Your complaint is still being progressed but at this time I am not able to provide you with a more comprehensive update. My personal workload is exceptionally high and I am systematically working through my complaints.
I assure you that your complaint is being taken seriously and your concerns will be addressed in due course. I fully appreciate that these updates may become frustrating, and I can only apologise for that any upset or frustration that is caused. I appreciate your ongoing patience with this process.
Address: Metropolitan Police, 40-42 Newlands Park, Sydenham SE26 5NF
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Please accept this letter as a FORMAL COMPLAINT for 23 years of Housing for Women breaching the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics and the Tenancy Agreements, I signed throughout the time I am living at 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey, London SE1 5PY December 2000 to date.
This COMPLAINT is in addition to REF: 20240000273.
I am requesting a Subject Access Request from H4W to replace the data wiped from the Customer Portal after I became a target of H4W when Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert were employed in April and May 2022.
I will therefore list the Complaint from todayโs date to the times I raised concerns to the Housing Ombudsman Services and MP Neil Coyle who contacted H4W twice on my behalf.
Areas of Concerns โ MCP Contractors
I would like MCP Contractors to be included in this COMPLAINT based on the handling of the matter by the person/female I spoke to on the 23 September 2024. When I spoke to the person from H4W earlier I was advised that MCP should have contacted me to do the repairs. I was told the matter would be escalated. When I did not hear from MCP I called and the person who already knows about the โLady with the Toilet Seatโ was so offensive I will be raising a separate COMPLAINT based on the shoddy work that was done and MCP insisting I am responsible for the toilet. Despite getting confirmation from H4W that the issues must be sorted by MCP.
Trauma from Mobile Phone Falling in Toilet
Because of MCP and H4W both my visitor and I are TRAUMATISED from her mobile phone falling in the toilet. We had to go get it fixed at the โPhone Shopโ paying money I can hardly afford. I will be seeking compensation. There is no toilet seat, and the toilet is left uncovered. Since my visitor arrives the water is not filling up to flush the toilet. We have to use container to pour water in to flush it.
BUNDLE K02CL827
The BUNDLE and its CONTENT is an avenue of COMPLAINT that H4W must consider when am seeking COMPENSATION for DEFAMMATION GASLIGHTING and MISOGYNY.
Page 320 โ Reference Dr. Maria Hudsonโs research paper for the Policy Studies Institute โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationโ recommended to ACAS. Freema
Pages 300-319 Medical Reports & DWP
Pages 284 โ 298 โ Stephen Agera Coerced by Narin Masera not to represent me.
Pages 266-271 โ Devonshires Solicitors LLP and H4W are guilty of HATE CRIMES and COERCIVE CONTROL of Debbie Gilchrist.
Pages 272-283 โ Devonshires Solicitors LLP and Devonshires Solicitors LLP guilty of paying Mimi Owusu for 12 pages Witness Statement to DEFAME my name. .
22nd September 2024
Interview at Home by the Police the continuation of Ms. Gilchrist and Mr. Hooperโs HATE CRIMES. Reference Number: 7435/16SEP24.
18th September 2024
Attended Court and Mental Health appointment. Fear of Ms. Gilchrist and her partner and members of Alma Grove caused me not to go home. I sleep on my MALE friendโs sofa.
Trina Philbert went out of her way to TRIIGGER me on the 4th April 2024 like she was coerced to do by H4W and Devonshires Solicitors LLP.
Letter dated 25th November 2022 page 125 of the BUNDLE is proof that H4W is/was aware of my COMPLAINT to HOS.
16th November 2023 Trina Philbert witness statement LIES.
Pages 229-240 โ Trina Philbert is a LIAR.
Narin Masera
10th November 2023 Statement of LIES Contempt of Court.
7th & 8th November 2023 Correspondence with Stephen Agera.
Sent Police to my home on 25th October 2023. My husband was triggered, I came home to find him going into a HYPO. Stephen Agera advised her to send the Police.
Mimi Owusu 13th October 2023
12 pages Witness Statement used to DEFAME my name. How much did H4W and Devonshires Solicitors LLP pay the CEO of Blac Awards for her SERVICEES?
BUNDLE Pages 142-154
Equality Act, Public Sector Equality Duty and Proportionality Review
BUNDLE Pages 169-172
The INJUNCTION dated 1st August 2023 is UNLAWFUL. Evidence can be verified leading up to the date on YouTube.
