Refer to
The defendant’s response
Housing Ombudsman Service has rejected the claim.
Their defence
Why they disagree with the claim
The Housing Ombudsman is a non-departmental public body whose purpose is to administer the Housing Ombudsman Scheme (“the Scheme”) and to enable tenants and other individuals to have complaints about member landlords investigated in accordance with the Scheme approved by the Secretary of State. The Scheme is approved by the Secretary of State under (inter alia) the Housing Act 1996 as amended. The service is free, independent and impartial. Mrs Myers’ claim appears to arise out of her complaint of the Ombudsman’s service and the handling of a complaint between the Claimant and its landlord. The Housing Ombudsman Service (HOS) addressed the points raised, confirming with the Resident (R) that their Landlord (LL) was not escalating their complaint to Stage 2 of their process due to the development of the legal proceedings, on 3 June 2024. The R raised a service complaint with HOS, citing that HOS has demonstrated discrimination, and ignored discrimination by their landlord. The complaint was investigated , a response issued 3 April 2024, and a subsequent request to escalate the complaint to Stage 2 of HOS’ process rejected 1 May 2024, as the Rs complaint points had already been addressed in previous response. We dispute and reject all parts of the claim.
Their timeline of events
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| 4 August 2022 | Resident (R) call – raised landlord (LL) complaint based on repairs, ASB and complaint handling. Still within LL internal complaints process (ICP), so not yet ready to refer to HOS. |
| 5 August 2022 | HOS writes to LL and R to support completion of ICP – asks LL to provide S1 response by 19 August 2022 |
| 28 September 2022 | Email from R – copies and pastes initial HOS letter. HOS writes back to R on 13 October 2022 to clarify this. |
| 31 October 2022 | R confirms no S1 response received from LL. Gives further details of complaints about LL |
| 7 November 2022 | HOS chases S1 LL response and gives LL a 5 working day deadline. |
| 14 November 2022 | LL provides S1 complaint response. HOS provides this to R 15 November 2022, with escalation advice if required. |
| 7 August 2023 | Email from R to multiple recipients including info@housing-ombudsman.org.uk, content includes commentary re anti-social behaviour injunction . HMCTS and Devonshires LLP copied. |
| 8 August 2023 | R calls asking for an update on their case. Escalation advice provided verbally. |
| 8 September 2023 | Email from R to multiple recipients, embedding link and providing evidence to support claim for a hearing. |
| 18 September 2023 | Emails dated 16 August 2023, attaching R’s tenancy agreement, photograph and legal documents attached to HOS’ case management system. |
| 13 October 2023 | HOS writes to R to provide complaint escalation advice, but indicates that they may be out of time with LL to do so. |
| 18 October 2023 | Email from R to HOS, embedding links that are not supported. Attached multiple legal documents including Notice of Seeking Possession (NOSP) and Notice of Hearing Application. |
| 16 November 2023 | Emails from R to multiple recipients, including HOS (includes weblinks). Mentions postponement of police interview.Emails from R to multiple recipients, including HOS. Includes weblinks. Mentions postponement of police interview. |
| 19 November 2023 | Duplicates of all emails dated 16 November 2023 received, plus further emails from R to Southwark Council dated 24 and 25 October 2023 raising formal complaint. |
| 14 December 2023 | Three emails from R to multiple recipients – includes email dated 13 December 2023 from LL, asking if R wishes to make a complaint about neighbour’s noise. |
| 15 December 2023 | Three emails from R copying in multiple recipients. R explains to LL that they does not wish to raise noise complaint, but wants to complain about LL ‘wiping her data from portal in 2000’. Email from R dated 14 December 2023 enclosing documents to support her claim that injunction is unlawful and NOSP breaches Equality Act 2010. |
| 18 December 2023 | Four emails received. Email from R to LL and multiple recipients dated 15 December 2023 – states R is awaiting response to their communication about neighbour’s Anti Social Behaviour (ASB). Three emails with YouTube links. |
| 19 December 2023 | Email from R to multiple recipients including HOS – R asks Manchester Police to get footage from neighbours regarding damage to her door. |
| 20 December 2023 | Email from R to multiple recipients with YouTube link. |
| 15 January 2024 | Letter from HOS to LL asking whether R ever escalated LL complaint to Stage 2 of the process (S2). HOS requests confirmation of legal documents relating to NOSP (court stamped claim form) and any formal response letters (FRLs) regarding LL complaint. |
