Ingrid Ann Simler of EAT 8th March 2019. Edited by Mervelee Myers after copying from the Internet for publication on International Women’s Day. On the 96th birthday of Arnold Ebenezer Dame Tomlinson who was told by a Bank Manager “Mr Tomlinson, you have a small illusion that one day you can develop into a Property Tycoon”, I want the world to see how discrimination is still rife in the UK. Resulting from the fact that some are willing to turn a blind eye to what’s happening under their very nose. Because they are not comfortable with the “personal challenges” of people like Mervelee Myers. In order not to end up doing what my brother did out of frustration when no one is willing to my concerns about the impact of discrimination on my overall emotional health and wellbeing, I will carry on writing at https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site. In the hope that even after I am dead, someone will make reference to my story.
Copied from the
Internet 7/3/2019 by Mervelee Myers: Dame Ingrid Ann Simler, DBE, styled
The Hon. Mrs Justice Simler, is a judge of the High Court of England and Wales.
She was educated at Henrietta Barnett School, Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge
and the University of Amsterdam. She was called to the bar at Inner Temple in
1987 and became a QC 2006. Wikipedia
September 1963 (age 55 years). Mervelee
Myers Analysis 8/3/2019: Find out more about me at https://www.google.com for why I am writing
this and sharing with the world after spending the past 5 years leading up to
my 60th birthday struggling with the discrimination from 2004 which
ruined my career and blighted my life. I thought I would die before my 56th
birthday as a result of the discrimination used by www.leyf.org.uk
to trigger my traumas into PTSD (PTSD). I should be resting, but unable to
because coming up to Mothering Sunday, I am fighting depression. If you don’t believe I am a credible witness
because I am a participant in http://www.radar-cns.org/.
I am also a participant in www.heal-d.co.uk
because of the fact I was diagnosed and gets support from www.diabetes.org.uk and done the www.desmond-project.org.uk programme
after diagnosis in 2012.
Sussex College, University
The government recently announced the appointment of seven
new Court of Appeal judges, among them Mrs Justice Simler, current president of
the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Mervelee
Myers Analysis 8/3/2019: This is the EAT judge who sent my ET case back to
the EAT. I am still at a loss to understand why she sent it back after the way
she dealt with my complaints against Judge Shanks www.judicialombudsman.gov.uk. It
is evident that the Judiciary Of England And Wales is staff by judges who are
colluding with employers to deny vulnerable employees our entitlements.
People Management caught up with her to discuss
what the future holds for employment law – and the joys of lunching in the EAT
judges’ common room. Mervelee Myers
Analysis 8/3/2019: Owing to the fact about my ET and EAT case I would like
the world to help me understand how the http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding
can get away with presiding over another miscarriages of justice. In light of
the fact that the “Protected Characteristics” of my diabetes disabilities was
not upheld by the ET and EAT. Despite the Medical Reports of www.healthmanltd.com and the www.desmond-project.org.uk that
treated me? I would like for those responsible to look at the impacts of my
disabilities on how I am/was able to carry out normal day-to day activities
after I was targeted and my disabilities used against me.
What have been the highlights from your time as president
of the EAT?
There have been many; it is a role I will miss enormously
when I step down at the end of my three-year term. First, the quality of the
advocacy at the employment bar is high, and means a difficult appeal in the EAT
is likely to be well argued. This makes hearing complex appeals all the more
enjoyable. Arguments can be properly tested and often a clearer route to
resolution emerges than might otherwise be the case. Mervelee Myers Analysis 8/3/2019: I will refer you to the reserve
to dispute this argument about how Justice Simler have trivialised an EAT case
like mine as enjoyable. I am challenging
her that she used my case for her own perversity, the same way Samantha
Rochelle Jones of www.7br.co.uk did after I
was targeted into having a nervous breakdown using sensitive information from
my FILE that was withheld before I transferred from Luton Street LEYF.
Second, dealing with complex appeals that raise issues of
wider importance is challenging and rewarding, particularly where I am able to
provide guidance that might assist those in the workplace or tribunals deciding
cases at first instance. Cases about payments
for sleep-in shifts and about
employment statushave been
highlights. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019:
I would like to direct the reader to www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers
to find out why recommendation was made to ACAS by Dr Maria Hudson. The
Judiciary Of England And Wales is guilty of abusing the power of their
authority in not listening to the plight of employees who are not getting
support and representations. Refer to the reviews at www.leyf.org.uk whilst my case was at the ET.