BUNDLE 183-197 Samantha Gibbs
Why is Samantha Gibbs on Long Term Sick Leave?
BUNDLE 198-215
Breach of the Equality Act, Data Protection Act, Human Rights Act, Charter of Rights 12 Codes, GDPR 2018, Freedom of Information.
District Judge Sterlini Page 202
DJ Sterlini was involved in striking out my claims with Winsome Duncan after it reaches Telephone Mediation. Winsome Duncan stole my manuscript and sent POLICE to section me from a malicious report. Like H4W this was a premeditated act. I have taken out a claim against DJ Sterlini for DEFAMATION.
Page 204 โ Who take the photo? Can you see there were no CAMERA when this photo was taken. Proves my point that the camera was installed to TARGET me inside the Communal Area. Reference letter to H4W April 2019.
Page 205 โ When this photo was taken the mats, my husband brought from 2001 were still at the door. In 2022 when Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert joined H4W they target US until they were taken away, when my husband needed them the most.
Page 206 โ Who takes this photo? The person who takes this photo has to be inside 16 Alma Grove. This is breaching all the laws and legislations and codes of practice and conducts. Reasons I say I am not SAFE in 16 Alma Grove. Camera installed to monitor my movements. The person standing at the door with me is Mimi Owusuโs friend. She later threatened and assaulted me.
Pages 207-216 โ I invested in Platforms to keep me active after I was denied my RIGHTS.
Page 138 19th July 2023 Email โ Narin Masera breaches โ Note to Self.
Narin Masera โ BUNDLE Page 133
17th July 2023 Email re letter REPOSESSION.
Pages 134-140 Breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics.
Debbie Gilchrist โ BUNDLE Page 128-132.
5th March 2023: This would be 3 days before my HUSBANDโs 100th birthday. I planned a PARTY for my husband, so when did I get time to be a VIOENT NUISANCE. Ms. Gilchrist.
Pages 126 โ 140 BREACHES
Pages 83 โ 122 BREACHES Tenancy Agreement.
Pages 42 โ 46 Stephen Agera Witness Statement. H4W failed to act
December 2022
Christmas eve had to barricade myself in waited for over 1 hour before the Police arrived. My brother was on the phone with me from the USA. Nathan said the Safer Neighbourhood Team would come to see me, am still waiting.
Letter dated 30th September 2022 is proof that H4W had plans to make me HOMELESS. Ms. Gilchrist told Ms Thomas that someone in H4W wanted me out. Ms. Gilchrist will have to disclose who at H4W wanted me out and why. On pages 223-124 of the BUNDLE, Trina Philbert made it clear that I would be made HOMELESS INTENTIONALLY. Threats of reporting me to the Police proves my ARGUMENTS about the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION threats of IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION via Contempt of Court.
Complaints
References: 20240000272 and 2024000031 and 20220000552
Housing Ombudsman Service
How does a VIOLENT NUISANCE get accepted to be on the RESIDENT PANEL?
Conclusion
I issued some CLAIMS already and I will be issuing more as soon as I have finished with the first lot. Why did H4W and Devonshires Solicitors LLP and HMCTS think they can get away with the TRAUMAS caused to my HUSBAND and I?
Copyright of
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
Turn Activist.
Claim against Druces LLP Ref Druces LLP:MA:DRU029.0037๎
Druces LLP, Salisbury House, London Wall, London, EC2M 5PSโโโโ Main: +44 (0)20 7638 9271 โข Fax: +44 (0)20 7628 7525 โข DX: 33862 Finsbury Sq โข www.druces.com โ โโThis e-mail is for the exclusive and confidential use of the addressee. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without our prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by telephone immediately. No engagements are entered into by Druces LLP except by a letter or fax bearing a Partnerโs signature. The term โPartnerโ in relation to Druces LLP is used to refer to a member of Druces LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. All partners of Druces LLP are solicitors of England and Wales. Druces LLP is a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales with registered number OC332179. A list of members is open for inspection at the registered office mentioned above. The firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 487134), whose rules are available at http://www.sra.org.uk/.
E-mails containing bank details are vulnerable to cyber-fraud. Please ensure that you get verbal confirmation of any bank account details given to you by e-mail. If you do not follow this procedure you may be deceived into transferring funds to a fraudsterโs bank account.
A member of the international network, Alliance of Business Lawyers.
