.
Notice to Attend Court
In your capacity as CEO and a legally responsible officer of your organisation, I formally demand that you attend court to provide:
1. The above-requested documents OR
2. A plausible explanation, under oath, as to why these documents do not exist.
Failure to comply with this request will result in an escalation of this matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Charity Commission, the police, and other relevant regulatory bodies. In light of the seriousness of these allegations, I reserve the right to seek further legal action, including filing a formal criminal complaint.
I expect a full response and disclosure of the requested materials within 7 days from the date of this notice.
Mervelee Myers โ cc To Whom it may Concern โ All Rights Reserved
Join Boris Johnson, Chris Evans and Lord Prem Sika against Court Order Scams https://bit.ly
CaseId : 202120035 Created and sent on : 30/11/2021 at 13:23 Created by : @housing-ombudsman.org.uk Created using template Admin Acknowledgement Complainant Emailed from address : casework@housing-ombudsman.org.uk Email Recipients : hpresley78@hotmail.co.uk Email Subject : Case ID – 202120035 [REF/Lq/19/Vw/8p/] Email Body :
30 November 2021
Dear Ms Presley Complaint: 202120035 – Housing For Women Thank you for your correspondence. Your enquiry has been assigned reference number 202120035. This reference number will enable our team to locate the information you have provided us with. Please quote this when contacting us about your case. Your correspondence has been passed to a member of the Dispute Resolution Team who will contact you within 15 working days if necessary. Further correspondence can be forwarded to us using the following methods: Email: info@housing-ombudsman.org.uk Address: Housing Ombudsman Service, PO Box 152, Liverpool L33 7WQ Telephone: 0300 111 3000
Try our free online dispute resolution training (click here to access) Case Reference: 202120035 3 of 3
Case Reference: 202204637 1 of 21
16 September 2022
Ms Hulya Presley Flat 23 Clarson Court 130 Gosterwood Street LONDON SE8 5NY
Dear Ms Presley Complaint: 202204637 – Housing For Women Thank you for your correspondence and the recent information you have provided. I understand you have a number of complaints. Your complaints You have complained about: ๏ท The landlordโs handling of repairs ๏ท The landlordโs handling of your Subject Access Request Background to your complaints I can see the Ombudsman has investigated your complaints in 2016 and July 2022 in respect of various repairs. Those cases are now closed and concluded as our statutory dispute resolution procedure is at an end. In respect of your contact on 17 May 2022, it is unclear whether the repairs you are referring to are wholly new or were part of your claim and complaint that was investigated by the Ombudsman in July 2022. As such, we require further information from you. Further information required I should be grateful if you would provide answers to the following: ๏ท Please specify the repairs, including: o The repair issue o Which room(s) is/are affected o When they were reported to the landlord
PO Box 152 Liverpool L33 7WQ Tel: 0300 111 3000 info@housing-ombudsman.org.uk http://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk Case Reference: 202204637 2 of 21
o When you raised a complaint with the landlord about its handling of the repairs.
The Ombudsmanโs jurisdiction I should advise you that there are some complaints the Ombudsman does not investigate, including: ๏ท Complaints which the Ombudsman has already considered or determined ๏ท Complaints where there is another Ombudsman or complaint handling body to consider the matter In your case, if the repairs you are now complaining about relate to the repairs complaint, we determined in 2016 and 2022, weโll not be able to investigate those again. The complaint about a subject access request is better dealt with by the Information Commissionerโs Office who is responsible for deciding if organisations have complied with their obligations under the relevant data protection legislation. Our role Once we receive the above information, we then may be able to ask your landlord to consider a complaint via its internal procedures. We may only investigate where a complaint has exhausted the landlordโs complaint procedure. Yours sincerely
Chloe Winstone Dispute Resolution Advisor Case Reference: 202204637 3 of 21
From: hpresley78@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Re: Case ID – 202204637 [REF/J5/N4/Zb/2Z/] To: “casework@housing-ombudsman.org.uk” (casework@housing-ombudsman.org.uk); CC: “vicky.foxcroft.mp@parliament.uk” (Vicky Foxcroft MP); Date Sent: 28/07/2022 15:12:07 Dear Hannah Thank you for your email. I have two complaints currently with the Housing Ombudsman. One relates to the disrepairs and complaints handling which has been investigated with a determination and order given to my landlord. The second complaint relates to my SAR and complaints handling which I am assuming is the case you are referring to. I forwarded all the relevant evidence last year.
My case has not progressed to court and my SAR complaint is nothing to do with the legal case which is currently being delayed by my landlord and which the ombudsman are aware of.
The disrepair case has not gone to court.
I raised the complaint through my landlord and followed the procedure last year. My landlord provided their final response which I forwarded to the ombudsman. Many thanks. Kind regards Hulya Presley
On 28 Jul 2022, at 13:40, casework@housing-ombudsman.org.uk wrote:
๏ปฟ28 July 2022
Dear Ms Presley
Complaint: 202204637 – Housing For Women
Thank you for contacting the Housing Ombudsman Service, I am sorry to hear about the problems that are affecting you in your home.
As I understand it, your complaint relates to the landlord’s handling of disrepairs to your property.
On reviewing your case, you have provided our Service with letters from legal representatives, but it remains unclear whether this progressed to the Court and whether the outstanding concerns where made as part of the claim. Case Reference: 202204637 4 of 21
>
Before we are able to assist you it would be helpful if you could please clarify the following: 1) can you confirm if your disrepair claim was progressed at Court 2) can you confirm when you most recently raised your concerns with the landlord through its complaints process
It is your landlordโs responsibility to investigate your concerns and provide a response to you. It is the Housing Ombudsmanโs job to make sure that your landlord responds to you, treats you fairly and puts things right. I have included a factsheet about our service which will explain more about how we can help.
The first step is to make sure that you make a complaint and from the information you have provided it is not clear if you have made a formal complaint directly to your landlord, and whether your complaint was subject to legal proceedings.
Jurisdiction
The Housing Ombudsman are unable to review a case which has been subjected to legal proceedings, as this sits outside of our jurisdiction. For further information on this, please see below:
Once you have clarified the status of the complaint and whether any of the repairs or disrepair claim was subject to legal proceedings, the Housing Ombudsman can advise and assist you further.
If responding by email, please reply to this email without editing the subject line which contains a unique code allowing our systems to automatically file the email and inform the casework team.
The Housing Ombudsman are unable to review a case which has been subjected to legal proceedings, as this sits outside of our jurisdiction. For further information on this, please see below: Frequently Asked Questions – Housing Ombudsman (housing-ombudsman.org.uk) Once you have clarified the status of the complaint and whether any of the repairs or disrepair claim was subject to legal proceedings, the Housing Ombudsman can advise and assist you further. If responding by email, please reply to this email without editing the subject line which contains a unique code allowing our systems to automatically file the email and inform the casework team. Yours sincerely Hannah Dispute Resolution Advisor
PO Box 152, Liverpool L33 7WQ 0300 111 3000 http://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk To find out how we use your personal data together with your rights under the
Try our free online dispute resolution training (click here to access) Case Reference: 202204637 7 of 21
Case Reference: 202204637 8 of 21
On 17 May 2022, at 17:33, H P hpresley78@hotmail.co.uk wrote: Dear Mr Blakeway I apologise for contacting you directly but as I do not know who is dealing with my case at the Housing Ombudsman, I wanted to contact you directly to make you aware of my landlordโs unreasonable behaviour. I have a long history with the Ombudsman going back years. My previous case was not
Case Reference: 202204637 9 of 21
dealt with appropriately and delays and mistakes were made by the Ombudsman despite the evidence I had. Since my case was closed by the Ombudsman in 2016, I have tried every step to resolve getting the correct repairs carried out but unfortunately here I am in 2022, still waiting for the repairs. I have gone through my MP throughout the years, including Lewisham Council, local councillors, your department and nothing has improved or helped. In fact, LBL have failed to take my case seriously over the years which has resulted in my landlord continuing to abuse their power and causing myself and son ill health through their refusal to carry out the disrepairs, for repeatedly discriminating us as well as using intimidating behaviours to get me to drop my case and move out. They have ignored years of ASB that has directly affected myself and son, repeatedly put us at risk and ignored many concerns Iโve raised which other neighbours have also reported. As a result of the council refusing to help and refusing to put me on the housing register, failing to use their powers to and duty of care and H4W continuing to lie and cover up evidence, I was left with no other option but to seek legal advice again last year through other neighbours who were already taking out a group claim against H4W. Had my case been taken seriously previously in 2016 by the Ombudsman and had the council intervened, I would not be living in this property years later, still waiting for the same repairs that were due to be repaired many years ago. I have documented everything throughout the years. As a result of me taking legal action for the disrepairs in my home, H4W have turned more hostile against me, further discriminating myself and son and excluding us from services while they receive full rent and service charges. Throughout this legal disrepair case, H4W have made life incredibly stressful and hard and clearly have no intentions of wanting to resolve my case. Initially they made an offer to settle by ignoring the disrepairs including the flooring disrepairs that has been outstanding since 2013. When the Ombudsman ordered H4W to repair the flooring in 2016, H4W did not rectify and repair the flooring, all they did was replace the top two layers. They did nothing to prevent further leaks and as a result of their negligence my home has suffered many other leaks that has caused damage to my home. This case has been extremely distressing. Mistakes have been made by the expert inspector with disrepairs missing from the expert report, as well as incorrect information on another expert report. As a result of these, I refused to sign any agreement until all my disrepairs were listed and the correct information was provided in regards to the district heating. H4W then made another offer, listing what they would do and wouldnโt do. I received an email from the Housing Ombudsman to say that my complaint was going to be investigated which was referred to your office last year. Two days later, H4W made another offer to settle my claim on the conditions I withdraw my complaint from the Ombudsman and any further complaints and cases. That specifically named the Housing Ombudsman. The CEO of H4W is fully aware I would never withdraw or not pursue my complaint and
Case Reference: 202204637 10 of 21
any other cases and complaints. This was done to deliberately cause me further stress and anxiety and to further delay my case. They also wanted me to sign a full confidentiality agreement. I never agreed to sign or do anything until my solicitor corrected the experts reports and I told my solicitor I would not agree to any of their terms, however that I would agree to keep the compensation confidential only once the remaining disrepairs were added and correct information was submitted regarding the district heating. So my question is, was the case officer assigned to my case aware that H4W are requesting I withdraw my complaint from your department? Is this what the Ombudsman want for tenants to withdraw their complaints? I fully understand and appreciate how busy your department are, increasing caseloads that are demanding and stressful but I really hope this is not something investigating officerโs are encouraging social housing landlords to do. My solicitor has finally added the remaining disrepairs in the counter offer made to H4W and I have paid for a private, qualified and competent engineer who carried out an inspection on my heating and hot water which confirmed the the truth about the issues with my heating and hot water and H4W still withhold evidence and reports. H4W have deliberately delayed the repairs and my cases knowing that the disrepairs in my home are getting worse, including leaks, damp, mould, infestations, blocked drains to name a few. Itโs absolutely clear that H4W are hoping the disrepairs get to the point that theyโre so bad, it will require us to move out which I have personally told them last year during their property MOT inspection that we would not move out during the works due to my health conditions and poor health. Theyโve just continued to mock me and deny us living in a decent home, taking away our peace, taking away our dignity while earning money from me through their rent and service charges. Please could you look into my case because this treatment is totally unfair and unacceptable and journalists have seen my evidence and see how we continue to he discriminated and punished for speaking out and pursuing my complaint and case. Thank you for your time. Kind regards Hulya Presley
Thank you for contacting the Housing Ombudsman Service.
