Thank you for your complaint received on 23/09/2024. MM Response: Actually the first complaint was submitted by one of Housing for Women’s employee. Seems she has not been coerced like Samantha Gibbs and Trina Philbert were???
In line with our policy, you were due to receive a response on the 18th of October, however your complaint is still under review. MM Response: Am not surprised because I am not sure what H4W Policy is since the Scrutiny Panel was abandoned in 2019. However, as a HOARDER, I have all my documents from I signed the first “Tenancy Agreement” with H4W. Please be assured your complaint is being considered as a matter of priority and we are working on ensuring a reasonable resolution is sought.
MM Response: I have to get the “Smelling Salts” so as not to FAINT. Am I to assume you are treating it the same as the “Toilet Seat” for which the complaint is/was about? What reasonable resolution are you talking about? Let me put some information so everyone is clear where Mervelee Myers stands on this matter. The following are the “Request Judgements” so far: H4W 1. 570MC171 2. 570MC174 3. 570MC180 4. 570MC419 5. 570MC664 6. 570MC492 Charles Hills & CO 7. 570MC604 Druces LLP 8. 570MC567 NHSEngland 9. 570MC423. Telephone Mediation: Housing Ombudsman Service – 570MC490. Gone To Court: Devonshires – 1. 570MC567 2. 570MC618 3. Nexus Health Group: 1. 570MC548 2. 570MC475. Kings College Hospital NHS Trust 1. 570MC482. Nationwide Building Society 1. 567MC716. Mimi Owusu 1. 557MC249. I am keeping track of District Judge ETHERINGTON.
Thank you for your patience and understanding whilst we resolve this matter, MM Response: You are obviously taking liberties. Considering H4W is the cause of my husband losing his DIGNITY at the end of his transitioning. Having to put up with Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and Joe Hooper hate crimes from withing 16-16A Alma Grove. Having been traumatised the last 10 years because of how the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Service set out to treat US after the death of my mother with dementia. The Metropolitan Police attempts to SECTION MURDER and KIDNAP me in and from my home between 30th October 2017 to 9th August 2024. The roles of the HATE MOB in Alma Grove as a result of District Judge Sterlini label me a “Violent Nuisance”. The 12 pages “Witness Statement” of Mimi Owusu admitting implications of individuals and organisations in the breaching of the Amended Housing Act 1988. It is a “Criminal Offence” to harass or unlawfully evict a residential occupier. For your information I am a member of the HOS “Resident Panel”.
We intend on providing you with a full written response within the next 10 working days. MM Response: Are you hoping Debbie Gilchrist and the MOB in Alma Grove will harm me before the 10 days? I must think about putting in another claim then, in the meantime.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact us if you wish to discuss your complaint. MM Response: This is obviously a joke!
Thank you for your complaint received on 23/09/2024.
In line with our policy, you were due to receive a response on the 18th of October, however your complaint is still under review. Please be assured your complaint is being considered as a matter of priority and we are working on ensuring a reasonable resolution is sought.
Thank you for your patience and understanding whilst we resolve this matter, we intend on providing you with a full written response within the next 10 working days.
In the meantime, please feel free to contact us if you wish to discuss your complaint.
Kind Regards,
โBy including any personal data in your response to this email, you freely consent to this being used and stored by Housing for Women for the purposes of service delivery in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation. All information and attachments included in this email are confidential and intended for the original recipient only, it may also be legally privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or acting in reliance upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient then please do not use or publish its contents, contact the sender and then delete. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.โโโโ Housing for Women Limited is a Registered Social Landlord registered with the Regulator of Social Housing (No L0970); and is a charity registered with the Charity Commission (No 211351); and is a Private Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and Wales (No 00420651). The registered office is at Sixth Floor, Blue Star House, 234-244 Stockwell Road, London SW9 9SP.
saint_2_sinner_18, catch up on moments that you’ve missed
CI
chefmurrayscurries on Instagram<no-reply@mail.instagram.com>๎ฆฝ๎๎๎ฌฆ
To:โYouโ
Sat 19/10/2024 05:26๎ป
chefmurrayscurries, lady_love_angels53 and others posted something new.Catch up with InstagramSee what’s fun and inspired from the accounts that you follow.See what’s newDiscover moreThe more accounts you follow, the more great things you’ll see in your feed.Find accounts to follow1You have 1 notification you may not have seen. ยฉ Instagram. Meta Platforms, Inc., 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USThis message was sent to ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com and intended for saint_2_sinner_18. Instagram sends updates such as this to help you keep up with the latest on Instagram. You can unsubscribe from these updates, or remove your email address if this isn’t your Instagram account. Unsubscribe or remove your email address from this account.
Refer to Mr Tony Cealy’s video below because he was the one who helped me with his “Theatre of the Oppressed” training that taken me from the background I retreated after my life was turned upside down in my teen years and “Childhood Traumas” impacted my life. I asked Tony Cealy to help me share my stories. But like the others who used me, he is not willing to help. I have since discovered that Mr Cealy might need counselling to understand why he did “Not visited his SISTER who was SECTIONED?”
Watch EDITION Season 3, our last IRL event this year & updates – Your October Newsletter
Community matters.ย This October is all about coming together and growing your community on YouTube. From in person events to exciting platform announcements, weโve got you covered. Itโs here! Watch Season 3 of YouTubeโs EDITION now… MM Response: Mervelee Myers put on record that YouTube is nothing but a CYBERBULLYING PLATFORM targeting me on behalf of the A-Z of abusers including http://www.leyf.org.uk PAEDOPHILE RINGS of Richard Harty MIC and June O’Sullivan’s Drag Queen Storytellers, jumping ship in the EYFS. Operating out of the HOC Nursery since 2010 when the Equality Act 2010 became LAW.
This October weโve partnered withย @drveekativhuย andย @TheHackOfficialย to celebrate amazing black creators from the UK, during Black History Month. MM Response: How about YouTube start paying me for my CREATIONS instead of CYBERBULLYING me? Without Prejudice YouTube Be A Thorn In Foot Walking Bare Feet Day I Ran Out Of Husband Home 17 Denchworth House Stockwell SW9 OBN 2000 16 Alma Grove Taken Out Half Clothe By Holly Sweeney Born After I Came To UK 1992 HMCTS CPS CJS SRA BSB IOPC JCIO CC… F Fight4justice<comment-reply@wordpress.com>
We have aย Creator Collectiveย event for the YouTube Black community taking place in London, to celebrate the Season 3 launch of YouTubeโs EDITION. Hosted byย @drveekativhuย andย @TheHackOfficial.ย MM RESPONSE: Here is another of the CYBERBULLYING CRIMINALS invading my personal space via emails whilst taking away my RIGHTS to having my voice heard… saint_2_sinner_18, see what’s been happening on Instagram MI merveleemyers on Instagram<no-reply@mail.instagram.com> ๎ฆฝ๎๎๎ฌฆ To:โYouโ Fri 18/10/2024 05:24 Mervelee Myers, Tony Cealy and others shared 162 photos.Open Instagrammerveleemyers tonycealy – Tony Cealy will be part of my Research into MISOGYNY leyfonline – My RESEARCH into Paedophile RINGS of Richard Harty MIC and June O’Sullivan’s Drag Queen Storytellers will be published. nationalautisticsociety – My contributions to the Early Childhood Education from Jamaica to the UK will be published with my Mental Health and SEND Advocacy through Zaydan Murray Academy for delayed Speech and Language dementia_friends – My 18 Pages Account that Facebook DISABLED, the 3 accounts that LinkedIn stolen the 1st with 69 Publications will be accounted for. Google My Business Suspensions of accounts. Twitter, Instagram, TikTok accounts that are limited will feature in the RESEARCH. brthcompanions thevoicenewspaper – My association with George Ruddock and Garfield Robinson will be explored bbclondon – promotingourheritage – Garfield Robinson and my contributions will take focus. 1 You have 1 notification you may not have seen. ย ย ย ยฉ Instagram. Meta Platforms, Inc., 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, US This message was sent to ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com and intended for saint_2_sinner_18. Instagram sends updates such as this to help you keep up with the latest on Instagram. You can unsubscribe from these updates, or remove your email address if this isn’t your Instagram account.ย Unsubscribeย orย remove your email addressย from this account. Register your interest now to join the last IRL event this year. A more powerful way to connect with your community ย
Atย Made On YouTube,ย we revealed some exciting platform updates, like Communities, a new way for you to build deeper connections with your fans.ย MM RESPONSE: YouTube the CYBERBULLYING CRIMINALS party to A-Z of ABUSERS can read this… Re: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] MM Mervelee Myers ๎ฆฝ๎๎๎ง๎ฌฆ To:โYouโ Cc: โLina Amir;โ Sola Obajuluwaโ
Thu 17/10/2024 20:51
Here’s an article that will make good reading. I just seen Jason Latham from HMCTS who was on one of my case via ZOOM. I did do LIVE so will have to see if I can find them. Let me make it clear to Devonshires Solicitors LLP am responding in the CAPACITY of the Claimant who was asked to “Request Judgement” in 6 cases for Housing for Women and 1 for the witness Terri Hatersley who LIED about Samantha Gibbs. By the way is Narin Masera off on long leave too?ย ย How the Judiciary of England and Wales & Criminal Justice System Targets a Person Made Vulnerable by Abuse Rings After Mumโs Death with Dementia That is why I can get the following: General Form of Judgment or Order In the County Court at Central London Claim Number: F03CL973 Date: 24 February 2021. MRS MERVELEE MYERS 1stย Claimant Ref BARRISTER SAMANTHA JONES 1stย Defendant Ref. Before His Honour Judge Dight CBE sitting at the County Court at Central London, Central London, R.C.J, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL. UPON considering correspondence from the Defendant IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. List application for a ECRO before HHJ Dight CBE, HHJ Backhouse or HHJ Luba QC on first open date with a time estimate of 1 hour. Extended Civil Restraint Orders (ECRO). ย Dated 24 February 2021ย ย ย ย ย Aboutย CROs Aย CROย is a court order issued by a judge. Theyโre usually given when a personโs application for a court hearing is refused but they wonโt accept the judgeโs decision. Aย CROย then stops that person from re-applying to court. MM Arguments: The CCMCCย www.moneyclaim.gov.ukย is complicit in the discrimination against me from the time I saved up to take Winsome Duncan to Court. My claims reached Telephone Mediation and was struck out. I was advised to reapply. The same pattern of discrimination continues where Claims were defended and struck out by County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch for no reason that am a target of the Judiciary of England & Wales that presided over the two miscarriages of justice.ย
