Mr Armstrong I will respond in due course with the Charter of Rights Code of Justice. Because I get the impression that your motive is the opposite of what’s written. I think you were fishing. I have a right to be understood.
Regards
Mervelee Myers.
Sent from my Galaxy
——– Original message ——–
From: John Armstrong <johnarmstrong@armstrongsol.com>
Date: 07/04/2021 10:06 (GMT+00:00)
To: Mervelee Myers <ratty.nembhard1956@gmail.com>
Subject: Croydon Magistrates Court 16/4/21 first appearance.
Dear Ms Myers.
I rang you this morning to confirm that having reviewed the nature of this case it seems to me that unfortunately we would not be able to obtain a grant of legal aid in your case so as to be able to act for you on the 16th. MM Arguments: Since Mr Armstrong has the audacity to be taking me for an idiot after sending me the names of 3 Solicitors to contact. I will expose him for what he is using the CHARTER OF RIGHTS YOUR OVERARCHING CODE FOR JUSTICE. When I mentioned it he said he did not know anything about it. For the benefit of protecting myself from any further discrimination from the Legal Systems acting on behalf of LEYF. I recorded the conversation upon realising what Mr Armstrong was up to.
This is because there is no apparent prospect of the offences charged giving rise to a risk of custody; as such your case would not satisfy what is known as the “interests of justice” test. MM Arguments: I failed to understand what this means and since Mr Armstrong have no intentions of making anything clear clear to me. I refuse to stress myself as am sure this is the intention for the call today. Since I have been assured I have been granted Legal Aid I am at a loss to understand what Mr Armstrong is on about. May I refer him to Code 1. To be understood as nothing that has been said to me from day one makes sense.
I rang this morning because I know these proceedings have caused you a good deal of anxiety MM Arguments: The hypocrisy of this man, he should be disciplined for using my disability of “Chronic Anxiety” in this manner to further his own agenda. When I release the recording the listener can decide for themselves. Code 2. To have the details of a crime recorded without unjustified details. Mr Armstrong was not interested in knowing how I was radicalised with my disabilities used to break me like happening past seven years.
And to confirm that when you attend Court on the 16th. MM Arguments: How can Mr Armstrong be saying in one breathe he knows that these proceedings have caused me a great deal of anxiety and in the next telling me to wait until the 16/4/2021 to speak to someone about my case.
If you ask for the services of the Duty Solicitor you will be, as of right, provided with free legal representation from the Duty Solicitor on duty. MM Arguments: Another Duty Solicitor with one intention making me a victim of the CORRUPT Judiciary of England and Wales & Criminal Justice System. My experiences of Solicitors started with https://www.capsticks.com representing Kings College NHS Foundation Trust https://www.jobs.nhs.uk when my https://careers.kch.nhs.uk was destroyed and I had to start from scratch again. I was a participant in www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers and http://unison.org.uk abandoned me. In 2017 when they overturned the https://www.gov.uk Employment Law for employees to pay to take employers to the Employment Tribunals they claimed my case was closed. Code 3. To be provided with information when reporting a crime.
They will be able to obtain case papers in your case there and then and thereafter to provide you with appropriate representation. MM Arguments: I am due in Court at 9:30 and with my “Chronic Anxiety” how can Mr Armstrong be writing this crap to me? Code 4. To be referred to Victim Support Services, including Independent Advisers, to provide emotional and practical help regardless of whether a crime is reported to the police. The Police is responsible for putting me in this predicament after refusing to act on my concerns about verbal threats from Winsome Duncan www.peachespublications.co.uk and Barrister Ryan Clement https://www.ryanclement.com but turned up at my home on 30/10/2017 to section me. From a malicious report allegedly I had written on https://www.facebook.com I was feeling suicidal. Code 5. To be provided with information about the investigation and prosecution including the right to be informed as to the reasons why a suspect will not be prosecuted. The Judiciary of England And Wales and Criminal Justice Systems presided over two miscarriages of justice. And threatening me with Criminal Record to cover up LEYF abuse rings in reviews online. The Employment Tribunal rejected my Additional Witness Statement when https://www.39essex.com/barrister/samantha-jones claimed to have Contagious Disease. Code 6. To make a Victim’s Personal Statement, which tells the Court how the crime has affected the individual. My 67 Pages Witness Statement will be part of another of my Books.
I am sorry that we are not in a position to help you further MM Arguments: Mr Armstrong is so insincere that I will expose him for what he stands for and proves to the world that Legal Entities discriminate. Code 7. To be given information about the trial, trial process and the role of a witness. This time it started with www.voicetheunion.org.uk Employment Solicitor Arwen Makin. She advised me not to appeal the Disciplinary after giving me Union Rep Darren Mahon. He disappeared after the Hearing at www.leyf.org.uk not to be heard of again. Then www.bwbllp.com contacted me on behalf of LEYF on 24/9/2016. And again after https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016 was posted online.
I hope that knowing that appropriate legal representation will be available on the day puts your mind to rest to some extent. MM Updates: Mr Armstrong is obviously taking me for an idiot or someone with money who was going to pay private for representations. That is why he encouraged me to sue the Police because he knows some other FIRMS that can do it. He already contacted me about not being able to help me. I was sent the names of 3 Solicitor’s Firm. One of which contacted me, but I was suspicious of how I was expected to sign Legally Binding Documents referring to my partner’s assets.
Regards,
John Armstrong
johnarmstrong@armstrongsol.com
Armstrong Solicitors
Tintagel House
92 Albert Embankment
London SE1 7TY
Telephone: 020 3498 1772 Mobile: 07944 962686
SRA 533851 Company No 07137158 VAT 9905104 22
This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and any attachments are confidential and may be the subject of legal privilege. Any advice or information included in this email is subject to Armstrong Solicitors’s Terms of Engagement under which services are offered. Any use, copying or disclosure other than by the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message and any copies from your computer and network. The contents of an attachment to this e-mail may contain software viruses which could damage your own computer system. While Armstrong Solicitors has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise this risk, we cannot accept liability for any damage which you sustain as a result of software viruses.
Fight4justice 