The Housing Ombudsman Service investigates complaints about housing services from tenants and leaseholders of member landlords. Complaints the Ombudsman investigates must:
– be about a landlord that is a member of the Housing Ombudsman Scheme, – relate to housing services, – have exhausted the landlordโs complaints procedure. – not be subject to or have been subject to any legal proceedings – have been brought to us within 12 months of the final response from the landlord
Iโm afraid that we are not able to offer advice, assistance, or advocacy and as I understand it, your concerns are not something that we are able to help with because:
– your case has been subject to any legal proceedings
Your case has been closed, however if I have misunderstood your concerns, or your landlord is a member of our Scheme, please let us know and we will consider what we can do to help.
Yours sincerely
Dispute Resolution Adviser
PO Box 152, Liverpool L33 7WQ 0300 111 3000 www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk To find out how we use your personal data together with your rights under the Data Protection Act 2018 go to www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/your-data/ Try our free online dispute resolution training (click here to access) Changes to the Housing Ombudsman Scheme took effect from 1 October 2022. To find out what this means for residents and landlords visit our website
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2017 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal and destroying my career prospects.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation.
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases.
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions: The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
2. Assumptions: Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders.
3. Differences in Treatment: Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly.
4. Language and Behaviour: Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties.
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence: Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact: The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.
7. Good Outcome: A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
Yours sincerely,
Mervelee Myers
Cc to whom it may concern โ All Rights Reserved
Dear Mrs Myers
Please see attached witness statements of the Claimant.
These include a further witness statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025 and a statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025.
Kindly acknowledge receipt.
Kind regards,
Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor
London Office:Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362Web: www.jisolicitors.co.uk
WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint.Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free.J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
Please find enclosed the following Witness Statements by way of service.
Witness Statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025
Witness Statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025
Please note, you will receive a separate email granting you access to view the video exhibits for each Witness Statement. Please can you download the videos from the shared folder as then you will be able to access them
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert: Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
11 February 2025 Raquel Lovekin Met Police Complaints
Raquel Lovekin acting as Constable,
Professional Standards Department
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise. MM Response: MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW this is Mervelee Myers involved in Kings College London RADAR-CNS after the 12 sessions at the Maudsley NHS with Trainee Counsellor Laura Tinsley. I completed 2 years research and was involved with other projects about Mental Health.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences. MM Response: The evidence about the breaking of the glass to the Communal Door on the 13th December 2021 must be considered. The fact that the Police who was sent as EMERGENCY left claiming I was shouting, and the act was not MALICIOUS because I locked Ms Gilchrist out is key to why Ms Gilchrist continued making MALICIOUS reports resulting in me having to attend Croydon Magistrates 3 times. I also had to attend Walworth Police Station for INTERVIEW when my husband and I got SEPARATED. The Police is still investigating the MATTER.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2015 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal needing Emotional Regulation Treatment and destroying my career prospects. MM Response: I refused LEYF ยฃ58,000.00 NDA.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices. MM Response: As an EYFS Coordinator SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator in my last employment I did training โUNDERSTANDING STATUTORY ASSESSMENTโ in 2009. The fact I was offered the job of SENCO for ยฃ46-55,000.00 by Smart Teachers in 2021 from an old CV from 2015 in proof I continued training despite my ENTITLEMENTS denied.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation. MM Response: District Bell requested the Psychiatric Assessment which I did on the 15th April 2024 after the death of my husband. This is the ASSESSMENT that the court requested. As stated in the conversation between me and Dr Phil Gregory his report is not factual. Why did he want me to meet with him to correct his mistakes to send to the solicitor?
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559). MM Response: I will be relying on my CONTRIBUTIONS to British Values from the time I had the first nervous breakdown at Kings College Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and started FUNDRAISING for CHARITIES to prove that Dr Gregoryโs DIAGNOSIS is a DISTORTATION of me. Dr Gregory visited my home on the 21st November 2024 with the nurse Hawah Oweh unannounced and upon inviting him in, demanding that I stopped my RECORDING. He claimed he was concerned about my WELFARE. I was on the Housing Ombudsman Zoom on the 20th November 2024 because I am a member of the โCustomer Panelโ. I was sent email from H4W for opportunity to be on the โCustomer Panelโ recruitment. I was the โMinute Takerโ for the H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel that was disbanded in 2020. That is how Ms H Presley became aware that H4W was discriminating against me because Hermoine Cameron was ADVOCATING on my behalf online. Ms Cameron visited me at home twice. The same way HCT Group Impact Report 2016 statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with unemployment was used by Barrister Ryan Clement and Winsome Duncan to send Police to SECTION me. That I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. I showed Dr Gregory the BOOK and explained how this was misconstrued and used against me. IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE was signed at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ by Sir Mark Rowley. A month after District Judge Sterlini labelled me a โVIOLENT NUISANCEโ without me knowing about the INJUNCTION proceedings started in the court from 24th July 2023. The month I was sent POSSESSION letter, and I was having CRISIS which were posted online as a โContent Creatorโ. DJ Sterlini is listed with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell for striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan that reached โTelephone Conciliationโ.
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). MM Response: Amended Housing Act 1988 & Eviction Act 1977
The Met Police
We further note videos in which she claims to be barricading herself in her property for fear that Police or other organisations will kill her, or where she claims not to be eating or opening curtains. MM Response: The Met Police failed me from they came to SECTION me from a malicious report made by Winsome Duncan. The Police and Ambulance Service turned up at my home on the 30th October 2017. I have proof of the NEGLIGENCE by the POLICE from then to date. Some of these visits can be put in the same category as members of the BAME COMMUNITY who were MURDERED or HARMED as in the case of Cherry Grouse son who I recorded speaking about his experience as a child.
Threatened with EVICTION
I was threatened with EVICTION by Peju Awoye via telephone on 7/6/2022 because Barclays stole my money on the day I was called by Richard Harty who later kicked me out of UEL. My account was closed whilst I was locked in the bank for over an hour waiting for the Police. I was told by Debbie Thomas who since turned against me that Ms Gilchrist told her H4W wanted me out.
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977. MM Response: Elder Abuse & Mental Health Act
Nevertheless, our client has made multiple referrals to adult safeguarding. MM Response: Did Mimi Owusuโs 12 pages โWitness Statementโ the reasons for the REFERRALS to โADULT SAFEGUARDING?โ If so the EQUALITY ASSESSOR for the case will have address because no offer of help was forthcoming from the time, I write to LEYF Senior HR Dilys Epton on the eve of โMothering Sundayโ 14 March 2015 am DERESSED and DYING SLOWLY of TORTURE. My BOOK is just one of the types of evidence I am expecting to be used. I gave copies to the solicitor, barrister, Joseph and Dr Phil Gregory that they should have used as reference about whether I am making up things.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868). MM Response: Carer October 2015 to April 2024
Why were there no support during the 10 years I was struggling with denied ENTITLEMENTS and caring for my HUSBAND. Were there concerns and if they were why did no one help?
Bereavements & Losses
Is the court aware of the impacts of bereavements and losses on me and how the POSSESSION letter triggered my PTSD?
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms: MM Response: Entrapment
Please can you urgently confirm her treatment plan and whether she intends to engage with the same. MM Response: The INJUNCTION is an ENTRAPMENT and to prove this I will mention some facts that can be found in the PUBLIC DOMAIN: 1. Started fundraising with Cancer Research UK after the death of my brother and I had the first Nervous Breakdownโ. I had an appointment on the 5th December 2024 and was turned away from the Surgery. I was laid up with BACK PAINS and am on my own.
2. Started volunteering with Resources for Autism in 2015 after I was sent on Medical Suspension and got myself a โNIGERIAN Familyโ. The mother was pregnant at the time and the child has his own YouTube channel. I was asked to help with the childโs โCare Planโ by the school because of the noticeable progress when I started visiting the family.
3. Started fundraising with Parkinsonโs UK in 2017 and was in their 2018/2019 BROCHURE.
4. I was asked by Southwark Council to do a video to encourage the BAME Community to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
5. I took out a petition during the ET/EAT for an โInquiry in the Early Years Sector that was rejected.
6. My Neighbour TESS was left to die on her own despite my husband cried and ask me to get help for her. I contacted the authorities several times.
7. I averted a Grenfell Tower at Alma Grove because of GREEDY CONTRACTORS. 8. Barrister Samantha Jones bragged to SRA Michael Carter that Judge Freer gave her REFERENCE to be on the Grenfell Tower Panel Inquiry.
9. I was the face of Windrush 70 published across the world 2018.
10. Attended The Guardian Live โIs Modern Slavery Thriving in the UK and sent it to them 2018.
11. Reference Macmillan Cancer Support interviews
12. ยฃ46-55,000.00 SENCO job offer from Smart Teachers 2021 after I was endorsed on LinkedIn by Professors Chris Pascal and Tony Bertram.
