Raquel Lovekin acting as Constable,
Professional Standards Department
NOTICE OF COMPLAINT RESPONSE AND DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY
TO: Raquel Lovekin, Acting Constable, Professional Standards Department
RE: Police Misconduct, Discrimination, and False Court Orders (03/03/2024 Complaint)
Dear Ms. Lovekin,
Thank you for your response dated 04/02/2025. However, this response falls short of addressing the longstanding pattern of misconduct, discrimination, and conspiracy involving the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS). Since my initial complaint, my 100-year-old husband, Arnold Tomlinson, has passed away, and I firmly believe the continuous harassment we experienced was a significant contributing factor to his demise.
This response highlights how the MPS failed to follow lawful due process, including reliance on fabricated warrants, false court orders, and data misuse, all of which are actionable under civil and criminal law. I am therefore compelled to restate my demands and request accountability, with reference to case law and potential criminal consequences.
Summary of Key Issues
1. Discrimination and Sexual Discrimination Background
ยท The discrimination began in 2017 when my long-standing employment was terminated due to LEYFโs discriminatory โMen in Childcareโ policy, an example of sexual discrimination. Instead of investigating LEYFโs conduct, the police unfairly targeted me and my protest, resulting in a fabricated court order branding me a criminal and destroying my career prospects.
ยท This constitutes discriminatory misconduct contrary to Equality Act 2010, Section 13 and relevant case law (Nagarajan v London Regional Transport [1999] UKHL 36), which recognises indirect discrimination through systemic practices.
1. Fabricated Warrants, False Court Orders, and Data Misuse
ยท My sensitive data was unlawfully disclosed to Dr. Phil Gregory, who falsified a psychiatric report citing eight non-existent court orders, which led to the loss of my GP services and further victimisation.
ยท The police acted repeatedly on fabricated warrants and injunctions, as proven during staged incidents and court hearings where no genuine investigation of both sides occurred. False statements by police officers acting as witnesses constitute perjury (R v Andrews [1993] 4 All ER 559).
1. Harassment and Trespass
ยท Numerous officers trespassed into our home without lawful authority, causing alarm, distress, and humiliation, in breach of Section 5 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
ยท The abusive entry, use of battering rams, and reliance on non-existent warrants constitute trespass under civil law (Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98) and potential criminal misconduct under Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977.
1. Conspiracy and Misconduct in Public Office
ยท The coordinated actions of MPS Constables, involving fabricated documents and repeated failure to investigate counterclaims, amount to a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice (R v Rafique [1993] 96 Cr App R 133) and misconduct in public office (Attorney Generalโs Reference (No. 3 of 2003) [2004] EWCA Crim 868).
ยท These criminal acts carry potential prison terms:
ยท Perjury (Section 1 of the Perjury Act 1911) โ up to 7 yearsโ imprisonment.
ยท Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice โ up to life imprisonment in serious cases.
ยท Misconduct in public office โ up to life imprisonment depending on the severity.
Responses to Your Questions (IOPC Discrimination Inquiry)
1. Discriminatory Actions:
The discriminatory conduct began when the police unfairly targeted me instead of the employer during the LEYF incident. The assumption that I was the aggressor reflects a clear gender bias, constituting indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.
2. Assumptions:
Officers consistently assumed that due to our vulnerable status, we were incapable of defending ourselves, resulting in the wrongful issuance of fabricated warrants and court orders.
3. Differences in Treatment:
Officers treated us as suspects while refusing to investigate neighbour Debbie Gilchrist, despite her criminal record and repeated role in instigating harassment. This selective policing is evidence of bias and failure to investigate both sides fairly.
4. Language and Behaviour:
Officers frequently made threats, such as one officer stating, โIf we find any evidence, it will be different this time,โ which was never directed toward Gilchrist or other third parties.
5. Witnesses and Body Cam Evidence:
Multiple incidents were captured on body-worn cameras, confirming abusive behaviour, the use of battering rams, and reliance on fabricated warrants.