Challenging HHJ Marc Dight CBE Judgment of 24 February 2021. The following is my Arguments for challenging HHJ Dightโs judgment: JCIO/13/20ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย Date: 19 May 2020 STATEMENT FROM THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATION OFFICE His Honour Judge Marc Dight A spokesperson for Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said: โHis Honour Judge (HHJ) Dight has been subject to an investigation into his conduct following complaints of a serious delay in producing a judgment. The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice found that the delay was unacceptable and concluded that HHJ Dightโs behaviour amounted to misconduct having fallen below the standards expected of a member of the Judiciary. They have issued HHJ Dight with formal adviceโ. ENDS Notes for Editors Media queries in relation to the JCIO should be made in the first instance to the Judicial Press Office โ telephone 020-7073-4852 or via email โย press.enquiries@judiciary.uk For more information about the Office, including details on how to make a complaint against a judicial office holder, you can visit the JICO website at:ย http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk In line with this advice why has the JCIO failed to respond to Email: Sent: 08 October 2020 10:32 To: Mervelee Myers Subject: A caseworker has been assigned to your case CRM: 0055203 You are receiving this email as notification that a caseworker from JCIO has been assigned to your case. Your caseworkerโs name is Vincent Umeukeje and they will be in contact with you in due course. Your case reference is โ 33448/20 You can access your case at our Thank You, Judicial Conduct Investigation Office. ย The Judicial Conduct Investigation Office Gross Professional Misconduct Can the JCIO say what is the difference with HHJ Dightโs misconduct and the caseworker Vincent Umeukeje failure to contact me and the ET/EAT miscarriages of justice in breach of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics 1. Race, 2. Religions, 3. Disability, 4. Sexual Orientation, 5. Transgender Status? ย ย ย ย Here is my listing from the JCIO: 1. Judicial Ombudsman Paul Kernaghan & Adam Jones dealing of my complaint against HHJ Shanks who conducted the EAT. ย 2. The JCIO swapping HHJ Marc Dight with HHJ Nicholas Parfitt at CLCC on 2/9/2020 because I discovered his MISCONDUCT and posted in the Public Domain. 3. President of the EAT Justice Ingrid Simler โ What fact did she deal with when sending my Claim to the EAT with caveats? 3A. EAT HHJ Shanks โ Claimed I made up disabilities โ Allowedย https://www.39essex.com/barrister/samantha-jonesย to argue the EAT about Parkinsonโs disease. My Claim was not about Parkinsonโs disease because I do not have a Medical Diagnosis. But refer to My Experiences of Parkinsonโs Disease โ Updated 17/8/2017 atย https://plus.google.com/100939131463790195264/posts/YoJDpGvhGMGย for why I Know More About Parkinsonโs Disease Than Mostโฆ was used by other websites. It was published 3/4/2015 when I was sent on Medical Suspension in breach of the Contract I signed on 7/9/2009. 3B. John Booth โ Takes 1 year to return my FILE โ Refer to LEYF claim not to have any data for me after refusing me access to my FILE. However, using DISCLOSURES from my FILE to continue to DISCRIMINATE against me, 7 years after I raised concerns about my MENTAL HEALTH to Senior HR Dilys Epton on eve of Mothering Sunday 14/3/2015ย https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.siteย on Social Media. 4. President of the ET โ Brian Doyle โ The ET presided over 2 miscarriages of justice. Refer toย www.acas.org.uk/researchpapersย by Dr Maria Hudson โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationย andย www.ico.org.ukย SAR. 5. The ET Panel โ Judge Freer, Ms Fennel and Mr Dixon for perverting the course of justice. Taking 5 months to copy and paste the Respondentโs Representative Summary. From John Fenton ofย www.personnelconsultancy.comย a Conman who represented LEYF pretending to be a Solicitor. He was instructed by Barrister Samantha Jones who manufactured a Contagious Disease after telling the ET Panel she did not prepare a Case. 5A. David Chapman โ Tried to set me up about the Telephone Conciliation. 5B. Judge Martin โ Strike out my RACISM Claim repeatedly after Judge Baron recognize me on 15/3/2016 and sent it back. Look at the pattern of STRIKE OUT of my CLAIMS since. 5C. Judge Hildebrand โ Conducted the Telephone Conciliation โ Tried stitch me up to ยฃ58,000.00 NDA. Claims LEYF must protect themselves from me. Refer to the REVIEWS online.ย ย ย See Southwark News Publication โย https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/coronavirus-london-early-years-nurseries-unite/#.XpQfd4vU6lc.mailtoย for more about whyย https://www.policeconduct.gov.ukย is just another CORRUPT PLATFORM. 6. The CCMCC โ Providing platforms for Career Criminals from HMCTS to target vulnerable BLACK People โย https://www.ryanclement.comย andย www.peachespublications.co.ukย for more. 7. The BSB โ Waiting on the Review about my Complaint re Barrister Samantha Jones since September 2019. She was given a Reference by Judge Freer to be on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Panel. 8. SRA โ Claim LEYF can use my disability against me. Failed to act aboutย www.bwbllp.comย that claimed LEYF was their Client and got Facebook & Twitter Legal Team to contact me after the Judgment was posted online 16 August 2017.
Section 60 of the Equality Act 2010 The Equality Act prohibits discrimination against people with a disability, whether this is physical or mental impairment. The impairment is expected to last 12 months or more and impacts on a personโs day to day activities. The Judiciary of England & Wales is responsible for ruining my career and heath with the perversion and joining in with LEYF discrimination. Please see the REVIEWS online. Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service โ ACAS:ย http://www.acas.org.ukย Telephone: 08457-47-47-47. Equality Advisory and Support Services โ EASS:ย http://www.equalityadvisoryservice.comย at Email:ย adviceline@equalityadvisoryservice.comย Telephone: 0808-800-0082. ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย
Serious Delays in Producing Judgment Why has all my Claims sent to CLCC for Civil District Judge to impose Restraint Order? Barrister Ryan Clement: 1. Even the one for Barrister Ryan Clement has been sent back. 2. There was failure to collect my money from the judgment. ย 3. The Court Enforcement Service Ltd charging me to abort the Claim after I had to pay for my Claim, pay again to find Ryan Clement with 15 Companies registered online. 4. I mentioned the matter on 2/9/2020 and HHJ Parfitt says I have no say in the matter. 5. Whose responsibility is it to collect the money after I paid, and judgment passed? 6. Why is there one rule for me and another for those that DISCRIMINATED against me?ย ย Winsome Duncan: 1. The Claims reached Telephone Media and was struck out by the Career Criminal Judges at County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. This is the person who got the Metropolitan Police involved to carry out her discrimination. Because she was planning to harm me at her 40thย Birthday Party after setting up with Ryan Clement to scam me. She was groomed by Ryan Clement to find vulnerable BLACK People for him to SCAM. ย Claims Listed for CLCC: The Claims listed for CLCC is the result of the Institutional Discrimination of the Judiciary of England & Wales & Criminal Justice System. Those listed shout be dealt with instead Barrister Samantha Jones is colluding with HHJ Dight with the misconduct to impose ECRO. What does the 2 shares? They are CAREER CRIMINALS acting unprofessionally and will use CORRUPTION to get up the Career Ladder. Claims that were Defended and Struck Out:ย How much did the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch collect to strike out Claims that were Defended? Case ofย www.voicetheunion.org.ukย is relevant because they are charging me FEE after not representing me after getting rid of Union Rep Darren Mahon โ Refer to Disciplinary Hearing Outcome. The Union Solicitor Arwen Makin told me not to Appeal the Disciplinary. ย New Claims I have no intentions of issuing any New Claims as the recent Judgment/Order is how CLCC and HHJ Marc Dight shows how HMCTS is prepared to use my DISABILITIES against me, a Lay Person to continue the DISCRIMINATION. However, what about the Claims sent to CLCC from 2019? ย ย
Different types ofย CRO The judge will decide which is the most suitable type of order to issue. MM Arguments:ย The List of HMCTS Judges involved in Discrimination of Mervelee Myers: 1. HHJ Nicholas Parfitt โ CLCC Triggered my PTSD Called the Ambulance 3/9/2020 & 8/9/2020. Why isย http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.ukย failing to act after naming a caseworker?ย 2. HHJ Dight was the Designated Civil Judge listed for the CLCC on 2/9/2020 and was swapped with HHJ Parfitt when I discovered he has a MISCONDUCT against him on my DOB 2020. How can His Honour Judge Dight CBE be making decisions in any matter to do with Mervelee Myers, when HMCTS is in breach of every Rules of Law and acted unlawfullyย https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 in 2017? 3. All the Judges from County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch involved in striking out my claimsย www.ico.org.ukย Subject Access Request โ Data Protection Act โ 117119. ย 4. President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Justice Ingrid Simler โ Inย www.express.co.ukย advocating on behalf of criminals not to be deported to Jamaica. I contributed to the Daily Express Mental Health CRUSADE. Refer to my letter/email to LEYF on the eve of Mothering Sunday 14/3/2015. Now refer toย www.ofsted.gov.ukย as I was the EYFS coordinator, SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator at LEYF 2009-2014 when I was stripped of my Rights after CEO June OโSullivan sanctioned discrimination after Ofsted visited BIB and I was used for how they deliver Reasonable Adjustment in line with the Equality Act 2010. But LEYF can say they have no data for me with my Image Rights inย www.nurseryworld.co.ukย in July 2011 and onย http://skynews.co.ukย on the 5/9/2011 โThe Cost of Childcareโ.ย ย 5. JCIO โ Paul Kernaghan & Adam Jones โ Agreeing with Claims I made up disabilities by the EATย www.ico.org.ukย SAR. 6. President of the Employment Tribunal โ Brian Doyleย www.wslaw.co.ukย GDPR 2018 7. EAT โ Justice Simler who sent my Claim to EAT with caveats for disabilities and agreed with HHJ Shanks I made up disabilities. What fact did she used when sending my Claims to the EAT? 7B. HHJ Shanks โ Claim I made up disabilities. ย Limitedย CROย (LCRO) If a person is issued with anย LCRO, it means they have to get the judgeโs permission before making any application to the court covered by the order. Extendedย CROย (ECRO) If the person continues to go back to the court, a judge can issue anย ECRO. This order is limited to a specified group of courts.ย ECROsย last 2 years but can be renewed for a further 2 years. ย The CCMCC & County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Guilty of Perverting Course of Justice Let them do whatever they please. This is in addition to the CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1971 the TERRORIST Police using against me.
Generalย CROย (GCRO) In the most extreme cases, the judge will grant aย GCRO. This order applies to all the county courts and the High Court.ย GCROsย last 2 years but can be renewed for a further 2 years. If this order is ignored, the person will be in contempt of court and may receive a prison sentence. ย I Will Post a List of those to go to Prison in due course. See my Websites. Lists of people withย CROs General civil restraint orders currently in force Extended civil restraint orders currently in force ย Published 1 October 2014 โย MM Arguments: When I was given the CEO June OโSullivanโs Long Service Award. Who is responsible for the changes when LEYF say they have no data for me? Contents ย ย The Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics ย As a participant inย www.acas.org.uk/researchpapersย by Dr Maria Hudson for the Policy Studies Institute โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationโ when I was interviewed at my home in 2010. This was the year the Equality Act was implemented. I started working with LEYF on 1/9/2009, however the Contract I signed was not updated in line with the Act. The point am making is I am viewing the above as a threat, the same kind of threat as why PC Holly Sweeney was sent to my home on 26/1/2021 to deliver the envelope. Like the visit, the letter is/was delivered to exacerbate and trigger my PTSD on my mumโs DOB. Everything the Police is doing is geared towards impacting on my mental and physical disabilities. The fact I was arrested unlawfully is another factor to be taken into consideration. At every stage from the time PC Holly Sweeney called me on 29/11/2020, threat of ARREST was used. Therefore, the fact that the Police came to my home to SECTION me on 30/10/2017 after refusing to act on my concerns will be another of the Hate Crimes listed against the Police. I have a Chronic Anxiety diagnosis from 18/7/2006. As a result of LEYF discrimination from I transferred to BIB 23/7/2014 to sending the Police to MURDER me on 30/11/2020 is an indication of the kind of TERRORISM the Police is involved in. As a participant inย http://www.radar-cns.orgย Mental Health Research I had CBT counselling atย www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwarkย after I was advised to seek counselling to find out why I react the way I do to certain situation byย www.healthmanltd.comย Dr Laura Crawford. ย ย ย ย ย POSTAL REQUISITION You are charged with the offence(s) below. Onย 16/04/2021 at 9:30ย you must appear at the courthouse atย CROYDON COURT 10, Croydon Magistrates Court, Barclay Road, Croydonย to answer the charge(s). If you do not attend, the court may hear the case in your absence and may issue a warrant for your arrest. If a warrant is issued for your arrest, you may be held in custody until you are brought to court. MM Updates: In line with Discount for early plea I have made use of the circumstances that made you plead guilty to send my plea to the Prosecutor and the Court. Since the Solicitor is advising me that there is nothing in law for me to plead guilty with explanation, I refuse to be led like a lamb to the slaughter on the 16/04/2021 at Croydon Magistrates Court. My naivete in believing in the procedures of the Rules of Law has left me to conclude that I have no trust in the Judiciary of England and Wales and the Criminal Justice System. ย Police Bail If you are on Police bail for the offence(s) you do not have to return to the Police Station and your Police bail has been cancelled. ย MM Arguments: Refer to IOPC Claim: Number: F21YM135 Andrew Truby Lawyer FOR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Independent Office for Police Conduct Date: 24 October 2019. Claim Number: F45YM082 Date: 29 November 2019. This why the Police came to my house to MURDER me on 30/11/2020. DEAD MAN or MERVELEE MYERS TELLS NO TALE. Advice and Help If you need advice about what to do you should get help from a Solicitor or Advice Agency at once. If you cannot afford a Solicitor you may be able to get free advice about your plea, or how to apply to the Court for a Representative Order so that you can have a Solicitor at the Hearing. Do not wait until you first come to Court. If need any general advice about the Court, contact the Court Office at Croydon Magistrates, Croydon Law Courts, Barclay Road, Croydon, CRO 1JN 0207-8059851.ย MM Updates: No one answers my call, however, I made a recording and posted online as my Defensive Practice against HMCTS TERRORISM. ย ย ย CHARGE(S) 1ย ย ย ย Criminal damage to property valued under ยฃ5000 On 15/11/2020 at Bird in the Bush Community Centre, SE15 without lawful excuse, damaged Door, Wall and Flooring to the value of ยฃ1062 cash belonging to BIB intending to destroy or damage such property or being reckless as to whether such property would be destroyed or damaged CONTRARY TO SECTIONS 1(1) AND 4 OF THE CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1971 H.O. 149/None None CD71.ย MM Updates: Refer to theย https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016ย for how HMCTS is covering for LEYF Abuse Rings led by CEO June OโSullivan. Who wants to be remembered as a Disruptive Influence? Therefore, Social Media and the Press, and Ofsted and the Early Years Sector must be used as evidence. ย ย 2ย ย ย ย ย ย Criminal damage to property valued under ยฃ5000 On 28/11/2020 at BIB without lawful excuse, damaged Advertising Banner, Wall, Flooring and Entrance to the value of ยฃ1062 belonging to BIB intending to destroy or damage such property or being reckless as to whether such property would be destroyed or damaged CONTRARY TO SECTIONS 1(1) AND 4 OF THE CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1971 H.O. 149/None None CD71039. MM Updates: Refer toย http://skynews.co.ukย andย www.nurseryworld.co.ukย andย http://communityplaythings.co.ukย andย www.resourcesforautism.org.ukย andย www.morellomarketing.comย andย www.adwords.google.comย andย http://www.myvision.org.ukย andย www.parkinsons.org.ukย andย http://worldreferee.com/referee/valdin-legister/bioย andย http://jamaica-star.com/article/20161128/jlp-breaks-pnps-dominance-westmorelandย and Windrush 70ย www.itv.com/londonย andย https://www.hfw.org.ukย and Professor Tony Bertram โ EECERAย https://www.eecera.orgย and Dr Chris Pascalย www.crec.co.ukย andย https://www.diabetes.org.ukย andย https://www.macmillan.org.ukย and JA 53ย https://youtu.be/NwdEddlilwย andย https://www.facebook.com/PembrokeHouse/videos/302334554093821/? ย Why Did LEYF Fail to Report my Visit of 11/11/2020? Please visitย https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=taA14IVIm9gย to view my investments telling my story about LEYF and HMCTS discrimination. Check my YouTube & Websites to know why LEYF and cohorts from HMCTS & IOPC & JCIO & CCMCC & CLCC must be charged for Discrimination & Hate Crimes against Mervelee Myers after the death of my mother. I have been divested of my other Social Media Accounts. I was targeted by a James Jones and locked out of Facebook for 3 days. Realising that this was the final plot in the HATE CRIMES to take away my PASSION of using WRITING for THERAPY, I refused to fall for the TRAP. Reviews Online The Catalogue of ABUSE in the reviews are there from I was sent 3 of them by Winsome Duncan who later sent the Police to SECTION me. ย I applied for Additional Witness Statement during the Adjournment but again this was rejected. Same asย https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standardsย in 2017. ย Charge authorised by:ย Nameย ย ย HAWKINS. Officerย ย ย PC. Collar number P236802. Prosecution Contact:ย Walworth Police Station, 12 โ 28 Manor Place, Southwark, London SE17 3BB Tel: Date: Statement of means Please ensure you fill in and bring the enclosed Statement of Income and Expenditure to Court. If this information is not provided, you may be ordered to pay a fine which is more than you can afford.ย MM Updates: There was no Statement of Means Form enclosed.ย Discount for early plea The Court, when passing sentence on you, will consider giving you a lower sentence if you enter an early guilty plea. The amount of any discount will depend on how early you indicate your plea, as well as the circumstances that made you plead guilty. If you wish, you can write to the Prosecutor and the Court as soon as you have been charged and you are sure you want to plead guilty. If you intend to see a Solicitor you should speak to your Solicitor first. You can tell the Court how you will be pleading at any hearing of your case, even if your case may have to be heard at the Crown Court.ย MM Updates: This was sent to the Court & Prosecutor as advised.ย Nothing stated here is intended to persuade you to plead guilty.
Conclusion This is another catalogue of contingent Policy & Procedures to deny my Rights. The UNCRC Article 14 states that it is a basic entitlement of humans to enjoy their rights and freedom without discrimination on any grounds. Find my Image Rights & Intellectual Property from I done โA Voice of a Childโ Research for June OโSullivan in August 2010 to find out why HMCTS must be exposed for the discrimination which affected, impacted on, and changed the lives of my husband and I after the death of my mother in 2014. Prepared by: Mervelee Myers FD (Open) Mental Health & SEND Advocate Date: 28 February 2021.ย ย
om:ย Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Sent:ย Thursday, October 17, 2024 6:04 PM To:ย Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Cc:ย ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Complaints Coordinator <complaints@h4w.co.uk>; Complaints Coordinator <complaints@h4w.co.uk>; Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk> Subject:ย Re: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]ย From:ย Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent:ย Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:23 PM To:ย enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk <enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; Clerkenwell & Shoreditch, Enquiries <enquiries.clerkenwellandshoreditch.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk <hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk> Cc:ย Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk>; Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk> Subject:ย RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] ย Dear Sirs,ย MM Response: By now Devonshires should be aware I am a FEMALE not a MALE. Please refrain from addressing me as Dear Sirs. Whilst am at it my name is MERVELEE MYERS.ย ย Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claimย 570MC618ย has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court.ย MM Response: Let me inform Devonshires that this is because of the DEFAMATION.ย ย As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claimย 566MC567ย also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.ย MM Response: I don’t know if it is my MAD HEAD, but what does District Judge Beecham have to do with my claims for DAMAGES under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and Amended Housing Act 1988? She will have enough on her hands dealing with District Judge Sterlini and District Judge Bell breaches.ย ย ย We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claimย 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court.ย MM Response: Let me the unlearned tell Devonshires. Because of the DEFAMATION. In that case DJ Beecham will have to consider the 7 claims that DJ Bell transferred from the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch. Including that of Barrister Ryan Clement for which judgement was passed. For clarity I still have the documentation, if DJ Beecham don’t have access.ย ย Am I to understand that Devonshires Solicitors LLP only want to attend certain courts for reasons my BIPOLAR is saying is against the Rules of Laws?ย ย Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows:ย MM Response: Since the new claims are separate and apart from the above which will be proven to be unlawful. Is Devonshires Solicitors LLP saying they have exclusive rights to dictate to the Judiciary of England and Wales HMCTS?ย
K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings –ย MM Response: Where is Narin Masera who sent me the letter in July when I was having some CRISIS? Is she on long term sick leave like Samantha Gibbs?ย K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings –ย MM Response: The world will be watching via YouTube about this Committal Proceedings. 566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Please can you do me the honour of spelling my name correctly. Can they see I was not bothered by their THREATS. Am only concerned about what Deborah Agnes Gilchrist might do to me and get away like the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION.ย 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Is Devonshires aware that Housing for Women did not respond to any of my CLAIMS? Devonshires were too busy trying to threaten me they did not have time for H4W.ย ย These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together.ย MM Response: No, these matters don’t relate to one another. Since I have exhausted the Legal Systems the past 10 years, I can say that the biases against me is well known. Therefore, for all I am concerned DJ Beecham mmight be holding grudges against me. Because the information am relying on is online, I will invite anyone coonducting any courts am involved in to do their RESEARCH.ย ย ย We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter, and we look forward to hearing from the court.ย MM Response: What urgent consideration are they talking about?ย ย
Yours faithfully,
Lina Amirย |ย Senior Associateย |ย Devonshires Solicitors LLP ย Direct Dial:ย ย ย 020 7880 4472 Switchboard: 020 7628 7576 Fax:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 0870 608 9390 Website:ย ย ย ย ย ย www.devonshires.com ย 30 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7DT From:ย Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent:ย Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To:ย enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc:ย Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject:ย RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance:ย High ย Dear Sirs,ย MM Response: Since I did not tell Devonshires Solicitors LLP that am to be addressed as SIRS. Can they please take steps t correct this OFFENCE?ย ย Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court.ย MM Response: Can I just make reference once again to DJ Bell transferring my claims to CLCC. This is proof about the DISCRIMINATION against me by HMCTS. I will address this in my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy coming soon. Some of the names to be considered are HHJ Dight who had a MISCONDUCT and was represented by HHJ Parfitt after Robert Buckland reprimanded him. I did write to Robert Buckland about my situation. This will be made for good reading or even a NETFLIX comedy. The fact am still waiting to be paid by Barrister Ryan Clement is telling indeed about how HMCTS operating.ย ย ย ย This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch.ย MM Response: Is Devonshires saying they will not be handling Housing for Women claims then? So Devonshires understands the claims is not about H4W but Devonshires UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT from Narin Masera sent me POSSESSION letter in July 2023.ย ย ย We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.ย MM Response: If I have any say in the matter I will be putting in a COMPLAINTS about how Devonshires Solicitors LLP have power to manipulate the COURT. Then the court will have to explain how they went about treating me as a person without “Legal Training” left to represent myself from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 where I had the first nervous breakdown after the death of my brother with Colon Cancer Age 56 years old.ย ย ย Kind regards,
Dear Sirs, ย Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors
We write further to the above matter.ย ย We enclosed herewith for issue the Claimantโs application. Triplicate copies have been posted to you today. ย Please note, the Defendant willnot be filing Defences to these claims in accordance with CPR 3.4(7). ย In respect to the Court fee, we authorise you to take the Court fee of ยฃ303.00 from our PBA account being, PBA 009 0280. ย We respectfully request that the application issued urgently. ย The Claimant has been copied into this email for service. ย We look forward to hearing from the Court. ย Kind Regards, Duva ย Duvaraka Balachandranย |ย Paralegalย |ย Devonshires (she/her) ย Direct Dial: 020 7880 4459 Switchboard: 020 7628 7576 Fax: 0870 608 9390 Website:ย www.devonshires.com ย 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT ย We are usingย ย software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. ย We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
MM Response: I have every intentions of dealing with these matters as long as Devonshires Solicitors LLP are aware of the following: 1. 570MC171, 174, 180, 419, 492, 664. It has been brought to my attention that DRUCES LLP 570MC567 did not respond to the claim after sending me THREATS.ย Neither did NHS England 570MC423. For Devonshires information it was District Judge Etherington who sent the claims to Mayor Of London County Court because of DEFAMATION. How much is DEFAMATION worth?ย
Regardsย Mervelee Myers FD (Open) Mental Health & SEND Advocateย Tctivist.ย ย ย a Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent:ย Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:23 PM To:ย enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk <enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; Clerkenwell & Shoreditch, Enquiries <enquiries.clerkenwellandshoreditch.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk <hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk> Cc:ย Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk>; Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk> Subject:ย RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]ย Dear Sirs, ย Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claimย 570MC618ย has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court. ย As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claimย 566MC567ย also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. ย We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claimย 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court. ย Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows: ย K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings 566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim ย These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together. ย We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter and we look forward to hearing from the court. ย Yours faithfully,
Lina Amirย |ย Senior Associateย |ย Devonshires Solicitors LLP ย Direct Dial:ย ย ย 020 7880 4472 Switchboard: 020 7628 7576 Fax:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 0870 608 9390 Website:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย www.devonshires.com ย 30 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7DT ย ย Devonshires has signed both theย Greener Litigation Pledgeย and theย BPF Net Zero Pledge. We are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our practice. ย From:ย Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent:ย Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To:ย enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc:ย Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject:ย RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance:ย High ย Dear Sirs, ย Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court. ย This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. ย We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. ย Kind regards,
Lina Amirย |ย Senior Associateย |ย Devonshires Solicitors LLP ย Direct Dial:ย ย ย 020 7880 4472 Switchboard: 020 7628 7576 Fax:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย 0870 608 9390 Website:ย ย ย ย ย ย ย www.devonshires.com ย 30 Finsbury Circus, London, EC2M 7DT ย ย Devonshires has signed both theย Greener Litigation Pledgeย and theย BPF Net Zero Pledge. We are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our practice. ย From:ย Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Sent:ย Monday, September 30, 2024 10:35 AM To:ย enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc:ย Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk>; Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject:ย Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] ย Dear Sirs, ย Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors
We write further to the above matter.ย ย We enclosed herewith for issue the Claimantโs application. Triplicate copies have been posted to you today. ย Please note, the Defendant willnot be filing Defences to these claims in accordance with CPR 3.4(7). ย In respect to the Court fee, we authorise you to take the Court fee of ยฃ303.00 from our PBA account being, PBA 009 0280. ย We respectfully request that the application issued urgently. ย The Claimant has been copied into this email for service. ย We look forward to hearing from the Court. ย Kind Regards, Duva ย Duvaraka Balachandran|Paralegalย |ย Devonshires (she/her) ย Direct Dial: 020 7880 4459 Switchboard: 020 7628 7576 Fax: 0870 608 9390 Website:ย www.devonshires.com ย 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT ย We are usingย ย software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. ย We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information. ย ย Devonshires has signed both theย Greener Litigation Pledgeย and theย BPF Net Zero Pledge. We are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our practice. ย
Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert:ย Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Communities offers a dedicated space for your fans to get to know more about you and each other, share their stories and build deeper relationships around shared passions.
Connecting this Community throughout 2024
Weโve been up to a lot recently and weโd love to share the highlights with you. MM Response: I have been defending myself from YouTube the CYBERBULLYING CRIMINALS taking away my CHANNELS.
Notting Hill Carnival
For the first time, YouTube Black had the immense honour to be an active part of the Notting Hill Carnival joy. MM Response: I visited for the first time to share the experience with my SON.
Pass the Meerkat (@9ineDegrees)ย teamed up withย @MikaiMcDermottย to record a very specialย live podcastย at our carnival warm up, and on the Sunday we hosted creators on a special YouTube Black float to experience this celebration from a new perspective.ย
Decorated with YouTube Black Community photos, creators enjoyed, celebrated and embraced the day with food, drinks and music.ย
Bowling in Birmingham
ย This year we hosted the first ever YouTube Black event in Birmingham, hosted by Wall of Entertainment. Creators joined us to connect and network while enjoying drinks and nibbles, and demonstrating their best bowling skills! ๐ณThatโs another newsletter wrapped for now. Make sure you keep your ๐s on your inbox for future updates and more opportunities from YouTube.
๐ The YouTube Black Team #YouTubeBlackย ยฉ 2024 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066.ย All Rights Reserved. YouTube and the YouTube logo are registered trademarks of Google Inc. If you don’t want to receive any more emails about this event, you can opt outย here.
MM Response: The world will be informed that YouTube is targeting me for A-Z of Abusers including PAEDOPHILES.
How long is the commitment?ย If youโre chosen to join a panel, youโll receive invitations to participate in studies for up to one year.
What kinds of invitations will I receive?ย Youโll receive invitations to a variety of studies, including surveys, feature tests, and interviews, depending on your eligibility for each study.
How many invitations will I receive?ย 2-6 invitations per year, depending on eligibility
Do I have to join when I receive an invitation?ย We hope that youโll join every study, but we understand thatโs not always possible. Participants who repeatedly turn down invitations or are unresponsive may be opted out of a panel.
What are the thank-you gifts for participating?
Thank-you gifts vary depending on the time required for each study and will be specified in the invitations you receive. Examples include a 10 GBPย gift code for a 10-minute survey, a 15 GBPย gift code for a feature test, or a 65 GBPย gift code for a 60-minute interview.
Can I opt out of a study or a panel?ย Yes. You can opt out of a study, a panel, or all of YouTube User Research at any time, for any reason, without penalty by submitting thisย opt-out form.
Thank you for your time and interest! YouTube User Research
Why am I being contacted?
You were contacted by YouTube User Research because you opted in at https://www.youtube.com/creators/research or via an in-app message in YouTube or YouTube Studio.
To contact us with questions, please reply to this email. You may also withdraw from the study or YouTube User Research at any time, for any reason, without penalty by submitting this opt-out form (Panel ID: 371215532).
YouTube, LLC. 901 Cherry Ave. San Bruno, CA 94066 USA | Privacy Policy
The Queen has appointed Sara Elisabeth Beecham to be a District Judge on the advice of the Lord Chancellor, the Right Honourable Robert Buckland QC MP and the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, the Right Honourable The Lord Burnett of Maldon.
The Lord Chief Justice has deployed her to the South Eastern Circuit, based at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court with effect from 4 November 2019.
Notes to editors
Sara Elisabeth Beecham, aged 47 will be known as District Judge Beecham. She was called to the Bar (M) in 1999. She was appointed as a Deputy District Judge in 2010.Did you find what you were looking for?
Jason has worked in different areas of the justice system over the last 20 years including operations, policy, service design and projects and programmes.
Jason was appointed interim Development Director in October 2020 and was appointed permanently in April 2022. Jason leads the improvements to court and tribunal performance – enabling reform of courts and tribunals through the design of new services – and building the capability of the service teams through leadership and talent development.
Jason also leads a grassroots youth football club in North Manchester, and is an FA Coach.
Before His Honour Judge Dight CBE sitting at the County Court at Central London, Central London, R.C.J, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.
UPON considering correspondence from the Defendant
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. List application for a ECRO before HHJ Dight CBE, HHJ Backhouse or HHJ Luba QC on first open date with a time estimate of 1 hour. Extended Civil Restraint Orders (ECRO).
Dated 24 February 2021
About CROs
A CRO is a court order issued by a judge.
Theyโre usually given when a personโs application for a court hearing is refused but they wonโt accept the judgeโs decision.
A CRO then stops that person from re-applying to court.
MM Arguments: The CCMCC www.moneyclaim.gov.uk is complicit in the discrimination against me from the time I saved up to take Winsome Duncan to Court. My claims reached Telephone Mediation and was struck out. I was advised to reapply. The same pattern of discrimination continues where Claims were defended and struck out by County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch for no reason that am a target of the Judiciary of England & Wales that presided over the two miscarriages of justice.
Challenging HHJ Marc Dight CBE Judgment of 24 February 2021.
The following is my Arguments for challenging HHJ Dightโs judgment:
JCIO/13/20 Date: 19 May 2020
STATEMENT FROM THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT INVESTIGATION OFFICE
His Honour Judge Marc Dight
A spokesperson for Judicial Conduct Investigations Office said:
โHis Honour Judge (HHJ) Dight has been subject to an investigation into his conduct following complaints of a serious delay in producing a judgment. The Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice found that the delay was unacceptable and concluded that HHJ Dightโs behaviour amounted to misconduct having fallen below the standards expected of a member of the Judiciary. They have issued HHJ Dight with formal adviceโ. ENDS
Notes for Editors
Media queries in relation to the JCIO should be made in the first instance to the Judicial Press Office โ telephone 020-7073-4852 or via email โ press.enquiries@judiciary.uk
For more information about the Office, including details on how to make a complaint against a judicial office holder, you can visit the JICO website at: http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk
In line with this advice why has the JCIO failed to respond to Email: Sent: 08 October 2020 10:32 To: Mervelee Myers Subject: A caseworker has been assigned to your case CRM: 0055203
You are receiving this email as notification that a caseworker from JCIO has been assigned to your case.
Your caseworkerโs name is Vincent Umeukeje and they will be in contact with you in due course.
Your case reference is โ 33448/20
You can access your case at our
Thank You,
Judicial Conduct Investigation Office.
The Judicial Conduct Investigation Office Gross Professional Misconduct
Can the JCIO say what is the difference with HHJ Dightโs misconduct and the caseworker Vincent Umeukeje failure to contact me and the ET/EAT miscarriages of justice in breach of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics 1. Race, 2. Religions, 3. Disability, 4. Sexual Orientation, 5. Transgender Status?
Here is my listing from the JCIO:
1. Judicial Ombudsman Paul Kernaghan & Adam Jones dealing of my complaint against HHJ Shanks who conducted the EAT.
2. The JCIO swapping HHJ Marc Dight with HHJ Nicholas Parfitt at CLCC on 2/9/2020 because I discovered his MISCONDUCT and posted in the Public Domain.
3. President of the EAT Justice Ingrid Simler โ What fact did she deal with when sending my Claim to the EAT with caveats?
3A. EAT HHJ Shanks โ Claimed I made up disabilities โ Allowed https://www.39essex.com/barrister/samantha-jones to argue the EAT about Parkinsonโs disease. My Claim was not about Parkinsonโs disease because I do not have a Medical Diagnosis. But refer to My Experiences of Parkinsonโs Disease โ Updated 17/8/2017 at https://plus.google.com/100939131463790195264/posts/YoJDpGvhGMG for why I Know More About Parkinsonโs Disease Than Mostโฆ was used by other websites. It was published 3/4/2015 when I was sent on Medical Suspension in breach of the Contract I signed on 7/9/2009.
3B. John Booth โ Takes 1 year to return my FILE โ Refer to LEYF claim not to have any data for me after refusing me access to my FILE. However, using DISCLOSURES from my FILE to continue to DISCRIMINATE against me, 7 years after I raised concerns about my MENTAL HEALTH to Senior HR Dilys Epton on eve of Mothering Sunday 14/3/2015 https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site on Social Media.
4. President of the ET โ Brian Doyle โ The ET presided over 2 miscarriages of justice. Refer to www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers by Dr Maria Hudson โThe Experience of Multiple Discrimination and www.ico.org.uk SAR.
5. The ET Panel โ Judge Freer, Ms Fennel and Mr Dixon for perverting the course of justice. Taking 5 months to copy and paste the Respondentโs Representative Summary. From John Fenton of www.personnelconsultancy.com a Conman who represented LEYF pretending to be a Solicitor. He was instructed by Barrister Samantha Jones who manufactured a Contagious Disease after telling the ET Panel she did not prepare a Case.
5A. David Chapman โ Tried to set me up about the Telephone Conciliation.
5B. Judge Martin โ Strike out my RACISM Claim repeatedly after Judge Baron recognize me on 15/3/2016 and sent it back. Look at the pattern of STRIKE OUT of my CLAIMS since.
7. The BSB โ Waiting on the Review about my Complaint re Barrister Samantha Jones since September 2019. She was given a Reference by Judge Freer to be on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Panel.
8. SRA โ Claim LEYF can use my disability against me. Failed to act about www.bwbllp.com that claimed LEYF was their Client and got Facebook & Twitter Legal Team to contact me after the Judgment was posted online 16 August 2017.
Section 60 of the Equality Act 2010
The Equality Act prohibits discrimination against people with a disability, whether this is physical or mental impairment. The impairment is expected to last 12 months or more and impacts on a personโs day to day activities.
The Judiciary of England & Wales is responsible for ruining my career and heath with the perversion and joining in with LEYF discrimination. Please see the REVIEWS online.
Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service โ ACAS: http://www.acas.org.uk Telephone: 08457-47-47-47.
Why has all my Claims sent to CLCC for Civil District Judge to impose Restraint Order?
Barrister Ryan Clement: 1. Even the one for Barrister Ryan Clement has been sent back. 2. There was failure to collect my money from the judgment. 3. The Court Enforcement Service Ltd charging me to abort the Claim after I had to pay for my Claim, pay again to find Ryan Clement with 15 Companies registered online. 4. I mentioned the matter on 2/9/2020 and HHJ Parfitt says I have no say in the matter. 5. Whose responsibility is it to collect the money after I paid, and judgment passed? 6. Why is there one rule for me and another for those that DISCRIMINATED against me?
Winsome Duncan: 1. The Claims reached Telephone Media and was struck out by the Career Criminal Judges at County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. This is the person who got the Metropolitan Police involved to carry out her discrimination. Because she was planning to harm me at her 40th Birthday Party after setting up with Ryan Clement to scam me. She was groomed by Ryan Clement to find vulnerable BLACK People for him to SCAM.
Claims Listed for CLCC: The Claims listed for CLCC is the result of the Institutional Discrimination of the Judiciary of England & Wales & Criminal Justice System. Those listed shout be dealt with instead Barrister Samantha Jones is colluding with HHJ Dight with the misconduct to impose ECRO. What does the 2 shares? They are CAREER CRIMINALS acting unprofessionally and will use CORRUPTION to get up the Career Ladder.
Claims that were Defended and Struck Out: How much did the County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch collect to strike out Claims that were Defended? Case of www.voicetheunion.org.uk is relevant because they are charging me FEE after not representing me after getting rid of Union Rep Darren Mahon โ Refer to Disciplinary Hearing Outcome. The Union Solicitor Arwen Makin told me not to Appeal the Disciplinary.
New Claims
I have no intentions of issuing any New Claims as the recent Judgment/Order is how CLCC and HHJ Marc Dight shows how HMCTS is prepared to use my DISABILITIES against me, a Lay Person to continue the DISCRIMINATION. However, what about the Claims sent to CLCC from 2019?
Different types of CRO
The judge will decide which is the most suitable type of order to issue.
MM Arguments: The List of HMCTS Judges involved in Discrimination of Mervelee Myers:
1. HHJ Nicholas Parfitt โ CLCC Triggered my PTSD Called the Ambulance 3/9/2020 & 8/9/2020. Why is http://judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk failing to act after naming a caseworker?
2. HHJ Dight was the Designated Civil Judge listed for the CLCC on 2/9/2020 and was swapped with HHJ Parfitt when I discovered he has a MISCONDUCT against him on my DOB 2020. How can His Honour Judge Dight CBE be making decisions in any matter to do with Mervelee Myers, when HMCTS is in breach of every Rules of Law and acted unlawfully https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 in 2017?
3. All the Judges from County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch involved in striking out my claims www.ico.org.uk Subject Access Request โ Data Protection Act โ 117119.
4. President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Justice Ingrid Simler โ In www.express.co.uk advocating on behalf of criminals not to be deported to Jamaica. I contributed to the Daily Express Mental Health CRUSADE. Refer to my letter/email to LEYF on the eve of Mothering Sunday 14/3/2015. Now refer to www.ofsted.gov.uk as I was the EYFS coordinator, SENCO and Multigenerational Working Approach Facilitator at LEYF 2009-2014 when I was stripped of my Rights after CEO June OโSullivan sanctioned discrimination after Ofsted visited BIB and I was used for how they deliver Reasonable Adjustment in line with the Equality Act 2010. But LEYF can say they have no data for me with my Image Rights in www.nurseryworld.co.uk in July 2011 and on http://skynews.co.uk on the 5/9/2011 โThe Cost of Childcareโ.
5. JCIO โ Paul Kernaghan & Adam Jones โ Agreeing with Claims I made up disabilities by the EAT www.ico.org.uk SAR.
6. President of the Employment Tribunal โ Brian Doyle www.wslaw.co.uk GDPR 2018
7. EAT โ Justice Simler who sent my Claim to EAT with caveats for disabilities and agreed with HHJ Shanks I made up disabilities. What fact did she used when sending my Claims to the EAT?
7B. HHJ Shanks โ Claim I made up disabilities.
Limited CRO (LCRO)
If a person is issued with an LCRO, it means they have to get the judgeโs permission before making any application to the court covered by the order.
Extended CRO (ECRO)
If the person continues to go back to the court, a judge can issue an ECRO.
This order is limited to a specified group of courts. ECROs last 2 years but can be renewed for a further 2 years.
The CCMCC & County Court at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch Guilty of Perverting Course of Justice
Let them do whatever they please. This is in addition to the CRIMINAL DAMAGE ACT 1971 the TERRORIST Police using against me.
General CRO (GCRO)
In the most extreme cases, the judge will grant a GCRO.
This order applies to all the county courts and the High Court. GCROs last 2 years but can be renewed for a further 2 years.
If this order is ignored, the person will be in contempt of court and may receive a prison sentence.
I Will Post a List of those to go to Prison in due course.
Published 1 October 2014 โ MM Arguments: When I was given the CEO June OโSullivanโs Long Service Award. Who is responsible for the changes when LEYF say they have no data for me?
As a participant in www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers by Dr Maria Hudson for the Policy Studies Institute โThe Experience of Multiple Discriminationโ when I was interviewed at my home in 2010. This was the year the Equality Act was implemented. I started working with LEYF on 1/9/2009, however the Contract I signed was not updated in line with the Act. The point am making is I am viewing the above as a threat, the same kind of threat as why PC Holly Sweeney was sent to my home on 26/1/2021 to deliver the envelope. Like the visit, the letter is/was delivered to exacerbate and trigger my PTSD on my mumโs DOB. Everything the Police is doing is geared towards impacting on my mental and physical disabilities. The fact I was arrested unlawfully is another factor to be taken into consideration. At every stage from the time PC Holly Sweeney called me on 29/11/2020, threat of ARREST was used. Therefore, the fact that the Police came to my home to SECTION me on 30/10/2017 after refusing to act on my concerns will be another of the Hate Crimes listed against the Police. I have a Chronic Anxiety diagnosis from 18/7/2006. As a result of LEYF discrimination from I transferred to BIB 23/7/2014 to sending the Police to MURDER me on 30/11/2020 is an indication of the kind of TERRORISM the Police is involved in.
On 16/04/2021 at 9:30 you must appear at the courthouse at CROYDON COURT 10, Croydon Magistrates Court, Barclay Road, Croydon to answer the charge(s).
If you do not attend, the court may hear the case in your absence and may issue a warrant for your arrest. If a warrant is issued for your arrest, you may be held in custody until you are brought to court.
MM Updates: In line with Discount for early plea I have made use of the circumstances that made you plead guilty to send my plea to the Prosecutor and the Court. Since the Solicitor is advising me that there is nothing in law for me to plead guilty with explanation, I refuse to be led like a lamb to the slaughter on the 16/04/2021 at Croydon Magistrates Court. My naivete in believing in the procedures of the Rules of Law has left me to conclude that I have no trust in the Judiciary of England and Wales and the Criminal Justice System.
Police Bail
If you are on Police bail for the offence(s) you do not have to return to the Police Station and your Police bail has been cancelled. MM Arguments: Refer to IOPC Claim: Number: F21YM135 Andrew Truby Lawyer FOR THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Independent Office for Police Conduct Date: 24 October 2019. Claim Number: F45YM082 Date: 29 November 2019. This why the Police came to my house to MURDER me on 30/11/2020. DEAD MAN or MERVELEE MYERS TELLS NO TALE.
Advice and Help
If you need advice about what to do you should get help from a Solicitor or Advice Agency at once. If you cannot afford a Solicitor you may be able to get free advice about your plea, or how to apply to the Court for a Representative Order so that you can have a Solicitor at the Hearing. Do not wait until you first come to Court. If need any general advice about the Court, contact the Court Office at Croydon Magistrates, Croydon Law Courts, Barclay Road, Croydon, CRO 1JN 0207-8059851. MM Updates: No one answers my call, however, I made a recording and posted online as my Defensive Practice against HMCTS TERRORISM.
Check my YouTube & Websites to know why LEYF and cohorts from HMCTS & IOPC & JCIO & CCMCC & CLCC must be charged for Discrimination & Hate Crimes against Mervelee Myers after the death of my mother. I have been divested of my other Social Media Accounts. I was targeted by a James Jones and locked out of Facebook for 3 days. Realising that this was the final plot in the HATE CRIMES to take away my PASSION of using WRITING for THERAPY, I refused to fall for the TRAP.
Reviews Online
The Catalogue of ABUSE in the reviews are there from I was sent 3 of them by Winsome Duncan who later sent the Police to SECTION me. I applied for Additional Witness Statement during the Adjournment but again this was rejected. Same as https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards in 2017.
Charge authorised by: Name HAWKINS. Officer PC. Collar number P236802.
Please ensure you fill in and bring the enclosed Statement of Income and Expenditure to Court. If this information is not provided, you may be ordered to pay a fine which is more than you can afford. MM Updates: There was no Statement of Means Form enclosed.
Discount for early plea
The Court, when passing sentence on you, will consider giving you a lower sentence if you enter an early guilty plea.
The amount of any discount will depend on how early you indicate your plea, as well as the circumstances that made you plead guilty.
If you wish, you can write to the Prosecutor and the Court as soon as you have been charged and you are sure you want to plead guilty. If you intend to see a Solicitor you should speak to your Solicitor first.
You can tell the Court how you will be pleading at any hearing of your case, even if your case may have to be heard at the Crown Court. MM Updates: This was sent to the Court & Prosecutor as advised.
Nothing stated here is intended to persuade you to plead guilty.
Conclusion
This is another catalogue of contingent Policy & Procedures to deny my Rights. The UNCRC Article 14 states that it is a basic entitlement of humans to enjoy their rights and freedom without discrimination on any grounds.
Find my Image Rights & Intellectual Property from I done โA Voice of a Childโ Research for June OโSullivan in August 2010 to find out why HMCTS must be exposed for the discrimination which affected, impacted on, and changed the lives of my husband and I after the death of my mother in 2014.
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 3:23 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk <enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; Clerkenwell & Shoreditch, Enquiries <enquiries.clerkenwellandshoreditch.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk <hmctscivilmoneyclaims@justice.gov.uk> Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk>; Sola Obajuluwa <sola@itsagwede.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]
Dear Sirs, MM Response: By now Devonshires should be aware I am a FEMALE not a MALE. Please refrain from addressing me as Dear Sirs. Whilst am at it my name is MERVELEE MYERS.
Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claim 570MC618 has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court. MM Response: Let me inform Devonshires that this is because of the DEFAMATION.