13. My http://myvision.org.uk website created from scratch stolen by Guy Lawfull and Mark Upton 2022.
14. My 18 pages Facebook account DISABLED in 2024 after I updated to be on Des OโConnor WOMEN IN BUSINESS in April 2024.
15. Planning Husband 100th Birthday Party 2023.
16. Planning Auntโs 90th birthday 2023.
17. Husbandโs Funeral 2024
18. Psychiatric Assessment requested by DJ Bell.
19. YouTube Channels with 6:11K and 1:08K subscribers where Dr Phil Gregory has gone to deny my RIGHTS to tell my stories and that of the oppressed.
20. Composer of Brixton Market for Border Crossings SONGSTREET App.
21. Narin Masera sent Police to my home on Stephen Ageraโs advice, came home from Tony Cealyโs training to get husband out of HYPO.
22. Prevented from using my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy to start EIS for my grandson with Language and Speech Delay.
23. End Gender Based Violence
Kind regards,
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment. MM Response: Dear Sirs
We refer to the above matter and further to our email of 18/10/2024 below.
Please see attached medical review of Dr Phil Gregory, Consultant Psychiatrist dated 1/11/2024.
Kind Regards,
MM Response: Dr Phil Gregory can be heard accepting that his MEDICAL REVIEW was not factual. I was not aware that Dr Phil Gregory was involved in the Psychiatric ASSESSMENT for the court. I was assessed on the 15th Aril 2024 and that is the TRUTH about who is MERVELEE MYERS. Further evidence can be collected online from my various engagements working, participating in research or from my BLOGS and other social media platforms.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases. MM Research: From: Sola Obajuluwa [mailto:sola@itsagwede.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2024 at 1:41 PM
To: Lina Amir
Subject: K05EC530 H4W -V- Mervelee Myers
Dear Sirs,
Please see initial assessment report of Joseph Mukuba Community Psychiatric Nurse dated 08/10/2024. Also attached is the letter for an appointment with Dr Phil Gregory Consultant Psychiatrist on 16 October 2024.
We were provided with the same by our client during our appointment with her held yesterday.
Following the appointment with Dr Phil Gregory on Wednesday, he has scheduled a further appointment on 25 October to take place at her home address so that he can factor in her living circumstances and day to day experiences.
While we rely on the initial assessment report we would also seek to rely on any further report prepared by Dr Gregory.
Even on the basis of the initial assessment report we say that it is more likely than not that our client suffers from a disability, consequently we invite you to agree that an Equality Act assessor is required.
We should be grateful for your urgent response as to whether or not you agree so if need be we will apply to Court for an Equality Act assessor to be appointed. MM Response: Based on the continuing DEFAMATION about MERVELEE MYERS during the BEREAVEMENT and LOSS of my husband that has profound impact on my MENTAL and PHYSICAL HEALTH I am requesting that An EQUALITY ACT ASSESSOR is required. This is because Dr Phil Gregoryโs report is not FACTUAL, and he has furthered continued to breach my RIGHTS by calling me to meet with him to fix the errors in the report. He has admitted to knowingly omitting facts and not aware of how to transmit the REPORT to me except by post. Since he only knew it could be sent by posts why is it signed ELECTIONALICAL? Dr Gregory also abused his AUTHORITY when talking to my son. Another glaring mistake is the fact Dr Gregory is using CRB instead of DBS.
London Office:Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362
Festive Season Hours: We will be closed during the festive season from Monday 25 December to Friday 29 December 2023 and will re-open at 9:30am Tuesday 2 January 2024. Wishing you a Happy Christmas and Happy New Year 2024.WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account. Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity. MM Response: Copyright of
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate e
6 December 2024 K05EC530 Assessor
Dear Sirs,
Further to your email below are you able to confirm your clientโs treatment plan further to the diagnosis of a non-organic psychosis? MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW this is Mervelee Myers involved in Kings College London RADAR-CNS after the 12 sessions at the Maudsley NHS with Trainee Counsellor Laura Tinsley. I completed 2 years research and was involved with other projects about Mental Health.
We note a video posted online in which your client appears to be advising her psychiatrist, Dr Phil Gregory, that his diagnosis is โnot herโ and it is her โneighbourโ that needs help, so that she not does not murder MM or โdamageโ her. MM Response: The evidence about the breaking of the glass to the Communal Door on the 13th December 2021 must be considered. The fact that the Police who was sent as EMERGENCY left claiming I was shouting, and the act was not MALICIOUS because I locked Mss Gilchrist out is key to why Ms Gilchrist continued making MALICIOUS reports resulting in me having to attend Croydon Magistrates 3 times. I also had to attend Walworth Police Station for INTERVIEW when my husband and I got SEPARATED. The Police is still investigating the MATTER. I was locked out on the 23 October 2024 and only got entry because Paul Morgan was with me. As an EYFS Coordinator SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator in my last employment I did training โUNDERSTANDING STATUTORY ASSESSMENTโ in 2009. The fact I was offered the job of SENCO for ยฃ46-55,000.00 by Smart Teachers in 2021 from an old CV from 2015 in proof I continued training despite my ENTITLEMENTS denied. District Bell requested the Psychiatric Assessment which I did on the 15th April 2024 after the death of my husband. This is the ASSESSMENT that the court requested. As stated in the conversation between me and Dr Phil Gregory his report is not factual. Why did he want me to meet with him to correct his mistakes to send to the solicitor? I will be relying on my CONTRIBUTIONS to British Values from the time I had the first nervous breakdown at Kings College London and started FUNDRAISING for CHARITIES to prove that Dr Gregoryโs DIAGNOSIS is a DISTORTATION of me. Dr Gregory visited my home on the 21st November 2024 with the nurse unannounced and upon inviting him in, demanding that I stopped my RECORDING. He claimed he was concerned about my WELFARE. I was on the Housing Ombudsman Zoom on the 20th November 2024 because I am a member of the โCustomer Panelโ. I was sent email from H4W for opportunity to be on the โCustomer Panelโ recruitment. I was the โMinute Takerโ for the H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel that was disbanded in 2020. That is how Ms H Presley became aware that H4W was discriminating against me because Hermoine Cameron was ADVOCATING on my behalf online. Ms Cameron visited me at home twice. The same way HCT Group Impact Report 2016 statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with unemployment was used by Barrister Ryan Clement and Winsome Duncan to send Police to SECTION me. That I wrote on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. I showed Dr Gregory the BOOK and explained how this was misconstrued and used against me. IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE was signed at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ by Sir Mark Rowley. A month after District Judge Sterlini labelled me a โVIOLENT NUISANCEโ without me knowing about the INJUNCTION proceedings started in the court from 24th July 2023. The month I was sent POSSESSION letter, and I was having CRISIS which were posted online as a โContent Creatorโ. DJ Sterlini is listed with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell for striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan that reached โTelephone Conciliationโ.
She says she will not be taking any medication and considers it an โentrapmentโ to make her โunable to functionโ and that she will edit his report. MM Response: Based on Dr Maria Hudson research paper โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationโ for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS that I was a participant in. The RADAR-CNS MM Response: https://youtu.be/pgI02uOLUAY?si=-axM3XY664jqIXWW at Kings College London. Diabetes HEAL-D research. My Report to The Guardian Is Modern Slavery Thriving in the UK. Endorsed by Professors Chris Pascal and Tony Bertram on LinkedIn after meeting them at Middlesex University. LEYF Big Childcare Conversation when I told them I intend to get my SEND Teacher qualification before returning to Jamaica. I was kicked out of the UEL after Richard Harty called my mobile on the 27th September 2021. We must therefore, link the โSystemic Discriminationโ because when I conducted the โA Voice of a Childโ research project for LEYF CEO June OโSullivan in August 2010 after I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper I had no knowledge who was responsible for them.
Please see the following link to the video: MM Response: EQUALITY ACT 2010 Protected Characteristics.
If you listen carefully, you will understand that I was called by Dr Phil Gregory because I did not attend the appointment, I requested to discuss the information for the recommended MEDICATION. I was unable to attend because I had to call the AMBULANCE out again and was taken to A&E. I am telling Dr Gregory that the neighbours continuing to TRIGGER me with their UNREASONABLE BEHAVIOURS which is the NORM especially when they realised am not well. Dr Gregory always calling on PRIVATE number and because I am getting CYBERBULLYING online and via my home phone and mobile, I do not always answer PRIVATE/WITHHELD calls. If you listen carefully, you will hear me correcting Dr Gregory about some minor mistakes that I would not be expecting from people I MENTORED in my job. Dr Gregory breached the Protected Characteristics. He didnโt just leave it there he got YouTube involved. YouTube is all I have left to share my stories.
The Mental Health Act 2010/2015
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions: The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. MM Response: Copyright of
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
NHS RESPONSIBILITY
The NHS seems to have forgotten their responsibility to me. Maybe NHS need to go back to 2003-2008. And reference the treatment of my husband ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON on BYRON ward.
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well. Look forward to speaking on Wednesday.
I’ve attached information sheets and consent forms for both my project and my colleague Ayana’s, who I mentioned will join us. It’s a standard part of the University’s ethics process, to show that people speak to us with informed consent.
Ayana’s main focus is on the role of retrofit in addressing damp and mould for homeowners. But her work, like mine, is also interested in the experiences of tenants and the challenges they face in getting damp and mould problems fixed. Her information sheet indicates a Yorkshire focus, but the work is also looking across England as well.
Have a read and if you could sign or type your name on the attached consent forms to show your are happy to participate, that would be great. If the consent forms don’t open for you, I’ve also copied them below. (Some people who are Mac users, or are using their phone, have had issues).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Pratichi
2. Assumptions: Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders. MM Response: PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Housing Quality in England: Damp Mould and Cold Housing
Thank you for your interest in this research project. Before agreeing to participate, please read the Information Sheet. If you have any questions, please ask a researcher.
โ I have read the information sheet and understand the purpose of the research
โ I understand that my participation is voluntary. If I decide to no longer take part in this research, I can withdraw from the study up to two weeks from the date of the interview or evidence submission by contacting Phil Brown at p.a.brown@hud.ac.uk.
โ I understand that my personal information will be processed only for the purposes of this research. I understand that such information will be treated as confidential, except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel, and handled in accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and UK Data Protection Act 2018.