| 22 January 2024 | Response from LL received – R did not request to escalate LL complaint to S2. ASB issue did not go to court as R refused to engage with Neighbourhood Officer on the matter. LL has been granted injunction against R for breach of tenancy due to her ASB. R breached injunction and NOSP proceedings initiated. R remains at property. |
| 24 January 2024 | HOS emails LL and asks if it would be willing to escalate complaint to S2 now |
| 29 January 2024 | Three emails from R to multiple recipients, embedding YouTube link (email dated 11 January 2024). Email from R explaining that she will be seeking legal advice against multiple parties. |
| 29 January 2024 | HOS chases LL for response to S2 query. |
| 30 January 2024 | Email from LL to HOS confirming that complaint would need to start again at Stage 1 (S1). |
| 31 January 2024 | Letter to R from HOS explaining that complaints process with LL will need to start again. Letter from HOS to LL asking it to raise new complaint and respond to R by 21 February 2024. |
| 31 January 2024 | Document Employment Tribunal reserved judgment sent by R to HOS re unsuccessful claims by R (appears to relate to 2017). |
| 2 February 2024 | Email from R responding to HOS – R refers to her unhappiness with HOS communication with LL, and refers to another Housing for Women (HfW) tenant’s complaint. |
| 12 February 2024 | Email from R to multiple recipients dated 10 February 2024 explaining that Housing Ombudsman will be cited for discrimination of tenants. |
| 20 February 2024 | R responds to LL S1 complaint response and copies in HOS. |
| 20 February 2024 | Email from R to HOS and LL, providing contents page for what appeared to be a court bundle. No bundle attached to email. |
| 28 February 2024 | Four emails from R to multiple recipients about buying a domain name. |
| 28 February 2024 | Letter to R from HOS explaining that they won’t take further action unless R escalates LL complaint to S2 and LL doesn’t provide response |
| 29 February 2024 | Email from HO to R acknowledging her service complaint (o provide S1 response by 21 March 2024). |
| 29 February 2024 | R responds to HOS acknowledgement with her own points. |
| 9 March 2024 | HOS copied into email between R and Neighbourhood Officer |
| 11 March 2024 | Email from R to HOS and LL dated 6 March 2024 explaining R’s ongoing communication via her book and social media. |
| 13 March 2024 | Email from R to multiple recipients asking Neighbourhood Officer to leave R alone. Email attaches complaint about HOS. |
| 13 March 2024 | HOS copied into emails between R and LL – R responding to Neighbourhood Officer. |
| 15 March 2024 | Email from R to HOS – email written from Meme Meme (email address of niccoladasilva@gmail.com). Email indicates intent to raise complaint about another LL (London & Quadrant). |
| 18 March 2024 | HOS Service Complaints Investigator (SCI) asks R for specific examples of discrimination. |
| 27 March 2024 | Email from HOS to R – explains that R has indicated her unhappiness with LL S2 complaint response. HOS requests a copy of S2 response. |
| 29 March 2024 | Email from R in response to HOS request 27March 2024 – R explains she is caring for poorly husband. R directs HOS to go back to 2022 to her first complaint. |
| 30 March 2024 | HOS copied into email enclosing hearing bundle and statement of costs from paralegal at Devonshires LLP. (PDFs were not attached to R’s email) |
| 3 April 2024 | S1 service complaint response provided to R by HOS |
| 8 April 2024 | Stage 2 (S2) of the process, based on ‘upcoming cases on 12 June and 25 July 2024’. |
| 16 April 2024 | Letter from HOS to R explaining the difference between a service request and a complaint. Hos letter highlights the fact that LL letter of 25 March 2024 appears to be a response to a service request. HOS writes to LL to ask for any S2 response issued. |
| 25 April 2024 | HOS responds to R with criteria for escalating service complaint to S2. |
| 26 April 2024 | Email from R to HOS with reasons for wishing to escalate SC to S2 |
| 1 May 2024 | Email from HOS to R declining S2 escalation request |
| 23 May 2024 | Letter from HOS to R, explaining that HOS has chased LL for provision of S2 response. |
| 31 May 2024 | Letter sent from HOS including unacceptable user warning over obscene photograph attached to R’s email of 23 May 2024. |
| 3 June 2024 | Letter received from LL to R explaining that it is not escalating her complaint to S2. Forwarded to R by HOS on 4 June 2024. |
| 4 June 2024 | Email from R to HOS – R raising points in response to LL refusal to escalate |
| 4 June 2024 | Email from R to HOS responding to Unacceptable User letter |
| 12 September 2024 | HMCTS letter dated 6 September 2024 received by HOS |
| 20 September 2024 | Call from R to HOS, seeking information on previous complaints. R expressed suicidal ideation but explained that they did not want to act on this. HOS signposted R. |
Why they disagree with your timeline
“This timeline spans the period from the date of the resident’s initial contact with HOS August 2022. The content has been summarised, provides the recent chain of events leading to the resident raising a Money Claim Online via HMCTS.”
