Refer to

7 February 2025 MET POLICE COMPLAINTS

Good Morning Mrs Myers,

Please see attached outcome for your police complaint,

Kindest Regards

Raquel Lovekin

Police Constable

Op Embassy

Directorate of Professional Standards

Metropolitan Police Service

NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.

Mrs Mervelee Myers 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY Dear Mrs Myers, How we have considered your complaint AS Professional Standards Unit Peckham Police Station, 177 Peckham High Street, London SE15 5SL Email: Feedback@met.police.uk Your reference: PC/02268/24 Our Reference: PC/02268/24 Date: 07/02/2025 I am writing in relation to the complaint you made on 03/03/2024 in relation to discrimination by officers. MM Response: Why did the TERRORIST RACIST MET POLICE wait until nearly a year to cntact me? The report attached with this letter outlines the actions I have taken to deal with your concerns and explains how I have considered each aspect of your complaint. I hope the report attached addresses your concerns but if you remain unsatisfied you may apply to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) for a review; full details of how to request a review and the timescales involved are contained within the report. MM Response: I will certainly be contacting the MURDERERS at the IOPC for a REVIEW and everything will be PUBLIC from Ratna Khanam was the Case Manager for my other COMPLAINTS sent to the IOPC. Further information about the handling of police complaints can be found in the guidance document attached – ‘Our Guide To Your Complaint’. We are committed to developing a learning culture and your complaint has been fully documented and catalogued with the Directorate of Professional Standards as part of the Metropolitan Police’s organisational learning. A survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another person’s behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers. We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. MM Response: The world will be informed that the Metropolitan Policce is the GESTAO that TERRORISE VULNERABLE BLACK WOMEN in our homes by trying to MURDER me to cover for the A-Z of CRIMINALS needing Emotional Regulation Treatment. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. MM Response: When am finished the IGNORANT in the Met Police will be filtered out. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete. MM Response: Are you sure? I will be using this for a BOOK about Sir Mark Rowley and his THUGS some are PAEDOPHILES, RAPISTS RACISTS MUREDERERS.

1 Official Survey link: https://www.londonvoice.org.uk/cru In addition to learning from individual cases, we use complaint information from our police complaints system to monitor performance and to identify opportunities for learning and improvement. Thank you again for taking the time to raise your concerns with us. MM Response: I hope you are ready for MERVELEE MYERS. Yours sincerely, Raquel Lovekin Police Constable Directorate of Professional Standards For more information on the Metropolitan Police Service visit our website at http://www.met.police.uk GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used to provide an outcome to that complaint.

Any right to Review will mean that the MPS will provide that data to the Relevant Review Body for the purpose of conducting that review.

2 Official Directorate of Professional Standards Directorate of Professional Standards Complaint Report Protective Marking Official No Disclosure under FOIA 2000 Complaint Reference Person dealing with complaint PC/02268/24 Raquel Lovekin Organisation / Department / Strand Appropriate Authority Directorate of Professional Standards A/Insp Steven Parker How we have recorded and dealt with your complaint Recorded under Schedule 3 Police Reform Act 2002 – Handled proportionately otherwise than by investigation Date Created 04/02/2025 Summary of Incident On the 03/03/2024 you logged a complaint regarding your encounter with the police. On your original submission you have explained this is the Decriminalization of Mervelee Myers that you will describe as Colonisation in Reverse based on the nature of the discrimination and the time frame in which the discrimination occurred. The name PS 2450 AS Tanner, PC 2344AS Hunte, PC 2624AS Martinez, PC 1147AS Maddock and 2 other PCs whose names were not written down visited your home when you heard a knock on your door and there was no ringing of the buzzer. Upon inviting those in you were asked if you know Arnold Tomlinson. That’s when you realised that one of the PCs had a battering ram, because he puts it at the door to come inside. Since the incident was captured on YouTube LIVE. You would like YouTube to be used as evidence. The fact you called the Met Police 3 times about the kicking of your door must be part of your arguments that the actions of the 6 Police who came to your home with a battering ram are part of the systemic discrimination against you from you reporting Winsome Duncan and Barrister Ryan Clement for verbal threats in October 2017. The Police claim this was none of their concerns but turned up at your home on the 30th of November 2017 to section you for a malicious report, you wrote on Facebook, that you were feeling SUICIDAL based on your participation with “A New Met for London” that can be verified online. You are giving the Met Police the opportunity to redeem themselves by revisiting your complaints to IOPC and MOPAC and how your complaints were dealt with.

Your husband who is TRAUMATISED by the discrimination is dying and it would be good if he can have reassurance from the Met Police that you will be safeguard before he dies. If this matter is not addressed and resolved satisfactorily, you will continue sharing your stories until they are picked up by the international media. Refer to https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site for more. The incidents span 30/10/2017 to March 2024 – January 2025.

3 Official Your concerns The concerns listed below set out the nature of your complaint, which we have yet to agree however I emailed you dated 4/2/2025 and your response did not make any sense, so I have continued with the allegation I think is correct, but on the whole I am unclear: MM Response: You have contradicted yourself with this statement. I was asked to submit EVIDENCE 7 days of the EMAIL and today the 7th you came up with an outcome. The fact that the Police waited almost a year to respond is DISCRIMINATION. •

Concern 1 – Discrimination against you by 6 officers when they attended your address. Actions taken to address your complaint I have taken the following steps to address your concerns, which I consider to be both reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances, to address the matters described above. Where I have not pursued a particular line of enquiry, this is because I believe this would not be reasonable or proportionate, taking into consideration all of the circumstances. To address all aspects of your complaint I have taken the following actions: • I have reviewed your initial complaint submission. • I have emailed you to confirm your complaint, however I have not received a coherent response. MM Response: You will be charged for DEFAMATION and why did the Met Police waited nearly a year to contact me? • I have emailed you to get further information regarding the discrimination aspect of your complaint but you have not provided me with any further credible information I can use for my complaint handling. MM Response: You are obviously illiterate??? You emailed me and asked for informatipn to be submitted in a time frame. Do you think I have nothing else to do except answer STUPID QUESTIONS you concocted to cover up the HATE CRIMES against me especially since the death of my HUSBAND?

• I have reviewed police indices to establish why officers attended in March 2024. This includes 6 CADS (Calls to police) by you: 5481/26Feb24 – ASB Call by you 6297/27Feb24 – ASB Call by you 2825/27Feb24 – ASB Call by you 6569/27Feb24 – Police Scotland saw a video of you streaming threatening officers. MM Response: Are you telling me Police Scotland saw a video of me streaming THREATENING OFFICERS. What kind of OFFICERS are they? Did Police Scotland see any other videos of me and POLICE? If Police Scotland did not see any, ask POLICE SCOTLAND to sign up for FREE TRAINING about how not to DISCRIMINATE against the face of ITV News Windrush 70. E1272/28Feb24 – ASB Call by you 4990/1Mar24 – ASB Call by you – This seems to be the call you are complaining about. MM Response: Sorry STUPID I am not in no mood for your IGNORANCE and GASLIGHTING• I have reviewed a crime report whereby you have been named as a suspect for Harassment 01/67016/24 • MM Response: Go ahead and DEFAME my NAME as each time the Met Police does this the more FAMOUS I will become like IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE that Sir Mark Rowley endorsed at A New Met for London lanch on the 2nd September 2023. I have reviewed adult safety concerns on two records called Merlin: 24PAC005902 – Officers worried about your mental health 24PAC047671 – on the 27th Feb 2024, Officers worried about your mental health after Police Scotland called re a video you were streaming on you tube that an elderly female was tied up in the bedroom. MM Response: It seems that the entire Met Police need their HEADS examined. Because the 27th February 2024, I was STRESSED out trying to get the bed for my HUSBAND to return home to DIE. Any SENSIBLE PERSON would have made the difference about an uploaded video and one that I was LIVE STREAMING. They would seen that the ENVRONMENT where the elderly lady is/was, was different from the UK. And where would I get this elderly lady to tie up? Upon police arrival it was noted that you said you were filming them live on you tube and did not know why they were there. • I have considered the IOPC Discrimination procedures of asking officer for an account, however I do not deem this reasonable and proportionate given the communication I have received from you. MM Response: But you stated I did not send you any information, so where did you get this from. The fact that you sent the REPORT back before the 7 days you asked me to give you information is relevant to the covering up of the GASLIGHTING and MISOGYNY by those with something to hide and AXE to GRIND.

4 Official 5 Official • I have considered the IOPC Discrimination procedures of conducting comparable data checks, however I do not deem this reasonable and proportionate given that your circumstances are that you are poorly and you need to receive medical care. MM Response: You will be charged for breaches of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics. You will be responsible for the attempts to SECTION MURDER KIDNAP me between 30 October 2017 to 22 January 2025 for why I am POORLY according to you. Maybe you are aware why I am not receiving MEDICAL CARE. “No society can legitimately call itself civilise if a SICK person is DENIED Medical AID because of lack of means” Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948. Your circumstances would also prove difficult to compare. MM Response: You are correct because I am sure an IDIOT like you would not know that I am an NHS Pensioner with REFERENCES from parents that will make those DISCRIMINATING against me hold their HEADS in SHAME. • You name the officers in your complaint, however they do not match any specific date, times and actions taken by those who did attend on certain days. MM Response: Maybe you need to get Police Scotland to go through YouTube to pinpoint the OFFICERS who attend my home and are catured on LIVE. A case in point is the 3rd January 2025. I do not feel it is fair to name these officers when I do not have more specific information from you to be able to identify which ones you alleged to have done something. MM Response: You make me FUCKING ANGRY and you will be exposed as who you are…

A reflection on the service we provided: Concern number 1 Nature of complaint Discrimination against you by 6 officers when they attended your address. Officer(s) Members of Staff Identified Unknown Our consideration (Our Determination) Your complaint has been recorded but I have decided to take no further action. MM Response: Am not bothered because you will be judged by the world and not MERVELEE MYERS.

Rationale After reviewing your complaint submission, your subsequent emails and also conducting a search for any police dealings you have had in the past, I have noted many calls by you for ASB and Nuisance Neighbours, I also note that you are a suspect for harassment against your neighbours and you have a crime report on for an incident involving your step son, whose father, your husband sadly passed away, please accept my sincerest condolences. MM Response: How about you check my engagement with Nigel Pearce at Elim House in August 2023? I have noted that you feel you are being discriminated against, you have not provided me with any information other than GP medical records that you would like everyone to keep due to medical negligence. MM Response: Here is the PROOF that you need to be admitted to an INSTITUTION for treatment. I note that this is born from your mental health issues, however I feel this is due to you feeling like you are not getting the medical help you require. MM Response: The Met Police will pay for your DISCRIMINATION. I do not feel confident in being able to address this matter without any further information from you, for example the responses to my questions. MM Response: How about you cut the CRAP? I also feel it would be unfair of me to address this with the named officers due to this reason. MM Response: I refuse to engage with an ASSHOLE like you. I can confirm that when police have attended to your calls, they have created welfare reports which are transferred to partner agencies in order that the best care can be provided to you. MM Resonse: Thanks for providing me with the information needed to take the PARTNER AGENCIES to the world to know about the WINDRUSH SCANDAL.

It seems your GP is aware you are poorly as per your screen shots of your medical record and you sent me a sickness note, explaining you were not fit for work due to stress. MM Response: There is no doubt you are SICKER than my neighbour Deborah Agnes Gilchrist.

6 Official While I appreciate that you have been poorly with your mental health, this is not a police matter, this is a medical matter and as such, I would urge to you seek help from the relevant medical areas. MM Response: I will recommend that you be treated for DELUSIONS of GRANDEUR. For continuity following on from your complaint handling, I will pass your details to the mental health liaison officer in your area, who will then be aware of your declining mental health. MM Response: Keep it up. I am really sorry that you are going through a tough time. MM Response: Seems as if you get PERVESE PLEASURE like http://www.leyf.org.uk CEO June O’Sullivan the PAEDOPHILE mastermind of Richard Harty MIC who wants to be remembered as a DISRUPTIVE INFLUENCE.

Action Taken Reviewed all readily available material Action Taken Recording Category Explanation Provided Learning No learning identified Your right to a review If you are unhappy with the way your complaint was handled, or with the final outcome, you can apply for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and we have listed the review body for your complaint below. Relevant Review Body Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) Ways to make a review request • Email – NorthCasework@policeconduct.gov.uk • Online Form – Via the IOPC’s website using the following link: http://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/complaints-reviews-and appeals • By post – IOPC, PO Box 473, Sale. M33 0BW Review to be received by 08/03/2025. Thank you for raising your concerns We understand that the outcome of your complaint may not be to your satisfaction, but we would like to thank you for taking the time to raise your concerns. Kind regards Raquel Lovekin Police Constable Directorate of Professional Standards GDPR – Any personal data submitted in the course of making a complaint will be processed and used

Our Guide To Your Complaint What will this guide tell you? This guide explains the principles of our complaints system, how we handle complaints, and the possible outcomes. What can I complain about? If you think you have been treated unfairly by the police or the standard of service you received was unacceptable you have the right to make a complaint. A complaint can be made about the conduct of any person serving with the police, i.e. a police officer, police staff member, special constable, designated volunteer or a person contracted to provide services to the Met Police. You can also complain about how a police force is run. For example, you can complain about force-wide crime initiatives, the organisation of policing resources and general policing standards. There is no time limit for making a complaint. However, if you complain about something that happened more than 12 months ago, you should explain why you didn’t complain sooner. Who can make a complaint? You can make a complaint if: · You were directly affected by the behaviour of our police officers, special constables, members of police staff, volunteers or contractors. · Witnessed an incident – for example, you were present when an incident took place or were close enough to see or hear the incident (you cannot claim to have witnessed an incident if you have seen it on television or social media). · Have been adversely affected by the conduct or matter complained about – this means that the actions of the police have indirectly affected you, for example you have suffered any form of loss, damage, distress or inconvenience as a result of the matter complained about, or you have been put in danger or otherwise put at risk of being adversely affected. 1 You could be acting on behalf of someone in any of the people listed above – for example, a family member, friend, legal representative or any other person of their choosing. You may be able to make a complaint if you are a parent or guardian. Persons serving with the police force cannot make a complaint about incidents and officers in their own force. This does not mean they are unable to raise concerns, there are other ways to do this such as internal conduct investigations and the staff resolution process. This just means that they will not have the statutory rights of a complainant. What can you expect when you complain? You can expect: · Contact from us to get some further details · To be asked what you would like to happen · To be listened to and treated fairly · To be updated about the progress of your complaint · To be told the outcome of your complaint when it has been finalised · If your complaint has been formally recorded and you are not happy with the outcome, you can request an independent review How will my complaint be handled? By law all complaints against the police must be logged. We make an initial assessment of how your complaint may be dealt with and we will contact you to find out what you would like to happen. Your complaint may be dealt with in one of the following ways: · Early contact – A complaint handler will make contact with you as soon as possible after you raised your concerns. They may be able to provide an explanation or an apology, or other information to assure you that appropriate action is being taken. Their aim is to try and resolve your issues and create an environment for learning where people learn from mistakes made. · By investigation – If the complaint is serious enough to warrant disciplinary action then it will be investigated and an investigator will be appointed. · In some circumstances, no further action may be taken. 2 We’ll ask you how you’d like to be contacted, keep you informed on the progress, write to you to tell you the outcome and explain your right to an independent review. However we deal with your complaint, it is important to us. Will my complaint be referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC)? When we receive your complaint, we consider whether it should be referred to the IOPC. The most serious incidents must be referred to the IOPC – whether someone has made a complaint or not. For example, if police actions result in a member of the public being seriously injured or dying: · while in custody · after they’ve had contact with the police · as a result of a police shooting · in a road accident involving the police We can also refer incidents to the IOPC if we have concerns, for instance about the conduct of our officers or staff. The IOPC can direct us to record incidents and then ‘call them in’. The IOPC may choose to investigate these cases themselves, independently of us. Further information regarding referrals to the IOPC can be found in the IOPC’s Statutory Guidance. How often will I be updated? Keeping you informed is one of our key priorities; our updates should be regular and meaningful. Our first update will be provided promptly, in writing, and, at the latest, within four weeks of the start of the handling of your complaint. Further updates will be provided at least every four weeks. How long will my complaint take to deal with? We aim to deal with complaints in timely a manner, however there is no time limit on how long we will take to deal with your complaint. The person dealing with your complaint should be able to tell you how long it is likely to take. 3 Who will be involved in dealing with my complaint? This depends on how your complaint will be handled. Your point of contact will be either a: · Complaint handler – if your complaint is being dealt with through early contact, or · Investigator – if your complaint is being investigated as there is an indication a criminal offence may have been committed or the behaviour may justify disciplinary proceedings. You may also see the role, ‘appropriate authority’ used in your complaint report. This is the person who assesses and makes decisions about your complaint at various stages in the complaint process. What are the possible outcomes? We will send you a report to explain how we have dealt with your complaint. If our service didn’t meet the standards expected, we will inform you of the action we are taking. Possible outcomes could include: · An explanation or apology for what has happened · Training to further develop our officers and staff · Making changes to our policies or procedures · Giving advice to the officer or person you have complained about so that their