โ I understand that the information I share, including anonymised direct quotes, may be included in any resulting reports, presentations and academic publication.
โ I understand that any identifying information will be kept confidential (except where legal obligations require information to be shared with relevant personnel), and access limited strictly to staff at the Healthy Housing Initiative, University of Huddersfield, and researchers they collaborate with.
โ I understand that the data collected from the interviews will be audio or video recorded and transcribed using Microsoft Teams or another appropriate software or professional transcription service.
โ I understand that the transcriptions will be retained for ten years and destroyed after this time.
โ I have read and understood the institutionโs Data Protection Policy and consent to the researchers processing my personal data accordingly.
PRINT NAME: ________________________________
SIGNATURE: _________________________________
DATE: _______________________________________
Ayana Consent Form
ARTS AND HUMANITIES
UNIVERSITY OF HUDDERSFIELD
PARTICIPANT CONSENT FORM
Title of the research: Involving Homeowners in Developing Climate-Adaptive and Good-quality Residential Housing Retrofitting in Yorkshire, England
Name of researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Participant Identifier Number: NA
I confirm that I have read and understood the participant Information sheet related to this research and have had the opportunity to ask questions.
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I can withdraw at any time without giving any reason.
I understand that all my responses will be anonymised.
I authorise the research team members to access my anonymised responses.
I permit the research team to audio record the interview.
I agree to take part in the above study.
Name of Participant:
Signature of Participant: Date:
Name of Researcher: Ayana Ifeorah
Signature of Researcher: Date:
3. Differences in Treatment: Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly. MM Response: From: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 1:54 AM To: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk>; Philip Brown <P.A.Brown@hud.ac.uk>; ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject: Research
My name is Mervelee Myers living in Social Housing since December 2000 and would like to be a participant in the research.
I have experiences participating in research before and would like to gain more experiences to finalise my own research projects.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
University of Huddersfield inspiring global professionals.
4. Language and Behaviour: Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties. MM Response: From: Pratichi Chatterjee <P.Chatterjee@hud.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 6:25 PM To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Cc: Ayana Ifeorah (Researcher) <Ayana.Ifeorah@hud.ac.uk> Subject: Re: Research
Dear Mervelee,
Thanks so much for reaching out. We really appreciate it.
In our research we’re doing interviews with residents and others who have experience of living with and/or responding to damp and mould problems. We’re asking people about its impacts and about what has and hasn’t worked in addressing these problems as well as what they feel needs to change so such issues are dealt with better.
Its usually myself and my colleague Ayana, cc’d in, who carry out the interviews. Ayana is doing a PhD in architecture, on a related but separate project on damp and mould.
The interviews we do are semi-structured, usually online via Teams and they last 45 minutes to 1 hour depending on how much people want to say. They are semi-structured and quite informal. As its a university led project we do give everyone an information sheet about the project and a consent form.
How does that sound to you? I’m not sure if it helps with the experience you want to build. But if you have any questions about research let me know, and I’ll see if I can answer them.
If you are still keen to speak wit us, I can send you some dates/times or let me know if you have any preferences.
Let me know if you have any questions. Look forward to hearing back.
Best,
Pratichi
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence: Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact: The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct. MM Response: NHS RESPONSIBILITY
The NHS seems to have forgotten their responsibility to me. Maybe NHS need to go back to 2003-2008. And reference the treatment of my husband ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON on BYRON ward.
Hi Mervelee,
Hope you are well. Look forward to speaking on Wednesday.
I’ve attached information sheets and consent forms for both my project and my colleague Ayana’s, who I mentioned will join us. It’s a standard part of the University’s ethics process, to show that people speak to us with informed consent.
Ayana’s main focus is on the role of retrofit in addressing damp and mould for homeowners. But her work, like mine, is also interested in the experiences of tenants and the challenges they face in getting damp and mould problems fixed. Her information sheet indicates a Yorkshire focus, but the work is also looking across England as well.
Have a read and if you could sign or type your name on the attached consent forms to show your are happy to participate, that would be great. If the consent forms don’t open for you, I’ve also copied them below. (Some people who are Mac users, or are using their phone, have had issues).
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best,
Pratichi
7. Good Outcome: A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
1. In the County Court at Mayors & City of London Court Devonshires Solicitors LLP Claim Number: 570MC618 Michael Petrick and Narin Masera 566MC567.
2. In the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Nexus Health Group Dr Joanna Pennack 570MC548 and Leigh Kavanah 570MC475. Did DJ Swan appear at the 2 Courts on the 15 January 2025 to conduct the STRIKE OUT of the CLAIMS? This is the same DJ Swan whose name is on Court Order for the 26 July 2023 that I had no knowledge of.
3. I was not informed about any COURT ORDER Proceedings by DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan and DJ Sterlini until after I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE on the 1st August 2023.
4. HM Courts & Tribunals Service, The County Court at Mayors & City Of London Court, The Guildhall Building, Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5AR. Case Number: 570MC482 Mervelee Myers v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Date: 13 December 2024.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would
RDJ Swan is not FIT enough to make the DECISION about whether my CLAIMS have MERIT.
1. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 570MC618: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
2. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 566MC567: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
3. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC548: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
4. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC475: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
5. MYERS V KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 570MC482: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
CAD January 2025
1. Date: 22 January 2025 NHS Ambulance Service CAD 1804 was sent by the Metropolitan Police re a MALICIOUS REPORT. The pattern of the MR goes back to 30 October 2017 when the Met Police and NHS Ambulance came to SECTION me from Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement MR. Georgina and Dr Ocansey 02032282240 unannounced visit to my home. I am awaiting an invitation to meeting and letter to clarify what STATE I was in when they visited. https://www.youtube.com/live/oLbPBnx9e7o?si=tWRW97jxZgty3grP.
2. Date: 20 January 2025 the NHS Ambulance Service was let into 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist.
3. 7026/20Jany25 – NHS Ambulance outside trying to break down the door – Refer to note left under door.
4. CAD 4455/20Jany25 – Police came to my home and left because I am recording
5. CAD 4349/20Jany25 – The Operator could hear Ms Gilchrist outside my window and outside my door
6. CAD 469/18Jany25 – PC Frisby 3348AS was searching my home without my consent. PC West 15880AS acted like a BULLY. I was reported to the NHS Ambulance Service and was called by a female who THREATENED to send the Ambulance to get me.
22. 2712/8JAN24 3452AS & 3435AS CAD 43251/19JAN24 PC LEE 2531AS PC PUTMAN 11J8AS. CRN 746951/10JAN24 CAD 2712/08JAN24 CHS 32186/07JAN24 CAD 2953/07JAN24 CAD 2087/06JAN 2024 PC 343AS PC 1862AS PC 2599AS PC 3030AS
38. Date: 25/12/2023 PC James Murphy P263398 โ Left letter โ Came home to find husband going into HYPO.
39. Date: Crime Reference Number: 3034363/23 โ Robbed in Peckham lost ID.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025.
1. The Catalogue of ABUSE in the reviews are there from I was sent 3 of them by Winsome Duncan who later sent the Police to SECTION me. I applied for Additional Witness Statement during the Adjournment but again this was rejected. Same as https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards in 2017.
Charge authorised by: Name HAWKINS. Officer PC. Collar number P236802.
2. MM Arguments: Refer to IOPC Claim: Number: F21YM135 Andrew Truby Lawyer FOR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Independent Office for Police Conduct Date: 24 October 2019. Claim Number: F45YM082 Date: 29 November 2019. This why the Police came to my house to MURDER me on 30/11/2020. DEAD MAN or MERVELEE MYERS TELLS NO TALE.
3. Mervelee Myers Subject: A caseworker has been assigned to your case CRM: 0055203
You are receiving this email as notification that a caseworker from JCIO has been assigned to your case.
Your caseworkerโs name is Vincent Umeukeje and they will be in contact with you in due course.
Your case reference is โ 33448/20
4. That is why I can get the following:
General Form of Judgment or Order In the County Court at Central London Claim Number: F03CL973 Date: 24 February 2021.
Before His Honour Judge Dight CBE sitting at the County Court at Central London, Central London, R.C.J, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
5. Nursery World Show 2018
I was targeted by a Young White Girl who assaulted me and tried to grab my mobile phone. When I moved away from her, she ran off saying she was going to call Security. This means this was premeditated.
Next day I was targeted because I was attended her Seminar to find out which of my Intellectual Property she was using. What I see happening when she turned up late triggered my PTSD. Throughout the Seminar there was a Security pacing up on down the doorway. I did not return to the NWS since.
Charge Authorised by:
Name: HAWKINS Officer Rank: PC Collar Number: P236802
, Basinghall Street, London EC2V 5AR. Case Number: 570MC482 Mervelee Myers v Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Date: 13 December 2024.
16. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025.
4. MOPAC Reference: PC/7911/20 proves that I am a VICTIM of the Metropolitan Police that are party to breaching my RIGHTS under the Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 and the complaint was not HANDLED proportionately and must be INVESTIGATED.
17. Reference: 2018/11351 IOPC John Howarth.
18. Holly Sweeney led her MURDERERS to murder me under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture to say I committed SUICIDE. (D) White Dr Phil Gregory turned up unannounced with Black CMN on 21/11/2024 and Black Dr Peter Ocansey and White Georgina turned up on the 22/1/2025. (E) London Ambulance Service tried breaking down my door 20/1/2025 after they were given access to Alma Grove by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper
19. Ms Gilchrist locked me out on the 23/10/2024.
20. Let me share information that will make the world pay attention to the GESTAPO that is the Metropolitan Police: 1. LAS 22/1/25 CAD 1804 turned up after Dr Peter Ocansey & Georgina left. 2. 20/1/25 Record ID 812825221651 left a note under the door after trying to force entry. How many HOURS did they spent whilst people were in need of the AMBULANCE? 3. 469/18Jan25 after leaving my home they filled a REPORT that caused the London Ambulance Service to call ant THREATENED me. 4. Had to call 30 Jany 2025. Who is AS2547 Potter? 5. 2358/03Jany25 are 2924AS and 2499AS captured LIVE YouTube that proves the Met Police is the most RACIST TOKENISTIC MISOGYNISTIC GASLIGHTERS of DISABLED NHS PENSIONER who has been denied MEDICAL AID. 5. CAD 4638/11DEC24 Mike re INTERVIEW. Who is PC CLARKE 2893AS?