Their evidence
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Letters, emails and other correspondence | Letters and emails sent by HOS to Resident Correspondence sent by Resident to HOS Correspondence sent by Resident to other parties, copying in HOS |
| Other | Details of Housing Ombudsman Scheme |
Full response
Download their full response and hearing requirements (PDF)Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise
Free telephone mediation
We have automatically registered you for free telephone mediation from HM Courts and Tribunals Service.
How free mediation works
A trained, neutral mediator from HM Courts and Tribunals Service will listen to your views and help you to negotiate a settlement of your dispute.
Mediation can be quicker, cheaper and less stressful than going to court.
Mediation is confidential, and nothing said in the mediation can be used in court proceedings if the dispute cannot be settled. The mediator speaks to each party separately, this is not a conference call.
The defendant has already agreed to mediation. We’ll contact you, within 28 days after your response, to arrange a free appointment.
Your mediation appointment will last for no more than an hour.
Find out more about free telephone mediation (opens in new tab).
Reaching a settlement
If mediation is successful, you’ll make a verbal agreement over the phone. This is legally binding which means that you must comply with it. You will be given the terms of the agreement in a document – this is called a settlement agreement.
If either party breaks the terms the other party can go to court to ask for a judgment or hearing.
If mediation fails and a court hearing is needed, what happened during the mediation appointment cannot be mentioned in court.
You will not have to wait longer for a court hearing if you choose mediation.Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Check your answers
Your response
Do you want to proceed with the claim?YesChangedo you want to proceed with the claim?
Free telephone mediation
Will you try free mediation?YesChangewill you try free mediation?Contact number02072310813Changecontact number
Your hearing requirements
Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?YesChangedo you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?Do you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the Court needs to consider?YesChangedo you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the court needs to consider?If you have answered “yes” to question 1, in what way/s are you/ the witness vulnerable and what steps, support or adjustments do you wish the Court to consider?MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSSupport required for a hearingOther:MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSChangesupport required for a hearingPreferred hearing centreClerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court and Family CourtChangepreferred hearing centreDo you want to give evidence?YesChangedo you want to give evidence?Other witnesses5Changeother witnessesDates unavailable18 December 2024Changedates unavailable
Confirmation
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Claim details
Claim number: 570MC490
Claim amount: £9,500View amount breakdown
Reason for claim:
The Defendant is party to the MISOGYNY of the Housing Association coercive control of the neighbour whose hate crimes traumatised me and my husband for 23 years. Failure to address the complaints after it reached stage 2 of the procedures allowed H4W to wipe the Control Panel of my data from 2000. I became the target of the Metropolitan Police, the HMCTS CPS CJS CCMCC IOPC JCIO BSB SRA HMPPS CLCC because the defendant allowed H4W to continue with the MISOGYNISTIC policies used to gag tenants. The Defendant is aware of concerns via the complaints I submitted about the HOS failures to act without biases. I must make mention of the FIRES recently saying I averted a Grenfell Tower in Alma Grove when contractors tried to put the electric pipes through my flat to go upstairs. I did not agree because of the times the neighbour left the pipes running in the bathroom and it affected the electrical wiring. This had to be changed. The gas pipes were left exposed until I raised concerns about pulling my heavy trolley over it. The barrister Samantha Jones who coerced Con Man John Fenton to represent LEYF pretending he is a solicitor. Bragged about getting a reference from Judge Freer to be on the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Panel. Despite not addressing my complaints about H4W and the HOS. I am now a member of the HOS Customer Panel that I have to pass their selection for. But at the same time I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE by District Judge Sterlini on Mimi Owusu who scammed me £10,000.00 within 4 months of meeting me at an event. Richard Harty and his team sit back allowing me and my husband to experience the TERRORISM from the MISOGYNIST at Housing for Women, Devonshires Solicitors and the Metropolitan Police by doing nothing. Repairing Trust Call for Evidence is an INSULT to those who experience https://x.com/SkyNews/status/1828434278180425750 being trapped in their home. Thank God everyone’s safe. @LewishamCouncil ignore cladding & fire safety issues, non compliances, defects & refuse to inspect buildings & homes here since 2016. Fire Risk Assessments since 2021 have been withheld with stay put still on place @H_S_E @mhclg @RSHEngland @Shelter Lewisham Green Party and 9 others Quote Housing for Women @Housing4Women · Oct 6, 2020 Replying to @hfw_actiongroup @natfednews and 2 others The cladding is currently under review, in line with our Fire Risk Assessments. We are working for a solution, to be included