Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Name Housing For Women Zaiba Qureshi Modern Slavery Traffic Asians EAL To Take Jobs Of UK Citizens Devonshires Solicitors LLP Target Ms H Presley Lewisham Council Hermoine Cameron Member Of Customer Scrutiny Panel Set Up By Hony Premial Author ASB Policy Advocate Find MM Online Victim Of Debbie Gilchrist Drink Driver Alcoholic Turn Junkie Joe Hooper Man In Female Refuge Turn Terrorist Alma Grove Hate Mobs Tony Council Worker Abuse Child Partner She Left Barbara McCoy Moved In Debbie Thomas Said There Is A Drugs Den Upstairs She Must Know She Was A Mule Colin Join DG Each Time She Cuts Garden Told Me Am Mad When I Greeted Him In Garden NHS Disabled Pensioner Kicked Out 3 GPs Nye Bevan Founder NHS 1948 No Society Can Legitimately Call Itself Civilised If A Sick Person Is Denied Medical Aid Because Of Lack Of Means CJS CPS HMCTS SRA BSB CCMCC MOPAC HMPPS CLCC Miscarriages Of Justice Disability Discrimination Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 Judge Baron Sent Racism Claims Back Martin Strike LEYF 2009-2025 Justice Simler EAT In Daily Express Legal Row 17 Deported To Jamaica Richard Blakeway Housing Ombudsman Service Party Breaches Amended Housing Act 1988 Eviction Act 1977 Reference Mervelee Myers Voice For The Voiceless Kings College Hospital South East London Exposed A Voodum Productions Met Police Will Be Challenged From A New Met For London Launch Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley Seb Adjei-Addoh Nigel Pearce Will Answer About Attempts To Section Murder Kidnap Between 30/10/2017-22/1/2025 2/5/2025

Refer to

Use our Rogue Landlord Checker to see which landlords and agents have been fined or prosecuted in London.

You can see if a landlord or agent has been:

  • successfully prosecuted or fined by a council in London
  • successfully prosecuted or given a prohibition notice by the London Fire Brigade
  • expelled from a mandatory consumer redress scheme (expulsion from these schemes means an agent is no longer able to operate legally).

Check a landlord or agent

Before you start

Things you need to know when using this Checker:

  1. Records will only stay on the system for a limited time. Every record shows the date when it will no longer be viewable to the public. Please read our Policies and Procedures for more information.
  2. This Checker only covers certain offences.
    Only landlords and agents who’ve been fined or convicted of a relevant housing offence will appear.
  3. If a landlord or agent looks like they’ve received a £0 fine, it may be because they were convicted of multiple offences at once and the Judge issued a combined fine. The fine will therefore display against the first conviction only.

Information included in the Checker

We have built this Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker to empower renters, support local councils and others to use their enforcement powers, and deter private landlords and letting agents from behaving unlawfully.

All London councils have agreed to participate in our Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker, which contains information about private landlords and letting agents who have been prosecuted or fined.

All London councils with enforcement records have now added them to the Checker. Some boroughs have uploaded records which cannot be viewed publicly, but which are available to other London councils to help with their enforcement activities.

Our Policies and Procedures document provides more information on this.

The Checker also includes information about landlord and agent offences submitted by the London Fire Brigade and the two letting agent consumer redress schemes – The Property Redress Scheme and The Property Ombudsman.

Share this page

Need a document on this page in an accessible format?

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need.

It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.

19 December 2017

In this section

What is it?

The Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker is a new public database introduced by Mayor Sadiq Khan. It names and shames unscrupulous private landlords and letting agents who have been prosecuted or fined for housing offences such as allowing homes to fall into a bad or dangerous condition – for example, through overcrowding, providing poor escape routes or badly maintained fire doors.

How does it work?

The checker allows you to find out whether a current or future landlord has a record of such offences, to help you make an informed choice about where you live. It will also allow you to easily report a landlord or agent whom you suspect of unscrupulous practices.

Who does the checker cover?

At the moment, landlords and agents from ten boroughs – Brent, Camden, Greenwich, Islington, Kingston, Newham, Southwark, Sutton, Waltham Forest and Westminster – are on the database. This will allow 600,000 tenants, a quarter of London renters, to check for rogue landlords and agents in their area.

What about other boroughs?

Eight more boroughs – Barking and Dagenham, Croydon, Enfield, Hackney, Haringey, Lewisham, Redbridge and Tower Hamlets – will submit records to the database in the next few weeks. The Mayor wants all London councils to add their data, to help protect tenants in their areas.

What information is on there?

You can use the checker to see:

o Landlords and agents’ full names

o What type of action was taken against them, for what offence, and any fines

o Who undertook the enforcement – for example, a London borough

o The address of the property where the offence took place

o Part of the landlord’s home address

For legal reasons, names are only visible to the public for a limited time, typically 12 months. A private database will hold records for up to 10 years, to allow authorities to get a full picture of a landlord or agent’s past when conducting investigations.

Where can I find it?

The Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker is on the City Hall website here: www.london.gov.uk/rogue-landlord-checker

Share this page

Translate

Select LanguageEnglishالعربيةБългарски简体中文繁體中文HrvatskiČeština‎DanskNederlandsSuomiFrançaisDeutschΕλληνικάहिन्दीItaliano日本語한국어Norsk bokmålPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийEspañolSvenskaCatalàFilipinoעִבְרִיתBahasa IndonesiaLatviešu valodaLietuvių kalbaСрпски језикSlovenčinaSlovenščinaУкраїнськаTiếng ViệtShqipEestiGalegoMagyarMalteseไทยTürkçeفارسیAfrikaansBahasa MelayuKiswahiliGaeilgeCymraegБеларуская моваÍslenskaМакедонски јазикיידישՀայերենAzərbaycan diliEuskaraქართულიKreyol ayisyenاردوবাংলাBosanskiCebuanoEsperantoગુજરાતીHarshen HausaHmongIgboBasa Jawaಕನ್ನಡភាសាខ្មែរພາສາລາວLatinTe Reo MāoriमराठीМонголनेपालीਪੰਜਾਬੀAfsoomaaliதமிழ்తెలుగుYorùbáZuluဗမာစာChichewaҚазақ тіліMalagasyമലയാളംසිංහලSesothoBasa SundaТоҷикӣO‘zbekchaአማርኛCorsuŌlelo Hawaiʻiكوردی‎КыргызчаLëtzebuergeschپښتوSamoanGàidhligShonaسنڌيFryskisiXhosaSelect LanguageEnglishالعربيةБългарски简体中文繁體中文HrvatskiČeština‎DanskNederlandsSuomiFrançaisDeutschΕλληνικάहिन्दीItaliano日本語한국어Norsk bokmålPolskiPortuguêsRomânăРусскийEspañolSvenskaCatalàFilipinoעִבְרִיתBahasa IndonesiaLatviešu valodaLietuvių kalbaСрпски језикSlovenčinaSlovenščinaУкраїнськаTiếng ViệtShqipEestiGalegoMagyarMalteseไทยTürkçeفارسیAfrikaansBahasa MelayuKiswahiliGaeilgeCymraegБеларуская моваÍslenskaМакедонски јазикיידישՀայերենAzərbaycan diliEuskaraქართულიKreyol ayisyenاردوবাংলাBosanskiCebuanoEsperantoગુજરાતીHarshen HausaHmongIgboBasa Jawaಕನ್ನಡភាសាខ្មែរພາສາລາວLatinTe Reo MāoriमराठीМонголनेपालीਪੰਜਾਬੀAfsoomaaliதமிழ்తెలుగుYorùbáZuluဗမာစာChichewaҚазақ тіліMalagasyമലയാളംසිංහලSesothoBasa SundaТоҷикӣO‘zbekchaአማርኛCorsuŌlelo Hawaiʻiكوردی‎КыргызчаLëtzebuergeschپښتوSamoanGàidhligShonaسنڌيFryskisiXhosaTranslate

Translation disclaimer

Connect with us

Does #youtube the #paedophiles RINGS think am not #monitoring Use our Rogue Landlord Checker to see which landlords and agents have been fined or prosecuted in London. You can see if a landlord or agent has been: successfully prosecuted or fined by a council in London successfully prosecuted or given a prohibition notice by the London Fire Brigade expelled from a mandatory consumer redress scheme (expulsion from these schemes means an agent is no longer able to operate legally). Before you start Things you need to know when using this Checker: Records will only stay on the system for a limited time. Every record shows the date when it will no longer be viewable to the public. Please read our Policies and Procedures for more information. This Checker only covers certain offences. Only landlords and agents who’ve been fined or convicted of a relevant housing offence will appear. If a landlord or agent looks like they’ve received a £0 fine, it may be because they were convicted of multiple offences at once and the Judge issued a combined fine. The fine will therefore display against the first conviction only. Information included in the Checker We have built this Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker to empower renters, support local councils and others to use their enforcement powers, and deter private landlords and letting agents from behaving unlawfully. All London councils have agreed to participate in our Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker, which contains information about private landlords and letting agents who have been prosecuted or fined. All London councils with enforcement records have now added them to the Checker. Some boroughs have uploaded records which cannot be viewed publicly, but which are available to other London councils to help with their enforcement activities. Our Policies and Procedures document provides more information on this. The Checker also includes information about landlord and agent offences submitted by the London Fire Brigade and the two letting agent consumer redress schemes – The Property Redress Scheme and The Property Ombudsman. Related content If your name is on the Checker Report a rogue landlord or agent Rogue Landlord and Agent Checker accessibility statement Share this page Need a document on this page in an accessible format? If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of a PDF or other document on this page in a more accessible format, please get in touch via our online form and tell us which format you need. It will also help us if you tell us which assistive technology you use. We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Has Been Made A Victim Of The Childhood Traumas Of Disabilities Poverty HMCTS CPS CJS Violent Nuisances HHJ Richard Roberts Ranting Raving Lunatic Trigger Atypical Parkinsonism County Court Clerkenwell Shoreditch After DJ Sara Elizzabeth Beecham Chicken Out When I Challenge Her With HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Are Associated With Unemployment The Civil Restraint Order Imposed For Trying To Get Back Money Scammed From Over £100,000.00 Husband Left Me Read South London Press 28/5/2004 On Balance A Happy Ending There Will Be None As I Am Victim Of Barclays Santander Nationwide Lloyds Financial Ombudsman As I Will Die Like My Aunt Anita On Streets UK Whilst Aunt Icylyn Powell Last Of 3 Of Irene MiIls-Nembhard Children Born 27/10/ Is Dying Of Hunger In St Elizabeth Jamaica Where She Had Several Business I Write For Therapy When Father Was Stricken With Parkinson’s Disease I Have Spoken About It In Interviews 15/4/2025

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Put On Record How I Am A Victim Of Childhood Traumas Results Of Disabilities Poverty From Ivan Sandyman Nembhard Stricken By Parkinson’s Disease If I Was Not A Christian I Would Find A Way To Ease The Increasing Pains After I Write To LEYF Senior HR Dilys Epton On The Eve Of Mothering Sunday 2015 Am Depressed Dying Slowly Of Torture Entitlements Taken Benefits To Do Capability For Work Assessments I Never Missed One But I Contributed To British Values Writing For Therapy I Am Voiceless Vulnerable Victim Leaving Me Unable To Function Denied Medical Aid Am To Take Medication Making Me Reliant On Those Who Means Me No Good But What Is Breaking Me Families Friends Abandonned Rejected Me Am Tired Of Living This Way When Deborah Agnes Gilchrist Can Cut The Garden Stay At The Window To Provoke To Trigger Atypical Parkinsonism Country Of Opportunity Is Worse Nightmare I Wish I Go To Sleep And Don’t Wake Up Or Someone Would Come To Take Me Back Home Where I Intended After My Duty To Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Finished Instead I Will Be Criminal Who Is Homeless What About Stories Created Since I Joined Social Media Why Does God Hate Me Coming Up To My Birthday I Keep Fight4justice Until God Takes Me Out Of This Suffering I Don’t Know How Much I Can Bear Getting The Shakes Scared Of A Stroke Or High Blood Pressure Complications My Sons Are Too Busy For Me Ervin Julius Emster Nembhard Said I Can’t Go In His House In Jamaica Unless I Retract That My Husband Helped Me To Start A House On The Land My Parents Bought I Created Legacies For Others But What Will I Be Remembered For If Anyone Knows How To Go To Sleep Don’t Wake Up DJ Sara Elizabeth Beecham Got HHJ Richard Roberts When I Ask Her About HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Are Associated With Unemployment Am A Prisoner Waiting To Be Evicted Can Be Imprisoned For My Truths That Are Online 14/4/2025