27. ADULT SAFETY CONCERNS records MERLIN: 24PAC005902 – Officers worried about my Mental Health. 24PAC047671 – On 27th February 2024, Officers worried about Mental Health after Police Scotland called about video of elderly lady tied up in bedroom. Who was the lady? Where was the video taken? Where was my HUSBAND?
21. The CAD states Treatment Provided: Assessment Advice Referral to CMHT). If I feel at risk to self, to others or from others call 999 for Police. Now please check how many CALLS I have made about THREATS from OTHERS. For this COMPLAINT alone, there are: 6 CADS (Call to Police) 5481/26Feb24- ASB 6297/27Feb24 – 2825/27Feb24 – 6569/27Feb24 – 1272/27Feb24 – 4990/1Marc24 – ASB that were not attended to. But the Met Police sent 6 Officers to my home about a video on the date I was HOME ALONE sorting out for my HUSBAND to come home to DIE. What did the 6 TERRORISTS PCs expect to find when I was asked if I know ARNOLD TOMLINSON?
22. Assaulted by Trevor Anthony Tomlinson on 9th March 2024 caused HUSBAND to be readmitted to HOSPITAL
23. April 2024 โ (A) 29/04 PC CLARKE with 2 Colleagues recorded at Alma Grove. Letter was left.
Your form has been processed successfully and passed to the relevant police force or organisation. Please note, the IOPC do not have any involvement at this stage and are not able to provide updates. If you have not heard from the police force or organisation in a timely manner, usually within three weeks, we would advise you to contact them directly using the details in the acknowledgement email you will receive from us shortly (please check your junk email for this).
ยฉ IOPC 2023. This is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated.
Reference:ย
1. Claim Number 570MC618
2. Claim Number: K05EC530
3. Claim Number: K02CL827.
MM
10 February 2025 Civil Restraint Order
Name of Court: Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court
Claim Number: 570MC618
Name of Claimant: MRS MERVELEE MYERS
Name of Defendant: DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP
Date of Issue: 31 JANUARY 2025
MRS MERVELEE MYERS
16 Alma Grove, Bermondsey, London SE1 5PY.
If you do not comply with this ORDER, you may be held in CONTEMPT of COURT and IMPRISONED or FIND your ASSETS maybe SIZED. MM Response: Since this ORDER is unlawful, I will provide EVIDENCE proving that Devonshires Solicitors LLP will be charged with Housing for Women, the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch for K05EC530 and K02CL827. If HHJ Richard Roberts continue the DEFAMATION, he will be made FAMOUS across my social media.
SECTION 1
Date of Order: 31 JANUARY 2025
Name of Judge: HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS, DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR EAST LONDON
Name of Person for whom ORDER is MADE: MERVELEE MYERS
The judge has considered an application by โฆ
OR
The Court has considered, of its own initiative X. MM Response: As a result of the COURT continuing with the miscarriages of justice from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust to www.leyf.org.uk to Small Claims Court to Housing for Women, the Banks and Building Societies and Mimi Owusu who wrote a 12 page Witness Statement for Housing for Women after SCAMMING me ยฃ10,000.00. I have no other alternatives than to lift the lid on LEYF June OโSullivan Drag Queen Storytellers and UEL Richard Harty MIC and Housing for Women party to Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and the Alma Grove HATE MOB. I had no knowledge of Devonshires Solicitors LLP until I was sent a POSSESSION LETTER via POST and I called the number to get information. It might be RELEVANT to know that I was taken to Court for an ECRO before. Reference https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 for more.
And has found that, the above-named person persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate. MM Response: I can end the careers of the CRIMINALS needing Emotional Regulation Treatment and VIOLENT NUISANCES. Details of the previous orders recording that claims and/or applications were totally without merit are set out below. MM Response: DJ Swan is not FIT enough to make the DECISION about whether my CLAIMS have MMERIT.
1. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 570MC618: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
2. MYERS V DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP 566MC567: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
3. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC548: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
4. MYERS V NEXUS HEALTH GROUP 570MC475: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
5. MYERS V KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 570MC482: Order of DJ Swan, drawn on 15 January 2025, which struck the claim out and certified it as totally without merit.
SECTION 2
The Order
It is ordered that you be restrained from issuing any claim or making any application in any court specified below without first obtaining permission of
Name of Judge: HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS, DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR EAST LONDON. MM Response: Can this named Judge do a check of the other claims I issued including the 7 that DJ Bell sent from County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch to Central London County Court for Civil District Judge. They included the judgement for Barrister Ryan Clement to pay back my HUSBAND ยฃ9,000.00. I am still waiting to be paid. DJ Sterlini was involved with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell striking out my claim with Winsome Duncan after it reached โTelephone Mediationโ. I applied to go on Judge Rynder, but she refused, and I was advised to use the Small Claims Court.
OR
If unavailable HHJ MARQUAND DESIGNATED CIVIL JUDGE FOR WEST LONDON. MM Response: I know HHJ Shanks the SHOUTING JUDGE, HHJ Dight with the MISCONDUCT on my birthday, he was advised by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, who I wrote to regarding the Charter of Rights 12 Codes.
X Any County Court.
This Order will remain in effect until 23:59 ON 30 JANUARY 2028. MM Response: There is no ORDER.
1. If you wish to apply for permission-
(a) to make an application in these proceedings; OR
(b) to make an application to amend or discharge this order,
You must first serve notice of your application on the other party. The notice must set out the nature and grounds of the application and provide the other party with at least 7 days within which to respond. You must then apply for permission of the judge identified in the order. The application for permission must be made in writing and include the other partyโs written response, if any, to the notice served. The application will be determined without a hearing. MM Response: Please get a copy of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the launch of โA New Met for Londonโ. A month after DJ Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE.
2. If you repeatedly make applications for permission under 1 above which are totally without merit, the court may direct that if you make any further application for permission which is totally without merit, the decision to dismiss the application will be final and there will be no right to appeal, unless the judge who refused permission grants permission to appeal. MM Response: Please subscribe to my social media.
3. Any application for permission to appeal a refusal of an application under 1 above must be made in writing and will be determined without a hearing. MM Response: My RESEARCH will be published, and I will forward the link.
SECTION 3
COSTS
X There is no order for costs. MM Response: I will be sending in COST from the time I was contacted by Devonshires Solicitors LLP in July 2023.
Note
If you attempt to make a further application in these proceedings without first obtaining permission of the judge named in the order above, your application will automatically be dismissed without the judge having to make any further order and without the need for the other party to respond to it.
If this order was made in your absence, you may make an application to set aside, vary or stay the order. An application must be made within the period specified, not more than 7 days after service of this order on you. You do not require permission of the court to make such an application.
If you do not understand anything in this order you should go to a Solicitor, Legal Advice Centre or a Citizensโ Advice Bureau. MM Response: I represented myself at 2 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS and the Small Claims Court. The current SOLICITORS and BARRISTER are CORRUPT.
Copyright Mervelee Myers
Mental Health & SEND Advocate.
Mervelee Myers Assault by Metropolitan Police Report 1 December 2020
Address: 16 Alma Grove, Bermondsey, London, SE1 5PY
Officer In Case
Surname: SWEENEY Rank: PC No. P255654
Station: AS โ Central South Command Unit
Alleged Offence(s) Criminal damage to property valued under ยฃ5000
Custody Officer
Surname: AZU Rank PS No. P209177
Time: 21:42 Date: 20/11/2020
Matters Leading up to Police Visit to my Home
Sunday at 17.44 there was a call 020-8780-4180 from a female sounding voice who asked if this is Mervelee. The gist of the conversation was I was to attend Walworth Police Station for an interview on 1 December 2020 at 10.00 AM about Criminal activities. I told the person I have an appointment for my Flu Jab so I would prefer to have an alternative date. I also said I prefer not to attend at Walworth Police Station and would be grateful to be interviewed at home or another convenient location. The person shouted if you do not come for the interview you will be arrested because you are a CRIMINAL and hung up. I set about recording videos as this is my Defensive Practice for the past 6 years. I contacted my family abroad and stepson in the UK to let them know what happened.
Monday, I called the number 020-8780-4180 on my House phone and recorded on my mobile. There was no response, so I said as per usual this was LEYF winding me up as they have been doing since I got back from burying my mother. And denying me my entitlement.
At about minutes after 2:00 I heard my buzzer, am sat near the window, looked outside, and see the Police van parked up out there. I went put my front door on the latch and opened the communal door. I came back and sat continuing my work at the computer. I heard one of the Officers asking where is the door and I invited them in and she mentioned it is a funny sort of door. I was not expecting them, 3 Officers, a male and 2 females came in and I thought they came to interview me as I had asked. The female Officer said I was going to be taken to Walworth Road and I should get dressed and pack a bag. I responded I was told to be there on 1/12/2020 for an interview. I need to phone someone to let them know the latest development. She said I am not allowed to use my phone or any electronics I must put my phone away. I did and got up saying I need to go talk to my husband in the kitchen. That is when the 3 Officers assaulted me and handcuffed me and taken me through the door to the van. I was only dressed in my top and shorts. I had taken off my jeans because my husband needs the heating so at times, I take off some layers to balance and meet both our needs.
The Handcuffs
I was bundled into the back of the van and the male Officers was sat observing me, told him the handcuffs were hurting my hands. The van was parked, and I was sat in the back and by this time I started shivering causing the handcuffs to become more painful. I called the attention of the male Officer and told him I was shivering and the last time I had to call out the Ambulance on 3/9/2020. Because I was unable to stop the shakes. I explained about my disabilities and that I have Parkinsonโs disease in my DNA, but not a Medical Diagnosis. Without Prejudice he began to treat me the same way HHJ Parfitt did on 2/9/2020 at Central London County Court and that triggered my traumas. I began to swear which bring lots of Officers standing behind the van. The Officer offered to loosen the handcuff and asked me to turn around. The next thing he asked me to bend over. I would not have minded if it were the Officers who accompanied were there. But there were a few gathered, and I was wearing nothing more than a short. In the end he said he was unable to unlock the handcuff. I had the handcuff on, until I was stood before Sargant Patel and he commented about the bruises on my hands.