in our 2020/21 planned program of works. Gibbs https://youtube.com/live/sub07SCQBgU?feature=share. I am gagged facing IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION despite asking for help from everyone including the MP and the Housing Ombudsman Service. ‘Repairing Trust’ Call for Evidence The Housing Ombudsman is exploring common issues in housing maintenance, following a significant rise in complaints about disrepair. This Call to Evidence will help us to understand how increasing repair costs, complaints, and skill shortages are impacting residents’ safety in their homes. The Spotlight report on repairs and maintenance – ‘Repairing Trust’ will highlight some of the positive changes landlords have made to rise to the maintenance challenge and explore the complex relationship between landlords, contractors, and residents. With a particular focus on accountability, roles, and responsibilities. It will examine the experiences of operatives on the ground as well as residents and the breakdown in relationships that can happen between the landlord and residents. The ‘Call for Evidence’ will remain open for over 12 weeks, closing on Friday 25 October 2024, supported by casework reviews and fieldwork across England. We are seeking insights from residents, repair operatives, landlords, contractors, MPs, and councillors. If you are a stakeholder who is not a resident, repairs operative or landlord staff member, please feel free to submit written statements to insight@housing-ombudsman.org.uk(External link). The questions in each survey will cover: • What are the main issues landlords face when contracting services, what causes these issues, and what impact do they have? • What problems do residents encounter with these services, the underlying reasons, and their effects? • What barriers do operatives experience in delivering services, the root causes, and the repercussions? • What are the lessons learned from cases with no maladministration and successful initiatives within the sector? You will find more information about the ‘Repairing Trust’ Call to Evidence on our website(External link). Please choose to complete one of the following surveys. Thank you for taking part. • Survey • Resident survey This survey asks about your experience of repairs and maintenance operatives in your home or other buildings owned and operated by your landlord. (Repairs and maintenance includes, but is not limited to, responsive repairs, major works, grounds maintenance and gas servicing).
Timeline
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| 2022 | Submitted Complaints about Landlord. Reached Stage 2. MP involved |
| 2023 | Submitted Complaint about the HOS. |
| 2024 | HOS made me member of Customer Panel but failing to do anything about H4W MISOGYNY |
Evidence
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Letters, emails and other correspondence | |
| Contracts and agreements | |
| Photo evidence |
Download the claim
Download claim (PDF)Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Claim details
Claim number: 570MC482
Claim amount: £9,500View amount breakdown
Reason for claim:
Dear Ms Myers, My name is Gayle Lewis, and I am a Patient Complaint Officer at King’s College Hospital. My reason for contacting you is to introduce myself and to confirm we are taking the concerns you raised about your recent experience at King’s forward through the formal complaints process. MM Response: I will go back to Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Mapother House Nursery 2003-2008 and the first nervous breakdown. After the death of my brother with colon cancer age 56 years old. I was a participant in Dr. Maria Hudson’s research paper for the Policy Studies Institute “The Experience of Multiple Discrimination” recommended to ACAS. I was abandoned by UNISON, the NHS GP, LEA, LSB, the CAB, organisations and individuals that left me to be the victim of systemic discrimination. The Trust aims to have investigated your concerns within 40 working days. MM Response: What is PALS waiting on and am I the only one who is DYSLEXIC? Once our investigations are complete we will send you a formal response in a letter from one of our Executive team. MM Response: It is now 28th August 2024 so what is happening to the formal response? The patterns of MISOGYNY from the time I raised concerns at Kings about children with SEND can be tracked to why the Judiciary of England and Wales presided over the first miscarriages of justice when I was accused of making up disabilities and not a credible witness. If at any stage we find we need more time to complete our investigations we will contact you to inform you of this. MM Response: I will tell the world that the discrimination started at Kings 2003-2008 and 2024 when my husband was NEGLECTED on BYRON ward. I was assaulted on the 6th April 2024 when Nurse Betty called the racist security I assaulted staff. I was tired after attending the “Windrush Vigil” but it was my duty to visit my husband in the hospital. I ended up in A&E because I was manhandled by haters and the staff who were struggling to cope. I have read your account of what happened and apologise that this led to you raising a complaint. MM Response: How many complaints have I raised since I contacted UNISON about the treatment at KINGS. To http://www.leyf.org.uk and the MISOGYNIST thinking they can get away like Gayle Lewis is ducking and diving. To aid our investigation into your concerns, I have listed key points that you have asked us to respond to. MM Response: Mervelee Myers stories are documented online and as a result of the HATE CRIMES of me and my husband I got 700K views on one of the videos of my husband in the HOSPITAL. There is no way the MISOGYNY can be hidden