Refer
FW: 570MC567 Mrs Mervelee Myers -v- Druces LLP APPLICATION TO STRIKE OUT Ref Druces LLP:MA:DRU029.0037
TH Terri Hattersley<T.Hattersley@druces.com>
To:You
Fri 27/09/2024 16:25
8878093 N244 Myers v Druces.pdf
267 KB
8878169 WS to accompany application.pdf
2 MB
8878178 DRAFT Order – strike out claim.docx
43 KB
Show all 3 attachments (2 MB)Save All Attachments
Dear Mrs Myers
By way of service, please find attached:
- Defendant’s application dated 27 September 2024 to strike out the claim;
- Witness Statement of Terri Hattersley dated 27 Setpember 2024; and
- Draft Order.
We confirm that the above has been filed with the court today.
Yours faithfully
DRUCES LLP
Terri Hattersley Solicitor | Dispute Resolution For and on behalf of Druces LLP Direct: +44 20 7216 5562Mobile: +44 7732 686105 |
| Druces LLP, Salisbury House, London Wall, London, EC2M 5PS Main: +44 (0)20 7638 9271 • Fax: +44 (0)20 7628 7525 • DX: 33862 Finsbury Sq • www.druces.com This e-mail is for the exclusive and confidential use of the addressee. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without our prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by telephone immediately. No engagements are entered into by Druces LLP except by a letter or fax bearing a Partner’s signature. The term “Partner” in relation to Druces LLP is used to refer to a member of Druces LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. All partners of Druces LLP are solicitors of England and Wales. Druces LLP is a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales with registered number OC332179. A list of members is open for inspection at the registered office mentioned above. The firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 487134), whose rules are available at http://www.sra.org.uk/. MM Response: Michael Carter has yet to respond about Barrister Samantha Gibbs misconduct https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016. Automatic reply: KINGS COLLEGE HOSPITAL NEGLECTING 101 YEAR OLD HUSBAND MC Michael Carter<MCarter@BarStandardsBoard.org.uk> To:You Sun 07/04/2024 00:15 Thank you for your email. I am away from the office today, Friday, 5 April 2024, as I usually do not work on Fridays. I will respond to your email following my return to the office on Monday 8 April 2024. PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any attachments are confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not read, copy, distribute, discuss or take any action in reliance upon it. If you have received this information in error, please destroy it and inform me on +44(0) 20 72420082 as soon as possible. Thank you. E-mails containing bank details are vulnerable to cyber-fraud. Please ensure that you get verbal confirmation of any bank account details given to you by e-mail. If you do not follow this procedure you may be deceived into transferring funds to a fraudster’s bank account. A member of the international network, Alliance of Business Lawyers. |
IN THE CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE CLAIM NO: 570MC567
BETWEEN: MRS MERVELEE MYERS Claimant -and DRUCES LLP Defendant
WITNESS STATEMENT OF TERRI ELIZABETH HATTERSLEY
I, Terri Hattersley, of Druces LLP, Salisbury House, London Wall, EC2M 5PS, will say as follows:
- The facts and matters set out in this statement are within my own knowledge unless otherwise stated, and I believe them to be true. Where I refer to information supplied by others, the source of the information is identified; facts and matters derived from other sources are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. MM Response: Mervelee Myers reference Dr. Maria Hudson research papers for the Policy Studies Institute “The Experience of Multiple Discrimination” recommended to ACAS. Because Devonshires Solicitors LLP have the email I sent to Dr. Hudson listed in the BUNDLE agreeing to be a participant in research.
- There is now produced and shown to me a paginated bundle of true copy documents marked “TEH1”. All references to documents in this statement are to Exhibit TEH1 unless otherwise stated. MM Response: Terri Hattersley signed to TOTAL LIES that is Contempt of Court. Refer to https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site where Devonshires Solicitors LLP breach every laws, legislations and codes of conducts and practices to get the Judiciary of England and Wales, the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Services involved with District Judge Sterlini label me a VIOLENT NUISANCE on Emancipation Day 2023. He along with Rand and Zimmell strike out my claims with Winsome Duncan after it reached Telephone Mediation.
- On 6 September 2024, the Claimant issued a claim against the Defendant for a total sum of £9,500 in damages. This was broken down as follows:
a. £3,000 for breach of the Equality Act 2010;
b. £2,000 for Misogyny;
c. £3,000 for Traumas [sic]; and
d. £1,500 for Misconduct. - I am a solicitor at Druces LLP and have conduct of the above claim on behalf of the Defendant. I am duly authorised by the Defendant to make this witness statement in support of its application dated 27 September 2024, to have the Claimant’s claim struck out. MM Response: All solicitors I have dealt with except the present one representing me are CORRUPT. I will publish my research as part of my Mental Health & SEND Advocacy “Business Model“.