Case No: K02CL827 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CLERKENWELL & SHOREDITCH The Gee Street Courthouse 29-41 Gee Street London EC1V 3RE Date: 20/03/2025 Before : HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Between : HOUSING FOR WOMEN Claimant – and – MERVELEE MYERS Defendant – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mr Tristan Salter of Counsel (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors LLP) for the Claimant The Defendant appearing in person, assisted by a McKenzie Friend, Miss Theresa White Hearing date: 20 March 2025 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ……………………….. HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment HIS HONOUR JUDGE RICHARD ROBERTS : Introduction 1. 2. 3. 4. This is the hearing of the Claimant’s committal application, dated 28 November 2023 (p. 50 – 59). The Claimant, Housing for Women, is represented by Mr Tristan Salter of Counsel. The Defendant, Ms Myers, appears in person, assisted by her McKenzie Friend, Theresa White. There is before the Court a committal bundle of 616 pages. References to page numbers in this judgment are to the committal bundle. Instagram post threatening District Judge 5. 6. I mention at the very outset that the Court has been alerted to the fact that on Monday 17 March 2025, the Defendant posted a video on Instagram in which she said, “District Judge Beecham, I’m going to take you out. Bitch, District Judge Beecham, I’m going to take you out. And this is how I’m going to take you out, Motherfucker. [She shows her computer screen, which is displaying the notice of DJ Beecham’s appointment as a Judge] … Is Tristan Salter your man, bitch? Bitch Sara Elizabeth Beecham. … Bitch, I’m coming after you.” This hearing is to sentence the Defendant for six admitted breaches of an injunction order. The Court is not sentencing the Defendant for the video posted on Instagram on 17 March 2025. However, this video is relevant to the issue of whether the injunction order should be extended in time and whether the groups of persons protected by the injunction should be widened to include all members of the Judiciary, all members of the legal profession and all HMCTS court staff. Background 7. 8. 9. As already stated, this hearing is for the purpose of considering the sentence for the Defendant’s admitted six breaches of the injunction. The Claimant is the owner of Flat 16, Alma Grove, London SE1 5PY (the Property). The Property was let to the Defendant pursuant to an assured tenancy agreement, which began on 1 December 2000 (p. 111 – 130). In the witness statement of Trina Philbert, Neighbourhood Officer at Housing for Women, dated 21 July 2023, she says (p. 132), “5. There have been multiple incidents of anti-social behaviour reported to the claimant and/or the police relating to the defendant in or around the property since May 2022. The antisocial behaviour appears in the form of racist and threatening language against residents in or around the property and the claimant’s staff and posting slanderous and inflammatory material against other residents and the claimant’s employees.” Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment 10. The Claimant obtained a final injunction order against the Defendant, dated 1 August 2023 (p. 12 – 14). The Court ordered that: “MERVELEE MYERS Is forbidden (whether by herself or by instructing or encouraging or permitting any other person) from: 1. Causing nuisance, annoyance or distress to any person, or allowing any other visitor/s or occupant of Flat 16, Alma Grove, London, SC1 5PY (the Property) to cause a nuisance, annoyance or distress to any person of the following people: a. Any person with a right (of whatever description) to reside at Alma Grove, London, SE1 5PY (Alma Grove) or any lawful visitor to Alma Grove; and b. Any member of the claimant, staff, agents or contractors; c. Any member, employee, consultant or agent of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, 30 Finsbury circus, London, EC2M 7DT; d. Any person engaging in lawful activity in or around the locality of the property. 2. Using or threatening to use violence or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to use or threaten to use violence, towards any person in categories 1 (a) to (d); 3. Intimidating or acting in an intimidating manner, or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to intimidate or act in an intimidating manner towards any person in any of the categories set out in paragraph 1 (a) to (d); 4. Harassing or attempting to harass, or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to harass or attempting to harass, be it physically or verbally towards any person in any of the categories set out in paragraph 1 (a) to (d); 5. Naming and making any reference whatsoever to any of the people referred to at paragraph 1 (a) to (d) on any social media or electronic network or platform or other including but not limited to WordPress, TikTok and YouTube. And further ordered that the said Mervelee Myers must forthwith upon service of this order 6. Remove all videos uploaded content from all social media or electronic networks or platforms or other including those referred to at paragraph 5 above whereby the individuals referred Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment to at paragraph 1 (a) to (d), the landlord and the firm have been named, and 7. Remove all posters from the communal areas of Alma Grove and from the windows of the Property. Paragraphs 1 to 7 of this order will remain in force until 12.00 noon on the 1st August 2024, unless before then this order is varied or revoked by a further order of the court” 11. 12. 13. By her order dated 9 July 2024, District Judge Beecham ordered: “2. The injunction order dated 01.08.2023 is extended on the same terms to the final determination of the penalty on the committal application or further order. 3. Personal service of this order is dispensed with, the defendant having been in court and having been informed that the injunction would be extended.” The Claimant has summarised the Defendant’s breaches of the injunction order in a schedule dated 28 November 2023 (p. 60 – 64). I have taken into account the following written evidence: i) ii) iii) Trina Philbert, a Neighbourhood Officer employed by the Claimant: a) b) c) d) First witness statement, dated 13 December 2023 (p. 100 – 108) and exhibit TP1 (p. 110 – 195); Second witness statement, dated 16 November 2023 (196 – 200) and exhibit TP2 (202 – 203); Sworn affidavit of Trina Philbert, dated 12 January 2024 (396 – 397); Second affidavit of Trina Philbert, undated and unsigned (408 – 415) and exhibit TF2 (416 – 463). Narin Masera, Trainee Chartered Legal Executive at Devonshires Solicitors: a) b) c) Witness statement, dated 10 November 2023 (313 – 315) and exhibit NM1 (316 – 319); Sworn affidavit, dated 28 November 2023 (264 – 267) and exhibit NM1 (268 – 272). Second sworn affidavit, dated 30 May 2024 (399 – 401) and exhibit NM2 (402 – 407) Sworn affidavit of Samantha Gibbs, Housing Team Leader employed by the Claimant, dated 31 August 2023 (285 – 291). Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment iv) 14. Witness statement of Stephen Agera, solicitor for the Defendant, dated 17 August 2023 (42 – 43). The Defendant has not herself filed any witness statement in the committal proceedings. 15. 16. The Defendant was born on 19 May 1959 and is now aged 65. In the committal bundle is a report from Dr Babtunde Oyedeji Oyebode, Responsible Officer and Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, dated 29 April 2024 (562 – 592). Dr Oyebode says in her report (578), “3.5 She has been reported to have suffered with anxiety and depression, for which she received counselling sessions with good effect. She is currently on no treatment.” 3.6 She has been assessed on several occasions by various services, including secondary mental health services, and has not been accepted for treatment, as her condition has not been deemed serious enough to require care by secondary mental health services. I note that she is awaiting referral to IAPT from the entry in the GP record of 11 January 2024. 3.7 I consider that this is appropriate, as she appears to have benefitted from counselling for her anxiety and depression in the past. The Defendant was bereaved of her late husband, Mr Tomlinson, who passed away aged 101 on 8 April 2024. The Defendant was married to Mr Tomlinson for 10 years and had been his sole carer. Dr Oyebode was asked, “3.25 whether in your professional opinion the burden for caring for her late husband played any role or contributed to the behaviours she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant?” Dr Oyebode replied: “3.26 I consider that the burden of caring for her late husband would have played a role, indeed compounded the behaviour she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant, in view of her history of experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression in the past.” Allegation 1 17. Allegation 1 (p. 62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 3 August 2023 by posting a video on Youtube whereby the Defendant named both the Claimant and Devonshires Solicitors LLP and referred to both as “#criminals”. At Exhibit SG1 to the witness statement of Samantha Gibbs, dated 31 August 2023 there is a screenshot of the Defendant’s posts on social media (p. 303 – 304), showing the post: “#fight4justice #expose @housingforwomen8227 & @devonshires @metpolice-uk #criminals.” Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment Allegation 2 18. Allegation 2 (62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 6 August 2023 by posting on WordPress, “Trolls Scammers Target Mervelee Myers TikTok Join List of Systemic Discrimination District Judge Sterlini Presided Over Housing For Women Terror Cells Of Devonshires Solicitors”. Screenshots of this post are at page 305. Allegation 3 19. Allegation 3 (62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 7 August 2023 by posting WordPress, “District Judge Sterlini To Be Party To Systemic Discrimination At Clerkenwell Shoreditch Involve In CCMCC Winsome Duncan Scam Housing For Women Devonshires Solicitors LLP Terrorism Deborah Agnes Gilchrist An Alcoholic Turn Drugs Abuser For Whom Beg The Police To Get Help For Each Time She Makes Malicious Allegations Against Me The World Must Know UK Is Racist Society Target BAME People Label US Violent Criminals Need ERT Whilst Husband And I Traumatised By Hate Crimes 7/8/23.” There is a screenshot of the Defendant’s blog post at page 308. Allegation 4 20. Allegation 4 (62-63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 31 August 2023 by failing to remove the video on TikTok whereby the Defendant names Michael Lewis, a solicitor of Devonshires LLP. In the video, the Defendant refers to Mr Lewis as “a Cunt”. A screenshot of the video is at page 311. Allegation 5 21. Allegation 5 (63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 31 August 2023 by failing to remove the video on Youtube and/or TikTok whereby the Defendant posts the contact details of Narin Masera (a Trainee Chartered Legal Executive of Devonshires Solicitors LLP) which include Ms Masera’s name, direct dial and email address. There is a screenshot of the video at page 312, which gives Ms Masera’s contact details and then says, “so Housing for Women the TERRORISM CELL is getting Devonshires involved their Hate Crime Against MM.” Allegation 6 22. 23. Allegation 6 (63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 4 and 5 of the injunction order on 7 November 2023 by posting a video on YouTube in which she named Ms Masera and referred to her as “a terrorist”, “a bully”, “a racist”, “a coward”, “a gutless excuse for a female”, a “bitch” and a “cunt”.” Ms Masera is a Trainee Chartered Legal Executive at Devonshires. She has provided a witness statement, dated 28 November 2023 (264 – 267), in which she says at paragraphs 5 and 6 that on 7 November 2023 the Defendant called her on her direct dial. Ms Masera did not answer. The Defendant left her a voicemail, which stated, “Hi Devonshires Solicitors Narin Masera Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment This is Mervelee Myers The reference is NZM/HOU16/258 I am calling about your terrorist activities against me from the time I received a letter and just in case this is going over I am doing a live yeah I am doing a live Narin Masera Terrorist Narin Masera I’m doing a live before I am due to go for my whatever it is flu” 24. 25. 26. In her witness statement, Ms Masera says, “7. Following this, I received an e-mail from the Defendant timed 12.29pm on the same date, the subject of which was “Narin Masera the Terrorist”. Within the body of the e-mail is a link to a YouTube video. … 8. The video that the defendant has uploaded to YouTube is entitled “My #views #defamation 100” and within the video the defendant can be seen calling me, repeating my name and referring to me as a terrorist, a bully, a racist, a coward, “a gutless excuse for a female”, a “bitch” and a “cunt”. … 9. This is not the first time the defendant has behaved in this manner towards me, details of the previous incident can be seen at paragraph 7 (xix) of the witness statement of Trina Philbert dated 21 July 2023 and exhibit “TP1”. 10. After listening to the Defendant’s voicemail and receiving the Defendant’s e-mail on 7 November 2023, I felt upset and concerned that the Defendant continued to publicly broadcast untrue and malicious lies about me by posting these on social media platforms. The Defendant’s behaviour is causing me significant stress as to be labelled as a “terrorist” is deeply concerning and is not something I take lightly. As such, I reported this to the Police on 7 November 2023 and the reference is CAD 319 9/07Nov23.” Trina Philbert says in her first witness statement, dated 13 December 2023 (108), “13. The Defendant’s behaviour is having a widespread and detrimental effect on those individuals targeted and the Claimant’s staff members.” The order of DJ Beecham, dated 9 July 2024, (which has not been included in bundle), includes the following recitals: “UPON the Defendant attending and admitting all the allegations in the contempt application and service of the injunction dated 01.08.2023 on 03.08.2023 Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment AND UPON the court adjourning to give the Defendant opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order and adduce further medical evidence on penalty AND UPON the parties submitting and the court accepting that the initial view on penalty is that the breaches fall within category B3 of the CJC Anti-Social behaviour and the Civil courts Report, with the range of penalty being adjourn consideration to 1 month custody AND UPON the court taking into account that good behaviour will be a mitigating factor and any relevant medical evidence may be mitigation and further breaches will be aggravating factors and the court noting the challenging circumstances with which the Defendant has had to contend in the recent past such as the bereavements suffered, will be relevant mitigation AND UPON the Claimant making an unopposed oral application to extend the injunction order dated 01.08.2023 AND UPON the Defendant confirming orally that she understands the injunction shall continue” Decision 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Mr Salter referred the Court to the leading case of Lovett v Wigan Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1631. Regarding the issues of harm and culpability, I have had regard to paragraphs 46 to 57 of the judgment of Birss LJ. I find that the Defendant’s culpability falls within band B of the Sentencing Council’s guideline grid. I find that the harm caused by the Defendant falls within Category 3 of the grid. I accept the evidence of Ms Masera in her witness statement (266), dated 28 November 2023, at paragraph 10 that the Defendant’s behaviour is deeply concerning and is causing her significant stress. She felt upset. She reported the matter to the police. I also take into account that Ms Philbert says in her first witness statement, dated 13 December 2023, at paragraph 13 (108) that the Defendant’s behaviour is having a widespread and detrimental effect on those individuals targeted and the Claimant’s staff members. The starting point for B3 is adjourned consideration and the category range is adjourned consideration to 1 month. I find that the Defendant’s culpability is aggravated by the fact that there are six breaches of the injunction order. I find that a further aggravating factor is that the Defendant was advised on two occasions by District Judge Beecham of the importance of compliance with the injunction: i) By an order dated 9 July 2024, District Judge Beecham included the recital, Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment “AND UPON the court adjourning to give the Defendant opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order and adduce further medical evidence on penalty” ii) 32. District Judge Beecham reiterated to the Defendant the importance of the Defendant showing compliance with the injunction order in her order of 18 September 2024, where she said in the recital: “AND UPON the court explaining to the Defendant the importance of compliance with the injunction dated 01.08.23 as extended by the order dated 12.06.2024 and explaining that the injunction remains in force on the same terms until 20.01.2025 or such other date as penalty is determined or further order.” Despite this, I am told by Mr Salter, and accept, that there have been further breaches of the injunction order. 33. 34. 35. On the other hand, I find that there are the following factors which mitigate the Defendant’s culpability: i) ii) iii) iv) At the hearing on 9 July 2024, the Defendant pleaded guilty to the 6 allegations in the contempt application. Whilst the plea of guilty was not at the first hearing and the evidence for the allegations was very strong, bearing in mind the existence of the video footage on social media, I nevertheless give the Defendant credit for her plea of guilty, which has saved witnesses from being required to attend Court. The Defendant repeatedly said in her oral submissions to the Court today that she needed help. I bear in mind that the Defendant is vulnerable because of her anxiety and depression. I also bear in mind that Dr Oyebode said in his report: “3.26 I consider that the burden of caring for her late husband would have played a role, indeed compounded the behaviour she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant, in view of her history of experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression in the past.” The Defendant has not previously received a custodial sentence. Having regard to all the circumstances, including the seriousness of the six breaches of the injunction order and the fact that the Defendant has continued to breach the injunction order despite District Judge Beecham explaining to the Defendant on two occasions that the Court was adjourning sentencing to give the Defendant an opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order, I find that the custody threshold is passed and a sentence of imprisonment is appropriate. I bear in mind that the Court must impose the shortest period of imprisonment which properly reflects the seriousness of the contempt. I have also stood back and considered the totality of the evidence. Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment 36. 37. 38. I conclude that the appropriate period of custody, having regard to all the circumstances, including the aggravating and mitigating factors is one month, concurrent on each of the 6 charges. I must next consider whether the sentence should be suspended. I find that whether the custodial sentence should be immediate or suspended is finely balanced. However, having regard to the Defendant’s vulnerability and the fact that she has not received a term of imprisonment, immediate or suspended in the past, I find that the just and proportionate sentence is to suspend the sentence on condition that the Defendant complies with the injunction order dated 1 August 2023 and any variations, including that set out below, for a period of two years from today’s date, ending at 4pm on 19 March 2027 or on further order of the Court. Allegations 2 and 3 involve the Defendant naming and making offensive comments about a District Judge. As recently as 17 March 2025, the Defendant posted on social media a video in which she made threatening and abusive comments about another District Judge. Having regard to the this, I order that paragraph 1 of the injunction order is amended to include a new paragraph 1(e): “(1)(e) All members of the judiciary, all members of the legal profession, and all HMCTS court staff. ” Right of appeal 39. Costs 40. 41. 42. 43. I advise the Defendant that she has an automatic right of appeal to the Court of Appeal. She does not need to request permission to appeal. An appeal must be made within 21 days of today. I find that costs should follow the event, pursuant to CPR 44.2(2). The Defendant has served an N260 statement of costs, dated 6 March 2025, totalling £21,814.80. I find that the hourly rates are far below the guideline rates, and that the time sought for the work carried out is reasonable. I conclude that the sum sought is both proportionate and reasonable. I order that the Defendant pay the sum of £21,814.80, not to be enforced without an assessment of the Defendant’s ability to pay under s.26 LASPO 2012, the assessment to include the determination of the period in which the Defendant had costs protection. Finally, I warn the Defendant that the consequences of breaching the injunction order are likely to be very serious and include the activation of the suspended sentence. The injunction order will remain in force for two years from today’s date until 4pm on 19 March 2027. I emphasize to the Defendant that she must not cause nuisance, annoyance or distress to any of the persons mentioned at paragraph 1(a) to (e) of the injunction order.

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Put On Record How I Am A Victim Of Childhood Traumas Results Of Disabilities Poverty From Ivan Sandyman Nembhard Stricken By Parkinson’s Disease If I Was Not A Christian I Would Find A Way To Ease The Increasing Pains After I Write To LEYF Senior HR Dilys Epton On The Eve Of Mothering Sunday 2015 Am Depressed Dying Slowly Of Torture Entitlements Taken Benefits To Do Capability For Work Assessments I Never Missed One But I Contributed To British Values Writing For Therapy I Am Voiceless Vulnerable Victim Leaving Me Unable To Function Denied Medical Aid Am To Take Medication Making Me Reliant On Those Who Means Me No Good But What Is Breaking Me Families Friends Abandonned Rejected Me Am Tired Of Living This Way When Deborah Agnes Gilchrist Can Cut The Garden Stay At The Window To Provoke To Trigger Atypical Parkinsonism Country Of Opportunity Is Worse Nightmare I Wish I Go To Sleep And Don’t Wake Up Or Someone Would Come To Take Me Back Home Where I Intended After My Duty To Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Finished Instead I Will Be Criminal Who Is Homeless What About Stories Created Since I Joined Social Media Why Does God Hate Me Coming Up To My Birthday I Keep Fight4justice Until God Takes Me Out Of This Suffering I Don’t Know How Much I Can Bear Getting The Shakes Scared Of A Stroke Or High Blood Pressure Complications My Sons Are Too Busy For Me Ervin Julius Emster Nembhard Said I Can’t Go In His House In Jamaica Unless I Retract That My Husband Helped Me To Start A House On The Land My Parents Bought I Created Legacies For Others But What Will I Be Remembered For If Anyone Knows How To Go To Sleep Don’t Wake Up DJ Sara Elizabeth Beecham Got HHJ Richard Roberts When I Ask Her About HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Are Associated With Unemployment Am A Prisoner Waiting To Be Evicted Can Be Imprisoned For My Truths That Are Online 14/4/2025