6. Impact:
The continuous harassment has caused severe distress, loss of trust in law enforcement, and compelled me to launch my Fight4Justice campaign as a citizen journalist to expose police misconduct.
7. Good Outcome:
A proper investigation that examines all fabricated warrants, court orders, and injunctions, and accountability for those responsible, including criminal prosecution if necessary.
Demand for Immediate Action
1. Produce Evidence of Warrants and Court Orders:
ยท I require a Sealed signed and dated copy of all warrants, court orders, and injunctions relied upon by MPS Constables from 2017 to 2025. Failure to produce these instruments will be treated as an admission that they do not exist and that unlawful actions were taken.
1. Signed Response:
ยท Your response must be in writing and signed in wet ink, to ensure accountability. I will not accept unsigned or electronic responses.
1. Data Protection Compliance:
ยท I do not consent to the sharing of my private and confidential data with any third parties. Any further misuse of my data will be reported to the Information Commissionerโs Office (ICO).
1. Notice of Witness Summons:
ยท Be advised that you and any involved officers may be summoned to court to testify regarding the existenceโor lack thereofโof the warrants and court orders you relied upon.
Failure to Comply
Failure to respond within 14 days will result in:
ยท Criminal complaints for perjury, conspiracy, and misconduct in public office.
ยท Civil claims for harassment, trespass, and breaches of my human rights.
ยท Public disclosure of this complaint as part of my ongoing Fight4Justice campaign.
I reserve all rights to pursue further legal remedies if necessary.
Yours sincerely,
Mervelee Myers
Cc to whom it may concern โ All Rights Reserved
Dear Mrs Myers
Please see attached witness statements of the Claimant.
These include a further witness statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025 and a statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025.
Kindly acknowledge receipt.
Kind regards,
| Mr Sola Obajuluwa Solicitor | London Office: Gravesend Office: 1-3 Atwell Road 185 Parrock Street London Gravesend SE15 4TW Kent DA12 1EN DX: 152641 Peckham 3 Tel: 014 7424 0190 Tel: 020 7732 8750 Fax: 014 7456 0377 Fax: 020 7732 0362Web: www.jisolicitors.co.uk |
WARNING – CYBER FRAUD is a significant risk, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details which can be intercepted and modified. Please note that we will NEVER change our bank details via email. Please be careful to check bank account details with us in person if in any doubt. We will not accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.Privacy Notice: General Data Protection Regulations (โGDPRโ) The GDPR are important EU regulations which introduced amendments to data protection law including introducing additional rights for individuals in relation to their personal and sensitive personal data. These changes came into effect on 25 May 2018. J I Solicitors are committed to protecting and keeping confidential all the information you provide to us, subject to certain legal duties that are explained in our GDPR Privacy Notice, which is available upon request. This privacy notice contains important information about who we are, how and why we collect, store, use and share personal information, your rights in relation to your personal information and how to contact us and supervisory authorities in the event you have a complaint.Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error.Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.Viruses: Although we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipients should ensure that they are actually virus free. J I Solicitors is the trading name of J I Solicitors Ltd, Company Registration No. 8654782. Registered office is 1-3 Atwell Road, London SE15 4TW. A list of the directors is available for inspection at our registered office. J I Solicitors is authorised and regulated by Solicitors Regulation Authority, SRA Nos. 607618 & 635175 | |
From: Usman Ali
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 6:07 PM
To: Sola Obajuluwa
Cc: Duvaraka Balachandran; Lina Amir
Subject: K05EC530- Housing for Women-v- Mervelee Myers – Serving Witness Statements [DEVS-MATTERS.FID1842961]
Dear Sirs,
K05EC530- Housing for Women-v- Mervelee Myers
We continue to act for the Claimant.
Please find enclosed the following Witness Statements by way of service.