Updates: I was explaining to the Officers about the handcuff saga on my way back from Brixton Police Station and she was trying to bring in training into it. I counteracted her argument when she claimed that being on the same level was why I was asked to bend over. I told her I was stood in the van. I am of the assumption asking me to bend over is a form of ridicule. There is a SONG that can take on derogatory connotes and discriminatory at the same time. I am feeling vulnerable and the least thing can trigger my traumas. Getting trolled on Social Media and Facebook can affect me.
PC SWEENEY
PC Sweeney was the one who decided to refuse me from using my phone and 3 of them wrestled and inflicted the bruises and handcuffed me. She was abusive calling me a CRIMINAL. Whilst she was stood outside the van watching she keep making faces at me. I know she was trying to smile, but this was rather unnerving, and I felt I was being ridiculed. By this time, I was shivering, my body shaking and the handcuffs banging, causing frictions on my hands. She did not notice later as an afterthought she asked if I have any COVID-19 systems. I asked her if she had only just considered and if she asked me about any disabilities I have.
At one stage I ask PC Sweeney if she do not mind, how old she was. She said 24 and I told her I could be her grandmother.
Later on PC Sweeney was trying to be nice to me, but the harm she done can not be rectified.
Requesting the Toilet
I am diabetic and stressful situations can trigger my PTSD and I get stress incontinence. I asked for the loo and was becoming anxious after PC Sweeney came back with the answer. I was becoming concerned that I would leak on myself as this happened to me before.
Inside the Station
When I was eventually led inside, I am in handcuff yet PC Sweeney have to hold unto me and I was become concerned she did accuse me of any attempts on her person because of my ANXIETY and SHAKES. As we were approaching the PC who upset me and caused me to swear come back to provoke me asking if I had โCalmed Downโ. So, I swear again and this I included the other 2 Female PC who began treating me like a CRIMINAL again. Saying they trying to help me. Their tokenism just brings back 6 years of injustice and why I am in this situation. I told them blatantly I would PISS where I was if I could not hold it.
Whilst I was standing waiting and asked by PC Sweeney how am feeling, I told her I feel like punching her, but I blog and will let the Officers who came to my house and treat me like a criminal star in their own show.
The Appropriate Person
She was incredibly supportive throughout and waited late until I got a lift to come home.
The Solicitor
He was told I was offered to come in for interview and refused. He obviously believed them and what can I do? Despite having my records out in PUBLIC I am once again not CREDIBLE WITNESS. However, I am thankful for his support.
The Second Arrest
The 2 Female Officers started out acting heavy handed until I let them know I am aware of my rights. I told them that their colleagues who visited my home yesterday was in breach because I was asked to attend the interview on the 1/12/2020 at 10:00 AM. How come they turned up on the 30/11/2020?
If they had acted professionally, they could have completed the investigation. Instead of putting me through the traumas.
My Concerns
I am in my own home and cannot use the toilet without the Officer, keeping the door open with her boots. In case she does not know some people cannot use the toilet in the presence of others. I suffer stress incontinence, and this do not help. Even my husband was questioning her actions. I left my husband with tears in his eyes. But at least the Officers behaviours were acceptable, compared to how I was treated by the others. This is the yardstick I want anyone to use when judging how I could be treated like this after my contributions of 28 years in the UK.
Brixton Police Station
All I can say is look at the way I was treated at Brixton and the 2 Officers who dealt with the case and that at Walworth Road and you know why BAME People are crying DISCRIMINATION by the POLICE.
Conclusion
It seems I am expected to be the STATISTCS about BLACK People on the basis of www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers โThe Experience of Discrimination on Multiple Groundsโ.
Please see attached outcome for your police complaint,
Kindest Regards
Raquel Lovekin
Police Constable
Op Embassy
Directorate of Professional Standards
Metropolitan Police Service
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Mrs Mervelee Myers 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY Dear Mrs Myers, How we have considered your complaint AS Professional Standards Unit Peckham Police Station, 177 Peckham High Street, London SE15 5SL Email: Feedback@met.police.uk Your reference: PC/02268/24 Our Reference: PC/02268/24 Date: 07/02/2025 I am writing in relation to the complaint you made on 03/03/2024 in relation to discrimination by officers. MM Response: Why did the TERRORIST RACIST MET POLICE wait until nearly a year to cntact me? The report attached with this letter outlines the actions I have taken to deal with your concerns and explains how I have considered each aspect of your complaint. I hope the report attached addresses your concerns but if you remain unsatisfied you may apply to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) for a review; full details of how to request a review and the timescales involved are contained within the report. MM Response: I will certainly be contacting the MURDERERS at the IOPC for a REVIEW and everything will be PUBLIC from Ratna Khanam was the Case Manager for my other COMPLAINTS sent to the IOPC. Further information about the handling of police complaints can be found in the guidance document attached – โOur Guide To Your Complaintโ. We are committed to developing a learning culture and your complaint has been fully documented and catalogued with the Directorate of Professional Standards as part of the Metropolitan Policeโs organisational learning. A survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another personโs behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers. We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. MM Response: The world will be informed that the Metropolitan Policce is the GESTAO that TERRORISE VULNERABLE BLACK WOMEN in our homes by trying to MURDER me to cover for the A-Z of CRIMINALS needing Emotional Regulation Treatment. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. MM Response: When am finished the IGNORANT in the Met Police will be filtered out. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete. MM Response: Are you sure? I will be using this for a BOOK about Sir Mark Rowley and his THUGS some are PAEDOPHILES, RAPISTS RACISTS MUREDERERS.
1 Official Survey link: https://www.londonvoice.org.uk/cru In addition to learning from individual cases, we use complaint information from our police complaints system to monitor performance and to identify opportunities for learning and improvement. Thank you again for taking the time to raise your concerns with us. MM Response: I hope you are ready for MERVELEE MYERS. Yours sincerely, Raquel Lovekin Police Constable Directorate of Professional Standards For more information on the Metropolitan Police Service visit our website at http://www.met.police.uk GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used to provide an outcome to that complaint.
Any right to Review will mean that the MPS will provide that data to the Relevant Review Body for the purpose of conducting that review.
2 Official Directorate of Professional Standards Directorate of Professional Standards Complaint Report Protective Marking Official No Disclosure under FOIA 2000 Complaint Reference Person dealing with complaint PC/02268/24 Raquel Lovekin Organisation / Department / Strand Appropriate Authority Directorate of Professional Standards A/Insp Steven Parker How we have recorded and dealt with your complaint Recorded under Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 – Handled proportionately otherwise than by investigation Date Created 04/02/2025 Summary of Incident On the 03/03/2024 you logged a complaint regarding your encounter with the police. On your original submission you have explained this is the Decriminalization of Mervelee Myers that you will describe as Colonisation in Reverse based on the nature of the discrimination and the time frame in which the discrimination occurred. The name PS 2450 AS Tanner, PC 2344AS Hunte, PC 2624AS Martinez, PC 1147AS Maddock and 2 other PCs whose names were not written down visited your home when you heard a knock on your door and there was no ringing of the buzzer. Upon inviting those in you were asked if you know Arnold Tomlinson. That’s when you realised that one of the PCs had a battering ram, because he puts it at the door to come inside. Since the incident was captured on YouTube LIVE. You would like YouTube to be used as evidence. The fact you called the Met Police 3 times about the kicking of your door must be part of your arguments that the actions of the 6 Police who came to your home with a battering ram are part of the systemic discrimination against you from you reporting Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement for verbal threats in October 2017. The Police claim this was none of their concerns but turned up at your home on the 30th of November 2017 to section you for a malicious report, you wrote on Facebook, that you were feeling SUICIDAL based on your participation with “A New Met for London” that can be verified online. You are giving the Met Police the opportunity to redeem themselves by revisiting your complaints to IOPC and MOPAC and how your complaints were dealt with.
Your husband who is TRAUMATISED by the discrimination is dying and it would be good if he can have reassurance from the Met Police that you will be safeguard before he dies. If this matter is not addressed and resolved satisfactorily, you will continue sharing your stories until they are picked up by the international media. Refer to https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site for more. The incidents span 30/10/2017 to March 2024 – January 2025.
3 Official Your concerns The concerns listed below set out the nature of your complaint, which we have yet to agree however I emailed you dated 4/2/2025 and your response did not make any sense, so I have continued with the allegation I think is correct, but on the whole I am unclear: MM Response: You have contradicted yourself with this statement. I was asked to submit EVIDENCE 7 days of the EMAIL and today the 7th you came up with an outcome. The fact that the Police waited almost a year to respond is DISCRIMINATION. โข
Concern 1 – Discrimination against you by 6 officers when they attended your address. Actions taken to address your complaint I have taken the following steps to address your concerns, which I consider to be both reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances, to address the matters described above. Where I have not pursued a particular line of enquiry, this is because I believe this would not be reasonable or proportionate, taking into consideration all of the circumstances. To address all aspects of your complaint I have taken the following actions: โข I have reviewed your initial complaint submission. โข I have emailed you to confirm your complaint, however I have not received a coherent response. MM Response: You will be charged for DEFAMATION and why did the Met Police waited nearly a year to contact me? โข I have emailed you to get further information regarding the discrimination aspect of your complaint but you have not provided me with any further credible information I can use for my complaint handling. MM Response: You are obviously illiterate??? You emailed me and asked for informatipn to be submitted in a time frame. Do you think I have nothing else to do except answer STUPID QUESTIONS you concocted to cover up the HATE CRIMES against me especially since the death of my HUSBAND?