REFER

Case No: K02CL827 IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CLERKENWELL & SHOREDITCH The Gee Street Courthouse 29-41 Gee Street London EC1V 3RE Date: 20/03/2025 Before : HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Between : HOUSING FOR WOMEN Claimant – and – MERVELEE MYERS Defendant – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Mr Tristan Salter of Counsel (instructed by Devonshires Solicitors LLP) for the Claimant The Defendant appearing in person, assisted by a McKenzie Friend, Miss Theresa White Hearing date: 20 March 2025 – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ……………………….. HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment HIS HONOUR JUDGE RICHARD ROBERTS : Introduction 1. 2. 3. 4. This is the hearing of the Claimant’s committal application, dated 28 November 2023 (p. 50 – 59). The Claimant, Housing for Women, is represented by Mr Tristan Salter of Counsel. MM Response: Was Tristan Salter groomed by DJ Sara Elizabeth Beecham who wanted to keep the case, but chicken out when I raised the HCT Group Impact Report 2016 of 1 in 5 of all suicides are associated with unemployment (pages 8-9). The Defendant, Ms Myers, appears in person, assisted by her McKenzie Friend, Theresa White. MM Response: Why Did DJ Beecham not allow the McKenzie Friend to talk in her Court? I knew nothing about McKenzie Friend and my this time the RANTING RAVING LUNATIC triggered my ATYPICAL PARKINSONYSM I was unable to function. There is before the Court a committal bundle of 616 pages. References to page numbers in this judgment are to the committal bundle. Instagram post threatening District Judge 5. 6. I mention at the very outset that the Court has been alerted to the fact that on Monday 17 March 2025, the Defendant posted a video on Instagram in which she said, “District Judge Beecham, I’m going to take you out. Bitch, District Judge Beecham, I’m going to take you out. And this is how I’m going to take you out, Motherfucker. [She shows her computer screen, which is displaying the notice of DJ Beecham’s appointment as a Judge] … Is Tristan Salter your man, bitch? Bitch Sara Elizabeth Beecham. … Bitch, I’m coming after you.” This hearing is to sentence the Defendant for six admitted breaches of an injunction order. The Court is not sentencing the Defendant for the video posted on Instagram on 17 March 2025. MM Response: The fact the DJ Beecham did not complete the case and sent a RANTING RAGING LUNATIC mentioning Winsome Duncan And DJ Sterlini are causes for concerns. At the time I was not aware of the name, but HHJ Richard Roberts imposed a Civil Restraint Order on me after DJ Swan strike out 5 Claims they were without merit, and I objected. If I die, my stories will serve future generations to avoid the pitfalls I have been down. Barrister Samantha Jones tried to take out ECRO, but did not succeed. Reference https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/m-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 where all this started. However, this video is relevant to the issue of whether the injunction order should be extended in time and whether the groups of persons protected by the injunction should be widened to include all members of the Judiciary, all members of the legal profession and all HMCTS court staff. MM Response: We should therefore go back to Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust when I had the first nevous breakdown after the death of my brother WALFORD BYRON ALBURNEY NEMBHARD. I represented myself then even though I had no legal knowledge. I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson http://www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers the Experience of Multiple Discrimination for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS. Background 7. 8. 9. As already stated, this hearing is for the purpose of considering the sentence for the Defendant’s admitted six breaches of the injunction. MM Response: I will bring my old folks saying to let the Reader understand how I was stitched up by JI Solicitors Sola Obajuluwa and Barrister Miranda Grell. After Charles Hills & CO Stephen Agera abandoned me via email when I got to Court on the 19th December 2023. Barrister Angela Delbourg had told me that I must be WHITER than WHITE and she thought I would SHOUT at DJ Richard Hayes when she represented me. The Claimant is the owner of Flat 16, Alma Grove, London SE1 5PY (the Property). The Property was let to the Defendant pursuant to an assured tenancy agreement, which began on 1 December 2000 (p. 111 – 130). In the witness statement of Trina Philbert, Neighbourhood Officer at Housing for Women, dated 21 July 2023, she says (p. 132), “5. There have been multiple incidents of anti-social behaviour reported to the claimant and/or the police relating to the defendant in or around the property since May 2022. MM Response: When did Trina Philbert started working with H4W? Why did H4W wiped the Customer Portal of all my DATA after refusing me ACCESS? What roles if any did MERVELEE MYERS played during my time at H4W before Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert started working for H4W in 2022? The antisocial behaviour appears in the form of racist and threatening language against residents in or around the property and the claimant’s staff and posting slanderous and inflammatory material against other residents and the claimant’s employees.” MM Response: Why did MM started doing this? There were no slanderous and inflammatory materials against residents. REFERENCE Social Media for my roles in Alma Grove. The A New Met for London launch in September 2023 will be EVIDENCE that I am a victim of the HMCTS and CPS and CJS in covering up miscarriages of justice and http://www.leyf.org.uk PAEDOPHILE RINGS of Richard Harty. Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment 10. The Claimant obtained a final injunction order against the Defendant, dated 1 August 2023 (p. 12 – 14). MM Response: Mervelee Myers was not made aware of this until after the injunction by DJ Sterlini. And that’s why I called HHJ Richard Roberts a RANTING RAVING LUNATIC because he mentioned Winsome Duncan and DJ Sterlini. Now who is Winsome Duncan and what role did DJ Sterlini played in the Case of Winsome Duncan. She stole my MANUSCRIPT and sent the Met Police and London Ambulance Service to section me from a malicious report I wrote on Facebook, I was feeling SUICIDAL. The Court ordered that: “MERVELEE MYERS Is forbidden (whether by herself or by instructing or encouraging or permitting any other person) from: 1. Causing nuisance, annoyance or distress to any person, or allowing any other visitor/s or occupant of Flat 16, Alma Grove, London, SC1 5PY (the Property) to cause a nuisance, annoyance or distress to any person of the following people: MM Response: MM was not GUILTY of this and this can be referenced online, but HMCTS with their agenda to SILENCE me was only interested in doing exactly this. a. Any person with a right (of whatever description) to reside at Alma Grove, London, SE1 5PY (Alma Grove) or any lawful visitor to Alma Grove; and MM Response: Since I am the person who was a victim after H4W coerced Ms Gilchrist to target me. The Court should investigate how the tenant before me was treated. I have rights as a tenant at Alma Grove by my ENTITLEMENTS of affording H4W privileges to handing over my key for them to get copy. This key was then used to allow persons to gain entry to DISCRIMINATE against me. Ms Gilchrist a convicted Drink Driver has used to property do do business, some of which are/were ILLEGAL. All types of people visited Alma Grove at all hours of the day and night. b. Any member of the claimant, staff, agents or contractors; MM Response: Check Social Media to verify how I facilitated the Claimant staff, agents or contractors to understand that my RECORD will be viewed online even after am dEAD. c. Any member, employee, consultant or agent of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, 30 Finsbury circus, London, EC2M 7DT; MM Response: Some have come to harass me when Ms Gilchrist leave the door on the latch for them. d. Any person engaging in lawful activity in or around the locality of the property. MM Response: How about Ms Gilchrist and her unlawful DRUGS BUSINESS is addressed? Check the times Ms Gilchrist don’t pay Electric and Gas Bills and bridge the SYSTEMS putting us in danger. Greedy contractors put up gas pipes and I averted a Grenfell Tower at Alma Grove. b2. Using or threatening to use violence or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to use or threaten to use violence, towards any person in categories 1 (a) to (d); MM Response: Refer to Mimi Owusu 12 pages Witness Statement for H4W. 3. Intimidating or acting in an intimidating manner, or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to intimidate or act in an intimidating manner towards any person in any of the categories set out in paragraph 1 (a) to (d); MM Response: Reference YouTube for those that are GUILTY. 4. Harassing or attempting to harass, or allowing any visitor or occupant of the property to harass or attempting to harass, be it physically or verbally towards any person in any of the categories set out in paragraph 1 (a) to (d); MM Response: Joe Hooper does this, Tony, Barbara McCoy also does this, so Debbie Thomas and Colin at 14. 5. Naming and making any reference whatsoever to any of the people referred to at paragraph 1 (a) to (d) on any social media or electronic network or platform or other including but not limited to WordPress, TikTok and YouTube. MM Response: Reference my roles from 1992 when I arrived in the UK. IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE must be reference. Along with RESEARCH, Working, Volunteering, my investments in Fight4justice and othe Media in sharing my stories. And further ordered that the said Mervelee Myers must forthwith upon service of this order 6. Remove all videos uploaded content from all social media or electronic networks or platforms or other including those referred to at paragraph 5 above whereby the individuals referred Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment to at paragraph 1 (a) to (d), the landlord and the firm have been named, and MM Response: To order me to remove videos is the same as my ENTITLEMENT taken by LEYF http://www.leyf.org.uk the PAEDOPHILE RINGS. 7. Remove all posters from the communal areas of Alma Grove and from the windows of the Property. Paragraphs 1 to 7 of this order will remain in force until 12.00 noon on the 1st August 2024, unless before then this order is varied or revoked by a further order of the court” 11. 12. 13. By her order dated 9 July 2024, District Judge Beecham ordered: “2. The injunction order dated 01.08.2023 is extended on the same terms to the final determination of the penalty on the committal application or further order. MM Response: DJ Beecham is party to the DISCRIMINATION. 3. Personal service of this order is dispensed with, the defendant having been in court and having been informed that the injunction would be extended.” The Claimant has summarised the Defendant’s breaches of the injunction order in a schedule dated 28 November 2023 (p. 60 – 64). I have taken into account the following written evidence: i) ii) iii) Trina Philbert, a Neighbourhood Officer employed by the Claimant: a) b) c) d) First witness statement, dated 13 December 2023 (p. 100 – 108) and exhibit TP1 (p. 110 – 195); Second witness statement, dated 16 November 2023 (196 – 200) and exhibit TP2 (202 – 203); Sworn affidavit of Trina Philbert, dated 12 January 2024 (396 – 397); Second affidavit of Trina Philbert, undated and unsigned (408 – 415) and exhibit TF2 (416 – 463). MM Response: When did Trina Philbert started working with H4W. Narin Masera, Trainee Chartered Legal Executive at Devonshires Solicitors: a) b) c) Witness statement, dated 10 November 2023 (313 – 315) and exhibit NM1 (316 – 319); Sworn affidavit, dated 28 November 2023 (264 – 267) and exhibit NM1 (268 – 272). Second sworn affidavit, dated 30 May 2024 (399 – 401) and exhibit NM2 (402 – 407) Sworn affidavit of Samantha Gibbs, Housing Team Leader employed by the Claimant, dated 31 August 2023 (285 – 291). Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment iv) 14. Witness statement of Stephen Agera, solicitor for the Defendant, dated 17 August 2023 (42 – 43). The Defendant has not herself filed any witness statement in the committal proceedings. 15. 16. The Defendant was born on 19 May 1959 and is now aged 65. In the committal bundle is a report from Dr Babtunde Oyedeji Oyebode, Responsible Officer and Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, dated 29 April 2024 (562 – 592). Dr Oyebode says in her report (578), “3.5 She has been reported to have suffered with anxiety and depression, for which she received counselling sessions with good effect. She is currently on no treatment.” 3.6 She has been assessed on several occasions by various services, including secondary mental health services, and has not been accepted for treatment, as her condition has not been deemed serious enough to require care by secondary mental health services. I note that she is awaiting referral to IAPT from the entry in the GP record of 11 January 2024. 3.7 I consider that this is appropriate, as she appears to have benefitted from counselling for her anxiety and depression in the past. The Defendant was bereaved of her late husband, Mr Tomlinson, who passed away aged 101 on 8 April 2024. The Defendant was married to Mr Tomlinson for 10 years and had been his sole carer. Dr Oyebode was asked, “3.25 whether in your professional opinion the burden for caring for her late husband played any role or contributed to the behaviours she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant?” Dr Oyebode replied: “3.26 I consider that the burden of caring for her late husband would have played a role, indeed compounded the behaviour she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant, in view of her history of experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression in the past.” Allegation 1 17. Allegation 1 (p. 62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 3 August 2023 by posting a video on Youtube whereby the Defendant named both the Claimant and Devonshires Solicitors LLP and referred to both as “#criminals”. At Exhibit SG1 to the witness statement of Samantha Gibbs, dated 31 August 2023 there is a screenshot of the Defendant’s posts on social media (p. 303 – 304), showing the post: “#fight4justice #expose @housingforwomen8227 & @devonshires @metpolice-uk #criminals.” Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment Allegation 2 18. Allegation 2 (62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 6 August 2023 by posting on WordPress, “Trolls Scammers Target Mervelee Myers TikTok Join List of Systemic Discrimination District Judge Sterlini Presided Over Housing For Women Terror Cells Of Devonshires Solicitors”. Screenshots of this post are at page 305. Allegation 3 19. Allegation 3 (62) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 7 August 2023 by posting WordPress, “District Judge Sterlini To Be Party To Systemic Discrimination At Clerkenwell Shoreditch Involve In CCMCC Winsome Duncan Scam Housing For Women Devonshires Solicitors LLP Terrorism Deborah Agnes Gilchrist An Alcoholic Turn Drugs Abuser For Whom Beg The Police To Get Help For Each Time She Makes Malicious Allegations Against Me The World Must Know UK Is Racist Society Target BAME People Label US Violent Criminals Need ERT Whilst Husband And I Traumatised By Hate Crimes 7/8/23.” There is a screenshot of the Defendant’s blog post at page 308. Allegation 4 20. Allegation 4 (62-63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 31 August 2023 by failing to remove the video on TikTok whereby the Defendant names Michael Lewis, a solicitor of Devonshires LLP. In the video, the Defendant refers to Mr Lewis as “a Cunt”. A screenshot of the video is at page 311. Allegation 5 21. Allegation 5 (63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of the injunction order on 31 August 2023 by failing to remove the video on Youtube and/or TikTok whereby the Defendant posts the contact details of Narin Masera (a Trainee Chartered Legal Executive of Devonshires Solicitors LLP) which include Ms Masera’s name, direct dial and email address. There is a screenshot of the video at page 312, which gives Ms Masera’s contact details and then says, “so Housing for Women the TERRORISM CELL is getting Devonshires involved their Hate Crime Against MM.” Allegation 6 22. 23. Allegation 6 (63) states that the Defendant breached paragraphs 1, 4 and 5 of the injunction order on 7 November 2023 by posting a video on YouTube in which she named Ms Masera and referred to her as “a terrorist”, “a bully”, “a racist”, “a coward”, “a gutless excuse for a female”, a “bitch” and a “cunt”.” Ms Masera is a Trainee Chartered Legal Executive at Devonshires. She has provided a witness statement, dated 28 November 2023 (264 – 267), in which she says at paragraphs 5 and 6 that on 7 November 2023 the Defendant called her on her direct dial. Ms Masera did not answer. The Defendant left her a voicemail, which stated, “Hi Devonshires Solicitors Narin Masera Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment This is Mervelee Myers The reference is NZM/HOU16/258 I am calling about your terrorist activities against me from the time I received a letter and just in case this is going over I am doing a live yeah I am doing a live Narin Masera Terrorist Narin Masera I’m doing a live before I am due to go for my whatever it is flu” 24. 25. 26. In her witness statement, Ms Masera says, “7. Following this, I received an e-mail from the Defendant timed 12.29pm on the same date, the subject of which was “Narin Masera the Terrorist”. Within the body of the e-mail is a link to a YouTube video. … 8. The video that the defendant has uploaded to YouTube is entitled “My #views #defamation 100” and within the video the defendant can be seen calling me, repeating my name and referring to me as a terrorist, a bully, a racist, a coward, “a gutless excuse for a female”, a “bitch” and a “cunt”. … 9. This is not the first time the defendant has behaved in this manner towards me, details of the previous incident can be seen at paragraph 7 (xix) of the witness statement of Trina Philbert dated 21 July 2023 and exhibit “TP1”. 10. After listening to the Defendant’s voicemail and receiving the Defendant’s e-mail on 7 November 2023, I felt upset and concerned that the Defendant continued to publicly broadcast untrue and malicious lies about me by posting these on social media platforms. The Defendant’s behaviour is causing me significant stress as to be labelled as a “terrorist” is deeply concerning and is not something I take lightly. As such, I reported this to the Police on 7 November 2023 and the reference is CAD 319 9/07Nov23.” Trina Philbert says in her first witness statement, dated 13 December 2023 (108), “13. The Defendant’s behaviour is having a widespread and detrimental effect on those individuals targeted and the Claimant’s staff members.” The order of DJ Beecham, dated 9 July 2024, (which has not been included in bundle), includes the following recitals: “UPON the Defendant attending and admitting all the allegations in the contempt application and service of the injunction dated 01.08.2023 on 03.08.2023 Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment AND UPON the court adjourning to give the Defendant opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order and adduce further medical evidence on penalty AND UPON the parties submitting and the court accepting that the initial view on penalty is that the breaches fall within category B3 of the CJC Anti-Social behaviour and the Civil courts Report, with the range of penalty being adjourn consideration to 1 month custody AND UPON the court taking into account that good behaviour will be a mitigating factor and any relevant medical evidence may be mitigation and further breaches will be aggravating factors and the court noting the challenging circumstances with which the Defendant has had to contend in the recent past such as the bereavements suffered, will be relevant mitigation AND UPON the Claimant making an unopposed oral application to extend the injunction order dated 01.08.2023 AND UPON the Defendant confirming orally that she understands the injunction shall continue” Decision 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. Mr Salter referred the Court to the leading case of Lovett v Wigan Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 1631. Regarding the issues of harm and culpability, I have had regard to paragraphs 46 to 57 of the judgment of Birss LJ. I find that the Defendant’s culpability falls within band B of the Sentencing Council’s guideline grid. I find that the harm caused by the Defendant falls within Category 3 of the grid. I accept the evidence of Ms Masera in her witness statement (266), dated 28 November 2023, at paragraph 10 that the Defendant’s behaviour is deeply concerning and is causing her significant stress. She felt upset. She reported the matter to the police. I also take into account that Ms Philbert says in her first witness statement, dated 13 December 2023, at paragraph 13 (108) that the Defendant’s behaviour is having a widespread and detrimental effect on those individuals targeted and the Claimant’s staff members. The starting point for B3 is adjourned consideration and the category range is adjourned consideration to 1 month. I find that the Defendant’s culpability is aggravated by the fact that there are six breaches of the injunction order. I find that a further aggravating factor is that the Defendant was advised on two occasions by District Judge Beecham of the importance of compliance with the injunction: i) By an order dated 9 July 2024, District Judge Beecham included the recital, Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment “AND UPON the court adjourning to give the Defendant opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order and adduce further medical evidence on penalty” ii) 32. District Judge Beecham reiterated to the Defendant the importance of the Defendant showing compliance with the injunction order in her order of 18 September 2024, where she said in the recital: “AND UPON the court explaining to the Defendant the importance of compliance with the injunction dated 01.08.23 as extended by the order dated 12.06.2024 and explaining that the injunction remains in force on the same terms until 20.01.2025 or such other date as penalty is determined or further order.” Despite this, I am told by Mr Salter, and accept, that there have been further breaches of the injunction order. 33. 34. 35. On the other hand, I find that there are the following factors which mitigate the Defendant’s culpability: i) ii) iii) iv) At the hearing on 9 July 2024, the Defendant pleaded guilty to the 6 allegations in the contempt application. Whilst the plea of guilty was not at the first hearing and the evidence for the allegations was very strong, bearing in mind the existence of the video footage on social media, I nevertheless give the Defendant credit for her plea of guilty, which has saved witnesses from being required to attend Court. The Defendant repeatedly said in her oral submissions to the Court today that she needed help. I bear in mind that the Defendant is vulnerable because of her anxiety and depression. I also bear in mind that Dr Oyebode said in his report: “3.26 I consider that the burden of caring for her late husband would have played a role, indeed compounded the behaviour she is alleged to have displayed during the relevant, in view of her history of experiencing symptoms of anxiety and depression in the past.” The Defendant has not previously received a custodial sentence. Having regard to all the circumstances, including the seriousness of the six breaches of the injunction order and the fact that the Defendant has continued to breach the injunction order despite District Judge Beecham explaining to the Defendant on two occasions that the Court was adjourning sentencing to give the Defendant an opportunity to show compliance with the injunction order, I find that the custody threshold is passed and a sentence of imprisonment is appropriate. I bear in mind that the Court must impose the shortest period of imprisonment which properly reflects the seriousness of the contempt. I have also stood back and considered the totality of the evidence. Double-click to enter the short title HHJ RICHARD ROBERTS Approved Judgment 36. 37. 38. I conclude that the appropriate period of custody, having regard to all the circumstances, including the aggravating and mitigating factors is one month, concurrent on each of the 6 charges. I must next consider whether the sentence should be suspended. I find that whether the custodial sentence should be immediate or suspended is finely balanced. However, having regard to the Defendant’s vulnerability and the fact that she has not received a term of imprisonment, immediate or suspended in the past, I find that the just and proportionate sentence is to suspend the sentence on condition that the Defendant complies with the injunction order dated 1 August 2023 and any variations, including that set out below, for a period of two years from today’s date, ending at 4pm on 19 March 2027 or on further order of the Court. Allegations 2 and 3 involve the Defendant naming and making offensive comments about a District Judge. As recently as 17 March 2025, the Defendant posted on social media a video in which she made threatening and abusive comments about another District Judge. Having regard to the this, I order that paragraph 1 of the injunction order is amended to include a new paragraph 1(e): “(1)(e) All members of the judiciary, all members of the legal profession, and all HMCTS court staff. ” Right of appeal 39. Costs 40. 41. 42. 43. I advise the Defendant that she has an automatic right of appeal to the Court of Appeal. She does not need to request permission to appeal. An appeal must be made within 21 days of today. I find that costs should follow the event, pursuant to CPR 44.2(2). The Defendant has served an N260 statement of costs, dated 6 March 2025, totalling £21,814.80. I find that the hourly rates are far below the guideline rates, and that the time sought for the work carried out is reasonable. I conclude that the sum sought is both proportionate and reasonable. I order that the Defendant pay the sum of £21,814.80, not to be enforced without an assessment of the Defendant’s ability to pay under s.26 LASPO 2012, the assessment to include the determination of the period in which the Defendant had costs protection. Finally, I warn the Defendant that the consequences of breaching the injunction order are likely to be very serious and include the activation of the suspended sentence. The injunction order will remain in force for two years from today’s date until 4pm on 19 March 2027. I emphasize to the Defendant that she must not cause nuisance, annoyance or distress to any of the persons mentioned at paragraph 1(a) to (e) of the injunction order.