anymore. The question is what does the BLACK persons failing their own believe in? • Complainant arrived to witness Mr Tomlinson falling out of bed, the nurse accompanying the complainant did not notice this MM Response Nurse Betty is just a careless, overworked AFRICAN acting like those who sold our ANCESTORS into SLAVERY. • Complainant decided to video events as wanted a record of the incidents that took place. MM Response: There is no question about the reasons I create contents. Refer to videos in Guys Hospital. • Complainant states that nursing staff were abusive towards her and not caring for her husband appropriately. MM Response: Fact. • Security staff were called and ejected (roughly handling her, causing her fingernail to break). MM Response: Why did Gayle Lewis put emphasis on my broken finger nail? Did she think I was taken to A&E because of my BROKEN FINGER NAIL? Her from the building – MM Response: Refer to the appointment on 21st August 2024 with the Mental Health Practitioner and the recommendations. She asked for her coat which was returned with money missing from the pocket. MM Response: I was expected to leave the hospital after I was tricked to leave my husband’s bedside without my coat with my keys in it. How was I to get back indoors without my keys and bus pass that were in my pocket. • Was safeguarding in place for complainant’s husband. MM Response: Can KINGS answer the question? To ensure we understand the key points within your complaint that you would like answered and to ensure a thorough investigation takes place, I want to ensure that I have accurately presented your key concerns. MM Response: I consider Gayle Lewis to be biased and working under the MISOGYNISTIC laws of the Judiciary of England and Wales that have presided over the miscarriages of justice after the death of my brother age 56 with colon cancer. My mother with dementia. Now after the CRISIS I went through during July 2023 I was labelled a VIOLENT NUISANCE. Facing IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION gagged with Contempt of Court. Well Gayle Lewis will be exposed like all in the BAME community who discriminated against me and my husband. What does Gayle Lewis need to understand about my complaints? My husband was NEGLECTED and I was ASSAULTED by RACIST Security Nurse Betty called and lied about me. It would also be helpful to understand the outcome you are seeking. MM Response: Now the outcome I am seeking is relevant to what the NHS has done to deny me my ENTITLEMENTS. But now the NHS England is joining in the MISOGYNY colluding with Nexus Health Group. Let me quote Nye Bevan founder of the NHS 1948 “No Society Can Legitimately Call Itself Civilised If A Sick Person Is Denied Medical Aid Because Of Lack Of Means”. Typical outcomes from raising a complaint would be: • An official explanation in the form of a written response. MM Response: What official written response is Gayle Lewis talking about? The NHS is not FIT For PURPOSE. • An apology for a poor experience. MM Response: It’s too late now for an apology. • Process improvements to help ensure a similar occurrence does not happen in the future. MM Response: This happened in 2008 at KINGS and in 2024 am hearing CRAP about improvement. • Potential retraining for staff, if identified through the course of the investigation. MM Response: Those responsible will be named including the Nexus Health Group MISOGYNIST. I would be grateful if you could confirm this is a fair reflection of your concerns for our investigation. MM Response: How many times have I contacted Gayle Lewis about this matter? If this is not correct, or you have additional issues you would like us to investigate, then please contact me to confirm these points. MM Response: Gayle Lewis is acting like those who assaulted me and NEGLECTED my husband in Kings College Hospital. If you need communication support such as an interpreter or information in another language, audio, Braille, Easy Read or large print, please let me know. MM Response: The tokenism of Gayle Lewis. If there is anything you wish to discuss about your case, please either email or contact Olivia on 0203 299 4515. With kind regards Gayle Lewis Gayle Lewis Patient Complaints Officer Patient Complaints King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS Chat with me on Teams Direct line: 020 3299 4501 | Switchboard 020 3299 9000 Ext 34501 Email: gaylelewis@nhs.net or kch-tr.patientcomplaints@nhs.net This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please: i) inform the sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it; and ii) do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in relation to its content (to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful). Thank you for your co-operation. NHSmail is the secure email, collaboration and directory service available for all NHS staff in England. NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive information with NHSmail and other accredited email services. For more information and to find out how you can switch visit Joining NHSmail – NHSmail Support
Timeline
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| APRIL 2024 | Raised Concerns |
| August 2024 | Still waiting on the response after several telephone contacts |
| 2024 | Called and left message, no response |
| 2024 | No respect from Gayle Lewis |
Evidence
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Letters, emails and other correspondence | |
| Photo evidence | |
| Receipts | |
| Contracts and agreements |
Download the claim
Download claim (PDF)Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Check your answers
Your response
Do you want to proceed with the claim?YesChangedo you want to proceed with the claim?