YOUR REF: OUR REF: NAA\DRU029.0037\TEH DIRECT DIAL: 020 7216 5502 EMAIL: t.hattersley@druces.com 23rd September 2024 Dear Madam CLAIM NO: 570MC567 PARTIES: MRS MERVELEE MYERS -v- DRUCES LLP We write further to the above claim made by you against this firm (โthe Claimโ). The Claim has no merit and has been brought incorrectly. This firm has no knowledge of the contents of the Affidavits of 31 August 2023 and 30 May 2024 (โthe Affidavitsโ) nor any involvement with the matters to which they relate. This firmโs only connection with the Affidavits is that they were witnessed by one of our employees, Terri Hattersley. As such, the Claim is misconceived and has no prospect of success. We invite you to discontinue the Claim by 4pm on 30 September 2024 failing which we will
F.A.O. Mrs Mervelee Myers 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY By post and email YOUR REF: OUR REF: NAA\DRU029.0037\TEH DIRECT DIAL: 020 7216 5502 EMAIL: t.hattersley@druces.com 23rd September 2024 Dear Madam CLAIM NO: 570MC567 PARTIES: MRS MERVELEE MYERS -v- DRUCES LLP We write further to the above claim made by you against this firm (โthe Claimโ). The Claim has no merit and has been brought incorrectly. This firm has no knowledge of the contents of the Affidavits of 31 August 2023 and 30 May 2024 (โthe Affidavitsโ) nor any involvement with the matters to which they relate. This firmโs only connection with the Affidavits is that they were witnessed by one of our employees, Terri Hattersley. As such, the Claim is misconceived and has no prospect of success. We invite you to discontinue the Claim by 4pm on 30 September 2024 failing whic failing which we will make an application to the court to have it struck out. Yours faithfully DRUCES L
F.A.O. Mrs Mervelee Myers 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY
By post and email YOUR REF:
OUR REF: NAA\DRU029.0037\TEH DIRECT DIAL: 020 7216 5502 EMAIL: t.hattersley@druces.com 23rd September 2024
Dear Madam CLAIM NO: 570MC567
PARTIES: MRS MERVELEE MYERS -v- DRUCES LLP We write further to the above claim made by you against this firm (โthe Claimโ). MM Response: Your Firm is listed on the paperwork in the BUNDLE. The Claim has no merit and has been brought incorrectly. MM Response: Do you have the choice to make a decision about this? This firm has no knowledge of the contents of the Affidavits of 31 August 2023 and 30 May 2024 (โthe Affidavitsโ). MM Response: Your Firm was used by the person to witness the Affidavits. Nor any involvement with the matters to which they relate. MM Response: The person who signs is an employee of your FIRM. This firmโs only connection with the Affidavits is that they were witnessed by one of our employees, Terri Hattersley. MM Response: Are you saying that Terri Hattersley has compromised herself and your FIRM signing/witnessing something that is FALSE that can be Contempt of Court? As such, the Claim is misconceived and has no prospect of success. MM Response: Why was it issued? We invite you to discontinue the Claim by 4pm on 30 September 2024 failing which we will make an application to the court to have it struck out. MM Response: You are sounding like the Housing Association and Solicitors for whom Terri Hattersley sold her SOUL. By the way is that a THREAT? Go ahead and apply for it to be struck out. I am not scared of threats I have been representing myself against the A-Z of Abusers of the VULNERABLE. Yours faithfully DRUCES L
OFFICIAL MP03/24 OFFICIAL Dear Mervelee Myers, Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 01/FOI/24/040338/L I write in connection with your request for information which was received by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) on 22/09/2024. DECISION I have decided that, in accordance with Section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act), your enquiry is not considered a valid request. REASON FOR DECISION A request under the Act is required by clearly describe the information that is being requested. As I am unable to ascertain what information you are seeking, I have decided that the requirement outlined by Section 8(1)(c) has not been met. In order for the MPS to proceed with your request you are required to provide the information outlined above. If for any reason you are unable to do so, please contact me for assistance or seek assistance from any other available source. We will consider your resubmitted request upon receipt as long as it meets the requirements stated above. You will receive a response within the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act. Should you have any further enquiries concerning this matter, please contact me using the email or postal addresses at the top of this document, quoting the reference number for this request. Yours sincerely, Data Rights PO Box 313 Sidcup DA15 0HH Email: MPSDataOffice@met.police.uk http://www.met.police.uk Your ref: FOI-22747-24-0100-000 Our ref: 01/FO
LEGAL ANNEX Section 8(1) of the Act provides: (1) In this Act any reference to a “request for information” is a reference to such a request which- (a) is in writing, (b) states the name of the applicant and an address for correspondence, and (c) describes the information requested. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a), a request is to be treated as made in writing where the text of the request- (a) is transmitted by electronic means,
In all possible circumstances the MPS will aim to respond to your complaint within 20 working days. The Information Commissioner After lodging a complaint with the MPS if you are still dissatisfied with the decision you may make application to the Information Commissioner for a decision on whether the request for information has been dealt with in accordance with the requirements of the Act. For information on how to make application to the Information Commissioner please visit their website at http://www.ico.org.uk. Alternatively, write to or phone: Information Commissioner’s Office Wycliffe House Water Lane Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF Phone: 0303 123 1113
This email is to advise that claims 566MC567 and 567MC716 have been transferred to the Claimants local court , as per order from District Judge Etherington. Claims relate in part to defamation which must be issued in the High Court. Claimants Court to provide further Judges directions.