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Spotlight On Richard Blakeway Housing Ombudsman Service As Housing For Women Devonshires Solicitors LLP Metropolitan Police London Ambulance Service NHS Trusts HMCTS CPS CJS CCMCC DBS IOPC JCIO BSB SRA MOPAC Come Under Scrutiny As Sara Elizabeth Beecham Must Be Charged For Gross Professional Misconduct Employ Emua Ali Equality Act Assessor To Help Tristan Salter Five Paper Chambers 7th March Interrupt Twice No ASB In Bundle Not Delivered 17th Delays Debbie Gilchrist Attempts To Provoke 20th After Made Her Responsible HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Associated With Unemployment Sent Ranting Raving Lunatic Trigger Atypical Parkinsonism Affected London Ambulance Sent Claim Burning Place H4W Fire Systems LTD With Asian Sound Like Scammers With English Name Added To List As Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Will Be Celebrated By His Wife 3/4/25

NOTICEANDDEMAND-202209405
Dear Richard Blakeway acting as Ombudsman,
Thank you for your recent response on an unsigned sheet of paper by an unidentified member of
your staff. I must formally object in the strongest terms to your attempt to absolve your statutory
responsibilities under the guise of alleged court proceedings—for which no lawful evidence has
been produced or verified by you nor the other informants.
Your statement:
“The landlord said there were legal proceedings regarding the antisocial behaviour, so it was no
longer being dealt with as a complaint… the matter would be dealt with by the courts… Paragraph
41c of the Scheme applies…”
is unsubstantiated, and amounts to knowingly acting upon hearsay, in a matter involving serious
harm, distress, and abuse of legal process.
🔍WhereIstheCourt Order?
As of today, I have never been served with any proceedings issued by Clerkenwell & Shoreditch
County Court, or any other court of record, as is required by law under Part 6 of the Civil
Procedure Rules (CPR). Despite multiple written requests, no party has provided a single piece
of verifiable, sealed court documentation. Not you, not the landlord, not their solicitors, and not
the court.1
Therefore, your reliance on unverified “court proceedings”—without disclosure of the claim form,
particulars of claim, sealed hearing notice, or judgment—is wholly improper, unethical, and
potentially unlawful.

️KnowinglyActing Without Authority Is Criminal– This Is Not a Civil
Matter
By continuing to participate in this charade, you are:
· Gaslighting a vulnerable person
· Relying on false legal authority
· Causingemotional injury
· Endangering health and safety
· Enabling financial and reputational harm
· Acting in collusion with third parties to intimidate, isolate, and silence
1 of 3
These actions mirror the tactics of organised extortion and fall under the definition of criminal
conspiracy as outlined in:
· FraudAct2006, s.2 & s.4– False representation and abuse of position
· Serious Crime Act 2007, s.44–46– Encouraging or assisting crime
· Forging Judicial Authority– Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, s.1– up to 10 years
imprisonment
· Misconduct in Public Office (Common Law)– up to life imprisonment
· Protection from Harassment Act 1997– where conduct causes alarm or distress
Additionally, your actions may breach Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s.7, by causing
foreseeable mental injury, alarm, and humiliation, particularly during periods of religious
observance and vulnerability.
📚CaseLawAuthorities
· R(GuardianNews&MediaLtd)vWestminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ
420– Court transparency and accountability is essential to justice.
· MacFoyvUnitedAfrica Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 1169– Any proceedings based on false or
void authority are themselves null and void ab initio.
· Entick vCarrington [1765]– No authority, no power. Agents acting without warrant
commit trespass and abuse of process.
· RvSoni[2009] EWCACrim42–Useofforged legal documents constitutes fraud upon
the court.
🛑ThisIs Part of a National Scandal– Court Order Scams
Your behaviour contributes to a widespread and well-documented national issue where false
court authority is used to abuse, evict, and defraud the public—often with the complicity of court
officers, councils, and ombudsman bodies.
This scandal is being actively investigated and reported on at:
🔗https://bit.lt/house4drugs
The victims of these fabricated claims include mothers, NHS workers, disabled persons, and
children—many of whom were never lawfully served, and yet are subjected to enforcement,
humiliation, and harm under fabricated legal pretexts.
✅MyFormalDemands
In light of the above, I now require:
1.
2.
3.
Acopy of the sealed court claim, hearing notice of issue, and particulars of claim upon
which your reliance is based.
Awritten apology and retraction of your decision to close the matter based on hearsay.
Reinstatement of the complaint and referral to an independent adjudicator, pending the
production of lawful court documentation.
1 of 3
4.
Confirmation that you will cease colluding with third parties who refuse to produce court
authorised evidence.
📣NextSteps if Ignored
Failure to comply will lead to:
· Escalation to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
· Referral to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for data handling abuses
· Public disclosure through legal campaigns and media platforms
· Apossible private criminal prosecution for misconduct, fraud, and conspiracy
· Referral to the ScamBuster.TV judicial fraud team
🧾Final Word
You are reminded that your duty is to uphold justice, not facilitate institutional wrongdoing. The
Housing Ombudsman Scheme is not exempt from law, and cannot lawfully use “court action” as a
cover for inaction in the face of abuse—especially when the “court action” is a fabrication.
I await your full response within 7 days, failing which this correspondence may be relied upon in
future proceedings and published in the public interest.
Yours Sincerely
:Mervelee :Myers
Cc to whom it may concern– All Rights Reserved
1 of

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers A Disabled Pensioner Made Inactive Patient 3 Times Since 5 December 2024 Apply Equality Act 2010 c. 15 s. 15 Discrimination Arising From Disability Employment Human Rights s. 149 Public Sector Equality Duty Employment Government Administration Local Government Age Belief Disability Race Sex DJ Beecham Claims She Not Dealing With LEYF Richard Harty MIC June O’Sullivan Drag Queen Story Tellers Met Police London Ambulance Service Attempts To Section Murder Kidnap Between 30/10/17-24/3/25 Evidence CPS HMCTS CJS Miscarriages Of Justice Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Nervous Breakdown Death Walford Byron Alburney Nembhard 56 Colon Cancer Perline Louise Chambers-Nembhard Dementia 90 Amly Decosie Alframy 60 Birthday Intensive Care Dostan Melric Prostate 70 1st High Blood Pressure ECG YouTube Devonshires Solicitors LLP Possession Letter Narin Masera July 2023 Greenidge Sterlini Swan Hayes Pigram Bell Naidoo Beecham Insists Keeping Cases Why Did She Chicken Out When Held Her Accountable HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Associated With Unemployment Raving Ranting Lunatic Dead Sheep On His Head Left Me Speechless Atypical Parkinson’s Had To Call London Ambulance Service Return Saying I Was Burning Place Fire Systems Ltd +447943114727 Threats 0207 4486191031 Recorded Sound Like Asian Scammers With English Names Tom Fool But Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Was Never Drunk County Court At Clerkenwell Shoreditch Violent Nuisances Criminals Make Them Viral April Fools 01/04/2025

Appellant’s notice
(All appeals except small claims
track appeals and appeals to the
Family Division of the High Court)
Notes for guidance are available which
will help you complete this form. Please
read them carefully before you complete
each section.
SEAL
Section 1 Details of the claim or case you are appealing against – –H W F
Fee Account no. Claim or Case no. (if applicable)
Help with Fees –
Ref no. (if applicable)
Name(s) of the Claimant(s) Applicant(s) Petitioner(s)
Name(s) of the Defendant(s) Respondent(s)

Sixth Floor Blue Star House
234-244 Stockwell Road
London SW9 9SP


Details of the party appealing (‘The Appellant’)
Name
Address (including postcode)
Tel No.
Fax
E-mail
Details of the Respondent to the appeal
Name
Address (including postcode)
Tel No.
Fax
E-mail

Devonshires Solicitors LLP
30 Finsbury Circus
London EC2M 7DT


Details of additional parties (if any) are attached Yes No
N161 Appellant’s notice (06.22) © Crown copyright 2022

Section 2 Details of the appeal
From which court is the appeal being brought?
The County Court at
The Family Court at
High Court
Queen’s Bench Division
Chancery Division
Family Division
Other (please specify)
What is the name of the Judge whose decision you want to appeal?
What is the status of the Judge whose decision you want to appeal?
District Judge or Deputy Circuit Judge or Recorder Tribunal Judge
High Court Judge or
Deputy
Justice(s) of the
Peace Master or Deputy
Is the decision you wish to appeal a previous appeal
decision?
Yes No
What is the date of the decision you wish to appeal against?

Section 3 Legal representation
Are you legally represented? Yes No
If Yes, is your legal representative (please tick as appropriate)
a solicitor
direct access counsel instructed to conduct litigation on your behalf
direct access counsel instructed to represent you at hearings only
Name of your legal representative
The address (including postcode) of your legal representative
Tel No.
Fax
E-mail
DX
Ref.
Are you, the Appellant, in receipt of a
Civil Legal Aid Certificate?
Yes No
Is the respondent legally represented? Yes No
If ‘Yes’, please give details of the
respondent’s legal representative below
Name and address (including postcode) of the respondent’s legal representative
Tel No.
Fax
E-mail
DX
Ref.

Section 4 Permission to appeal
Do you need permission to appeal? Yes No
Has permission to appeal been granted?
Box A
Yes (Complete Box A)
Box B
No (Complete Box B)
Date of order granting permission
Name of Judge granting permission
I
the Appellant(’s legal representative) seek
permission to appeal.
If permission to appeal has been granted in part by
the lower court, do you seek permission to appeal in
respect of the grounds refused by the lower court?
Yes No
Section 5 Other information required for the appeal
Please set out the order (or part of the order) you wish to appeal against
Have you lodged this notice with the court in time? Yes No
(There are different types of appeal –
see Guidance Notes N161A)
If ‘No’ you must also complete
Part B of Section 10 and Section 11

I have not received the ORDER from the Court in WRITING as yet. I am therefore, using MEMORY recall to APPEAL because of my DISABILITIES, I am unable to write during STRESSFUL EPISODES as can be verified by Medical Report of July 2006 for Chronic Anxiety DIAGNOSIS for Open University examination and was not allowed to RECORD. I am positive that the ORDER will be DELAYED until the 21 days elapses and then I have no grounds for APPEAL.

I wish to APPEAL all of the ORDER that was SUMMARIZED in the SKELETON ARGUMENT on behalf of the Claimant for the trial on the 7 March 2025. The Order was not Served until it went through a few stages presided over by DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan, DJ Sterlini from the date I was sent Possession letter by Devonshires Solicitors LLP Narin Masera in July 2023. I recognized the name DJ Sterlini who labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE because he along with DJ Rand and DJ Zimmell strike out my claims against Winsome Duncan who stole my manuscript IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE and sent the Metropolitan Police and London Ambulance Service to SECTION me I write on Facebook I was feeling SUICIDAL. The involvement of the Metropolitan Police and London Ambulance Service DISCRIMINATION against me and my husband continued between the 30 October 2017 to 24 March 2025 when the London Ambulance Service attended Alma Grove claiming I was burning down the place. All I was doing was reaching out for support.

Breaching the Equality Act Protected Characteristics: DJ Beecham requested an Equality Act Assessor at the 9th December 2024 HEARING behind my back. On the 7 & 17 & 20 March 2025 affected by my HIDDEN DISABILITIES and got to Court just in time. Protected Characteristic amended Housing Act 1988 Eviction Act 1977. Section 15 Equality Act 2010. The ASB on which I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE by DJ Sterlini in my absence was not in the BUNDLE that was delivered to me in Court on the 7 March 2025 in the presence of the Equality Act Assessor Emua Ali.
Section 6 Grounds of appeal
Please state, in numbered paragraphs, on a separate sheet attached to this notice and entitled
‘Grounds of Appeal’ (also in the top right hand corner add your claim or case number and full
name), why you are saying that the Judge who made the order you are appealing was wrong.
I confirm that the grounds of appeal are attached to this notice.

Section 7 Arguments in support of grounds for appeal
I confirm that the arguments (known as a ‘Skeleton Argument’) in support of the ‘Grounds of
Appeal’ are set out on a separate sheet and attached to this notice.
OR (in the case of appeals other than to the Court of Appeal)
I confirm that the arguments (known as a ‘Skeleton Argument’) in support of the ‘Grounds
of Appeal’ will follow within 14 days of filing this Appellant’s Notice. A skeleton argument
should only be filed if appropriate, in accordance with CPR Practice Direction 52B,
paragraph 8.3.
Section 8 Aarhus Convention Claim
For applications made under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 or Planning (Listed
Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990
I contend that this claim is an Aarhus Convention Claim Yes No
If Yes, and you are appealing to the Court of Appeal, any application for an order to limit the
recoverable costs of an appeal, pursuant to CPR 52.19, should be made in section 10.
If Yes, indicate in the following box if you do not wish the costs limits under CPR 45 to apply. If you
have indicated that the claim is an Aarthus claim set out the grounds below

Section 9 What are you asking the Appeal Court to do?
I am asking the appeal court to:
(please tick the appropriate box)
set aside the order which I am appealing
vary the order which I am appealing and substitute the following order. Set out in the
following space the order you are asking for:
order a new trial
Section 10 Other applications
Complete this section only if you are making any additional applications.
Part A
I apply for a stay of execution. (You must set out in Section 11 your reasons for seeking a stay
of execution and evidence in support of your application.)
I apply for an extension of time for filing my appeal notice. (You must set out in Section 11 the
reasons for the delay and what steps you have taken since the decision you are appealing.)
Part C
I apply for an order that:
Part B
(You must set out in Section 11 your reasons and your evidence in support of your
application.)
In support of my application(s) in Section 10, I wish to rely upon the following reasons and
evidence:
Section 11 Evidence in support

Because of my HIDDEN DISABILITIES I am unable to function to carry out certain INTELLECTUAL and COGNITIVE activities that are RELEVANT to the APPEAL

  1. Breach of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics
    A. Equality Act 2010 c. 15 Section 15 Equality Act 2010 Employments: I represented myself at 2 ET each time I experienced BEREAVEMENT and LOSSES and was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper for the Policy Studies Institute “The Experience of Multiple Disabilities” recommended to ACAS. Human Rights: I have not worked since I was forced out of my job in 2015 after the second NERVOUS BREAKDOWN in a TOXIC WORK PLACE. References of places to find EVIDENCE listed on social media that am BANNED and my intellectual property, copyright, images, CPPDP harvested. My website I created from scratch stolen. Key Words: Disability Discrimination I offered DJ Beecham a copy of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE. I have been given them away free. My Book is endorsed online and used to EMPOWER WOMEN to find their VOICE. As an “Expert Authority on Subjects from the Cradle to the Grave” I have done UNDERSTANDING STATUTORY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES knowing I am a victim of Systemic Discrimination to SILENCE ME. I am still getting job offers because of an old CV online from 2016. I was offered £46-55,000.00 SENCO job by Smart Teachers in 2021 before I was kicked out of the UEL by Richard Harty in 2021. I have been TREATED unfairly because of my DISABILITY from 2003-2008 at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & LEYF 2009-2015 and Housing for Women 2000-2025. But DJ Beecham refused to deal with any of the DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION other than the H4W which did not give me time to deal with the matter because of the CRISIS I was experiencing from July 2023 to date.