โข I have reviewed police indices to establish why officers attended in March 2024. This includes 6 CADS (Calls to police) by you: 5481/26Feb24 โ ASB Call by you 6297/27Feb24 โ ASB Call by you 2825/27Feb24 โ ASB Call by you 6569/27Feb24 โ Police Scotland saw a video of you streaming threatening officers. MM Response: Are you telling me Police Scotland saw a video of me streaming THREATENING OFFICERS. What kind of OFFICERS are they? Did Police Scotland see any other videos of me and POLICE? If Police Scotland did not see any, ask POLICE SCOTLAND to sign up for FREE TRAINING about how not to DISCRIMINATE against the face of ITV News Windrush 70. E1272/28Feb24 โ ASB Call by you 4990/1Mar24 โ ASB Call by you โ This seems to be the call you are complaining about. MM Response: Sorry STUPID I am not in no mood for your IGNORANCE and GASLIGHTINGโข I have reviewed a crime report whereby you have been named as a suspect for Harassment 01/67016/24 โข MM Response: Go ahead and DEFAME my NAME as each time the Met Police does this the more FAMOUS I will become like IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE that Sir Mark Rowley endorsed at A New Met for London lanch on the 2nd September 2023. I have reviewed adult safety concerns on two records called Merlin: 24PAC005902 โ Officers worried about your mental health 24PAC047671 โ on the 27th Feb 2024, Officers worried about your mental health after Police Scotland called re a video you were streaming on you tube that an elderly female was tied up in the bedroom. MM Response: It seems that the entire Met Police need their HEADS examined. Because the 27th February 2024, I was STRESSED out trying to get the bed for my HUSBAND to return home to DIE. Any SENSIBLE PERSON would have made the difference about an uploaded video and one that I was LIVE STREAMING. They would seen that the ENVRONMENT where the elderly lady is/was, was different from the UK. And where would I get this elderly lady to tie up? Upon police arrival it was noted that you said you were filming them live on you tube and did not know why they were there. โข I have considered the IOPC Discrimination procedures of asking officer for an account, however I do not deem this reasonable and proportionate given the communication I have received from you. MM Response: But you stated I did not send you any information, so where did you get this from. The fact that you sent the REPORT back before the 7 days you asked me to give you information is relevant to the covering up of the GASLIGHTING and MISOGYNY by those with something to hide and AXE to GRIND.
4 Official 5 Official โข I have considered the IOPC Discrimination procedures of conducting comparable data checks, however I do not deem this reasonable and proportionate given that your circumstances are that you are poorly and you need to receive medical care. MM Response: You will be charged for breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics. You will be responsible for the attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me between 30 October 2017 to 22 January 2025 for why I am POORLY according to you. Maybe you are aware why I am not receiving MEDICAL CARE. “No society can legitimately call itself civilise if a SICK person is DENIED Medical AID because of lack of means” Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948. Your circumstances would also prove difficult to compare. MM Response: You are correct because I am sure an IDIOT like you would not know that I am an NHS Pensioner with REFERENCES from parents that will make those DISCRIMINATING against me hold their HEADS in SHAME. โข You name the officers in your complaint, however they do not match any specific date, times and actions taken by those who did attend on certain days. MM Response: Maybe you need to get Police Scotland to go through YouTube to pinpoint the OFFICERS who attend my home and are catured on LIVE. A case in point is the 3rd January 2025. I do not feel it is fair to name these officers when I do not have more specific information from you to be able to identify which ones you alleged to have done something. MM Response: You make me FUCKING ANGRY and you will be exposed as who you are…
A reflection on the service we provided: Concern number 1 Nature of complaint Discrimination against you by 6 officers when they attended your address. Officer(s) Members of Staff Identified Unknown Our consideration (Our Determination) Your complaint has been recorded but I have decided to take no further action. MM Response: Am not bothered because you will be judged by the world and not MERVELEE MYERS.
Rationale After reviewing your complaint submission, your subsequent emails and also conducting a search for any police dealings you have had in the past, I have noted many calls by you for ASB and Nuisance Neighbours, I also note that you are a suspect for harassment against your neighbours and you have a crime report on for an incident involving your step son, whose father, your husband sadly passed away, please accept my sincerest condolences. MM Response: How about you check my engagement with Nigel Pearce at Elim House in August 2023? I have noted that you feel you are being discriminated against, you have not provided me with any information other than GP medical records that you would like everyone to keep due to medical negligence. MM Response: Here is the PROOF that you need to be admitted to an INSTITUTION for treatment. I note that this is born from your mental health issues, however I feel this is due to you feeling like you are not getting the medical help you require. MM Response: The Met Police will pay for your DISCRIMINATION. I do not feel confident in being able to address this matter without any further information from you, for example the responses to my questions. MM Response: How about you cut the CRAP? I also feel it would be unfair of me to address this with the named officers due to this reason. MM Response: I refuse to engage with an ASSHOLE like you. I can confirm that when police have attended to your calls, they have created welfare reports which are transferred to partner agencies in order that the best care can be provided to you. MM Resonse: Thanks for providing me with the information needed to take the PARTNER AGENCIES to the world to know about the WINDRUSH SCANDAL.
It seems your GP is aware you are poorly as per your screen shots of your medical record and you sent me a sickness note, explaining you were not fit for work due to stress. MM Response: There is no doubt you are SICKER than my neighbour Deborah Agnes Gilchrist.
6 Official While I appreciate that you have been poorly with your mental health, this is not a police matter, this is a medical matter and as such, I would urge to you seek help from the relevant medical areas. MM Response: I will recommend that you be treated for DELUSIONS of GRANDEUR. For continuity following on from your complaint handling, I will pass your details to the mental health liaison officer in your area, who will then be aware of your declining mental health. MM Response: Keep it up. I am really sorry that you are going through a tough time. MM Response: Seems as if you get PERVESE PLEASURE like http://www.leyf.org.uk CEO June O’Sullivan the PAEDOPHILE mastermind of Richard Harty MIC who wants to be remembered as a DISRUPTIVE INFLUENCE.
Action Taken Reviewed all readily available material Action Taken Recording Category Explanation Provided Learning No learning identified Your right to a review If you are unhappy with the way your complaint was handled, or with the final outcome, you can apply for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayorโs Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and we have listed the review body for your complaint below. Relevant Review Body Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) Ways to make a review request โข Email – NorthCasework@policeconduct.gov.uk โข Online Form โ Via the IOPCโs website using the following link: http://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/complaints-reviews-and appeals โข By post โ IOPC, PO Box 473, Sale. M33 0BW Review to be received by 08/03/2025. Thank you for raising your concerns We understand that the outcome of your complaint may not be to your satisfaction, but we would like to thank you for taking the time to raise your concerns. Kind regards Raquel Lovekin Police Constable Directorate of Professional Standards GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used
Our Guide To Your Complaint What will this guide tell you? This guide explains the principles of our complaints system, how we handle complaints, and the possible outcomes. What can I complain about? If you think you have been treated unfairly by the police or the standard of service you received was unacceptable you have the right to make a complaint. A complaint can be made about the conduct of any person serving with the police, i.e. a police officer, police staff member, special constable, designated volunteer or a person contracted to provide services to the Met Police. You can also complain about how a police force is run. For example, you can complain about force-wide crime initiatives, the organisation of policing resources and general policing standards. There is no time limit for making a complaint. However, if you complain about something that happened more than 12 months ago, you should explain why you didnโt complain sooner. Who can make a complaint? You can make a complaint if: ยท You were directly affected by the behaviour of our police officers, special constables, members of police staff, volunteers or contractors. ยท Witnessed an incident โ for example, you were present when an incident took place or were close enough to see or hear the incident (you cannot claim to have witnessed an incident if you have seen it on television or social media). ยท Have been adversely affected by the conduct or matter complained about โ this means that the actions of the police have indirectly affected you, for example you have suffered any form of loss, damage, distress or inconvenience as a result of the matter complained about, or you have been put in danger or otherwise put at risk of being adversely affected. 1 You could be acting on behalf of someone in any of the people listed above โ for example, a family member, friend, legal representative or any other person of their choosing. You may be able to make a complaint if you are a parent or guardian. Persons serving with the police force cannot make a complaint about incidents and officers in their own force. This does not mean they are unable to raise concerns, there are other ways to do this such as internal conduct investigations and the staff resolution process. This just means that they will not have the statutory rights of a complainant. What can you expect when you complain? You can expect: ยท Contact from us to get some further details ยท To be asked what you would like to happen ยท To be listened to and treated fairly ยท To be updated about the progress of your complaint ยท To be told the outcome of your complaint when it has been finalised ยท If your complaint has been formally recorded and you are not happy with the outcome, you can request an independent review How will my complaint be handled? By law all complaints against the police must be logged. We make an initial assessment of how your complaint may be dealt with and we will contact you to find out what you would like to happen. Your complaint may be dealt with in one of the following ways: ยท Early contact โ A complaint handler will make contact with you as soon as possible after you raised your concerns. They may be able to provide an explanation or an apology, or other information to assure you that appropriate action is being taken. Their aim is to try and resolve your issues and create an environment for learning where people learn from mistakes made. ยท By investigation – If the complaint is serious enough to warrant disciplinary action then it will be investigated and an investigator will be appointed. ยท In some circumstances, no further action may be taken. 2 We’ll ask you how you’d like to be contacted, keep you informed on the progress, write to you to tell you the outcome and explain your right to an independent review. However we deal with your complaint, it is important to us. Will my complaint be referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)? When we receive your complaint, we consider whether it should be referred to the IOPC. The most serious incidents must be referred to the IOPC โ whether someone has made a complaint or not. For example, if police actions result in a member of the public being seriously injured or dying: ยท while in custody ยท after theyโve had contact with the police ยท as a result of a police shooting ยท in a road accident involving the police We can also refer incidents to the IOPC if we have concerns, for instance about the conduct of our officers or staff. The IOPC can direct us to record incidents and then โcall them inโ. The IOPC may choose to investigate these cases themselves, independently of us. Further information regarding referrals to the IOPC can be found in the IOPCโs Statutory Guidance. How often will I be updated? Keeping you informed is one of our key priorities; our updates should be regular and meaningful. Our first update will be provided promptly, in writing, and, at the latest, within four weeks of the start of the handling of your complaint. Further updates will be provided at least every four weeks. How long will my complaint take to deal with? We aim to deal with complaints in timely a manner, however there is no time limit on how long we will take to deal with your complaint. The person dealing with your complaint should be able to tell you how long it is likely to take. 3 Who will be involved in dealing with my complaint? This depends on how your complaint will be handled. Your point of contact will be either a: ยท Complaint handler โ if your complaint is being dealt with through early contact, or ยท Investigator โ if your complaint is being investigated as there is an indication a criminal offence may have been committed or the behaviour may justify disciplinary proceedings. You may also see the role, โappropriate authorityโ used in your complaint report. This is the person who assesses and makes decisions about your complaint at various stages in the complaint process. What are the possible outcomes? We will send you a report to explain how we have dealt with your complaint. If our service didnโt meet the standards expected, we will inform you of the action we are taking. Possible outcomes could include: ยท An explanation or apology for what has happened ยท Training to further develop our officers and staff ยท Making changes to our policies or procedures ยท Giving advice to the officer or person you have complained about so that their
Possible outcomes could include: ยท An explanation or apology for what has happened ยท Training to further develop our officers and staff ยท Making changes to our policies or procedures ยท Giving advice to the officer or person you have complained about so that their performance improves ยท Referring your case to the Crown Prosecution Service. The CPS is responsible for deciding if criminal charges should be brought. ยท Referring the case for misconduct proceedings. ยท There may not be enough information to take action over your complaint. If this happens it may just mean there is not enough evidence available ยท In some cases, we may agree with you that something went wrong, but decide that no other action is appropriate How do we learn from complaints and dissatisfaction? Learning from complaints helps to improve the way we do things and stop the same thing from happening again. As well as learning from individual cases, we use information from our complaints system to monitor performance and identify potential learning for us as an organisation. 4 What if I am still unhappy? If we were dealing with your concerns through early resolution and you arenโt happy, we will record your complaint and appoint a complaint handler. If you are still unhappy after we have handled your complaint, you can ask for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayorโs Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). The report we send you when we have finished dealing with your complaint tells you the review body for your complaint. You need to apply within 28 days or your application won’t be accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances for the delay. The review will consider whether or not the handling of your complaint was reasonable and proportionate. Did you know? ยท The police complaints process has no means by which to deal with financial claims for compensation against the Met. Money cannot be awarded via the complaints procedure, regardless of the outcome. If you wish to seek compensation for something the police have done, please write to: Directorate of Legal Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 10 Lambs Conduit Street, London WC1N 3NR. Please be sure to include your full name and contact details, your case or report number (if applicable), the name or shoulder number of any Met officer, staff or volunteer involved and your reasons for claiming compensation. ยท The majority of complaints where mistakes are identified are resolved with learning and development after the complainantโs feedback has been taken on board. This is even more important under the new complaint legislation and the introduction of the Reflective Practice Review Process. ยท Legislation in relation to police complaints has changed from 1 February 2020 with the implementation of the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020. This allows for police complaints to be dealt with in a reasonable and proportionate manner and at the appropriate level. This supports both the efficiency and fairness of the complaints system. 5 How can I find out more information? Further information can be found in the following documents: ยท The IOPC Statutory Guidance https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/statutoryguidance /2020_statutory_guidance_english.pdf โข Police Reform Act 2002 โข Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 202
Complaints Resolution Unit Satisfaction Survey
This survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another personโs behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers.