Kind Regards
L Wild
Team Lead: Online Civil Money Claims
HMCTS | Courts & Tribunal Service Centre | Stoke on Trent | Online Civil Money Claims
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
To Whom It May Concern
I have to tag the Solicitor representing me in this email because there is information that is relevant to K02CL827 and for nothing to do with the Claim that Nexus Health Group rejected. I will deal with this matters as I have just responded to the rejection via my Portal before the deadline on the 21st October 2024.
For Nexus Health Group information, I did not ask for any Consultation dated 18/01/2024 but 18/9/2024 when I was in Court for the above mentioned. I know it can be hard to get my speech out when am under pressure and getting targeted VERBALLY and PHYSICALLY and in WRITING and over the TELEPHONE. Please accept my apologies.
I will use the following to briefly address the matter of why I have to seek the COURT to address the Medical Gaslighting and Misogyny and breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics by the failure of Dr. Joanna Pennnack in filling the DISABILITY form correctly when I was accepted by the University of East London. Nexus Health Group has been given every chance to correct the MISCONDUCT but instead chosen to deny me access to treatment. As the face of ITV News page 1 coverage Windrush 70 Mervelee Myers must use “No Society Can Legitimately Call Itself Civilized If A Sick Person Is Denied Medical Aid Because Of Lack Of Means” Nye Bevan Founder of the NHS 1948. Am positive the NHS have more to lose if the stories from 2003-2008 at Kings when I had the first nervous breakdown after the death of my brother was to surface? But to neglect 101 year old ARNOLD EBENEZER TOMLINSON on BYRON Ward and assaulted me after removing me from his bedside is another matter. I have another appointment on the 26th September at the Hospital. Let me add that Dr. Joanna Pennack “Report Writing” left much to be desired.
Nexus Health Group 2 Princess Street London Greater London SE1 6JP 02079280253 Mrs Mervelee Myers, 16 Alma Grove London SE1 5PY Date: 13-Aug-2024 Ref:
To J I solicitors Re: MYERS, Mervelee (Mrs) 625 090 0543, 19-May-1959 16 Alma Grove London SE1 5PY 02072310813 07950618083. In response to your request for a letter with more information, please see below. I am a GP working at the surgery Mervelee is registered at. Please note that my previous clinical interaction with Mervelee consists of 3x 10minute consultations since 2017. MM Response: I have no memory of those consultations. However, 2017 was one of the most difficult year for me and the GP Practice should have been aware. Maybe see https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 for more information.
Please note that time allocated by the surgery for completion of this letter was 20minutes, MM Response: Working as an EYFS Coordinator, SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator am appalled at Dr. Pennack having the nerves to admit that the SURGER allocated her only 20 minutes to write a report that can determine if am IMPRISONED and EVICTED after the death of my 101 year old husband.
I am note able to be as thorough as I would have liked, and I am also not sure that I am going to be able to add much to the thorough psychiatric report that was completed in April. MM Response: You have no reason to make any decisions about been as thorough as you like. All you had to do is put information together from DATA in the system. You ask for specific mental health conditions โ she was diagnosed with anxiety and depression several years ago (first coded in 2018). MM Response: Where do you get this information from about 2018? My Chronic Anxiety diagnosis was July 2006 for my Health and Social Examination with the Open University. The only exam I had to do because I chose courses to be able to achieve because of my IMPAIRMENTS.