B. Equality Act 2010 c. 15 s. 149 Public Sector equality duty 149 Equality Act 2010 This Case started with Former Employers Mervelee Myers V London Early Years Foundation https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 when I write a letter to the Senior HR I was DEPRESSED and DYING SLOWLY of TORTURE. EVIDENCE must be taken from my social media to form my ARGUMENTS for the APPEAL. Subjects: Employment I have been denied my ENTITLEMENTS, placed on BENEFITS to attend CAPABILITY for WORK ASSESSMENTS despite my QUALIFICATIONS and TRAINING.
Government Administration: I am a VICTIM of miscarriages of justice by the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and the Crown Prosecution Service. I have been made an INACTIVE PATIENT by the NHS and have no access to Medical Aid.
Local Government: I am a VICTIM of various Local Government Authorities from I worked at Mapother House Day Nursery Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Key Words: Public Sector Equality Duty H4W breach 1 – 7 and this can be verified by DELETING the Customer Portal of DATA from I signed the TENANCY AGREEMENT.
The relevant Protected Characteristics are –
Age: My husband ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON resided with me in the property because I was fearful of moving to somewhere, that I could become a VICTIM of Domestic Violence again. His life was cut short because of the ASB of Ms Gilchrist and Joe Hooper and members of Alma Grove HATE MOB after H4W groomed Ms Gilchrist as I had asked when she broke the glass to the communal door and I recognized her changing behaviours might be due to more than the petty issues we sorted before. Ms Gilchrist spent time in prison for DRINK DRIVING and was responsible for the TENANT before me leaving. Ms Gilchrist coerced Trevor Anthony Tomlinson to ASSAULT me telling him I was ABUSING his father. Ms Gilchrist since had a STROKE and blaming me instead of her LIFESTYLE.
Disability: Both my HUSBAND and MERVELEE MYERS were DISABLED. My online Fundraising, Volunteering and Mental Health & SEND Advocacy must be EVIDENCED. Left with NHS Medical Aid. Met Police & London Ambulance Service attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me between 30 October to 24 March 2025.
Race: Refer to H4W ASB the Author was Hony Premial who invited me to be a member of the Customer Scrutiny Panel in 2019. The year DJ Beecham was appointed by the Queen and Robert Buckland. Zaiba Qureshi disbanded the Customer Panel in 2020. In 2024 am getting invitation to apply. Ms H Presley find me online because Hermoine Cameron was advocating on my behalf. She visited my home twice. H4W has done the same to Ms Presley. As the face of ITV News Windrush 70 I write to the Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin who I meet at H4W AGM in April 2014 to mediate on my behalf. I am the VICTIM of the Metropolitan Police and the fact that my BOOK was signed by Sir Mark Rowley at A New Met for London Launch a month after DJ Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE must be EVIDENCE.
Religion or Belief: As the COMPOSER of Brixton Market for SONGSTREET App this and other PUBLIC ENGAGEMENTS must be EVIDENCE.

  1. Charter of Rights 12 Codes
    Open Letters
  2. PM David Cameron 2015 and Theresa May 2017
  3. Write to Justice Secretary Robert Buckland
  4. Social Media

Section 12 Vulnerability
Vulnerability
Do you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in
any way which the court needs to consider?

Mental & Physical Disability. In July 2006 I was given a Medical Report stating I have CHRONIC ANXIETY affecting WRITING. Because of the DISCRIMINATION that exacerbated the DEPRESSION, my COGNITION has impaired to the point I am unable to TALK, WRITE, UNDERSTAND, COMPREHEND INSTRUCTIONS.
I developed an EATING DISORDER leaving me prone to Physical IMPAIRMENTS.
The ATYPICAL PARKINSON’S (not Diagnosed) leave me unable to sit upright and functioning when I get the shakes.


Yes. Please explain in what way you or the witness are vulnerable and what steps, support
or adjustments you wish the court and the judge to consider.
No
Statement of Truth
This must be completed in support of the evidence in Section 11
I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be
brought against a person who makes, or causes to be made, a
false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth
without an honest belief in its truth.
I believe that the facts stated in section 11 are true.
The applicant believes that the facts stated in section 11 are
true. I am authorised by the applicant to sign this statement.
Signature
Applicant
Litigation friend (where applicant is a child or a Protected Party)
Applicant’s legal representative (as defined by CPR 2.3(1))
Date
Day
Full name
Month
Year
Name of applicant’s legal representative’s firm
If signing on behalf of firm or company give position or office held
Section 13 Supporting documents
To support your appeal you should file with this notice all relevant documents listed below. To show
which documents you are filing, please tick the appropriate boxes.
If you do not have a document that you intend to use to support your appeal complete the box over the
page.
In the County Court or High Court:
three copies of the appellant’s notice for the appeal court and three copies of the grounds of
appeal;
one additional copy of the appellant’s notice and grounds of appeal for each of the
respondents;
one copy of the sealed (stamped by the court) order being appealed;
a copy of any order giving or refusing permission to appeal; together with a copy of the judge’s
reasons for allowing or refusing permission to appeal; and
a copy of the Civil Legal Aid Agency Certificate (if legally represented).
In the Court of Appeal:
three copies of the appellant’s notice and three copies of the grounds of appeal on a separate
sheet attached to each appellant’s notice;
one additional copy of the appellant’s notice and one copy of the grounds of appeal for each
of the respondents;
one copy of the sealed (stamped by the court) order or tribunal determination being appealed;
a copy of any order giving or refusing permission to appeal together with a copy of the judge’s
reasons for allowing or refusing permission to appeal;
one copy of any witness statement or affidavit in support of any application included in the
appellant’s notice;
where the decision of the lower court was itself made on appeal, a copy of the first order,
the reasons given by the judge who made it and the appellant’s notice of appeal against that
order;
in a claim for judicial review or a statutory appeal a copy of the original decision which was the
subject of the application to the lower court;
one copy of the skeleton arguments in support of the appeal or application for permission to
appeal;
a copy of the approved transcript of judgment; and
a copy of the Civil Legal Aid Certificate (if applicable)
where a claim relates to an Aarhus Convention claim, a schedule of the claimant’s financial
resources

Reasons why you have not supplied a document and date when you expect it to be available:
Title of document and reason not supplied Date when it will be
supplied
Signed Appellant(’s legal representative)
Section 14 The notice of appeal must be signed here
Find out how HM Courts and Tribunals Service
uses personal information you give when you fill
in a form.
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/
hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Lists The County Court Clerkenwell Shoreditch DJs Greenidge Swan Sterlini I Was Never Inform About Any Order Label Me A Violent Nuisance DJs Hayes Pigram Bell I Was In Their Presence Stephen Agera Sent Email To Be Remove Duty Solicitor Support Naidoo Is A Liar Had Medical Review Decima Road Surgery DJ Beecham Decide To Stick With The Case Has An Equality Act Assessor Emua Ali 7 March Interruption Twice I Did Not Get Bundle By Breaching The Court Order Am Told I Am Only To Refer To Issues About Housing For Women Reasons I Go Back To LEYF HMCTS Miscarriages Of Justice From Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Mark Lake Lina Amir Barbara McCoy Debbie Gilchrist Will Be Expose With Devonshires Solicitors LLP J I Solicitors Sola Objaluwa Barrister Miranda Grell Must Be Book For Acting Like Our Ancestors Sold Into Slavery Purpose Of Freedom Is To Create For Others 10/3/2025

MERVELEE MYERS ARGUMENTS UPDATED EVIDENCE K05EC530 17 March 2025 Trial

In the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch

Claim Number K05EC530

Date: 17 March 2025

HOUSING FOR WOMEN  1ST  Claimant

MERVELEE MYERS 1ST Defendant

Before DJ Beecham 17th & 20th March 2025

County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch

NOTICE OF UPDATED ARGUMENTS EVIDENCE GENERAL FORM OF JUDGEMENT OR ORDER AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY

TO: DJ Beecham, Acting District Judge, HM Courts & Tribunals Service

RE: HMCTS CPS CJS Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (09/12/2024 Complaint)

Dear DJ Beecham,

Mervelee Myers Arguments Addressing the Breaches of the Equality Act, amended Housing Act 1988 and Eviction Act 1977 is the basis of my DEFENCE following another case of the conduct of Claimant Representatives at Court on the 7th March 2025. When I was expected to take the BUNDLE from Tristan Salter whilst I was sat on the floor after getting into Court from wondering the Street for HOURS because of my HIDDEN DISABILITIES.

REERENCING the TRIAL BUNDLE 863 Pages

By referencing the TRIAL BUNDLE 863 pages: 1. Not delivered until after my appearance at Court where it was implied, I was lying, and the CLAIMANT was given time twice to continue gathering evidence for the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION to succeed. 2.  Barrister tried to get me to accept the spare bundle whilst I was sat on the floor. 3. DJ Beecham considered giving me an hour to look over the bundle before going to TRIAL. Hence, I accepted the ADJOURNMENT when it was RELUCTANTLY offered. I, will provide the EVIDENCE proving that I am the VICTIM of the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution to cover up the miscarriages of justice from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008.

DJ Beecham letter dated 18/12/2024 falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Service dating back to Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, workplace nursery, Mopother House Day Nursery 2003-2008. Since DJ Beecham taken on the CLAIMS, my 101-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise. I am positive from DJ Beecham refusal to accept my book IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE on behalf of the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch in celebration of my husband’s birthday and International Women’s Day is an indication that the Court and the Claimant are not aware of the impacts of the BEREAVEMENTS and LOSSES I am experiences from Devonshires Solicitors LLP Narin Masera sent me the POSSESSION LETTER in July 2023.    

This UPDATED EVIDENCE highlights how the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch failed to follow lawful due process, on the 7 March 2025 by treating the DEFENDANT Mervelee Myers different than the CLAIMANT, their Legal Representatives and Witnesses. From the time I arrived at Court and sat on the FLOOR because I had gotten lost, and I was wondering the Street fearing I would lose my DIGNITY and accuse of not turning up as happened when I was not served with ORDER to attend Court. The reliance on fabricated “Medical Reports”, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.

Summary of Key Issues

     1.          Breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics Age, Beliefs, Disability, Race, and Sexual Discrimination Background

DJ Pigram advised me that I am entitled to use any RELEVANT information for my DEFENCE and DJ Beecham who needs an Equality Act Assessor tells me that she will not be dealing with any other ISSUES than K05EC530. As an “Expert Authority on Subjects from the Cradle to the Grave” my ARGUMENTS will prove how the CLAIMANT is the “Final Straw of Systemic Discrimination” that Mervelee Myers will not accept to take away my ENTITLEMENTS, now that ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON is dead. To send me to jail so that the CLAIMANT can make MONEY from my VULNERABILITY of being a VICTIM of the “Modern Slavery Thriving in the UK” in 2025 the 80th year of VE Day in May when I will be 66 years old.

INTRODUCTON      

When Did The Long Standing Anti-Social Behaviour Occurred?  

·       The discrimination began in 2015 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYF’s discriminatory “Men in Childcare” policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYF’s conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal needing Emotional Regulation Treatment and destroying my career prospects. This happened in November 2020 under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture when Holley Sweeney P255654 and Nikki Wright P240060 and Harry Stack P255641 and Ben Godfrey P255842 turned up to MURDER me to say I committed SUICIDE. (Reference MOPAC response of Neil Sollis and Nikki Babb to my Complaint).

Roles of the District Judges I was not given any notice of the ORDER presided over by DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan, DJ Sterlini. (Appendix 1-3 Court Orders of the above). I represented myself at 2 Employment Tribunals https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 and Small Claims Court. After I became the victim of the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Services. (Appendix 4 -7 General Civil Restraint Order.  Equality Act Assessor Emua Ali). DJ Swan strikes out 5 CLAIMS (Appendix 8-12). The strike out of CLAIMS by DJ Sterlini and DJ Bell who are involved in this UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION, following the patterns of breaches of the “Equality Act” from LEYF. Hence, there was no need for an Equality Act Assessor. This constitute DEFAMATION of why I was sent on “Medical Suspension” by my former employers in 2015 and the COURT is questioning my CAPACITY. (Appendix 13 – SENCO job offer £46-55,000.00 in 2021).   

 Where Is Samantha Gibbs? Is Samantha Gibbs Getting Paid on Long-Term-Sick-Leave?  

 ·       This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.

SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION

This happened at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Workplace Nursery why I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper for the Policy Studies Institute “The Experience of Multiple Discrimination” recommended to ACAS. (Appendix 14 – IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley at the launch of “A New Met for London” on the 2nd September 2023. Reference YouTube.  By making me an INACTIVE PATIENT twice in 3 months the NHS has breached my RIGHTS as a DISABLED NHS PENSIONER leaving me at risk of Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948 “No society can legitimately call itself civilised if a sick person is denied medical aid because of lack of means. (Appendix 15 – London Ambulance Service CAD 1804 on 22/01/2025)

HCT Group Impact Report 2016  

     1.          Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse for Medical Reports

·       My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation. (Appendix 16 – Statistic of 1 in 5 of all SUICIDES are associated with UNEMPLOYMENT was used to send the Metropolitan Police and London Ambulance Service to my home on the 30th October 2017. This pattern of DISCRIMINATION is continuing using MALICIOUS REPORTS about my MENTAL HEALTH as a TRIGGER). Reference Joshua Jacques MURDERED four people in a brutal attack at a home in South-East-London Bermondsey. Bermondsey is considered a RACIST AREA. Samantha Gibbs started working with Housing for Women in April 2022, the same month that Joshua Jacques murdered the people in Bermondsey. Samantha Gibbs is BLACK and so were the members of the FAMILY that were murdered. (Appendix 17 – The Psychiatric Assessment of DJ Bell I did on the 15th April 2024 to be used).

Updated Arguments re 7 March 2025

Misconduct of DJ Beecham in treating the CLAIMANT more favourable than the DEFENDANT goes back to me telling LEYF Senior HR Dilys Epton at HOC Nursery on the 27 March 2015 “If I was an ANIMAL at BIB the RSPCA would RESCUE me.

·       The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).

Reference the visits to SECTION, MURDER, KIDNAP me between 30 October 2017 – 22 January 2025 (Appendix 18 – Son on the phone).

     1.          Harassment and Trespass

·       Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The amended Housing Act 1988 and the Eviction Act 1977.

·       The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

 “Terrorist Incidents” 27 September 2021  

(a). On the 27th September 2021 I was called on my mobile by Richard Harty who later KICKED me out of the UEL (Appendix 19 MIC).

(b) I went into Barclays Bank and my money was taken. When I went back to sort it out on the 5th October 2021, I was locked in the Bank whilst my account was CLOSED and the Met Police tried to bully me to leave. (Appendix 20 – 24 Banks & Building Societies Claims strike out).

(c) (Appendix 25 – Nexus Health Group Dr Joanna Pennack – Medical Report for UEL).    

     1.          Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office

·       The coordinated actions of the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney General’s Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).

·       These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:

·       Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) – up to 7 years’ imprisonment.

·       Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice – up to life imprisonment in serious cases.

·       Misconduct in public office – up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.

RECOMMENDED READING

Responses to General Form of Judgement or Order (K05EC530 Breaches of the Equality Act 2010, amended Housing Act 1988 and Eviction Act 1977 Imprisonment and Committal Inquiry)

     1.          Discriminatory Actions:
The discriminatory conduct began when the Housing for Women Solicitors Devonshires Solicitors LLP Narin Masera sent me POSSESSION LETTER in July 2023. I became a target of the Housing Association because of the former employer LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

     2.          Assumptions:
Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders. Reference the ECRO of Barrister Samantha Jones presided over online by DJ Jason Latham for why HHJ Richard Roberts decided to General Civil Restraint Order. (Appendix 26 -There is an outstanding JUDGEMENT against Barrister Ryan Clement that I have not collected yet. This was included in the 7 claims that DJ Bell sent from the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch for Civil Judge at CLCC.  Let me pencil in the names I recall HHJ Parfitt replaced HHJ Dight after I discovered he had a MISCONDUCT and was advised by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland, who I wrote to.

     3.          Differences in Treatment:
Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly. (Appendix 27-38 The Housing for Women Solicitors LLP used Mimi Owusu’s 12 pages Witness Statement to DEFAME my name after she SCAMMED me when I meet her at an EVENT in April, the relationship lasted to July 2023. (Appendix 39 – Ms Owusu was introduced to me by Liz who later ASSAULTED me at an event to support a member of the Community who was DISCRIMINATED against in BRIXTON. Who photographed me and Liz at the door?  

     4.          Language and Behaviour:
Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, “If we find any evidence, it will be different next time,” which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties. (Appendix 40 YouTube as Defensive Practice).

     5.          Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence:
Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants. (Appendix 41 – 43 Ms Gilchrist recording me in the garden, claiming she wants it for her EVIDENCE – Letter to H4W April 2019.  

     6.          Impact:
The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.

(a) (Appendix 44 – Interview University of Huddersfield Disrepair DAMP & MOULD).

(b) (Appendix 45 – Member of Housing Ombudsman Service Resident Panel.

(c) Appendix 46 – Invitation for Customer Panel – I was the Minute Taker for the Customer Panel that was disbanded in 2020 by the CEO Zaiba Qureshi. (d) (Appendix 47 – Ms H Presley found me online because Hermoine Cameron was advocating on my behalf. Hermoine Cameron visited me twice.

(d) I must put on record my concerns for Ms Gilchrist and her son, who is now her CARER and living in FEAR that his MOTHER will HARM herself from the PRESSURES of the CLAIMANT and Devonshires Solicitors LLP.

     7.          Good Outcome:
A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.

The County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. (a) These are the DJs that must be investigated: DJ Greenidge, DJ Swan and DJ Sterlini because I was not served with any ORDER to attend court from July – August 2023 when I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE. (b) DJ Naidoo because I was not aware of any case on the 20th December 2023. I had a “Medical Review” that I was asked to book. The RECORDS can be checked in JULY about the CRISIS I experienced. (c) DJ Swan and HHJ Richard Roberts for striking out my CLAIMS and issuing General Civil Restraint Order. (Appendix 48 – Online EVIDENCE).

Croydon Magistrates Court The Metropolitan Police came to my home on the 26th January 2023 another MALICIOUS REPORT by Ms Gilchrist. (Appendix 49 – Google Reviews. The attendance at Croydon Magistrates Court was another breach of my RIGHTS as a DISABLED person who was CARER for my husband (Appendix 50 – I could not have breached any COMMUNITY ORDER on the 14th & 15th December 2021. This was a cover up for Ms Gilchrist breaking the glass to the Communal Door on the 13th December 2021. She broke the glass again in May 2022 after opening a letter from H4W and leaving it on the mat (Appendix 50 – Community Order.  