The Claimant appears to allege that the Defendant has caused the Claimant’s losses by “signing the Witness Statement of Samantha Gibbs” (see page 4). The reasons for the claim are not particularised, nor set out clearly or coherently. MM Response: Please excuse the incoherence as I am the victim of the neighbours and the Met Police that come to empower them.
- Neither I, nor anyone else at the Defendant was involved in the preparation of Ms Gibbs’ Witness Statement or have any knowledge of its contents or the matters to which it relates. Upon receipt of the claim, I made enquires with Devonshires Solicitors (“Devonshires”) who are also referenced in the particulars of claim. I was informed by Devonshires that on 31 August 2023 I witnessed the swearing and signing of an affidavit for Ms Gibbs. MM Response: You signed to the LIES of H4W and Devonshires Solicitors LLP. Do you know why Ms Gibbs is on “Long Term Sick Leave?“
- I frequently witness the swearing of affidavits or statutory declarations for Devonshires as the firm is in the same building as the Defendant. Whilst I do not recall this specific affidavit, I am sure that I signed the affidavit, printed my name and then stamped it with the Defendant’s address to signify that the affidavits had been sworn and signed in my presence and that the person signing had given the appropriate oath/affirmation. I am sure that this is what happened as this is what happens on each occasion that I perform this service for Devonshires (or anyone else). I believe that the Claimant may have misunderstood the role played by the Defendant in relation to the
affidavit of Ms. Gibbs. MM Response: No I did not misunderstand. It is clear that you are party to Devonshires Solicitors LLP Discrimination. I will give Ms. H. Presley’s name as reference.
The Defendant has received no prior correspondence from the Claimant before issuing the claim. On 23 September 2024, the Defendant wrote to the Claimant (see page 6) explaining that the claim has no merit and that it has been brought incorrectly. MM Response: I did not receive or know about Devonshires Solicitors LLP until Narin Masera sent me a REPOSSESSION letter in July 2023. Druces requested that the Claimant discontinue the claim, and informed her that, if she did not do so, the Defendant would file an application to have the application struck out. MM Response: Based on the amount of STRUCK OUT against me, I am waiting for the outcome.
- That same day, 23 September 2024, the Claimant replied to the Defendant’s letter (see page 7) making no indication that the claim would be withdrawn, in fact encouraging the Defendant to apply for the claim to be struck out. MM Response: This is based on my experiences of HMCTS miscarriages of justice.
Statement of Truth
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. MM Response: You did exactly that when you signed Ms. Samantha Gibbs Witness Statement without checking the FACTS. - The clamant has not set out a coherent set of facts or a legally recognisable claim against the Defendant and as such the claim should be struck out. MM Response: The facts are in the BUNDLE that I refuted. I am not a Legal Expert and is reading to help myself not sent to PRISON and EVICTED because HMCTS and the Housing Ombudsman Service and Metropolitan Police and Nexus Health Group and Southwark Council failed me as a disabled person. Allowed my husband to die without his DIGNITY TRAUMATISED. I respectfully request that the court grant the Defendant’s application and that an Order be granted in the terms set out in the Draft Order enclosed with the Defendant’s application or on any other terms that the court thinks fit. MM Response: Based on previous miscarriages of justice including the judgement for Barrister Ryan Clement to pay me £9455.00 that has not been granted. 4 years later I am the target of the Court Enforcement Services LTD, I am watching this space.
The Defendant has received no prior correspondence from the Claimant before issuing the claim. On 23 September 2024, the Defendant wrote to the Claimant (see page 6) explaining that the claim has no merit and that it has been brought incorrectly. Druces requested that the Claimant discontinue the claim, and informed her that, if she did not do so, the Defendant would file an application to have the application struck out.
- That same day, 23 September 2024, the Claimant replied to the Defendant’s letter (see page 7) making no indication that the claim would be withdrawn, in fact encouraging the Defendant to apply for the claim to be struck out.
Statement of Truth
I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for
contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false
statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. - The clamant has not set out a coherent set of facts or a legally recognisable claim against the Defendant and as such the claim should be struck out. I respectfully request that the court grant the Defendant’s application and that an Order be granted in the terms set out in the Draft Order enclosed with the Defendant’s application or on any other terms that the court thinks fit.