Possible outcomes could include: · An explanation or apology for what has happened · Training to further develop our officers and staff · Making changes to our policies or procedures · Giving advice to the officer or person you have complained about so that their performance improves · Referring your case to the Crown Prosecution Service. The CPS is responsible for deciding if criminal charges should be brought. · Referring the case for misconduct proceedings. · There may not be enough information to take action over your complaint. If this happens it may just mean there is not enough evidence available · In some cases, we may agree with you that something went wrong, but decide that no other action is appropriate How do we learn from complaints and dissatisfaction? Learning from complaints helps to improve the way we do things and stop the same thing from happening again. As well as learning from individual cases, we use information from our complaints system to monitor performance and identify potential learning for us as an organisation. 4 What if I am still unhappy? If we were dealing with your concerns through early resolution and you aren’t happy, we will record your complaint and appoint a complaint handler. If you are still unhappy after we have handled your complaint, you can ask for a review. Reviews are dealt with by either the Independent Officer for Police Conduct (IOPC) or the Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC). The report we send you when we have finished dealing with your complaint tells you the review body for your complaint. You need to apply within 28 days or your application won’t be accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances for the delay. The review will consider whether or not the handling of your complaint was reasonable and proportionate. Did you know? · The police complaints process has no means by which to deal with financial claims for compensation against the Met. Money cannot be awarded via the complaints procedure, regardless of the outcome. If you wish to seek compensation for something the police have done, please write to: Directorate of Legal Services, Metropolitan Police Service, 10 Lambs Conduit Street, London WC1N 3NR. Please be sure to include your full name and contact details, your case or report number (if applicable), the name or shoulder number of any Met officer, staff or volunteer involved and your reasons for claiming compensation. · The majority of complaints where mistakes are identified are resolved with learning and development after the complainant’s feedback has been taken on board. This is even more important under the new complaint legislation and the introduction of the Reflective Practice Review Process. · Legislation in relation to police complaints has changed from 1 February 2020 with the implementation of the Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 2020. This allows for police complaints to be dealt with in a reasonable and proportionate manner and at the appropriate level. This supports both the efficiency and fairness of the complaints system. 5 How can I find out more information? Further information can be found in the following documents: · The IOPC Statutory Guidance https://www.policeconduct.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Documents/statutoryguidance /2020_statutory_guidance_english.pdf • Police Reform Act 2002 • Police (Complaints and Misconduct) Regulations 202

Complaints Resolution Unit Satisfaction Survey

This survey is being run by the Met Police Complaints Resolution Unit. You are invited to participate in this survey because you have made a complaint, or did so on another person’s behalf, in relation to the level of service we provided or the conduct of our officers.

We want to hear your views on how your complaint was handled. This will help us improve what we do. For this reason we value and will act on your feedback. The survey should take you no longer than five minutes to complete

The information you give us will be used for analysis purposes, and may be published in anonymised form. We will never publish the comments you make or any other information you give us in a way that can be used to identify you.

Before completing the survey please note that:

• We are unable to alter the outcome of the investigation into your complaint. We are also unable to respond to any specific comments about the handling of individual complaint cases submitted by respondents in the course of completing this survey.
• Completing the survey does not constitute an application for an independent review of the Met Police handling of your complaint.

Privacy note
Whenever you press ‘Next’, the answers that you have provided will be submitted and may be included in the results.
If at any stage you decide that you do not want your answers to be included in the results, you can press ‘Exit and clear survey’.
This will clear all answers you have submitted up to that point.

Questions

* How easy was it to access the complaints system?

Choose one of the following answers

• 1 – Very easy
• 2 – Easy
• 3 – Neither difficult or easy
• 4 – Difficult
• 5 – Very difficult

* How satisfied were you in how your complaint was dealt with?

Choose one of the following answers

• Very satisfied
• Satisfied
• Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
• Dissatisfied
• Very dissatisfied

* How satisfied were you with the outcome of your complaint?

Choose one of the following answers

• Very satisfied
• Satisfied
• Neither satisfied or dissatisfied
• Dissatisfied
• Very dissatisfied

Do you have any comments about how the complaints process could be improved?

* Your feedback has the potential to help improve the quality of service for all.  Would you be happy to provide your complaints reference number? This means we will be able to identify you and link your survey response to your complaint.

Choose one of the following answers

• Yes
• No

SubmitExit and clear survey

THE WORLD WILL BE INFORMED ABOUT THE RACIST METROPOLITAN POLICE THAT MURDERED JOY GARDENER AND SHOOT CHERRY GROUSE IN BRIXTON. THEM SIR MARK ROWLEY WILL ISSUE ME WITH AN APOLOGY EMBOSSED IN THE MET POLICE EMBLEMS.

Copyright Mervelee Myers 7 February 2025.