Walworth Police Station   The INJUNCTION states that a NEIGHBOUR called the Police on the 2nd February 2023 because of my ASB, but this is DEFAMATION. The Police carried me home to wait for my husband because we got SEPARATED after the INTERVIEW. (Appendix 51 –  52 Interview at WPS – still INVESTIGATED – PC Chana.        

Demand for Immediate Action.

     1.          Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:

·       I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by HMCTS Judgements and Court ORDERS from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.

Devonshires Solicitors LLP

ITV News Documentary with Housing for Women and Queen Camilla will be compared to Windrush 70 where Mervelee Myers was page 1 of ITV News for Windrush 70 ahead of the Prime Minister Theresa May. Let me reference Facebook https://www.facebook.com/mervelee.myers that DISABLED my account in April 2024.

(a) The fact that I have written “Open Letters” to (Appendix 53-55 PM David Cameron and Theresa May and taken out a PETITION in 2017 is part of my EVIDENCE.

(b) (Appendix 56 – I am the COMPOSER of Brixton Market that is Border Crossings SONGSTREET App must be taken in EVIDENCE about the DEFAMATION of my name. https://www.facebook.com/groups/scambustertv/permalink/9379347335489296/

(c) (Appendix 57 – I was interviewed for King Charles Coronation. REFERENCE https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/5/4/troubled-histories-uk-caribbeans-on-king-charles-and-the-royals which will prove my ARGUMENTS about “No Blacks, No Dogs, No Irish” is worse today than in 1948. Because I am BLACK and the victim of IRISH Debbie Gilchrist who was coerced by Samantha Gibbs on the advice of Zaiba Qureshi when the H4W Customer Panel was disbanded in 2020.  Debbie Gilchrist teach me to communicate with her grey and white CAT, but teach the black cat to fear me, until I had to take care of it in their absence.   

(d) (Appendix 58 – performed at Lewisham and Tottenham in July 2023. Excluded from Moonshot because of LEYF Nurseries.  

(e ) (Appendix 59 – HCT Group Impact Report 2016 – I did not commit SUICIDE, so now am EXCLUDED and living like a PRISONER at 16 Alma Grove where the Metropolitan Police, the London Ambulance Service are called about my MENTAL HEALTH. Whilst the NHS made me an INACTIVE PATIENT twice in 3 months, because I refused to take RESPIREDONE to make me unable to FUNCTION.  https://youtu.be/GfxJh1QOPTI?si=30fpjraPoWmaBYt3

(f) (Appendix 60 – 100th Birthday Card.

(g) (Appendix 61 – Dr Phil Gregory WHITE and Hawah Oweh BLACK unannounced visit on the 21st November 2024.    

(h) (Appendix 62 – Georgina WHITE and Dr Peter Ocansey BLACK unannounced visit on the 22nd January 2025 and 17th February 2025.  

The role of the NHS

Without Prejudice the NHS seems to have embarked on a GASLIGHTING CAMPAIGN to cover the fact that ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON was NEGLECTED on BYRON ward between the 9th March – 8th April 2024.  

(a) (Appendix 63 – YouTube – Evidence of Defensive Practice in Hospitals. https://youtu.be/pNzbpwvFHCI?si=bAMsS52-eYvgNtZ1

(b) (Appendix 64 – Windrush Vigil 6th April 2024.

(c) (Appendix 65 – Claims HHJ Richard Roberts STRIKE out – Removed from husband’s bedside and MANHANDLED by WHITE SECURITY guards Nurse Betty called.  

(d) (Appendix 66 – The NHS is trying to entrap me focusing on my MENTAL HEALTH whilst not attending to my PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS. https://youtu.be/io2KUFZzfK8?si=56nTGNigbcOvaX77

(e ) (Appendix 67 – I have done 2 Blood Test and need the results to give to the DENTIST to SAVE the TEETH I have. Each time I am made INACTIVE PATIENT by the NHS.   

(f) (Appendix 68 – My son Kevin Murray spent 2 weeks in hospital with HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE because he is WORRIED about what the POLICE and NEIGHBOURS might do to me. He witnessed first-hand what they are CAPABLE of. https://youtu.be/2vnIeauLR3Q?si=eW27V2gZT1H_JJF8

     1.          Signed Response:

·       Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.  

Roles of Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust.

Acting UNPROFESSIONALLY claiming they sent me letter inviting me for meeting with Dr Peter Ocansey. Dr Ocansey and Georgina turning up at my home unannounced. (Appendix 69 RADAR-CNS Kings College London.

The Roles of the Solicitors & Barrister

I have no TRUST in the Solicitors and Barrister who are party to making me a VOICELESS VULNERABLE VICTIM of Housing for Women and Devonshires Solicitors LLP. During a ZOOM meeting with my SONS during the time I was experiencing the BEREAVEMENT from the LOSS of my BROTHER with PROSTATE CANCER and another DISABLED and spent his 60th in INTENSIVE CARE and I had the first HIGH BLOOD PRESSURE. I was in the Tessa Joel Medical Centre on the 30th July 2023 asking for SUPPORT with my HUSBAND. Reference DIABETIC EYE TEST. Barrister Miranda Grell said she would not REPRESENT me if I did not agree that she should talk for me. She claimed that no JUDGE would allow me to speak for myself. Since that  meeting I have not had any CONSULTATION with Barrister Grell except when I see her in Court. The Psychiatric Assessment I did on the 15th April 2024 stated I can INSTRUCT my LEGAL TEAM. Yet when I presented EVIDENCE, the SOLICITOR tells me the Court can do anything they please and my WITNESS STATEMENT is already prepared.

     1.          Data Protection Compliance:

·       I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

     1.          Notice of Witness Summons:

·        Be advised that you and any involved District Judges and His Honour Judges (HHJ) may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existence—or lack thereof—of the warrants and court orders you relied upon.

HUSBAND FUNERAL

Failure to Comply

Failure to let justice takes its course on the 17th & 20th March 2025 will result in:

·       Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.

·       Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.

·       Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign. https://youtu.be/hiwIflvqdD8?si=84FmwHt9o4MMPoqj

I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.

Yours sincerely,


Mervelee Myers

Cc to whom it may concern – All Rights Reserved

Appendix

  1. DJ Greenidge
  2. DJ Swan
  3. DJ Sterlini
  4. DJ Naidoo
  5. HHJ Richard Hayes – General Civil Restraint Order
  6. Equality Act Assessor – Emua Ali – I worked as cleaner at Victory House
  7. DJ Swan strikes out CLAIMS – 6-12
  8. Smart Teachers’ SENCO job offer 2021 – 13
  9. A New Met for London – 14
  10. London Ambulance Service visit 22/1/2025 – 15
  11. LAS visit 20/1/2025 – 16
  12. Solicitors & Barrister Unprofessional Conduct – DJ Bell Psychiatric Assessment – 17
  13. Police visit 18/1/2025 – I called – 18
  14. Richard Harty MIC – 19
  15. Claims Banks & Building Society – 20 – 24
  16. Dr Joana Pennack UEL Disability Form – 25
  17. Judgement Barrister Ryan Clement – 26.
  18. Mimi Owusu’s Witness Statement – 27 – 38
  19. Photo of Liz – 39
  20. YouTube – 40
  21. Ms Gilchrist recording me in the garden – Letter April 2019 – 41-43
  22. Interview University of Huddersfield – 44
  23. Member of HOS Resident Panel – 45
  24. Minute Taker for Customer Panel – 46
  25. Ms H Presley’s INJUNCTION – 47
  26. Online Evidence – Social Media INFLUENCER – 48
  27. Google Reviews – 49
  28. Croydon Magistrates Court – Community Order – 50
  29. Interview Walworth Police Station – 51
  30. PC Chana visited again – 52
  31. David Cameron response – 53
  32. Theresa May response – 54
  33. Petition – 55
  34. Border Crossings – SONGSTREET – 56
  35. Aljazeera Interview – 57
  36. Excluded from Moonshot – 58
  37. HCT Group Impact Report 2016 – Statistics – 59
  38. Husband 100 Birthday CARD –  60
  39. Dr Phil Gregory visit 21/11/2024 – 61
  40. Dr Ocansey visit 22/1/2025 – 62
  41. Kings College Hospital NEGLECT – YouTube – 63 – HHJ Richard Roberts General Civil Restraint Order –
  42. Windrush Vigil – 6th April 2024 – 64
  43. A&E Medical Report 7th April 2024 – 65
  44. Diabetes Eye Test – 66  
  45.   Blood Test – Dentist – Paid £2,440.00 to tell my STORY about SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION – IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE – 67
  46. Son spent 2 weeks in Hospital with High Blood Pressure 68
  47. RADAR-CNS Kings College Hospital Dr Faith Matcham – 69
  48. Social Media – Volunteering – Fundraising – 70

MMM

8 February 2025 Police Review IOPC

I want to request a REVIEW based on the following arguments: 1. Raquel Lovekin who contacted me nearly a year after I submitted the COMPLAINT has breached my RIGHTS under the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics, the Mental Health Act 2015, the GDPR 218 and the Charter of Rights Act 2021, the Amended Housing Act 1988 and Eviction Act 1977. 2. The fact that the IOPC is conducting the review is to be accepted as the continuing SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION by the RELEVANT AUTHORITIES’ PARTNERSHIPS denying my RIGHTS not to be treated like a CRIMINAL. 3. If the IOPC had not discriminated against me in Reference: 2019/119249 Force Reference: PC/7/19 I would not be asking for another REVIEW in 2025. 4. MOPAC Reference: PC/7911/20 proves that I am a VICTIM of the Metropolitan Police that are party to breaching my RIGHTS under the Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 and the complaint was not HANDLED proportionately and must be INVESTIGATED. 5. As the STRONG JAMAICAN WOMAN whose book IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE signed by the Commissioner at the launch of “A New Met for London”, I am on record asking to VOLUNTEER to help bring back the TRUST of the BAME Community with the Police. 6. If the Met is committed to developing a learning culture why did Raquel Lovekin believe she can continue to treat me as those who attempted to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me in my HOME from 30 October 2017 to 22 January 2025? 7. I have participated in SURVEYS that were used by BANKS, H4W Social Media to capture my TRUTHS to use to DISCREDIT me. 8. The fact that I have made COMPLAINTS against IOPC and MOPAC must be taken into considerations about how the Metropolitan Police is RACIST, TOKENISTIC, MISOGYNIST, ILLITERATE, INCOMPETENT GASLIGHTERS target VULNERABLE WOMEN in our HOME. 9. By now the Met Police should have learned from MERVELEE MYERS’ cases alone from 2019 with Tammie.Lawrance-Blake@met.police.uk and Owen.Pyle@met.police.uk the outcome of the MEETING was posted on YouTube the A-Z of ABUSERS ENABLERS. 10. Caseworker Ratna Khanam APPEAL Ref: 2019/11249 Email: ratna.khanam@policeconduct.gov.uk is another case. https://mervelee.com/2025/02/07/without-prejudice-mervelee-myers-chart-metropolitan-police-london-ambulance-service-attempts-to-section-murder-kidnap-between-30-october-2017-22-january-2025-16-alma-grove-london-se1-5py-as-commissio/ . 11. Reference: 2018/11351 IOPC John Howarth. 12. Why did it take Met Police nearly a year to contact me? I was asked to submit information 7 days of the email. Yet Raquel Lovekin sent me the OUTCOME on 7/2/2025 continuing the breaches of the various laws, legislations, codes of conduct and practices. 12. Based on Raquel Lovekin’s dealing of the complaint it is evident that her REPORT was pre-recorded to continue the DISCRIMINATION started after the death of my MOTHER by those covering up the PAEDOPHILE RINGS, I identified at www.leyf.org.uk where I worked from 1 September 2009-2015 without knowing. Richard Harty MIC was operating out of the HOC Nursery since the Equality Act 2010 became law. I did the “A Voice of a Child” research project for June O’Sullivan in August 2011. After I was a participant in Dr Maria Hudson research paper for the Policy Studies Institute recommended to ACAS. 13. IOPC can investigate the reasons for attempts on my life from 30 October 2017 to 22

January 2025 and get back to me before I put the information from RESEARCH about those involved in the REASONS Raquel Lovekin was given a PREPARED outcome for a COMPLAINT to contact me about. 14. Let me list some names for the Met Police to investigate in REVERSE ORDER: (A) Queen Camilla ITV News Domestic Abuse with Housing for Women – I was rescued from Domestic Abuse by H4W in 2000. I will make MONEY from husband 100th birthday card for my Fight4justice campaign. (A) Duchess Kate – Launched Child Mental Health from LEYF Nurseries Stockwell near where I lived when I escaped Domestic Violence, running barefoot on 30 November 2020 after I was assaulted. MOPAC Report by Neil Solliss and Nikki Babb outlines the DISCRIMINATION. (C) June O’Sullivan is/was advisor to the Mayor of London and Holly Sweeney led her MURDERERS to murder me under cover of LEYF Margaret Horn Lecture to say I committed SUICIDE. (D) White Dr Phil Gregory turned up unannounced with Black CMN on 21/11/2024 and Black Dr Peter Ocansey and White Georgina turned up on the 22/1/2025. (E) London Ambulance Service tried breaking down my door 20/1/2025 after they were given access to Alma Grove by Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper. (F) Housing for Women has given the key to the Communal Door to Devonshires Solicitors LLP and agents to gain access. 15. I am not SAFE at Alma Grove because of the following: 1. Metropolitan Police. 2. London Ambulance Service. 3. Hate Mob in Alma Grove. 4. Devonshires Solicitors LLP. 5. J I Solicitors. 6. NHS. 7. Individuals who played on my VULNERABILITY. 16. A New Met for London” must be used as EVIDENCE that the Metropolitan Police FAILED to SAFEGUARD me as REQUESTED from, I had to barricade myself inside on CHRISTMAS eve and waited over an hour before the Police arrived. My brother was with me on the phone from USA. 17. Met Police Safer Neighbourhood Team has not kept appointments to address the matter since. 18. Ms Gilchrist was coerced by H4W after she broke the glass to the Communal Door on the 13/12/2021. The Police came and accused me of locking her out. Ms Gilchrist locked me out on the 23/10/2024. 19. Matters with the H4W when Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert joined H4W in 2022. Ms Gilchrist was coerced to target me. 20. I was a member of H4W Customer Scrutiny Panel as the Minute Taker that was disbanded in 2020. 21. The visit by 6 members of the Met Police on the date I was receiving the bed on 27/2/2024 for my HUSBAND to come home to DIE will be recorded as part of the WINDRUSH SCANDAL and why LEYF must be INVESTIGATED for CHILD ABUSE, NHS for ELDER ABUSE & NEGLECT and prevention of TREATMENT to DISABLED NHS PENSIONER made INACTIVE PATIENT twice in 3 months. 22. The video online was posted to warn people about NEGLECT in cases of FAMILY who are in TRANSITION after the death of my husband’s SISTER. My husband was NEGLECTED on BYRON ward Kings College Hospital where I was removed from his bedside on the 6th April 2024 and manhandled. 23. We need to compare notes of PALS Gayle Lewis to understand why MERVELEE MYERS get DISCRIMINATED against DEFAMED and denied ENTITLEMENTS. 24. My husband’s brother died and will be buried on the 16th February 2025. Maybe the IOPC should get my TRIBUTES to understand why the PARTNERS involved with the DISCRIMINATION will not get away with DEFAMATION. 25. Let me share information that will make the world pay attention to the GESTAPO that is the Metropolitan Police: 1. LAS 22/1/25 CAD 1804 turned up after Dr Peter Ocansey & Georgina left. 2. 20/1/25 Record ID 812825221651

left a note under the door after trying to force entry. How many HOURS did they spent whilst people were in need of the AMBULANCE? 3. 469/18Jan25 after leaving my home they filled a REPORT that caused the London Ambulance Service to call ant THREATENED me. 4. Had to call 30 Jany 2025. Who is AS2547 Potter? 5. 2358/03Jany25 are 2924AS and 2499AS captured LIVE YouTube that proves the Met Police is the most RACIST TOKENISTIC MISOGYNISTIC GASLIGHTERS of DISABLED NHS PENSIONER who has been denied MEDICAL AID. 5. CAD 4638/11DEC24 Mike re INTERVIEW. Who is PC CLARKE 2893AS? 26. ADULT SAFETY CONCERNS records MERLIN: 24PAC005902 – Officers worried about my Mental Health. 24PAC047671 – On 27th February 2024, Officers worried about Mental Health after Police Scotland called about video of elderly lady tied up in bedroom. Who was the lady? Where was the video taken? Where was my HUSBAND? 27. The fact that the Met Police are FAILING to address matters impacting on my MENTAL & Physical Health in the cases where 2 Females visited on 9th August 2024 and Robert Lewsley is acting unprofessionally, my son and I were treated like CRIMINALS on 8/8/24, the Police still investigating re 2/2/24 when husband & I got separated, the robbery in Peckham has still not been RESOLVED. 28. I am expecting the IOPC to take all CASES of Metropolitan attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me into account and INVESTIGATE. Because I will be going PUBLIC, and the world will be INFORMED about me spending 11 years after I wrote to LEYF Senior HR am DEPRESSED and DYING SLOWLY of TORTURE on the eve of MOTHERING SUNDAY. On the eve of the death of my FATHER I will be known as the STRONG JAMAICAN WOMAN who challenge the GESTAPO that is MARK ROWLEY RACIST GASLIGHTERS in 2025 after he signed my BOOK in 2023.