- Witness Statement of Debbie Gilchrist dated 11 February 2025
- Witness Statement of Barbara McCoy dated 13 February 2025
Please note, you will receive a separate email granting you access to view the video exhibits for each Witness Statement. Please can you download the videos from the shared folder as then you will be able to access them
Kind regards,
Usman Ali | Paralegal | Devonshires
(he/him)
Direct Dial: 020 7880 4272
Switchboard: 020 7628 7576
Fax: 0870 608 9390
Website: www.devonshires.com
30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT
We are using software to improve our email security. Recipients of our emails may need to decrypt our emails to read their content and access secure links to open attachments. We have implemented this software to provide our firm and our clients with additional protection when sending/receiving emails and sharing sensitive information.

Devonshires has signed both the Greener Litigation Pledge and the BPF Net Zero Pledge. We are committed to reducing the environmental impact of our practice.

Service of claim forms, application notices and all other court and other documents, notices of adjudication, notices of arbitration and contractual notices are accepted by post, courier, DX or fax. With respect to all communications by e-mail, if you receive an โout of officeโ reply, then your document has not been received, and you are asked to follow the guidance in that reply, or to contact our main switchboard on +44 (0)20 7628 7576.
Anti-Fraud Alert: Please note that we will never communicate any changes to our bank account details or our banking arrangements to you by email. If you are asked to send money to a different bank account please telephone (do not email) and speak to the person dealing with your matter, or the Accounts team BEFORE transferring funds. In the event that you send us the wrong amount of monies, we reserve the right to refuse receipt and/or return the entire funds to you.
This email is intended for the addressee named within only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the named individual you should not read this email and if you do so, you must not under any circumstances make use of the information therein. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return of e-mail and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and no copies made. We accept no responsibility for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly coming from us and it is your responsibility to ensure that any emails purporting to come from us are genuine before relying on anything contained within them.
This e-mail and its contents neither purports, nor seeks, to comply with the formalities required by the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 section 2 and is not signed within the meaning of that section.
Devonshires is committed to high quality legal advice and client care. If you are unhappy about any aspect of the service you have received or about the bill, please contact us. We have a procedure in place which details how we handle complaints which is available on request. If you are not satisfied with our handling of your complaint, you may have the right to complain to the Legal Ombudsman. You will need to bring a complaint to the Legal Ombudsman within 6 months of receiving a final written response from us about your complaint or within one year of the act or omission about which you are complaining occurring, or within one year from when you should have known about the complaint.
Devonshires, Devonshires Solicitors, Devonshires Consultancy and The Debt Collection Centre are the trading names of Devonshires Solicitors LLP, registered in England and Wales with company number OC397401 at the address below. This Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under the name of Devonshires Solicitors LLP and registration number 619881. A list of members is open to inspection at the address below. Unless expressly stated to the contrary the term โSolicitorโ means a Solicitor of England and Wales. Any reference to a partner in relation to Devonshires Solicitors LLP is to a member of Devonshires Solicitors LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent qualifications and standing.
Devonshires, 30 Finsbury Circus, London EC2M 7DT tel +44 (0)20 7628 7576 fax +44 (0)870 608 9390
Please consider the environment before printing this email.




Happy New Year to all GLAD Study participants! Welcome to our first newsletter of 2025, highlighting recent activities and upcoming projects. We deeply appreciate your participation and look forward to spending 2025 with you!
General Updates
We have recently been focusing on improving our recruitment of individuals from South Asian & mixed ethnic backgrounds. Through our efforts, there have been increases of…
These efforts are essential to ensure our findings on anxiety and depression are relevant to all communities. Thank you for supporting these valuable updates to our study!
GLAD Study is making early plans to extend our recruitment to under-16s with parental consent. This will help us better understand and support younger individuals with mental health conditions. Ethical approval is underwayโstay tuned for updates on our website and social media!
In 2021, the GLAD Study joined the
If you know anyone who might be eligible, please encourage them to sign up today.GLAD Study Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) panel
PPI is when patients and members of the public get involved in shaping research. It helps to ensure that research is acceptable and relevant to the target communities meant to benefit from it. If you want to join our PPI panel to help inform our research, please email
Connect