We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete
The information you give us will be used for analysis purposes, and may be published in anonymised form. We will never publish the comments you make or any other information you give us in a way that can be used to identify you.
Before completing the survey please note that:
We are unable to alter the outcome of the investigation into your complaint. We are also unable to respond to any specific comments about the handling of individual complaint cases submitted by respondents in the course of completing this survey.
Completing the survey does not constitute an application for an independent review of the Met Police handling of your complaint.
Privacy note Whenever you press ‘Next’, the answers that you have provided will be submitted and may be included in the results. If at any stage you decide that you do not want your answers to be included in the results, you can press ‘Exit and clear survey’. This will clear all answers you have submitted up to that point.
Questions
* How easy was it to access the complaints system?
Choose one of the following answers
1 – Very easy
2 – Easy
3 – Neither difficult or easy
4 – Difficult
5 – Very difficult
* How satisfied were you in how your complaint was dealt with?
Choose one of the following answers
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
* How satisfied were you with the outcome of your complaint?
Choose one of the following answers
Very satisfied
Satisfied
Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
Very dissatisfied
Do you have any comments about how the complaints process could be improved?
* Your feedback has the potential to help improve the quality of service for all. Would you be happy to provide your complaints reference number? This means we will be able to identify you and link your survey response to your complaint.
Choose one of the following answers
Yes
No
SubmitExit and clear survey
THE WORLD WILL BE INFORMED ABOUT THE RACIST METROPOLITAN POLICE THAT MURDERED JOY GARDENER AND SHOOT CHERRY GROUSE IN BRIXTON. THEM SIR MARK ROWLEY WILL ISSUE ME WITH AN APOLOGY EMBOSSED IN THE MET POLICE EMBLEMS.
Today is World Cancer Day. An international day that takes place each year to raise awareness about cancer and encourage its prevention, detection, and treatment. At Cancer Research UK, weโre marking today across our social media channels, and shining a spotlight on our work as the worldโs leading cancer charity, dedicated to saving and improving lives through our research, influence and information.
This week, we have two new opportunities to get involved. Weโre asking about your experience of volunteering and being part of the Involvement Network at Cancer Research UK to help us improve the way we work with our volunteers in the future. The next survey asks what information youโd need to help you make an informed decision when considering a clinical trial.
Cancer Research UK has launched a ยฃ10m Cancer Data Driven Detection initiative, transforming how we assess cancer risk to advance early detection and precision prevention. Weโd like to thank the network members who are involved in this important piece of work to help to revolutionise research and deliver real-world impact.
I hope you have a lovely week and thanks for your continued support and involvement in our work.
Survey – Share your views and make Cancer Research UK a better place to give your timeHelp us to gain a better understanding of our volunteering and involvement communities, and your experiences with us. Your responses will help to make Cancer Research UK a more enjoyable, diverse and inclusive place to give your time.Find out more
๎
Survey – Development of a new clinical trials information resource for patientsThe Experimental Cancer Medicines Centres (ECMC) are developing a patient information website to provide cancer patients who are considering early phase clinical trials more information about them. Weโd like to hear from cancer patients not currently participating in clinical trials about what information they need to make an informed decision when considering trials.Find out more
๎
๎
The Cancer Data Driven Detection programmeยฃ10m funding for new programme to help identify individual cancer riskCancer Research UK is proud to launch a ยฃ10m Cancer Data Driven Detection initiative, transforming how we assess cancer risk to advance early detection and precision prevention.
An important part of this work includes the Patient & Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) Steering Group, which was formed in 2023 to help support this initative. People affected by cancer and the public helped create the programme.Read the full story
๎
๎
What did you think of this email? This is great! This isn’t for me!
๎
๎
Your cancer servicesCancer ChatChat to other people affected by cancer, in your cancer community, anytime. Information nursesQuestions about cancer? We’re here for you. Cancer newsThe latest news, analysis and opinion from Cancer Research UK
๎
Together we are beating cancer
๎
You’ve received this email as a result of signing up to Your Involvement Network. If your contact details have changed, or you’d like to unsubscribe from these updates, please email us on involvement@cancer.org.uk.You are playing a crucial role in helping us beat cancer, so we’d like to continue to keep you updated on what we’re up to. You can manage your preferences and unsubscribe here.
Your details are safe with us. Check out our Privacy Policy.
This email is from Cancer Research UK. Cancer Research UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1089464), Scotland (SC041666), the Isle of Man (1103) and Jersey (247). A company limited by guarantee. Registered company in England and Wales (4325234) and the Isle of Man (5713F). Registered address: 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ.
Media Volunteer newsletter – February 2025Dear Media Volunteer,As many of you will know, today is World Cancer Day. This annual event gives us the opportunity to remember those lost to cancer but also the progress we have made in cancer research over the years. It also acts, of course, as a reminder of why we must keep raising awareness and funds for research.
Weโve been marking the day with activity including Tommy (pictured above with his grandson) featuring in emails from Ticketmaster, one of our Corporate Partners.
Tommy, who appears in our โWe Areโ Brand campaign, took part in our TUXEDO clinical trial after he was diagnosed with bladder cancer.
It has also been a busy start to the year in other respects, with more information below about the relaunch of Race for Life, new films for our Legacy campaign and new posters in our shops supporting our work on cancers affecting children and young people – all supported by media volunteers like you.
Finally, we’d ask that you consider completing our latest volunteer survey to help shape how we work with our volunteers across the charity. More details below!Thank you for being a media volunteer.
Best wishes, Keyan Milanian Media Volunteer Liaison team
๎
How your stories are helping usHelp shape our work – Volunteer surveyThis February, weโre asking all volunteers to complete a survey to help us to gain a better understanding of our volunteer community and your experiences while volunteering with us.
The survey is completely anonymous and your responses will help us to make CRUK a more enjoyable, diverse and inclusive place to volunteer. Find out more on the Volunteer Hub. The survey closes on Monday 24 February.Complete the surveyRace for Life launchOur Race for Life 2025 season is now underway and media volunteer Jenny Hicks was on hand to help with the launch last month.
Breast cancer patient Jenny, from St Albans, recorded a new radio and YouTube advert which has gone out on stations throughout the UK to help highlight this yearโs forthcoming events.
Jenny, from St Albans, spoke of how much her two best friends, Alison and Jane (pictured from left to right, Alison, Jenny and Jane), mean to her and why theyโve inspired her to take part in Race for Life. The trio have known each other for 60 years and all three have been treated for breast cancer. Though Jennyโs cancer is now incurable the bond between the friends is stronger than ever.Read more Race for Life hereLegacy campaignMedia Volunteers Jesse (right) and Laurel (left) are appearing on TV as part of a new Legacy campaign in the coming weeks.
Jesse and Laurel both received radiotherapy as part of their treatment and are featuring in special short films on Channel 5 to encourage people to leave gifts in their Wills to help fund our research.See more of our films here
๎
Bowelbabe Fund and the London MarathonSam, a mum of two and new media volunteer, shared her story on social media as she prepares to run for the Bowelbabe Fund.
An anal cancer survivor, Sam lost her partner Chris to gall bladder cancer in 2017.
Zak (pictured), Faye and Fraser are featuring in posters for our Cancer Research UK for Children & Young People campaign that are up in stores all across the country, raising awareness of our work into cancers affecting 0-24-year-olds.Find out more
๎
Together we are beating cancer
๎
You are playing a crucial role in helping us beat cancer, so we’d like to continue to keep you updated on what we’re up to. You can manage your preferences and unsubscribe here.
Your details are safe with us. Check out our Privacy Policy.
This email is from Cancer Research UK. Cancer Research UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1089464), Scotland (SC041666), the Isle of Man (1103) and Jersey (247). A company limited by guarantee. Registered company in England and Wales (4325234) and the Isle of Man (5713F). Registered address: 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ.