Without Prejudice Mervelee Myers Spotlight On Richard Blakeway Housing Ombudsman Service As Housing For Women Devonshires Solicitors LLP Metropolitan Police London Ambulance Service NHS Trusts HMCTS CPS CJS CCMCC DBS IOPC JCIO BSB SRA MOPAC Come Under Scrutiny As Sara Elizabeth Beecham Must Be Charged For Gross Professional Misconduct Employ Emua Ali Equality Act Assessor To Help Tristan Salter Five Paper Chambers 7th March Interrupt Twice No ASB In Bundle Not Delivered 17th Delays Debbie Gilchrist Attempts To Provoke 20th After Made Her Responsible HCT Group Impact Report 2016 Of 1 In 5 Of All Suicides Associated With Unemployment Sent Ranting Raving Lunatic Trigger Atypical Parkinsonism Affected London Ambulance Sent Claim Burning Place H4W Fire Systems LTD With Asian Sound Like Scammers With English Name Added To List As Arnold Ebenezer Tomlinson Will Be Celebrated By His Wife 3/4/25

NOTICEANDDEMAND-202209405
Dear Richard Blakeway acting as Ombudsman,
Thank you for your recent response on an unsigned sheet of paper by an unidentified member of
your staff. I must formally object in the strongest terms to your attempt to absolve your statutory
responsibilities under the guise of alleged court proceedings—for which no lawful evidence has
been produced or verified by you nor the other informants.
Your statement:
“The landlord said there were legal proceedings regarding the antisocial behaviour, so it was no
longer being dealt with as a complaint… the matter would be dealt with by the courts… Paragraph
41c of the Scheme applies…”
is unsubstantiated, and amounts to knowingly acting upon hearsay, in a matter involving serious
harm, distress, and abuse of legal process.
🔍WhereIstheCourt Order?
As of today, I have never been served with any proceedings issued by Clerkenwell & Shoreditch
County Court, or any other court of record, as is required by law under Part 6 of the Civil
Procedure Rules (CPR). Despite multiple written requests, no party has provided a single piece
of verifiable, sealed court documentation. Not you, not the landlord, not their solicitors, and not
the court.1
Therefore, your reliance on unverified “court proceedings”—without disclosure of the claim form,
particulars of claim, sealed hearing notice, or judgment—is wholly improper, unethical, and
potentially unlawful.
⚖
️KnowinglyActing Without Authority Is Criminal– This Is Not a Civil
Matter
By continuing to participate in this charade, you are:
· Gaslighting a vulnerable person
· Relying on false legal authority
· Causingemotional injury
· Endangering health and safety
· Enabling financial and reputational harm
· Acting in collusion with third parties to intimidate, isolate, and silence
1 of 3
These actions mirror the tactics of organised extortion and fall under the definition of criminal
conspiracy as outlined in:
· FraudAct2006, s.2 & s.4– False representation and abuse of position
· Serious Crime Act 2007, s.44–46– Encouraging or assisting crime
· Forging Judicial Authority– Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981, s.1– up to 10 years
imprisonment
· Misconduct in Public Office (Common Law)– up to life imprisonment
· Protection from Harassment Act 1997– where conduct causes alarm or distress
Additionally, your actions may breach Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s.7, by causing
foreseeable mental injury, alarm, and humiliation, particularly during periods of religious
observance and vulnerability.
📚CaseLawAuthorities
· R(GuardianNews&MediaLtd)vWestminster Magistrates’ Court [2012] EWCA Civ
420– Court transparency and accountability is essential to justice.
· MacFoyvUnitedAfrica Co Ltd [1961] 3 All ER 1169– Any proceedings based on false or
void authority are themselves null and void ab initio.
· Entick vCarrington [1765]– No authority, no power. Agents acting without warrant
commit trespass and abuse of process.
· RvSoni[2009] EWCACrim42–Useofforged legal documents constitutes fraud upon
the court.
🛑ThisIs Part of a National Scandal– Court Order Scams
Your behaviour contributes to a widespread and well-documented national issue where false
court authority is used to abuse, evict, and defraud the public—often with the complicity of court
officers, councils, and ombudsman bodies.
This scandal is being actively investigated and reported on at:
🔗https://bit.lt/house4drugs
The victims of these fabricated claims include mothers, NHS workers, disabled persons, and
children—many of whom were never lawfully served, and yet are subjected to enforcement,
humiliation, and harm under fabricated legal pretexts.
✅MyFormalDemands
In light of the above, I now require:
1.
2.
3.
Acopy of the sealed court claim, hearing notice of issue, and particulars of claim upon
which your reliance is based.
Awritten apology and retraction of your decision to close the matter based on hearsay.
Reinstatement of the complaint and referral to an independent adjudicator, pending the
production of lawful court documentation.
1 of 3
4.
Confirmation that you will cease colluding with third parties who refuse to produce court
authorised evidence.
📣NextSteps if Ignored
Failure to comply will lead to:
· Escalation to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
· Referral to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for data handling abuses
· Public disclosure through legal campaigns and media platforms
· Apossible private criminal prosecution for misconduct, fraud, and conspiracy
· Referral to the ScamBuster.TV judicial fraud team
🧾Final Word
You are reminded that your duty is to uphold justice, not facilitate institutional wrongdoing. The
Housing Ombudsman Scheme is not exempt from law, and cannot lawfully use “court action” as a
cover for inaction in the face of abuse—especially when the “court action” is a fabrication.
I await your full response within 7 days, failing which this correspondence may be relied upon in
future proceedings and published in the public interest.
Yours Sincerely
:Mervelee :Myers
Cc to whom it may concern– All Rights Reserved
1 of