There was a query of bipolar disorder made by my colleague Dr Evans due to paranoid behaviour, pressure of speech, labile mood MM Response: I will have to find out more about this as I have no memory of this. Hence, I contacted you after you put the Aids Test in without being honest what your thoughts were when I visited you about Weight Loss noticed by the Professionals at appointment at the Hospital. (please note formal bipolar disorder diagnoses are not generally made by GPs, this is something our psychiatry colleagues do). A CMHT referral was done but rejected, they asked she see the mental health nurse first, but it appeared this never happened, although she does now have an appointment at the end of August with the mental health nurse at the surgery โ if the nurse feels CMHT input is needed she may then do a re-referral. Of note, CMHT did assess her in 2022 and found no evidence of bipolar disorder or psychosis. MM Response: When I organise my online Live Broadcasting under Mervelee Myers Consultancy Fight4justice as a Mental Health & SEND Advocate for the Early Intervention Strategies KEY to SURVIVAL. For my grandson with Speech and Language Delay, I will expose those covering for my former employers at http://www.leyf.org.uk and Nexus Health Group for breaches of the Equality Act.
Mervelee also reports that she has an eating disorder (Describes some days she cannot eat or drink anything at all), although I cannot find evidence of a formal psychiatric diagnosis of eating disorder. MM Response: Here we go again. Did I not say that my father and uncle had Parkinson’s? I developed “TRAUMAS” as a result of Disabilities and Poverty, but because I do not have a “Medical Diagnosis for Parkinson’s I cannot claim Parkinson’s as a DISABILITY. What you claim colleague Dr Evans due to paranoid behaviour, pressure of speech, labile mood is none other than the signs and symptoms of my “Atypical PARKINSONISM”. That is hard to diagnose and treat. I don’t need a diagnosis to say if I eat or not. My mother had the same condition.
You mentioned โdisability issuesโ โ I am not quite sure what you are asking? MM Response: Shame on you Dr. Pennack.
She has a past medical history of type 2 diabetes and knee osteoarthritis, although I cannot see any recent documentation on how the arthritis has affected her. MM Response: I did have Physio, and I do lots of walking. With aging come the exacerbation of any conditions. Sometimes my feet are swollen and painful and my toes dropped, and reason am visiting the hospital and was asked to make appointment for review. There are times when my hands crumble and I cannot use them.
There are no documented complications of her diabetes, it is well controlled. MM Response: Controlled as all my other CONDITIONS until I am pushed over the edge and triggered. Reasons Nexus Health Group will be exposed with NHS England and Maudsley NHS and Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Southwark Council Adult Social Care and Southwark Health Ambassador and Housing for Women and Housing Ombudsman Service and Devonshires Solicitors LLP. Others will be listed.
It is such a SHAME that it has come to this after the support I was given over the years to live a normal and fulfilling life until Dr. Joanna Pennack and Nexus Health Group decided to use Medical Gaslighting and Misogyny against me.
Yours sincerely,
Yours sincerely,
Page 2 of 2 PENNACK, Joanna (Dr) GP On behalf of Nexus Health Group 2 Princess Street London Greater London SE1 6JP 02079280253 selicb.nexus.clinic.letters@nhs.net
Invitation for collaborative engagement
S
Sony<laura.phillips@azet.sk>๎ฆฝ๎๎๎ง๎ฌฆ
To:โYouโ
Tue 24/09/2024 17:40
Greetings!
Allow me to introduce myself; I am Laura and currently, I am a PR manager for Sony Interactive Entertainment.
We are fans of your work on YouTube and value the wonderful quality of your material and your talent to engage and uplift your followers.
We are happy to inform you that we will shortly be introducing a new series of AI-enabled products.
This new lineup features cutting-edge technologies, many are aimed at enhancing the standard of your pictures and videos.
We would like to work together with you to advertise this new range of technology.
Your experience and credibility can substantially enhance our recognition campaign, and we are eager to consider various types of collaboration that will be beneficial for both parties.
There are many options for collaboration that can benefit us both, including: โข Reviewing the latest products from Sony. โข Incorporating our promotional video into your material. โข Joining forces on original video and project productions.
In compensation, we are prepared to offer you: โข Access to our cutting-edge products. โข Support through marketing promotions on our media outlets. โข Monetary reward for your contribution.
We believe that our partnership will help you to create even better and more exciting content and reach a wider audience. We are excited to discuss the potential of working together at your availability.