MERVELEE MYERS DEMAND STRIKE OUT OF K05EC530 – Addressing SKELETON ARGUMENT of Housing For Women

Based on the MISCONDUCT at the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch on the 7 March 2025, I Mervelee Myers who is of SOUND MIND is putting my ARGUMENTS for the STRIKE OUT of K05EC530 and K02CL827 forward.

Nelson Mandela “The Purpose of Freedom is to Create for Others” must be related to my Fight4justice that I invested in. I started on Facebook before transferring to Google My Business. Nelson Mandela “Sometimes it falls upon a generation to be great – you can be that generation”. The face of Windrush 70.

Nelson Mandela “Our children are our future and one of our most basic responsibilities is to care for them in the best and most compassionate manner possible”. I consider myself “An Expert Authority on Subjects from the Cradle to Grave”.

Marcus Garvey “If we as a people realised our GREATNESS from which we came we would be less likely to DISRESPECT ourselves”. I invested in my Fight4justice.

Ambrose Bierce “Speak when you are ANGRY, and you will make the best SPEECH you will ever REGRET”. Refer to the GASLIGHTING & MISOGYNY.

Maya Angelou “She was RAPED at the age of 8 years old. Her rapist was found guilty but spent only one day in jail. After was released, he was murdered. Because of this, she became MUTE for almost 5 years, believing “her VOICE killed him.” “I killed that man because I told his name. And, then I thought I would never speak again, because my voice would kill anyone…”

Nye Bevan Founder of the NHS 1948 “No society can LEGITIMATELY call itself CIVILISED if a SICK person is DENIED medical AID because of LACK of MEANS”.

“If this CHILD was STRONG enough to SURVIVE it, your child is strong enough to LEARN about it”.

Her name was Marguerite Ann Johnson. Later in life, she would change her name to Maya Angelou. When she finally did speak, she had a lot to say. Maya Angelou became the voice for WOMEN and the BLACK COMMUNITY, garnering RESPECT and admiration for her HONESTY.

She would say “There is no AGONY like bearing an UNTOLD STORY inside you”. INSPIRED by the JON S. RANDAL PEACE PAGE.  

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS

INTRODUCTION

  1. When did the Long Standing Anti-Social Behaviour Started and Where did they Occur?
  2. Where is Samantha Gibbs
  3. Is Samantha Gibbs getting paid whilst on Long-Term-Sick-Leave?
  4. Where is Narin Masera?
  5. Is the Court aware about Mervelee Myers HIDDEN DISABILITIES if yes, when?
  6. Is the Claimant aware about Ms Gilchrist changing behaviours from she broke the glass on the 13 December 2021?
  7. Why did the CLAIMANT delete the Data from the Customer Panel?
  8. What was the RELATIONSHIP between Mervelee Myers & Debbie Gilchrist before Samantha Gibbs was employed?
  9. Can Ms Gilchrist disclose who wants me out of Housing for Women?    

RECOMMENDED READING

  1. Does H4W current employees aware of the roles and responsibilities of Mervelee Myers with H4W?
  2. Is H4W aware of Mervelee Myers’ contributions to the “COMMUNITIES of PRACTICES” in Jamaica and across the World?
  3. Can anyone who becomes aware of Mervelee Myers Fight4justice please subscribe to my PLATFORMS?  

BACKGROUND

  1. Why did it take from 1 December 2000 to 1 August 2021 to make an INJUNCTION under ASBCPA to prevent Anti-Social Behaviours?
  2. Did DJ become a party to the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION on 9th December 2024?
  3. Why was there a NEED for Equality Act Assessor when Mervelee Myers attended the Psychiatric Assessment requested by DJ Bell?
  4. Did the Claimant Solicitors COERCED the Legal Representatives to abandoned Mervelee Myers?

RELEVANT LAW ON GROUND 7A

  1. Did Mervelee Myers hand out copies of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE to people associated with the case?
  2. How much did H4W pay Mimi Owusu for the 12 pages Witness Statement?
  3. When did Trina Philbert started working with H4W?
  4. Did Candy Smith from Southwark Adult Social Care facilitate a MEDIATION with H4W?
  5. Where did Mervelee Myers meet the Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin in person?
  6. Does H4W and the Mayor of London have a PROGRAMME to House Women coming out of PRISON?
  7. Did Mervelee Myers Complaint reach Stage 2 of the procedures?
  8. What was the RELATIONSHIP between Ms Gilchrist and MM?
  9. Is there a Hate Mob in Alma Grove?  

SUBMISSIONS

  1. The INJUNCTION is UNLAWFUL based on I only became aware of it after my son left.
  2. DJ Beecham asked for the ASB Policy that was not in the BUNDLE at this stage of the Trial when I did not receive the Bundle.
  3. Ms Gilchrist coerced by H4W, went on to coerce a. 1. Joe Hooper, b. Hate Mob in Alma Grove including Debbie Thomas, c. Stepson Trevor Tomlinson.
  4. CRISIS July 2023
  5. Hermoine Cameron advocating online and visiting me twice.
  6. Kicked out of UEL by Richard Harty
  7. Did the Claimant know that I intended going back HOME?
  8. Reference letter in BOOK about needing to go home before I am 60 years old.

Breach of Article 8 RIGHTS

I have no knowledge that the J I Solicitors put forward, I was not consulted. The Psychiatric Assessment state I am CAPABLE of INSTRUCTING LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE.

  1. Advocating on behalf of others.
  2. Interview University of Huddersfield DESREPAIR Damp & Mould.
  3. Debbie Gilchrist window held up by BLACK Tape – this is ENVIRONMENTA issues of SAFEGUARDING.
  4. Dr Phil Gregory’s visit – Mould, Toilet Seat and Windows.  MMM

CONCLUSION

Mervelee Myers “Defensive Practices” will leave the world to judge the UK treatment of the Windrush Generation in 2025.

  1. Queen Camilla and King Charles 100 birthday CARD to ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON
  2. Cultural Ambassador
  3. Honestly am feeling SORRY for Tristan Salter, that a young man is being used. He seems to be a DECENT bloke that I am expecting my GRANDSONS to become.
  4. Getting time to help my grandson EARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES with his Speech and Language DELAY.                                                                                       

End HMCTS Misogyny Gaslighting

  1. Husband 100 Birthday Card
  2. International Women’s Day – Visit to Ms H Presley
  3. Please Subscribe to MM online
  4. Royal Mail & Tony in Alma Grove 7 March
  5. DJ Beecham preferential treatment to CLAIMANT Representatives – Barrister Samantha Jones – Contagious Disease – ET
  6. RADAR-CNS – Mental Health research
  7. Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust – Dr Maria Hudson research
  8. Complaints – HOS Resident Panel & University of Huddersfield Research  
  9.  Met Police – Attempts to SECTION, MURDER, KIDNAP 30/10/2017 – 22/1/2025

End Gender Base Violence

MM

1. London Ambulance Service

2. Dr. Phil Gregory & Dr Peter Ocansey

3. Mimi Owusu – 12 pages Witness Statement – Pestering me via Phone & Mobile calls.

4. Civil Restraint Order – Devonshires Solicitors – Barrister Samantha Jones.

5. Judgement – Barrister Ryan Clement

6. Miscarriages of judgements 16. Disability – Is Samantha Gibbs getting paid

7. Facebook pages account DISABLED

8. LinkedIn

9. Instagram

10. TikTok

11. Google My Business

12. Website Stolen – 2022

13. Fundraising/Volunteering

14. Face of Windrush 70

15. Composer of Brixton Market – 2022

16. Aljazeera Interview – 2023

17. SENCO Job Offer

18. Kicked out of UEL

19. Banks

20. Building Society  

MM

PLEDGE to be the VOICE of the VULNERABLE VICTIMS of SYSTEMS  

Mervelee Myers “Defensive Practices” will leave the world to judge the UK treatment of the Windrush Generation in 2025. How I was made the Victim of the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Service to cover the A-Z of BUSERS with friends in high places. Queen Camilla and King Charles 100 birthday CARD to ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON must be used to highlight the “Double Standards” in the UK in 2025. The Cultural Ambassador is honestly feeling SORRY for Tristan Salter, that a young white man is being used by his Asian counterpart. He seems to be a DECENT bloke that I am expecting my GRANDSONS to become.  Getting time to help my grandson EARLY INTERVENTION STRATEGIES with his Speech and Language DELAY.         

Copyright of

Mervelee Myers FD (Open)

Mental Health & SEND Advocate Turn Activist.                                   

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Survive 10 Years HMCTS CPS CJS Systemic Discrimination That Should Cause Me To Be HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Are Associated With Unemployment Husband 600,000 Older People In UK Say They Get Out Of The House Once A Week Or Less As Soon As Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Died Byron Ward Neglected 9 March-8 April 2024 Became Target Of London Ambulance Service Met Police Dr Phil Gregory Dr Peter Ocansey Who Referred Me To Maudsley NHS Reference Kings College London RADAR-CNS Dr Faith Matcham Dr Maria Hudson The Experience Of Multiple Discrimination Policy Studies Institute Recommended ACAS Face ITV News Windrush 70 Composer Brixton Market I Must Collate Intellectual Property Copyright Images CPPDP Generational Wealth From The Foundations Laid Purpose Of Freedom Is To Create For Others Nelson Mandela Mark Rowley Endorsed In Honour Of Strong Women Everywhere To #StrongJamaicanWoman Launch A New Met For London Month After DJ Sterlini Label Violent Nuisance Add To Criminal Need ERT Cover Richard Harty MIC UURICA-LE June O’Sullivan Drag Queen Storytellers 3/3/2025

Raquel Lovekin acting as Constable,

Professional Standards Department

NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department

RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)

Dear Ms. Lovekin,

Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise.

This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.

Summary of Key Issues

     1.          Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background

·       The discrimination began in 2017 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYF’s discriminatory “Men in Childcare” policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYF’s conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal and destroying my career prospects.

·       This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.

     1.          Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse

·       My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation.

·       The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).

     1.          Harassment and Trespass

·       Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).

·       The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.

     1.          Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office

·       The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney General’s Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).

·       These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:

·       Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) – up to 7 years’ imprisonment.

·       Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice – up to life imprisonment in serious cases.

·       Misconduct in public office – up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.

Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)

     1.          Discriminatory Actions:
The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

     2.          Assumptions:
Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders.

     3.          Differences in Treatment:
Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly.

     4.          Language and Behaviour:
Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, “If we find any evidence, it will be different this time,” which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties.

     5.          Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence:
Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.

     6.          Impact:
The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.

     7.          Good Outcome:
A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.

Demand for Immediate Action

     1.          Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:

·       I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.

     1.          Signed Response:

·       Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.

     1.          Data Protection Compliance:

·       I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).

     1.          Notice of Witness Summons:

·        Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existence—or lack thereof—of the warrants and court orders you relied upon.

Failure to Comply

Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:

·       Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.

·       Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.

·       Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.

I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.

Yours sincerely,

Mervelee Myers

Cc to whom it may concern – All Rights Reserved

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Record Abandonment Rejection Based On Fact Of My Passion Not To Conform To Accepting Systemic Discrimination I Experience From I Was A Child Who Face Traumas Of Disability Poverty I Grew Up Alone Although I Had My Brothers Guess I Lost My Way From My Father Was Stricken With Parkinson’s I Lost My Faith In God Became A Rebel Who Take A Stance About Those Who Cause Others To Suffer I Told My Stories My Life Is An Open Book To Help Others My Intellectual Property Copyright Images CPPDP Harvested Build Brands Website Stolen Now Am The Victim Of The Legal System To Cover Social Injustices That Are Documented Online To Benefit Others Yet All I Need Is Someone To Be There For Me Now My Husband Is Dead Am Lonely The Money He Left Me Is Gone If I Am Not Careful I End Up Imprison Evicted Forced To Take Medication To Silence My Voice To Speak About My Truths Discovering I Worked In LEYF Richard Harty MIC Abusers Rings June O’Sullivan Drag Queen Storytellers As I Struggled With My Brother’s Bisexuality Worried If He Could Have Molested Anyone I Did Not Know Much About His Other Side I Knew A Bloke Who Was Sensitive Generous Caring I Keep Asking Why God Is Making Me Suffer I Believe I Deserve Much More I Am Broken At How I Am Living Each Time I Have Bereavement Losses I Get Knocked Down I Pick Myself Up So Why Housing For Women HMCTS CPS CJS SRA BSB IOPC JCIO CCMCC HMPPS MOPAC CLCC DBS Decided To Take Everything Away From Me Now Am Planning To Go Home To Jamaica 1/3/2025

Refer

Dear All, good morning,

Please find the access info forwarded  below. Click on the link

— 

Kind regards,

Lucas Ochoa (He/him)

The Westminster Hub Team

From: Kendall, Daunna <Daunna.Kendall1@justice.gov.uk>
Date: Tuesday, 18 February 2025 at 09:39
To:
Subject: COP COP 13258625 EO

Please join the hearing

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 323 357 159 164

Passcode: N7Wy7GN7


Dial in by phone

+44 20 3443 8791,,88034428# United Kingdom, City of London

Find a local number

Phone conference ID: 880 344 28#

Join on a video conferencing device

Tenant key: teams@moj.onpexip.com

Video ID: 128 181 946 1

More info

________________________________________________________________________________

Kind Regards

Mrs. Daunna Kendall

Associate

Daunna.Kendall1@justice.gov.uk

High Court Family Division, Clerk of the Rules, 1st Mezzanine Queen’s Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London  WC2A 2LL.

Here is how HMCTS uses your data

Personal information charter – HM Courts & Tribunals Service – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)


This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

Addressee Only Reg Post WM 1407 5380 6GB
Stephen Parkinson acting as CEO CPSPrivateoffice@cps.gov.uk
The Crown Prosecution Service Fake Claim Number K05EC530
Rose Court, 2 Soutwark Bridge False Injunction No –K02CL827
London SE1 9HS Crime No 4221169/23100
NOTICE AND DEMAND – 28-02-2025
NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE IS NOTICE TO AGENT NOTICE GO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPLE
TAKE NOTICE
Stephen Parkinson acting as (CEO),
I am writing to formally put you on notice regarding what appears to be a series of unlawful legal
proceedings and abuses of process involving various public officials, including but not limited to
members of your department, the police, HMCTS staff, and Housing for Women.
Background of the Issue

  1. Since my unlawful dismissal from my longstanding childcare position due to sexual
    discrimination under the Men in Childcare policy, I have been subjected to relentless legal
    attacks. This appears to have been further exacerbated by my refusal to accept a £58,000
    bribe aimed at securing my silence regarding the replacement of staff—including myself—
    with cross-dressers in child storytelling roles.
  2. Your name and authority were allegedly used to facilitate a false legal case (Case No.
    2200933233) against me, which Croydon Magistrates’ Court has confirmed does not exist.
    Despite this, I continue to face fabricated allegations of breaches of this non-existent
    “ORDER.”
  3. I am now being summoned to an alleged criminal trial at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch
    County Court on 10th March 2025, under Case Number K05EC30, which is not a
    criminal case number and appears to be an unlawful misuse of court process.
  4. I have never been lawfully served with any court-issued proceedings from Clerkenwell and
    Shoreditch County Court or any other court.
  5. This failure to provide proper service obstructs my ability to exercise my legal rights,
    including but not limited to:
    · Filing an appeal
    · Challenging the legitimacy of the alleged case
    · Verifying whether fraud has taken place
    LEGAL DEMAND FOR DISCL

LEGAL DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE
Pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1981, I formally request that you provide the
following without delay:
mervelee007@yahoo.com

  1. An official copy of the information laid before the court that led to the initiation of these
    alleged proceedings.
  2. Concrete evidence that I have been lawfully served with these proceedings in accordance
    with procedural fairness and due process.
  3. If no such valid evidence exists, I demand that the CPS invoke the court’s Anti-Fraud and
    Assurance Policy immediately to investigate potential fraudulent activity.
    LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE
    Failure to provide the requested documentation or a valid reason for your refusal may result in legal
    consequences, including potential criminal liability for:
    · Perverting the Course of Justice – A serious common law offence carrying a maximum
    sentence of life imprisonment (R v Cotter and Others [2000] EWCA Crim 88).
    · Fraud by False Representation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) – Up to 10 years’
    imprisonment if it is established that legal documents or case numbers have been falsified.
    · Fraud by Abuse of Position (Section 4, Fraud Act 2006) – Up to 10 years’ imprisonment
    for any public official who knowingly facilitates or allows fraudulent legal action to proceed.
    · Misfeasance in Public Office – A tort and criminal offence, holding public officials
    personally liable for knowingly abusing their legal authority (Three Rivers District Council
    v Bank of England (No. 3) [2003] 2 AC 1).
    FORMAL NOTICE
    · If you are unwilling or unable to comply with this lawful request, you must provide a
    written explanation.
    · Failure to respond will be taken as an implied admission that no lawful basis exists for
    these alleged proceedings.
    · This notice will be used in evidence in any future legal action, regulatory complaint, or
    judicial review regarding the matter.
    I expect your full response within seven (7) days from the date of this letter. If no satisfactory reply
    is received, I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the Independent Office for Police Conduct
    (IOPC), HMCTS Senior Presiding Judge, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Legal
    Ombudsman, and other relevant authorities.
    Kind Regards
    Mervelee Myers
    cc To Whom it may Concern – All Rights Reserved
    Join Boris Johnson, Chris Evans and Lord Prem Sika against Court Order Scams

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Go Global With Fight4justice LEYF To Housing For Women 7 March 2025 Colonization In Reverse The Decriminalization Of Traumatised Wife Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Came UK February 1956 Made His Comeback 19 Wilson Road Camberwell London SE5 8PB A Stones Throw From Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Where He Was Neglected On Byron Ward Nye Bevan Founder NHS No Society Can Legitimately Call Itself Civilised If A Sick Person Is Denied Medical Aid Because Of Means Disabled Pensioner Inactive Patient Refuse Respiredone To Stop Me Exposing Richard Harty MIC Turn Paedophile Rings June O’Sullivan Drag Queen Storytellers Join At County Court Clerkenwell Shoreditch To Stop J I Solicitors Ltd 1-3 Atwell Road London SE15 4TW Sola Obajuluwa Barrister Miranda Grell Entrap Vulnerable Females To Be Threatened With Imprisonment Eviction Then Dump Us At Last Minute When We Question Unprofessionalism 1/3

Osiorenua John Itsagwedeacting as ceo                     27-02-2025

 FakeClaim Number K05EC530

   J I Solicitors Ltd                                                                                False Injunction No –K02CL827

   1-3 Atwell Road                                                                               Crime No 4221169/23100

   London SE15 4TW                                                                     

Subject: Formal Demand for Disclosure of Court-Issued Documents & Notice of Potential Fraud Investigation

Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as CEO,

I write concerning your refusal, alongside your staff member Sola Obajuluwa, to provide copies of key court documents that were lawfully requested on 9th December 2024 and again on 23rd December 2024. Despite these formal requests, I have received only a single document via post, which bears a forged signature and still lacks the materials I specifically requested.