IN THE CIVIL NATIONAL BUSINESS CENTRE CLAIM NO: 570MC567
BETWEEN:
MRS MERVELEE MYERS
Claimant -and DRUCES LLP
Defendant
EXHIBIT TO WITNESS STATEMENT OF TERRI ELIZABETH HATTERSLEY
F.A.O. Mrs Mervelee Myers
16 Alma Grove
Bermondsey
London
SE1 5PY
By post and email
YOUR REF:
OUR REF: NAA\DRU029.0037\TEH
DIRECT DIAL: 020 7216 5502
EMAIL: t.hattersley@druces.com
23rd September 2024
Dear Madam
CLAIM NO: 570MC567
PARTIES: MRS MERVELEE MYERS -v- DRUCES LLP
We write further to the above claim made by you against this firm (“the Claim”).
The Claim has no merit and has been brought incorrectly. This firm has no knowledge of the contents
of the Affidavits of 31 August 2023 and 30 May 2024 (“the Affidavits”) nor any involvement with the
matters to which they relate. This firm’s only connection with the Affidavits is that they were witnessed
by one of our employees, Terri Hattersley. As such, the Claim is misconceived and has no prospect of
success. We invite you to discontinue the Claim by 4pm on 30 September 2024 failing which we will
make an application to the court to have it struck out.
Yours faithfully
DRUCES LLP
From: Mervelee Myers Sent: 23 September 2024 19:57 To: Terri Hattersley; ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com Subject: Re: Claim against Druces LLP Ref Druces LLP:MA:DRU029.0037 F.A.O. Mrs Mervelee Myers 16 Alma Grove Bermondsey London SE1 5PY By post and email YOUR REF: OUR REF: NAA\DRU029.0037\TEH DIRECT DIAL: 020 7216 5502 EMAIL: t.hattersley@druces.com 23rd September 2024
Dear Madam
CLAIM NO: 570MC567
PARTIES: MRS MERVELEE MYERS -v- DRUCES LLP
We write further to the above claim made by you against this firm (“the Claim”). MM Response: Your
Firm is listed on the paperwork in the BUNDLE.
The Claim has no merit and has been brought incorrectly. MM Response: Do you have the choice to make a decision about this? This firm has no knowledge of the contents of the Affidavits of 31August 2023 and 30 May 2024 (“the Affidavits”).MM Response: Your Firm was used by the person to witness the Affidavits. Nor any involvement with the matters to which they relate. MM Response: The person who signs is an employee of your FIRM. This firm’s only connection with the Affidavits is that they were witnessed by one of our employees, Terri Hattersley. MM Response:
Are you saying that Terri Hattersley has compromised herself and your FIRM signing/witnessing something that is FALSE that can be Contempt of Court? As such, the Claim is misconceived and has no prospect of success. MM Response: Why was it issued? We invite you to discontinue the Claim by 4pm on 30 September 2024 failing which we will make an application to the court to have it struck out. MM Response: You are sounding like the Housing Association and Solicitors for whom
Terri Hattersley sold her SOUL. By the way is that a THREAT? Go ahead and apply for it to be struck out. I am not scared of threats I have been representing myself against the A-Z of Abusers of the
VULNERABLE. Yours faithfully DRUCES LLP
Mervelee Myers FD (Open) From: Terri Hattersley Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 12:14 PM To: ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com Subject: Claim against Druces LLP Ref Druces LLP:MA:DRU029.0037 Page 7 of 8 2 Dear Madam Please see attached correspond
Dear Madam
Please see attached correspondence for your urgent attention.
Yours faithfully
DRUCES LLP
Terri Hattersley
Solicitor | Dispute Resolution
For and on behalf of Druces LLP
Direct: +44 20 7216 5562
Mobile: +44 7732 686105
Druces LLP, Salisbury House, London Wall, London, EC2M 5PS
Main: +44 (0)20 7638 9271 • Fax: +44 (0)20 7628 7525 • DX: 33862 Finsbury Sq • http://www.druces.com
This e-mail is for the exclusive and confidential use of the addressee. Any other distribution, use or reproduction without our prior consent is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by telephone immediately. No engagements are entered into by Druces LLP except by a letter or fax bearing a Partner’s signature. The term “Partner” in
relation to Druces LLP is used to refer to a member of Druces LLP or to an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. All partners of Druces LLP are solicitors of England and Wales. Druces LLP is a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales with registered number OC332179. A list of members is open for inspection at the registered office mentioned above.
The firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA Number 487134), whose rules are available at http://www.sra.org.uk/.
E-mails containing bank details are vulnerable to cyber-fraud. Please ensure that you get verbal confirmation of any bank account details given to you by e-mail. If you do not follow this procedure you may be deceived into transferring funds to a fraudster’s bank account. A member of the international network, Alliance of Business Lawyers.
Fight4justice 