Your hearing requirements
Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?YesChangedo you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?Do you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the Court needs to consider?YesChangedo you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the court needs to consider?If you have answered “yes” to question 1, in what way/s are you/ the witness vulnerable and what steps, support or adjustments do you wish the Court to consider?MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSSupport required for a hearingOther:MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSChangesupport required for a hearingPreferred hearing centreClerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court and Family CourtChangepreferred hearing centreDo you want to give evidence?YesChangedo you want to give evidence?Other witnesses5Changeother witnessesDates unavailableNoneChangedates unavailable
Confirmation
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Check your answers
Your response
Do you want to proceed with the claim?YesChangedo you want to proceed with the claim?
Your hearing requirements
Do you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?YesChangedo you consider that this claim is suitable for determination without a hearing?Do you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the Court needs to consider?YesChangedo you believe you, or a witness who will give evidence on your behalf, are vulnerable in anyway which the court needs to consider?If you have answered “yes” to question 1, in what way/s are you/ the witness vulnerable and what steps, support or adjustments do you wish the Court to consider?MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSSupport required for a hearingOther:MENTAL PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTSChangesupport required for a hearingPreferred hearing centreClerkenwell and Shoreditch County Court and Family CourtChangepreferred hearing centreDo you want to give evidence?YesChangedo you want to give evidence?Other witnesses5Changeother witnessesDates unavailableNoneChangedates unavailable
Confirmation
The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.The hearing requirement details on this page are true to the best of my knowledge.Contact us for help
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Re: PC/9191/24
9 April …2010.docx
MM
Mervelee Myers
To:DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk;+22 others
Tue 08/10/2024 09:03
9 April 2024 HMCTS Breaches of Equality Act 2010.docx
28 KB
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
PC/9191/24
D Mike.A.James@met.police.uk
on behalf of
DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk
To:You
Mon 07/10/2024 13:45
Good afternoon MM Response: 8/10/2024
Further to my earlier email. MM Response: I am responding with the Seriousness that this deserves.
I have discussed your previous complaint recorded under PC/2268/24 which is currently being handled by Central South Professional Standards Unit with a supervisor on that unit. MM Response: It would be interesting to know how you made the decision about who is handling the complaint. But I guess at this stage it’s not that relevant. Just so you understand that because of the Systemic Discrimination of the past 10 years, and as the author of IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE that was signed and dedicated to a #strong #jamaican #womant at the “A New Met for London #launch”. I know it’s my responsibility to myself with threats of IMPRISONMENT and EVICTION via Contempt of Court hanging over me for my “Defensive Practice”. To inform you that everything will be made public to safeguard me from being SECTION, MURDERED, KIDNAPPED in my home or on the streets of London before am ready to return home to JAMAICA.