It is my understanding that you claim to be acting on my behalf, defending alleged possession proceedings and a Sealed Injunction Order issued by the court. However, the court itself has been unable to produce these items and has subsequently opened Investigation Reference 67009789 into allegations of fraud and counterfeiting in conspiracy, which are criminal offences under the Fraud Act 2006 and Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981.

This follows 27th January 2023 – Croydon Court confirm FAKE Community Order –  2200933233 – No information was laid – No Sealed Order – No Case Management Records- Discontinue Proceedings.

Given the serious nature of this matter, take this as formal notice to attend as a witness and provide the requested documents under oath, with the penalty of perjury as prescribed under Perjury Act 1911, Section 5, should any false statements be made.

Formal Demand for Documents

Pursuant to your legal and professional obligations under the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct and relevant case law, I hereby demand the immediate disclosure of the following:

  1. A copy of the Sealed Lay of Information and Injunction Order allegedly issued by the court.
  2. The claim form for possession proceedings, issued by the court, along with the requested Case Management documents, originally sought since 9th December 2024.
  3. Evidence of payment receipts for court fees paid by H4W for issuing the alleged possession proceedings, as well as receipts for any public funds or legal aid received in relation to this matter.
  4. A copy of your firm’s indemnity insurance certificate, verifying coverage in excess of £5 million, against negligence, malpractice, and fraud, in line with your professional obligations.

Failure to comply with this request may result in further civil and criminal proceedings. Your obligations in matters concerning malfeasance, abuse of public office, and professional negligence are underscored in Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Constabulary [2001] UKHL 29, which establishes liability for misfeasance in public office. Should it be found that you have deliberately withheld documents or engaged in fraudulent activity, potential criminal charges under Section 2 (Fraud by False Representation) and Section 4 (Fraud by Abuse of Position) of the Fraud Act 2006 may apply.

Please provide the requested documents by [insert reasonable deadline, e.g., 7 days from the date of this letter]. If you fail to do so, I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Legal Ombudsman, the police, and other relevant regulatory bodies.

This letter serves as formal notice of my concerns and my intent to pursue all necessary legal avenues should you fail to comply.

 Yours faithfully

Mervelee Myers

Cc to whom it may concern – All Rights Reserved

mervelee007@yahoo.com

Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & VideosLatest news coverage, email, free stock quotes, live scores and video are just the beginning. Discover more every day at Yahoo!yahoo.com

On Monday 23 December 2024 at 14:19:22 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear Mr Sola,

I noticed a missed call from your office number. Unfortunately, I have been very busy with the Christmas festivities and other matters. Please send me an email regarding your update, as I have not had any response to my email of 9th December, which is peculiar.

I shall take this opportunity to wish you and your family a great festive period.

Kindest Regard

Mervelee

On Monday 9 December 2024 at 08:28:13 GMT, mervelee007@yahoo.com <mervelee007@yahoo.com> wrote:

Osiorenua John Itsagwede acting as ceo

                                                                                                        Mrs Mervelee Myers

   J I Solicitors Ltd                                                                          16 Alma Grove

   1-3 Atwell Road                                                                          Bermondsey

   London SE15 4TW                                                                      London [SE1 5PY]

Subject: Grave Concerns Regarding Procedural Irregularities and Potential Criminal Breaches

Dear CEO

Further to your call on Friday, 7th December 2024, informing me of a “criminal trial” to take place at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court on Monday, 9th December 2024, I must raise serious concerns regarding procedural breaches and potential criminal misconduct.

Grave Procedural Concerns

  1. Failure of Proper Service:
     I have not been served with any proceedings issued by the court, as required by Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) 6.3. The absence of service constitutes a breach of due process and undermines the fairness of the proceedings, in violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees a right to a fair trial.
  2. Case Law:
  • Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC [2003] EWCA Civ 1406: Establishes that parties must be properly informed of proceedings affecting their rights. Failure to do so invalidates the legitimacy of any such proceedings.
  1. Jurisdictional Error:
     It is procedurally and legally flawed to claim that a “criminal trial” can occur in a County Court, as County Courts do not have jurisdiction over criminal matters. This raises questions of judicial propriety and adherence to statutory functions.
  2. Case Law:
  • R v Manchester Crown Court, ex parte DPP [1993] 1 WLR 1524: Clarifies the specific jurisdictional boundaries of courts and the necessity of proper venue for proceedings.
  1. Questionable Claimant Identity:
     The documents list the claimant as “H4W,” an entity that I cannot identify as a legal person or corporate body capable of initiating legal proceedings. Furthermore, I have no contractual relationship with this entity, rendering any claim invalid.
  2. Case Law:
  • MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 1169: A defective claim by an entity without standing is a nullity and cannot confer jurisdiction upon the court.
  1. Breaches of the Companies Act 2006:
     Your company’s website lacks a registered address and company number, which are mandatory under Sections 82 and 1200 of the Companies Act 2006. These omissions constitute a criminal offence under Section 1112, which criminalizes the failure to comply with disclosure obligations.
  2. Negligence and Indemnity Insurance:
     Given the potential for negligence, malpractice, and fraud in conspiracy, I request a copy of your company’s indemnity insurance certificate to verify coverage of at least £5,000,000, as required by Regulation 3 of the Employers’ Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Regulations 1998.

Formal Requests

Pursuant to Rule 99 of the Magistrates’ Courts Rules 1999, I formally request:

  1. A copy of the Lay of Information, Issued by the court, to substantiate the basis for the alleged committal proceedings.
  2. A copy of your indemnity insurance certificate.
  3. Clear documentation evidencing the legitimacy of “H4W” as a legal entity capable of making claims.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failure to address the above concerns may constitute:

  • Fraud by false representation (Fraud Act 2006, Section 2), given the misrepresentation of the court’s jurisdiction and procedural validity.
  • Failure to disclose information (Fraud Act 2006, Section 3), particularly if material facts are knowingly withheld.
  • Abuse of process, as per Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, where proceedings are used for an improper purpose.

I require your written response and all requested documents by return. Failure to respond adequately will leave me no choice but to escalate this matter to the relevant regulatory and criminal enforcement authorities.

 Yours faithfully

Mervelee Myers

Today is 1st March 2025;

Three years ago I started working on my first book  and then my second in 2023 and you came along !! 

Thanks again. 

To celebrate the 3 years I need a little favor from you (no..not money !!)

This can be 

1. A photo of you with the book . or

2. A photo of you in the book. or

3. A short video about what being recognized in the book means to you.

PLEASE post on at least ONE platform.

Facebook

Instagram

X (Twitter)

YouTube or 

LinkedIn

and please MOST IMPORTANT use the hashtag

#saluting100blackauthors

Please do this RIGHT AWAY, TODAY or latest Sunday night !!

Thanks very much .

Garfield Robinson

Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Documenting The Unprofessional Conduct Of J I Solicitors 1-3 Atwell Road London SE15 4TW Tele: 02077328750 Sola Obajuluwa 07342908871 Barrister Miranda Grell Stitch Up During Meeting With Kevin Murray Valdin Legister Claims No Judge Will Give Me Time To Share Stores Re Deborah Agnes Gilchrist 23 Years Hate Crimes After The Zoom No Consultations Except In Court When I Am Told She Prepared Tried Discuss Matter Re Criminal Need ERT Told She Don’t Want To Know Upon Discovery Of DJs Greenidge Swan Sterlini Decisions Not Aware Contacted Solicitor Who Claim HMCTS Can Do What They Please I Was Promised If I Accept Dr Phil Gregory Medical Gaslighting Respiredone Until Am Ready To Leave For Jamaica To Be In Housing For Women Drugs Den To Be Victim Of Maudsley NHS Threatened To Remove Evidence On YouTube Dr Joanna Pennack Got Nexus Health Group Remove Since Silverlock Medical Centre Acorn Gaumont Surgery Done The Same Refuse Me Blood Test Result DJ Beecham Colluded To Defame Name 9/12/24 Get Equality Act Assessor Emua Ali Understanding Statutory Assessment Procedures Oct 2009 Camden Council LEA LEYF Formerly WCS CEO June O’Sullivan Will Be Charged UEL Richard Harty MIC Drag Queen Storytellers Who Got Rid Of Karen Walker Women In Leadership When She Got Her MBE 2013 Growing Pains Louise Cooper Development Director Explores Varied Growth Presented For LEYF How These Overcome I Was Never Consulted About Photos Nursery Management BIB 20/10/15 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2 AA Directorate Communications Unit David Chapman Department Education 03700002288 Message 13/11/15 Reference Miscarriages Of Justice Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust CCMCC CPS CJS SRA BSB IOPC JCIO HMPPS CLCC DBS Damp Mould Interview University Huddersfield 28/2/2025

Refer to

SO #youtube the #paedophiles #terrorists #enablers are #guilty and this goes to #instagram SO #youtube the #enablers of #paedophiles and #terrorists am #monitoring Dear Ms Myers I write further to the above housing proceedings in which we have represented you. I wrote to you on 13 February 2025, a copy of my letter is attached. You acknowledged my letter by email on 18 February 2025 at 09.34am. I also informed you that we had applied to the Court to come off the record as acting for you and you acknowledged receipt of our Application Notice by email on 25th February 2025 at 09.22am. Please note for the avoidance of any doubt that this email is confirmation to you that we no longer act for you in the proceedings and have written to other party that we have ceased acting for you. You will need to either arrange alternative solicitors to represent you at the forthcoming possession trial on 7th March 2025 and committal hearing on 10th March 2025 or you will need to attend in person. — Kind regards, Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor London Office: Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362 Web: http://www.jisolicitors.co.uk Home | J I Solicitors | Legal practice in South London and Kent Welcome to J I Solicitors J I Solicitors is a reputable legal practice located in South London and Kent We are a friendly team of solicitors who specialise in Family Law, Housing Law, Criminal Law, Immigration Law, Conveyancing and Property Law, Company Law, and Personal Injury http://www.jisolicitors.co.uk WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account. Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (“GDPR”) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint. Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us. Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175

Thanks very much. This will be used to expose the Black Solicitors taking Legal Aid to Discriminate against Vulnerable Tenants during CRISIS of Bereavement, Hospital Care and Gaslighting and MISOGYNY 

Regards 

MERVELEE Myers 

Sent from my Galaxy

——– Original message ——–

From: Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk>

Date: 28/02/2025 15:38 (GMT+00:00)

To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>

Subject: Case Numbers: K02CL827 & K05EC530Dear Ms Myers

I write further to the above housing proceedings in which we have represented you.

I wrote to you on 13 February 2025, a copy of my letter is attached.

You acknowledged my letter by email on 18 February 2025 at 09.34am.

I also informed you that we had applied to the Court to come off the record as acting for you and you acknowledged receipt of our Application Notice by email on 25th February 2025 at 09.22am.

Please note for the avoidance of any doubt that this email is confirmation to you that we no longer act for you in the proceedings and have written to other party that we have ceased acting for you.

You will need to either arrange alternative solicitors to represent you at the forthcoming possession trial on 7th March 2025 and committal hearing on 10th March 2025 or you will need to attend in person.


Kind regards,

Mr Sola Obajuluwa
Solicitor


London Office:                        Gravesend Office:        1-3 Atwell Road                        185 Parrock Street        London                                       Gravesend        SE15 4TW                                   Kent DA12 1EN        DX: 152641 Peckham 3           Tel:  014 7424 0190        Tel:  020 7732 8750                  Fax: 014 7456 0377        Fax: 020 7732 0362Web: www.jisolicitors.co.ukHome | J I Solicitors | Legal practice in South London and KentWelcome to J I Solicitors J I Solicitors is a reputable legal practice located in South London and Kent We are a friendly team of solicitors who specialise in Family Law, Housing Law, Criminal Law, Immigration Law, Conveyancing and Property Law, Company Law, and Personal Injurywww.jisolicitors.co.uk

WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (“GDPR”) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint.Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175                      
Housing For Women issue successfully submittedHi Mervelee,
Great news! You’ve successfully sent your issue to Housing For Women.

We’ll let you know when you get a response – or if you need to do anything else.This company is working with Resolver to ensure you get the best possible response to your issue. They will respond as soon as possible.Go to your case
How long should I wait for a reply?This depends on the size of the business (and the type of complaint you’re making), but generally you should expect a reply in around a week. There isn’t an official rule that says this, but it’s a good estimate.
What do I do if I don’t get a reply?Unfortunately, some businesses are better than others at getting back to you.

If a week passes and you haven’t heard from them, you should use Resolver to send a follow-up email or call them directly.
Can I raise another issue via Resolver?Of course! There’s no limit to the number of case files you can create with your Resolver account. It’s very easy to manage multiple cases at the same time – in fact, some of our users have 10 open at a time! No big deal.

Resolver covers a wide range of sectors and thousands of companies. If you need help with your rights, check out our comprehensive rights guides.Want the latest and greatest consumer rights news? Join Resolver’s thriving online community for a fresh perspective.Go to your caseGood luck with your case,  The Resolver teamHow can we help you?Finished with your case? Leave feedback here.Copyright © 2025      resolver.co.uk
All rights reserved.

Addressee Only Reg Post WM1407 5381 10GB Zaiba Quershi acting as CEO zaiba.quershi@h4w.co.uk

Housing For Women 00420651 Fake Claim Number K05EC530

Sixth Floor, Blue Star House False Injunction No –K02CL827

234-244 Stockwell Road, Crime No 4221169/23100

London, SW9 9SP Resolver RES10179943

NOTICE AND DEMAND – 28-02-2025

Zaiba Quershi acting as CEO,

I write to you with deep regret, as I have long been grateful for the assistance that both my late husband and I have received from your charity. I also wish to express my sincere intention to always conduct myself in a polite and respectful manner, despite the distressing situation that has arisen regarding my neighbour, Deborah Agnes-Gilchrist, and the purported injunction allegedly issued against me.

However, I am now gravely concerned about a series of court proceedings that appear to be taking place in my name without any lawful basis or verification. This matter is exacerbated by the fact that neither the court staff, the local authority, the police, the solicitors involved, nor yourself—as the purported claimant—have been able to provide any substantive evidence of these alleged proceedings.

Furthermore, it is deeply distressing that these false claims are being repeatedly referenced by authority figures and medical personnel as if they were legitimate, despite a clear lack of verification.

Evidence of Fraudulent Proceedings

On 27th January 2023, Croydon Magistrates’ Court confirmed that a false Community Order (Case No. 2200933233) had been recorded in my name. The court explicitly stated that:

· No information was laid before the court.

· No Sealed Order exists.

· No Case Management Records exist.

· Proceedings were formally discontinued, and an investigation was opened.

To date, I have never been lawfully served with any court-issued proceedings, and the court itself has failed to verify the existence of any such proceedings. This raises serious concerns of fraudulent misrepresentation and potential criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Formal Request for Disclosure

Under the principles established in R v Weir [2016] EWCA Crim 2170, which affirms the requirement for proper legal procedures in criminal and civil cases, I now make a lawful demand for the immediate disclosure of the following:

1. A copy of the Sealed Order of Injunction, along with the original Information that was laid before the court to obtain it.

2. A copy of the receipt for the court fee paid to issue the alleged possession proceedings.

Personal Liability for Fraudulent Conduct

As the CEO of Housing For Women, you hold personal and corporate accountability under the Companies Act 2006 and are legally responsible for ensuring that your organisation does not engage in fraudulent conduct.

Furthermore, under Section 12 of the Fraud Act 2006, a company director or senior officer who knowingly allows fraudulent activity to take place within their organisation can be held personally criminally liable. The penalties for such offences include:

· Fraud by false representation (Section 2, Fraud Act 2006) – carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment.

· Fraud by abuse of position (Section 4, Fraud Act 2006) – carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment.

· Conspiracy to defraud (Common Law, affirmed in R v Cooke [1986] AC 909) – carries an unlimited prison term depending on the severity of the fraud.

· Perverting the course of justice (Common Law, affirmed in R v Cotter and Others [2000] EWCA Crim 88) – carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment in extreme cases, such as this one.

Notice to Attend Court

In your capacity as CEO and a legally responsible officer of your organisation, I formally demand that you attend court to provide:

1. The above-requested documents OR

2. A plausible explanation, under oath, as to why these documents do not exist.

Failure to comply with this request will result in an escalation of this matter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Charity Commission, the police, and other relevant regulatory bodies. In light of the seriousness of these allegations, I reserve the right to seek further legal action, including filing a formal criminal complaint.

I expect a full response and disclosure of the requested materials within 7 days from the date of this notice.

Mervelee Myers – cc To Whom it may Concern – All Rights Reserved

Join Boris Johnson, Chris Evans and Lord Prem Sika against Court Order Scams https://bit.ly