If you are willing, please let us know, and we will get in touch with you to explore the next actions.
Kind regards, Laura PR Manager for Sony Interactive Entertainment
“SONY” is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Corporation. ยฉ 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.
Thank you for your complaint received on 23/09/2024. MM Response: Actually the first complaint was submitted by one of Housing for Women’s employee. Seems she has not been coerced like Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert were???
In line with our policy, you were due to receive a response on the 18th of October, however your complaint is still under review. MM Response: Am not surprised because I am not sure what H4W Policy is since the Scrutiny Panel was abandoned in 2019. However, as a HOARDER, I have all my documents from I signed the first “Tenancy Agreement” with H4W. Please be assured your complaint is being considered as a matter of priority and we are working on ensuring a reasonable resolution is sought.
MM Response: I have to get the “Smelling Salts” so as not to FAINT. Am I to assume you are treating it the same as the “Toilet Seat” for which the complaint is/was about? What reasonable resolution are you talking about? Let me put some information so everyone is clear where Mervelee Myers stands on this matter. The following are the “Request Judgements” so far: H4W 1. 570MC171 2. 570MC174 3. 570MC180 4. 570MC419 5. 570MC664 6. 570MC492 Charles Hills & CO 7. 570MC604 Druces LLP 8. 570MC567 NHSEngland 9. 570MC423. Telephone Mediation: Housing Ombudsman Service – 570MC490. Gone To Court: Devonshires – 1. 570MC567 2. 570MC618 3. Nexus Health Group: 1. 570MC548 2. 570MC475. Kings College Hospital NHS Trust 1. 570MC482. Nationwide Building Society 1. 567MC716. Mimi Owusu 1. 557MC249. I am keeping track of District Judge ETHERINGTON.
Thank you for your patience and understanding whilst we resolve this matter, MM Response: You are obviously taking liberties. Considering H4W is the cause of my husband losing his DIGNITY at the end of his transitioning. Having to put up with Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper hate crimes from withing 16-16A Alma Grove. Having been traumatised the last 10 years because of how the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Service set out to treat US after the death of my mother with dementia. The Metropolitan Police attempts to SECTION MURDER and KIDNAP me in and from my home between 30th October 2017 to 9th August 2024. The roles of the HATE MOB in Alma Grove as a result of District Judge Sterlini label me a “Violent Nuisance”. The 12 pages “Witness Statement” of Mimi Owusu admitting implications of individuals and organisations in the breaching of the Amended Housing Act 1988. It is a “Criminal Offence” to harass or unlawfully evict a residential occupier. For your information I am a member of the HOS “Resident Panel”.
We intend on providing you with a full written response within the next 10 working days. MM Response: Are you hoping Debbie Gilchrist and the MOB in Alma Grove will harm me before the 10 days? I must think about putting in another claim then, in the meantime.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact us if you wish to discuss your complaint. MM Response: This is obviously a joke!
Thank you for your complaint received on 23/09/2024.
In line with our policy, you were due to receive a response on the 18th of October, however your complaint is still under review. Please be assured your complaint is being considered as a matter of priority and we are working on ensuring a reasonable resolution is sought.
Thank you for your patience and understanding whilst we resolve this matter, we intend on providing you with a full written response within the next 10 working days.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact us if you wish to discuss your complaint.
Kind Regards,
โBy including any personal data in your response to this email, you freely consent to this being used and stored by Housing for Women for the purposes of service delivery in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation. All information and attachments included in this email are confidential and intended for the original recipient only, it may also be legally privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or acting in reliance upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient then please do not use or publish its contents, contact the sender and then delete. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.โโโโ Housing for Women Limited is a Registered Social Landlord registered with the Regulator of Social Housing (No L0970); and is a charity registered with the Charity Commission (No 211351); and is a Private Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales (No 00420651). The registered office is at Sixth Floor, Blue Star House, 234-244 Stockwell Road, London SW9 9SP.
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:23 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk <enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; Clerkenwell & Shoreditch, Enquiries <enquiries.clerkenwellandshoreditch.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk <hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk> Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk>; Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]
Dear Sirs, MM Response: By now Devonshires should be aware I am a FEMALE not a MALE. Please refrain from addressing me as Dear Sirs. Whilst am at it my name is MERVELEE MYERS.
Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claim 570MC618 has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court. MM Response: Let me inform Devonshires that this is because of the DEFAMATION.