As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claim 566MC567 also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. MM Response: I don’t know if it is my MAD HEAD, but what does District Judge Beecham have to do with my claims for DAMAGES under the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 and Amended Housing Act 1988? She will have enough on her hands dealing with District Judge Sterlini and District Judge Bell breaches.
We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claim 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court. MM Response: Let me the unlearned tell Devonshires. Because of the DEFAMATION. In that case DJ Beecham will have to consider the 7 claims that DJ Bell transferred from the County Court at Clerkenwell and Shoreditch. Including that of Barrister Ryan Clement for which judgement was passed. For clarity I still have the documentation, if DJ Beecham don’t have access. Am I to understand that Devonshires Solicitors LLP only want to attend certain courts for reasons my BIPOLAR is saying is against the Rules of Laws?
Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows: MM Response: Since the new claims are separate and apart from the above which will be proven to be unlawful. Is Devonshires Solicitors LLP saying they have exclusive rights to dictate to the Judiciary of England and Wales HMCTS?
K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings –ย MM Response: Where is Narin Masera who sent me the letter in July when I was having some CRISIS? Is she on long term sick leave like Samantha Gibbs?ย
K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings –ย MM Response: The world will be watching via YouTube about this Committal Proceedings.
566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Please can you do me the honour of spelling my name correctly. Can they see I was not bothered by their THREATS. Am only concerned about what Deborah Agnes Gilchrist might do to me and get away like the UNLAWFUL INJUNCTION.ย
570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim –ย MM Response: Is Devonshires aware that Housing for Women did not respond to any of my CLAIMS? Devonshires were too busy trying to threaten me they did not have time for H4W.ย
These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together. MM Response: No, these matters don’t relate to one another. Since I have exhausted the Legal Systems the past 10 years, I can say that the biases against me is well known. Therefore, for all I am concerned DJ Beecham mmight be holding grudges against me. Because the information am relying on is online, I will invite anyone coonducting any courts am involved in to do their RESEARCH.
We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter, and we look forward to hearing from the court. MM Response: What urgent consideration are they talking about?
Yours faithfully,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance: High
Dear Sirs, MM Response: Since I did not tell Devonshires Solicitors LLP that am to be addressed as SIRS. Can they please take steps t correct this OFFENCE?
Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court. MM Response: Can I just make reference once again to DJ Bell transferring my claims to CLCC. This is proof about the DISCRIMINATION against me by HMCTS. I will address this in my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy coming soon. Some of the names to be considered are HHJ Dight who had a MISCONDUCT and was represented by HHJ Parfitt after Robert Buckland reprimanded him. I did write to Robert Buckland about my situation. This will be made for good reading or even a NETFLIX comedy. The fact am still waiting to be paid by Barrister Ryan Clement is telling indeed about how HMCTS operating.
This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch. MM Response: Is Devonshires saying they will not be handling Housing for Women claims then? So Devonshires understands the claims is not about H4W but Devonshires UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT from Narin Masera sent me POSSESSION letter in July 2023.
We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham. MM Response: If I have any say in the matter I will be putting in a COMPLAINTS about how Devonshires Solicitors LLP have power to manipulate the COURT. Then the court will have to explain how they went about treating me as a person without “Legal Training” left to represent myself from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust 2003-2008 where I had the first nervous breakdown after the death of my brother with Colon Cancer Age 56 years old.
Kind regards,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
MM Response: I have every intentions of dealing with these matters as long as Devonshires Solicitors LLP are aware of the following: 1. 570MC171, 174, 180, 419, 492, 664. It has been brought to my attention that DRUCES LLP 570MC567 did not respond to the claim after sending me THREATS. Neither did NHS England 570MC423.
For Devonshires information it was District Judge Etherington who sent the claims to Mayor Of London County Court because of DEFAMATION. How much is DEFAMATION worth?
Regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
Turn Activist.
RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739]๎
Weโve transferred your claim to Mayorโs and City of London Court
Outlook Item๎ฅฒ
Dear Sirs,
Further to our email below, we have now received the attached notification that claim 570MC618 has once again been transferred. However, this time it has been transferred from Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court to Mayorโs and City of London Court.
As per our email below and application dated 30 September 2024, we requested that as 3x claims involving the Claimant were at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, that claim 566MC567 also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.
We are not clear as to the reason the court transferred claim 570MC618, which was already at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court, back out of this court and to Mayorโs and City of London Court.
Please may we respectfully repeat our request for all 4x claims to be retained by/transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court and to be reserved to District Judge Beecham who has reserved claims 1 and 2 below to herself. To confirm, the 4x claims referred to above are as follows:
K05EC530 – Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Possession Proceedings
K02CL827- Housing For Women v Meverlee Myers – Committal Proceedings
566MC567 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim
570MC618 – Meverlee Myers v Devonshires Solicitors – Money claim
These matters relate to one another and as confirmed in our application, we consider it makes practical sense for a judge familiar with these matters to hear them all together.
We would be grateful for your urgent consideration of this matter and we look forward to hearing from the court.
Yours faithfully,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
From: Lina Amir <Lina.Amir@devonshires.co.uk> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 3:16 PM To: enquiries.mayorsandcityoflondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk Cc: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>; Duvaraka Balachandran <Duvaraka.Balachandran@devonshires.co.uk> Subject: RE: Claim: 566MC567 and Claim: 570MC618 – Meverlee Myers V Devonshires Solicitors [DEVS-MATTERS.FID2037739] Importance: High
Dear Sirs,
Further to the application below, we have now received notification that claim 570MC618 has been transferred to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court.
This means that there are now 3 claims that this firm of solicitors is handling in relation to the above Claimant at Clerkenwell & Shoreditch.
We would be grateful if claim 566MC567 can now also be transferred from Mayors & City of London Court to Clerkenwell & Shoreditch County Court so that all 4 claims concerning the Claimant can be heard by the same judge and reserved to District Judge Beecham.
Kind regards,
Lina Amir | Senior Associate | Devonshires Solicitors LLP
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.
Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert: Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
Dear DEVONSHIRES SOLICITORS LLP,
Claim number: 570MC618
We=92ve transferred your claim to Mayor=92s and City of London Court.
From now on, you should send any forms, letters or other documents to this =
court and contact them with any questions you have.
IS #youtube a #paedophile RING #enabler? [Reminder] Opportunity to join a YouTube User Research Panel!
YouTube User Research<no-reply@feedback.google.com>
โ
You
โ
Dear Mervelee,
This is a friendly reminder to complete your application to join a YouTube User Research Panel!
Donโt miss your chance to:
Participate in surveys, interviews, and feature tests
Gain early access to new features
Receive gift cards for their participation
Share their feedback directly with YouTube product teams
Click here to apply by October 20th!
FAQ
How long is the commitment? If youโre chosen to join a panel, youโll receive invitations to participate in studies for up to one year.
What kinds of invitations will I receive? Youโll receive invitations to a variety of studies, including surveys, feature tests, and interviews, depending on your eligibility for each study.
How many invitations will I receive? 2-6 invitations per year, depending on eligibility
Do I have to join when I receive an invitation? We hope that youโll join every study, but we understand thatโs not always possible. Participants who repeatedly turn down invitations or are unresponsive may be opted out of a panel.
What are the thank-you gifts for participating?
Thank-you gifts vary depending on the time required for each study and will be specified in the invitations you receive. Examples include a 10 GBP gift code for a 10-minute survey, a 15 GBP gift code for a feature test, or a 65 GBP gift code for a 60-minute interview.
Gift codes are issued by our supplier Tremendous and can be redeemed for gift cards to a variety of retailers or donated to charity.
Can I opt out of a study or a panel? Yes. You can opt out of a study, a panel, or all of YouTube User Research at any time, for any reason, without penalty by submitting this opt-out form.
If you have any questions, please reach out to us at youtube-user-research@google.com.
Thank you for your time and interest!
YouTube User Research
Why am I being contacted?
You were contacted by YouTube User Research because you opted in at https://www.youtube.com/creators/research or via an in-app message in YouTube or YouTube Studio.
To contact us with questions, please reply to this email. You may also withdraw from the study or YouTube User Research at any time, for any reason, without penalty by submitting this opt-out form (Panel ID: 371215532).
YouTube, LLC. 901 Cherry Ave. San Bruno, CA 94066 USA | Privacy Policy
6 October 2024 CASE NUMBER 567MC716 Nationwide Building Society
Re Case Number: 567MC718 Mrs Mervelee Myers v Nationwide Building Society
Responding To Witness Statement Of Christopher Andrews
1. I will say that I will address Chritopher Andrews.
2. Let us examine the Witness Statement
3. Defendantโs application
3.1 CPR 24 The Claim has every prospect of success
3.2 I want to know which judge will strike out this claim
Background
4. We need to address how I come to have the FlexAccount debit card with the Defendant
5. We need to discuss the Defendantโs role in allowing the Blac Awards to scam me of ยฃ5,000.00 to Account Number: 11914509 First Payment 28th April 2023.
6. On or around 22 June 2023 the 2nd payment
7. Why would Mervelee Myers be going around doing this?
8. 10 May 2023 let us examine the Defendantโs contact starting with SURVEY. How long has Mervelee Myers held Savings Account with my husband?
9. Discrimination Complaint โ The role of Mimi Owusu
10. Reference Mimi Owusu visiting the Defendant with me โ Fraud Complaint
11. Reference why I had to get Mimi Owusu before transferring the money โ 12 pages Witness Statement for Housing for Women admitting the scam.
12.1 Failed to pay unspecified Standing Order โ Funerals
12.2 Systemic Discrimination โ
12.3 Assisted Mimi Owusu to SCAM me โ Witness Statement and other correspondence โ emails (1) Payments made as result of FRAUD โ Defendant did nothing to prevent me defrauded (ii) DEFAMED and DISCRIMINATED against. (iii) Matters alleged in paragraph 12 took place
Strike Out/Summary Judgement
14. Abuse of Courtโs process
15. Not ALLEGATIONS fact. I did not bring the CLAIM because of any of the above.
16. Discrimination Complaint โ Unlawful Injunction from Mimi Owusuโs 12 pages Witness Statement for H4W after meeting me April to July 2023. Reference Witness Statement and who she sent to my home. DEFAMATION โ Letter to close account โ Refer to BARCLAYS
17. I did not bring any CLAIMS about PAYMENTS. This claim is about what the Defendant did when I tried to pay for my CLAIM against Mimi Owusu online HMCTS and events leading to me and son visiting the branch in Brixton.
The Housing Ombudsman is a non-departmental public body whose purpose is to administer the Housing Ombudsman Scheme (โthe Schemeโ) and to enable tenants and other individuals to have complaints about member landlords investigated in accordance with the Scheme approved by the Secretary of State. The Scheme is approved by the Secretary of State under (inter alia) the Housing Act 1996 as amended. The service is free, independent and impartial. Mrs Myers’ claim appears to arise out of her complaint of the Ombudsmanโs service and the handling of a complaint between the Claimant and its landlord. The Housing Ombudsman Service (HOS) addressed the points raised, confirming with the Resident (R) that their Landlord (LL) was not escalating their complaint to Stage 2 of their process due to the development of the legal proceedings, on 3 June 2024. The R raised a service complaint with HOS, citing that HOS has demonstrated discrimination, and ignored discrimination by their landlord. The complaint was investigated , a response issued 3 April 2024, and a subsequent request to escalate the complaint to Stage 2 of HOS’ process rejected 1 May 2024, as the Rs complaint points had already been addressed in previous response. We dispute and reject all parts of the claim.
Their timeline of events
Date
What happened
4 August 2022
Resident (R) call – raised landlord (LL) complaint based on repairs, ASB and complaint handling. Still within LL internal complaints process (ICP), so not yet ready to refer to HOS.
