Refer to
https://www.housing-ombudsman.org.uk/decisions/housing-for-women-202015827/
Housing Ombudsman SURVEY
As stated before in other SURVEYS, the Landlord rescued me from domestic violence in 2000, providing me with a home and meeting the needs regarding my home. The fact I was a member of the SCRUTINY PANEL as the minute taker is testament to the good relationship I had with the landlords. I was even respected enough to be asked to give my keys to the Communal Area to gain access. However, this key is now used by the landlord to harass, bully and intimidate with letters left outside my door or appearance of Samantha Gibbs at my door with a man she claim she comes to introduce as my new Housing Officer. He tried to assault me. The Police took their time to show up and when they did, began to terrorise me to remove the evidence of my Landlord’s terrorism from my window. For clarifications, am not sure when the Landlord changed except saying I was issued with ASBO via letter after several incidents that the neighbour instigated from the time I moved here in 2000. I complained to the Housing Ombudsman and since then the Landlord wiped the Journal of my DATA from 2000. Now I am issued with REPOSSESSION LETTER and the cyberbullying has been taken up by the Landlord’s solicitor. I have my “DEFENSIVE ORACTICE” including how I averted a GRENFELL TOWER at ALMA GROVE.
Communication
I will be brief as I don’t intend to be buried under paperwork as I am carer of my 100 year old HUSBAND and the Landlord will be charged under the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics for coercing the neighbour to target me. Referred me to the Maudsley NHS, involved the Metropolitan Police to target me… Now sending me REPOSSESSION LETTER that exacerbated my DISABILITIES.
Reasonable Adjustments
NO! Instead the Landlord coerced my neighbour to target me despite me putting my concerns in writing. Now my JOURNAL is wiped of the DATA. But my “Defensive Practice” means I have my records. However, I am the victim of Systemic Discrimination where I am targeted by the Judiciary of England & Wales the Criminal Justice System and Crown Prosecution Services, Banks and Building Society. The fact that my MP does nothing except to send my concerns of not getting the WARM HOME DISCOUNT that I got previously to a LORD CALLANAN who wrote a letter stating why I was not ENTITLED is APPALLING and takes me back to the WELCOME of “No BLACKS, No DOGS, No IRISH” to a new low. Because I was the FACE of Windrush 70 splashed across the world. I have since written a SONG that is on an APP about the Windrush Stories. The fact I am online ADVOCATING on behalf of others will be the nail in the coffin of the Landlord. If am failed by the HOUSING OMBUDSMAN then we have to go back to the miscarriages of justice twice after bereavement and loss and the role of the Government in this matter… Considering I meet Michael Gove in 2011 at http://www.leyf.org.uk and fact I wrote to 2 PMs David Cameron and Theresa May.
2nd Form
Miss Mervelee Myers Flat 16 Alma Grove London SE1 5PY By email and post: ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com Our Ref: MEL\HOU16\258\23929677 18 July 2023 Dear Miss Mervelee Myers Re: Flat 16, Alma Grove, London, SE1 5PY We previously wrote to you on 13 July 2023 serving a Section 8 Notice of Seeking Possession on behalf of Housing for Women. On 17 July 2023 you spoke on the telephone with an employee of Devonshires Solicitors LLP (“Devonshires”). Without the individual’s or the firm’s consent you recorded and posted that on YouTube and TikTok, an online video of the conversation, uploaded on 17 July 2023, titled “#merveleemyers put #housingforwomen #terrorists & #debbiegilchrist & #police & #housingombudsman 100” (the “Video”). Posted onto the front of the Video you make and/or infer a number of false and malicious accusations levied against our client, and Devonshires, which you know or ought to know are untrue and/or you have no evidence to support the truthfulness of those statements. Housing for Women are a long-standing client of the firm, and we will fight tirelessly to protect their good reputation and the very important work that they do. We draw your attention to the following false and/or malicious accusations included in the Video, as set out below: 1. “…Housing for Women the TERRORISM CELL is getting Devonshires involved their Hate Crimes Against MM”. This is untrue. Housing for Women is not a terrorism cell, nor are they involved in any hate crimes. Housing for Women is a charity that champions female empowerment and works tirelessly to build an equal society for Women through the provision of affordable homes and gender-specific support services. Devonshires does not, and would not, work with a company that is involved in terrorism and/or hate crimes. Page 2 23929677.4 2. “The Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin will be called to give evidence in this CORRUPTION and ABUSE RINGS in breach of the Equality Act 2010 Protected Characteristics” This is untrue. There is no, and therefore no evidence of, corruption or abusive activities in relation to either Housing for Women or Devonshires. Housing for Women is a charity that prides itself on fully complying with the Charity Commission regulations and is not involved in any form of corruption or abuse. Devonshires is a firm authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and is not involved in any form of corruption or abuse. We therefore urge you to urgently cease and desist from this and any further defamatory remarks and/or malicious conduct. We are also duty bound to inform you that statements in the Video may be considered a criminal offence under Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988: Any person who sends to another person— (a)a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys— (i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive; (ii)a threat; or (iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or (b)any article or electronic communication which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature, is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated. Anyone found guilty of such an offense, on conviction on indictment is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine (or both). Whether or not it was your intention to cause distress or anxiety, you have done so in posting the Video. If you do not immediately delete the Video and ensure no further videos are posted, it can only mean that you did, and continue to, intend to cause distress or anxiety to Housing for Women and Devonshires. In such circumstances we will have no option but to report you to the police. Until such time we reserve our clients’ right, and our own, to provide the police with a copy of the Video. Page 3 23929677.
Whether or not it was your intention to cause distress or anxiety, you have done so in posting the Video. If you do not immediately delete the Video and ensure no further videos are posted, it can only mean that you did, and continue to, intend to cause distress or anxiety to Housing for Women and Devonshires. In such circumstances we will have no option but to report you to the police. Until such time we reserve our clients’ right, and our own, to provide the police with a copy of the Video. Page 3 23929677.4 We have enclosed with this letter a draft undertaking for you to sign to confirm that you understand the nature of what has been posted and you have taken steps to remedy the situation. If you wish to avoid any further legal action in relation to the video in so far as it references and/or implicates Devonshires, please return a signed copy of this letter to the firm by 3pm on 21 July 2023. Our clients’ rights regarding further action are reserved. In closing, we are truly sorry for your predicament and the difficult times you are experiencing in your personally circumstances. However, that does to give you the right to behave the way you have behaved. Malicious and defamatory remarks such as those contained in the Video not only have the potential to damage the reputation and business of Housing for Women and Devonshires, but more importantly undermine the exemplary work that Housing for Women undertake to support and protect vulnerable women. If there is anything in this letter you are unsure of you should seek immediate legal advice. Yours sincerely Devonshires Solicitors LL
Fight4justice 