As this complaint clearly overlaps with the previous complaint and the concerns raised are over the same time scale as the previous they are also going to be managing this complaint. MM Response: Just want you to understand that I sent a letter outlining my concerns with the Metropolitan Police handling my concerns between 30th October 2017 to 9th Auugust 2024 still stands. I will add visit on 22/9/2024 of Thiago.moreira@met.police.uk who visited on the 19/10/2023 after my husband and I were robbed in Peckham. This proves my point about the Metropolitan Police roles in the GASLIGHTING and MISOGYNY of Mervelee Myers. The various bodies from IOPC, JCIO, MOPAC will be accountable for allowing the HATE CRIMES against me. If I were you I would check the records of my claims against the Metropolitan Police and IOPC and JCIO after my complaints were not dealt with from the time I arranged a MEETING at the Southwark Police Station with Inspector Owen Pyle, and Tammie Tebboth who left Kevin Webster to handle their incompetence. For your information there are recordings on YouTube. As stated at the A New Met for London launch I am willing to VOLUNTEER to help the Metropolitan Police bring back the TRUST of the BAME communities. Instead they set out to wage a HATE CAMPAIGN with Housing for Women, Devonshires Solicitors LLP, Deborah Agnes Gilchrist and the HATE MOB in Alma Grove. I am still open to VOLUNTEERING after I get the justice, I have been FIGHT4JUSTICE for since I invested in sharing my stories.
Please use the reference PC/2268/24 in all future emails and if you require any updates please contact the professional standards unit on the below email address. MM Response: I certainly will.
DPSMailbox-.PSUAS@met.police.uk
Kind regards
Sergeant Mike JAMES
Complaints Resolution Unit – Team 2
Professional Standards
Metropolitan Police Service, Studland Block, Ground Floor, Newlands Park, London, SE26 5NF
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
MM Response: Reference this for future use https://youtu.be/GfxJh1QOPTI?si=P5tErRM_q2ze9Fo2 and https://youtu.be/FOGwwIMgl9E?si=6IgaIj1x6O01tCzd and https://youtu.be/vQD9Z6SBsC4?si=e8nPFzajYsNeIr-s and https://youtu.be/lsGQ56v7Ypo?si=iVypQY1PDkKSjGmW and https://youtu.be/io2KUFZzfK8?si=e4VLTbpnboE7tRL_ and https://www.youtube.com/live/lxhN-VRQrc8?si=jEc7ViedG3aOM7Oz and
| Live with” MERVELEE’S ADVOCACY PEARLS In The SAND “Early intervention strategies key to surv…Powered by Restream https://restream.ioI HAVE NO COPY-RITE TO THE SONGS/INSTRUMENTALS PLAYING IN THE BACKGROUND OF THIS LIVE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED TO THE OWN…www.youtube.com |
| YouTubeShare your videos with friends, family, and the worldyoutu.be |
Mervelee Myers have PROOF that the Metropolitan Police is INSTITTUTIONAL RACIST and breaches my RIGHTS as a DISABLED BLACK WOMAN. And continued the GASLIIGHTING and MISOGYNY after Sir Mark Rowley signed IN HONOUR OF STRONG WOMEN EVERYWHERE at the “A New Met for London” launch. A month after Disrict Judge Sterlini labelled me a VIOLENT NUISANCE on EMANCIPATION DAY 2023.
Kind regards
Mervelee Myers FD (Open)
Mental Health & SEND Advocate
Turn Activist.
From: Mike.A.James@met.police.uk <Mike.A.James@met.police.uk> on behalf of DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk <DPSMailbox-.CRUTeam2@met.police.uk>
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 1:45 PM
To: ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>
Subject: PC/9191/24
Good afternoon
Further to my earlier email.
I have discussed your previous complaint recorded under PC/2268/24 which is currently being handled by Central South Professional Standards Unit with a supervisor on that unit.
As this complaint clearly overlaps with the previous complaint and the concerns raised are over the same time scale as the previous they are also going to be managing this complaint.
Please use the reference PC/2268/24 in all future emails and if you require any updates please contact the professional standards unit on the below email address.
DPSMailbox-.PSUAS@met.police.uk
Kind regards
Sergeant Mike JAMES
Complaints Resolution Unit – Team 2
Professional Standards
Metropolitan Police Service, Studland Block, Ground Floor, Newlands Park, London, SE26 5NF
NOTICE – This email and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may be confidential. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this email or in any attachment without the permission of the sender. Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) communication systems are monitored to the extent permitted by law and any email and/or attachments may be read by monitoring staff. Only specified personnel are authorised to conclude binding agreements on behalf of the MPS by email and no responsibility is accepted for unauthorised agreements reached with other personnel. While reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present in this email, its security and that of any attachments cannot be guaranteed.
Fight4justice 