5 August 2022
HOS writes to LL and R to support completion of ICP โ asks LL to provide S1 response by 19 August 2022
28 September 2022
Email from R โ copies and pastes initial HOS letter. HOS writes back to R on 13 October 2022 to clarify this.
31 October 2022
R confirms no S1 response received from LL. Gives further details of complaints about LL
7 November 2022
HOS chases S1 LL response and gives LL a 5 working day deadline.
14 November 2022
LL provides S1 complaint response. HOS provides this to R 15 November 2022, with escalation advice if required.
7 August 2023
Email from R to multiple recipients including info@housing-ombudsman.org.uk, content includes commentary re anti-social behaviour injunction . HMCTS and Devonshires LLP copied.
8 August 2023
R calls asking for an update on their case. Escalation advice provided verbally.
8 September 2023
Email from R to multiple recipients, embedding link and providing evidence to support claim for a hearing.
18 September 2023
Emails dated 16 August 2023, attaching Rโs tenancy agreement, photograph and legal documents attached to HOS’ case management system.
13 October 2023
HOS writes to R to provide complaint escalation advice, but indicates that they may be out of time with LL to do so.
18 October 2023
Email from R to HOS, embedding links that are not supported. Attached multiple legal documents including Notice of Seeking Possession (NOSP) and Notice of Hearing Application.
16 November 2023
Emails from R to multiple recipients, including HOS (includes weblinks). Mentions postponement of police interview.Emails from R to multiple recipients, including HOS. Includes weblinks. Mentions postponement of police interview.
19 November 2023
Duplicates of all emails dated 16 November 2023 received, plus further emails from R to Southwark Council dated 24 and 25 October 2023 raising formal complaint.
14 December 2023
Three emails from R to multiple recipients – includes email dated 13 December 2023 from LL, asking if R wishes to make a complaint about neighbourโs noise.
15 December 2023
Three emails from R copying in multiple recipients. R explains to LL that they does not wish to raise noise complaint, but wants to complain about LL โwiping her data from portal in 2000โ. Email from R dated 14 December 2023 enclosing documents to support her claim that injunction is unlawful and NOSP breaches Equality Act 2010.
18 December 2023
Four emails received. Email from R to LL and multiple recipients dated 15 December 2023 – states R is awaiting response to their communication about neighbourโs Anti Social Behaviour (ASB). Three emails with YouTube links.
19 December 2023
Email from R to multiple recipients including HOS โ R asks Manchester Police to get footage from neighbours regarding damage to her door.
20 December 2023
Email from R to multiple recipients with YouTube link.
15 January 2024
Letter from HOS to LL asking whether R ever escalated LL complaint to Stage 2 of the process (S2). HOS requests confirmation of legal documents relating to NOSP (court stamped claim form) and any formal response letters (FRLs) regarding LL complaint.
22 January 2024
Response from LL received – R did not request to escalate LL complaint to S2. ASB issue did not go to court as R refused to engage with Neighbourhood Officer on the matter. LL has been granted injunction against R for breach of tenancy due to her ASB. R breached injunction and NOSP proceedings initiated. R remains at property.
24 January 2024
HOS emails LL and asks if it would be willing to escalate complaint to S2 now
29 January 2024
Three emails from R to multiple recipients, embedding YouTube link (email dated 11 January 2024). Email from R explaining that she will be seeking legal advice against multiple parties.
29 January 2024
HOS chases LL for response to S2 query.
30 January 2024
Email from LL to HOS confirming that complaint would need to start again at Stage 1 (S1).
31 January 2024
Letter to R from HOS explaining that complaints process with LL will need to start again. Letter from HOS to LL asking it to raise new complaint and respond to R by 21 February 2024.
31 January 2024
Document Employment Tribunal reserved judgment sent by R to HOS re unsuccessful claims by R (appears to relate to 2017).
2 February 2024
Email from R responding to HOS โ R refers to her unhappiness with HOS communication with LL, and refers to another Housing for Women (HfW) tenantโs complaint.
12 February 2024
Email from R to multiple recipients dated 10 February 2024 explaining that Housing Ombudsman will be cited for discrimination of tenants.
20 February 2024
R responds to LL S1 complaint response and copies in HOS.
20 February 2024
Email from R to HOS and LL, providing contents page for what appeared to be a court bundle. No bundle attached to email.
28 February 2024
Four emails from R to multiple recipients about buying a domain name.
28 February 2024
Letter to R from HOS explaining that they wonโt take further action unless R escalates LL complaint to S2 and LL doesnโt provide response
29 February 2024
Email from HO to R acknowledging her service complaint (o provide S1 response by 21 March 2024).
29 February 2024
R responds to HOS acknowledgement with her own points.
9 March 2024
HOS copied into email between R and Neighbourhood Officer
11 March 2024
Email from R to HOS and LL dated 6 March 2024 explaining Rโs ongoing communication via her book and social media.
13 March 2024
Email from R to multiple recipients asking Neighbourhood Officer to leave R alone. Email attaches complaint about HOS.
13 March 2024
HOS copied into emails between R and LL โ R responding to Neighbourhood Officer.
15 March 2024
Email from R to HOS โ email written from Meme Meme (email address of niccoladasilva@gmail.com). Email indicates intent to raise complaint about another LL (London & Quadrant).
18 March 2024
HOS Service Complaints Investigator (SCI) asks R for specific examples of discrimination.
27 March 2024
Email from HOS to R โ explains that R has indicated her unhappiness with LL S2 complaint response. HOS requests a copy of S2 response.
29 March 2024
Email from R in response to HOS request 27March 2024 โ R explains she is caring for poorly husband. R directs HOS to go back to 2022 to her first complaint.
30 March 2024
HOS copied into email enclosing hearing bundle and statement of costs from paralegal at Devonshires LLP. (PDFs were not attached to Rโs email)
3 April 2024
S1 service complaint response provided to R by HOS
8 April 2024
Stage 2 (S2) of the process, based on โupcoming cases on 12 June and 25 July 2024โ.
16 April 2024
Letter from HOS to R explaining the difference between a service request and a complaint. Hos letter highlights the fact that LL letter of 25 March 2024 appears to be a response to a service request. HOS writes to LL to ask for any S2 response issued.
25 April 2024
HOS responds to R with criteria for escalating service complaint to S2.
26 April 2024
Email from R to HOS with reasons for wishing to escalate SC to S2
1 May 2024
Email from HOS to R declining S2 escalation request
23 May 2024
Letter from HOS to R, explaining that HOS has chased LL for provision of S2 response.
31 May 2024
Letter sent from HOS including unacceptable user warning over obscene photograph attached to Rโs email of 23 May 2024.
3 June 2024
Letter received from LL to R explaining that it is not escalating her complaint to S2. Forwarded to R by HOS on 4 June 2024.
4 June 2024
Email from R to HOS โ R raising points in response to LL refusal to escalate
4 June 2024
Email from R to HOS responding to Unacceptable User letter
12 September 2024
HMCTS letter dated 6 September 2024 received by HOS
20 September 2024
Call from R to HOS, seeking information on previous complaints. R expressed suicidal ideation but explained that they did not want to act on this. HOS signposted R.
Why they disagree with your timeline
“This timeline spans the period from the date of the resident’s initial contact with HOS August 2022. The content has been summarised, provides the recent chain of events leading to the resident raising a Money Claim Online via HMCTS.”
Their evidence
Type
Description
Letters, emails and other correspondence
Letters and emails sent by HOS to Resident Correspondence sent by Resident to HOS Correspondence sent by Resident to other parties, copying in HOS
We have automatically registered you for free telephone mediation from HM Courts and Tribunals Service.
How free mediation works
A trained, neutral mediator from HM Courts and Tribunals Service will listen to your views and help you to negotiate a settlement of your dispute.
Mediation can be quicker, cheaper and less stressful than going to court.
Mediation is confidential, and nothing said in the mediation can be used in court proceedings if the dispute cannot be settled. The mediator speaks to each party separately, this is not a conference call.
The defendant has already agreed to mediation. Weโll contact you, within 28 days after your response, to arrange a free appointment.
Your mediation appointment will last for no more than an hour.
If mediation is successful, you’ll make a verbal agreement over the phone. This is legally binding which means that you must comply with it. You will be given the terms of the agreement in a document โ this is called a settlement agreement.
If either party breaks the terms the other party can go to court to ask for a judgment or hearing.
If mediation fails and a court hearing is needed, what happened during the mediation appointment cannot be mentioned in court.
You will not have to wait longer for a court hearing if you choose mediation.Contact us for help
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
The Defendant is party to the MISOGYNY of the Housing Association coercive control of the neighbour whose hate crimes traumatised me and my husband for 23 years. Failure to address the complaints after it reached stage 2 of the procedures allowed H4W to wipe the Control Panel of my data from 2000. I became the target of the Metropolitan Police, the HMCTS CPS CJS CCMCC IOPC JCIO BSB SRA HMPPS CLCC because the defendant allowed H4W to continue with the MISOGYNISTIC policies used to gag tenants. The Defendant is aware of concerns via the complaints I submitted about the HOS failures to act without biases. I must make mention of the FIRES recently saying I averted a Grenfell Tower in Alma Grove when contractors tried to put the electric pipes through my flat to go upstairs. I did not agree because of the times the neighbour left the pipes running in the bathroom and it affected the electrical wiring. This had to be changed. The gas pipes were left exposed until I raised concerns about pulling my heavy trolley over it. The barrister Samantha Jones who coerced Con Man John Fenton to represent LEYF pretending he is a solicitor. Bragged about getting a reference from Judge Freer to be on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Panel. Despite not addressing my complaints about H4W and the HOS. I am now a member of the HOS Customer Panel that I have to pass their selection for. But at the same time I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE by District Judge Sterlini on Mimi Owusu who scammed me ยฃ10,000.00 within 4 months of meeting me at an event. Richard Harty and his team sit back allowing me and my husband to experience the TERRORISM from the MISOGYNIST at Housing for Women, Devonshires Solicitors and the Metropolitan Police by doing nothing. Repairing Trust Call for Evidence is an INSULT to those who experience https://x.com/SkyNews/status/1828434278180425750 being trapped in their home. Thank God everyoneโs safe. @LewishamCouncil ignore cladding & fire safety issues, non compliances, defects & refuse to inspect buildings & homes here since 2016. Fire Risk Assessments since 2021 have been withheld with stay put still on place @H_S_E @mhclg @RSHEngland @Shelter Lewisham Green Party and 9 others Quote Housing for Women @Housing4Women ยท Oct 6, 2020 Replying to @hfw_actiongroup @natfednews and 2 others The cladding is currently under review, in line with our Fire Risk Assessments. We are working for a solution, to be included in our 2020/21 planned program of works. Gibbs https://youtube.com/live/sub07SCQBgU?feature=share. I am gagged facing IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION despite asking for help from everyone including the MP and the Housing Ombudsman Service. ‘Repairing Trust’ Call for Evidence The Housing Ombudsman is exploring common issues in housing maintenance, following a significant rise in complaints about disrepair. This Call to Evidence will help us to understand how increasing repair costs, complaints, and skill shortages are impacting residents’ safety in their homes. The Spotlight report on repairs and maintenance – ‘Repairing Trust’ will highlight some of the positive changes landlords have made to rise to the maintenance challenge and explore the complex relationship between landlords, contractors, and residents. With a particular focus on accountability, roles, and responsibilities. It will examine the experiences of operatives on the ground as well as residents and the breakdown in relationships that can happen between the landlord and residents. The โCall for Evidenceโ will remain open for over 12 weeks, closing on Friday 25 October 2024, supported by casework reviews and fieldwork across England. We are seeking insights from residents, repair operatives, landlords, contractors, MPs, and councillors. If you are a stakeholder who is not a resident, repairs operative or landlord staff member, please feel free to submit written statements to insight@housing-ombudsman.org.uk(External link). The questions in each survey will cover: โข What are the main issues landlords face when contracting services, what causes these issues, and what impact do they have? โข What problems do residents encounter with these services, the underlying reasons, and their effects? โข What barriers do operatives experience in delivering services, the root causes, and the repercussions? โข What are the lessons learned from cases with no maladministration and successful initiatives within the sector? You will find more information about the ‘Repairing Trust’ Call to Evidence on our website(External link). Please choose to complete one of the following surveys. Thank you for taking part. โข Survey โข Resident survey This survey asks about your experience of repairs and maintenance operatives in your home or other buildings owned and operated by your landlord. (Repairs and maintenance includes, but is not limited to, responsive repairs, major works, grounds maintenance and gas servicing).