As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claim 566MC567 also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. MM Response: I don’t know if it is my MAD HEAD, but what does District Judge Beecham have to do with my claims for DAMAGES under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and Amended Housing Act 1988? She will have enough on her hands dealing with District Judge Sterlini and District Judge Bell breaches.
We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claim 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court. MM Response: Let me the unlearned tell Devonshires. Because of the DEFAMATION. In that case DJ Beecham will have to consider the 7 claims that DJ Bell transferred from the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch. Including that of Barrister Ryan Clement for which judgement was passed. For clarity I still have the documentation, if DJ Beecham don’t have access. Am I to understand that Devonshires Solicitors LLP only want to attend certain courts for reasons my BIPOLAR is saying is against the Rules of Laws?
Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows: MM Response: Since the new claims are separate and apart from the above which will be proven to be unlawful. Is Devonshires Solicitors LLP saying they have exclusive rights to dictate to the Judiciary of England and Wales HMCTS?
K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings –ย MM Response: Where is Narin Masera who sent me the letter in July when I was having some CRISIS? Is she on long term sick leave like Samantha Gibbs?ย
K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings –ย MM Response: The world will be watching via YouTube about this Committal Proceedings.
566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Please can you do me the honour of spelling my name correctly. Can they see I was not bothered by their THREATS. Am only concerned about what Deborah Agnes Gilchrist might do to me and get away like the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION.ย
570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Is Devonshires aware that Housing for Women did not respond to any of my CLAIMS? Devonshires were too busy trying to threaten me they did not have time for H4W.ย
These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together. MM Response: No, these matters don’t relate to one another. Since I have exhausted the Legal Systems the past 10 years, I can say that the biases against me is well known. Therefore, for all I am concerned DJ Beecham mmight be holding grudges against me. Because the information am relying on is online, I will invite anyone coonducting any courts am involved in to do their RESEARCH.
We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter, and we look forward to hearing from the court. MM Response: What urgent consideration are they talking about?
Yours faithfully,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance: High
Dear Sirs, MM Response: Since I did not tell Devonshires Solicitors LLP that am to be addressed as SIRS. Can they please take steps t correct this OFFENCE?
Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court. MM Response: Can I just make reference once again to DJ Bell transferring my claims to CLCC. This is proof about the DISCRIMINATION against me by HMCTS. I will address this in my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy coming soon. Some of the names to be considered are HHJ Dight who had a MISCONDUCT and was represented by HHJ Parfitt after Robert Buckland reprimanded him. I did write to Robert Buckland about my situation. This will be made for good reading or even a NETFLIX comedy. The fact am still waiting to be paid by Barrister Ryan Clement is telling indeed about how HMCTS operating.
This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. MM Response: Is Devonshires saying they will not be handling Housing for Women claims then? So Devonshires understands the claims is not about H4W but Devonshires UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT from Narin Masera sent me POSSESSION letter in July 2023.
We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. MM Response: If I have any say in the matter I will be putting in a COMPLAINTS about how Devonshires Solicitors LLP have power to manipulate the COURT. Then the court will have to explain how they went about treating me as a person without “Legal Training” left to represent myself from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 where I had the first nervous breakdown after the death of my brother with Colon Cancer Age 56 years old.
Kind regards,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
MM Response: I have every intentions of dealing with these matters as long as Devonshires Solicitors LLP are aware of the following: 1. 570MC171, 174, 180, 419, 492, 664. It has been brought to my attention that DRUCES LLP 570MC567 did not respond to the claim after sending me THREATS. Neither did NHS England 570MC423.
For Devonshires information it was District Judge Etherington who sent the claims to Mayor Of London County Court because of DEFAMATION. How much is DEFAMATION worth?
Regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
Turn Activist.
RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]๎
Weโve transferred your claim to Mayorโs and City of London Court
Outlook Item๎ฅฒ
Dear Sirs,
Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claim 570MC618 has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court.
As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claim 566MC567 also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.
We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claim 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court.
Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows:
K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings
K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings
566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim
570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim
These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together.
We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter and we look forward to hearing from the court.
Yours faithfully,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance: High
Dear Sirs,
Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court.
This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch.
We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.
Kind regards,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert: Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Dear DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP,
Claim number: 570MC618
We=92ve transferred your claim to Mayor=92s and City of London Court.
From now on, you should send any forms, letters or other documents to this =
court and contact them with any questions you have.
software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
Fight4justice 