Timeline
Date
What happened
2022
Submitted Complaints about Landlord. Reached Stage 2. MP involved
2023
Submitted Complaint about the HOS.
2024
HOS made me member of Customer Panel but failing to do anything about H4W MISOGYNY
Dear Ms Myers, My name is Gayle Lewis, and I am a Patient Complaint Officer at Kingโs College Hospital. My reason for contacting you is to introduce myself and to confirm we are taking the concerns you raised about your recent experience at Kingโs forward through the formal complaints process. MM Response: I will go back to Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Mapother House Nursery 2003-2008 and the first nervous breakdown. After the death of my brother with colon cancer age 56 years old. I was a participant in Dr. Maria Hudson’s research paper for the Policy Studies Institute “The Experience of Multiple Discrimination” recommended to ACAS. I was abandoned by UNISON, the NHS GP, LEA, LSB, the CAB, organisations and individuals that left me to be the victim of systemic discrimination. The Trust aims to have investigated your concerns within 40 working days. MM Response: What is PALS waiting on and am I the only one who is DYSLEXIC? Once our investigations are complete we will send you a formal response in a letter from one of our Executive team. MM Response: It is now 28th August 2024 so what is happening to the formal response? The patterns of MISOGYNY from the time I raised concerns at Kings about children with SEND can be tracked to why the Judiciary of England and Wales presided over the first miscarriages of justice when I was accused of making up disabilities and not a credible witness. If at any stage we find we need more time to complete our investigations we will contact you to inform you of this. MM Response: I will tell the world that the discrimination started at Kings 2003-2008 and 2024 when my husband was NEGLECTED on BYRON ward. I was assaulted on the 6th April 2024 when Nurse Betty called the racist security I assaulted staff. I was tired after attending the “Windrush Vigil” but it was my duty to visit my husband in the hospital. I ended up in A&E because I was manhandled by haters and the staff who were struggling to cope. I have read your account of what happened and apologise that this led to you raising a complaint. MM Response: How many complaints have I raised since I contacted UNISON about the treatment at KINGS. To http://www.leyf.org.uk and the MISOGYNIST thinking they can get away like Gayle Lewis is ducking and diving. To aid our investigation into your concerns, I have listed key points that you have asked us to respond to. MM Response: Mervelee Myers stories are documented online and as a result of the HATE CRIMES of me and my husband I got 700K views on one of the videos of my husband in the HOSPITAL. There is no way the MISOGYNY can be hidden anymore. The question is what does the BLACK persons failing their own believe in? โข Complainant arrived to witness Mr Tomlinson falling out of bed, the nurse accompanying the complainant did not notice this MM Response Nurse Betty is just a careless, overworked AFRICAN acting like those who sold our ANCESTORS into SLAVERY. โข Complainant decided to video events as wanted a record of the incidents that took place. MM Response: There is no question about the reasons I create contents. Refer to videos in Guys Hospital. โข Complainant states that nursing staff were abusive towards her and not caring for her husband appropriately. MM Response: Fact. โข Security staff were called and ejected (roughly handling her, causing her fingernail to break). MM Response: Why did Gayle Lewis put emphasis on my broken finger nail? Did she think I was taken to A&E because of my BROKEN FINGER NAIL? Her from the building โ MM Response: Refer to the appointment on 21st August 2024 with the Mental Health Practitioner and the recommendations. She asked for her coat which was returned with money missing from the pocket. MM Response: I was expected to leave the hospital after I was tricked to leave my husband’s bedside without my coat with my keys in it. How was I to get back indoors without my keys and bus pass that were in my pocket. โข Was safeguarding in place for complainantโs husband. MM Response: Can KINGS answer the question? To ensure we understand the key points within your complaint that you would like answered and to ensure a thorough investigation takes place, I want to ensure that I have accurately presented your key concerns. MM Response: I consider Gayle Lewis to be biased and working under the MISOGYNISTIC laws of the Judiciary of England and Wales that have presided over the miscarriages of justice after the death of my brother age 56 with colon cancer. My mother with dementia. Now after the CRISIS I went through during July 2023 I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE. Facing IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION gagged with Contempt of Court. Well Gayle Lewis will be exposed like all in the BAME community who discriminated against me and my husband. What does Gayle Lewis need to understand about my complaints? My husband was NEGLECTED and I was ASSAULTED by RACIST Security Nurse Betty called and lied about me. It would also be helpful to understand the outcome you are seeking. MM Response: Now the outcome I am seeking is relevant to what the NHS has done to deny me my ENTITLEMENTS. But now the NHS England is joining in the MISOGYNY colluding with Nexus Health Group. Let me quote Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948 “No Society Can Legitimately Call Itself Civilised If A Sick Person Is Denied Medical Aid Because Of Lack Of Means”. Typical outcomes from raising a complaint would be: โข An official explanation in the form of a written response. MM Response: What official written response is Gayle Lewis talking about? The NHS is not FIT For PURPOSE. โข An apology for a poor experience. MM Response: It’s too late now for an apology. โข Process improvements to help ensure a similar occurrence does not happen in the future. MM Response: This happened in 2008 at KINGS and in 2024 am hearing CRAP about improvement. โข Potential retraining for staff, if identified through the course of the investigation. MM Response: Those responsible will be named including the Nexus Health Group MISOGYNIST. I would be grateful if you could confirm this is a fair reflection of your concerns for our investigation. MM Response: How many times have I contacted Gayle Lewis about this matter? If this is not correct, or you have additional issues you would like us to investigate, then please contact me to confirm these points. MM Response: Gayle Lewis is acting like those who assaulted me and NEGLECTED my husband in Kings College Hospital. If you need communication support such as an interpreter or information in another language, audio, Braille, Easy Read or large print, please let me know. MM Response: The tokenism of Gayle Lewis. If there is anything you wish to discuss about your case, please either email or contact Olivia on 0203 299 4515. With kind regards Gayle Lewis Gayle Lewis Patient Complaints Officer Patient Complaints King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS Chat with me on Teams Direct line: 020 3299 4501 | Switchboard 020 3299 9000 Ext 34501 Email: gaylelewis@nhs.net or kch-tr.patientcomplaints@nhs.net This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please: i) inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it; and ii) do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in relation to its content (to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful). Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is the secure email, collaboration and directory service available for all NHS staff in England. NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and other accredited email services. For more information and to find out how you can switch visit Joining NHSmail โ NHSmail Support
Timeline
Date
What happened
APRIL 2024
Raised Concerns
August 2024
Still waiting on the response after several telephone contacts
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
9 April 2024 HMCTS Breaches of Equality Act 2010.docx
28 KB๎ฅฒ
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
PC/9191/24
D Mike.A.James@met.police.uk
on behalf of
DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk
๎ฆฝ
๎
๎ฌฆ
To:โYouโ
Mon 07/10/2024 13:45
Good afternoon MM Response: 8/10/2024
Further to my earlier email. MM Response: I am responding with the Seriousness that this deserves.
I have discussed your previous complaint recorded under PC/2268/24 which is currently being handled by Central South Professional Standards Unit with a supervisor on that unit. MM Response: It would be interesting to know how you made the decision about who is handling the complaint. But I guess at this stage it’s not that relevant. Just so you understand that because of the Systemic Discrimination of the past 10 years, and as the author of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE that was signed and dedicated to a #strong #jamaican #womant at the “A New Met for London #launch”. I know it’s my responsibility to myself with threats of IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION via Contempt of Court hanging over me for my “Defensive Practice”. To inform you that everything will be made public to safeguard me from being SECTION, MURDERED, KIDNAPPED in my home or on the streets of London before am ready to return home to JAMAICA.
As this complaint clearly overlaps with the previous complaint and the concerns raised are over the same time scale as the previous they are also going to be managing this complaint. MM Response: Just want you to understand that I sent a letter outlining my concerns with the Metropolitan Police handling my concerns between 30th October 2017 to 9th Auugust 2024 still stands. I will add visit on 22/9/2024 of Thiago.moreira@met.police.uk who visited on the 19/10/2023 after my husband and I were robbed in Peckham. This proves my point about the Metropolitan Police roles in the GASLIGHTING and MISOGYNY of Mervelee Myers. The various bodies from IOPC, JCIO, MOPAC will be accountable for allowing the HATE CRIMES against me. If I were you I would check the records of my claims against the Metropolitan Police and IOPC and JCIO after my complaints were not dealt with from the time I arranged a MEETING at the Southwark Police Station with Inspector Owen Pyle, and Tammie Tebboth who left Kevin Webster to handle their incompetence. For your information there are recordings on YouTube. As stated at the A New Met for London launch I am willing to VOLUNTEER to help the Metropolitan Police bring back the TRUST of the BAME communities. Instead they set out to wage a HATE CAMPAIGN with Housing for Women, Devonshires Solicitors LLP, Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and the HATE MOB in Alma Grove. I am still open to VOLUNTEERING after I get the justice, I have been FIGHT4JUSTICE for since I invested in sharing my stories.
Please use the reference PC/2268/24 in all future emails and if you require any updates please contact the professional standards unit on the below email address. MM Response: I certainly will.
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
YouTubeShare your videos with friends, family, and the worldyoutu.be
Mervelee Myers have PROOF that the Metropolitan Police is INSTITTUTIONAL RACIST and breaches my RIGHTS as a DISABLED BLACK WOMAN. And continued the GASLIIGHTING and MISOGYNY after Sir Mark Rowley signed IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE at the “A New Met for London” launch. A month after Disrict Judge Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE on EMANCIPATION DAY 2023.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
Turn Activist.
From: Mike.A.James@met.police.uk <Mike.A.James@met.police.uk> on behalf of DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk <DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 1:45 PM To: ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com> Subject: PC/9191/24
Good afternoon
Further to my earlier email.
I have discussed your previous complaint recorded under PC/2268/24 which is currently being handled by Central South Professional Standards Unit with a supervisor on that unit.
As this complaint clearly overlaps with the previous complaint and the concerns raised are over the same time scale as the previous they are also going to be managing this complaint.
Please use the reference PC/2268/24 in all future emails and if you require any updates please contact the professional standards unit on the below email address.
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
ยฉ Instagram. Meta Platforms, Inc., 1601 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USThis message was sent to ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com and intended for saint_2_sinner_18. Instagram sends updates such as this to help you keep up with the latest on Instagram. You can unsubscribe from these updates, or remove your email address if this isn’t your Instagram account. 
Hey ย MERVELEE ,
We have aย Creator Collectiveย event for the YouTube Black community taking place in London, to celebrate the Season 3 launch of YouTubeโs EDITION. Hosted byย @drveekativhuย andย @TheHackOfficial.ย 
ยฉ 2024 YouTube, LLC 901 Cherry Ave, San Bruno, CA 94066.ย All Rights Reserved. YouTube and the YouTube logo are registered trademarks of Google Inc. If you don’t want to receive any more emails about this event, you can opt outย 
software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments.
Fight4justice 