The ET refused to accept the additional Witness Statement when this evidence
came to light during the adjournment. Am
I to conclude then that the guidance Justice Simler is taking about is one like
what the ET Judge Hildebrand tried using to tie me to a Non-Disclosure
Agreement (NDA) of £58,000.00? And how the ET acted unprofessionally to use my
disabilities to confuse me to accept.
Third, the EAT is highly efficient. It has one of the
best-run case management and progression systems I have experienced, despite
being still largely paper based (rather than digital – though that will
change). Staff are experienced and knowledgeable through long service and hard
work, so appeal bundles are properly prepared and made available to judges well
in advance. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019:
I am challenging this argument of highly efficient to be a big lie. As big a
lie as Judge Free saying there were no other Medical Reports. After I handed
him copies from my bundle at the ET to be place in the Respondent bundle. I am
therefore referring readers to firstname.lastname@example.org
about why the ET concealed documents. And refused to act on concerns raised
about the non-compliance of Judge Baron Court Management Order of 15th
March 2016. And even of greater importance that of Judge Elliott of 8th
June 2016. For me to provide Medical Reports. The Medical Reports which I
handed to Judge Freer at the ET because they were deliberately left out of my
ET bundle to confuse me. Once again using my vulnerability of having
disability, physical and mental against me. But Judge Freer can lie in the
reserve judgment about there were no other Medical Reports. And now the EAT
claiming they deal with the fact.
Finally, there is a strong sense of collegiality among the
judges who sit at the EAT. A sandwich lunch in the judges’ common room is a
good place to find out what is happening elsewhere in the justice system, share
war stories or simply unwind after a difficult morning. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019: I find this statement very offensive
after Judge Shanks claims at the EAT on the 19th November 2018 that
I made up my disabilities. In the presence of my husband for whom I am his
carer. But most times he is the one caring for me as can be ascertained from www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwark.
As offensive as the EAT bringing a black man to sit on the Panel because my
Racism claims was strike out repeatedly by Judge Martin. Maybe the judges need
to take more times looking at the glaring evidence in my Witness Statement and
the ET bundles to see how LEYF breached the Equality Act 2010 “Protected
Characteristics”, by not adhering to the Rule of Law. There was no reviewing or
updating of the contract I signed. I was expected to have a Hypo on the job and
subject children to experiences of developing traumas like I did because of my
unfortunate childhood of illnesses, disabilities and death. Maybe I should
refer to the www.express.co.uk that I
have contributed to the Mental Health CRUSADE at email@example.com for years.
What do you think are some of the biggest challenges for
employment lawyers going forward?
Digitalisation of the court and tribunal service; and
Brexit. But I have great faith in employment lawyers who are versatile and
flexible. I predict they will continue to go from strength to strength. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019: I am
challenging this on the grounds that this is the second time the ET presided
over the miscarriage of justice that ruined my career and destroyed my life.
Employment Lawyers who I have the misfortune to deal with are criminals without
any scruples. After the Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119.
I have been directed to https://www.gov/government/publications/record-retention-and-disposition-schedules.
Because the Employment Tribunal at London South no longer holds the personal
data in respect of my case against Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
What does that say about the Windrush Generation stories and what the Jewish
Bank Manager said to my husband all those years ago? The EAT refused to give me
back documents I ask for. In my vulnerable state I prepared and submitted 6
sets of documents in 2 bundles. But I have yet to receive the documents I
requested. That’s on top of LEYF saying they have no data for me after withholding
my FILE. The ET take 5 months to copy and paste the Respondent Summary and post
online making me a target for terrorists like www.peachespublications.co.uk
who I am taking to the Small Claims Court. She in turn introduce me to https://www.ryanclement.com/. I am
waiting on the judgement from the www.sra.org.uk
that claim it’s okay for www.bwbllp.com to
breach the Equality Act 2010 and use my vulnerability against me. Mr John
Fenton of www.personalconsultancy.com
can get away with pretending to be a solicitor to exploit me as well. The ET
was notified of my concerns from I meet Mr Fenton on the 15/3/2016.
What drew you to employment as an area of law?
Employment law combines human interest with an
ever-expanding domestic statutory law base, overlaid by the common law, and by
judgments and directives from Europe. This fast-changing area often gives rise
to difficult legal questions that matter to many people, and mattered to me.
After one’s family and home, a person’s employment is usually the most
important thing in her life. The introduction of the Human Rights Act in 1998
gave rise to additional interest and difficulty. It has presented challenging
cases requiring a difficult balance to be struck between, for example, the
rights to freedom of religious belief/manifestation for one group and those to
freedom from unlawful discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation for
another group; and particularly difficult issues around the balance between
open justice and freedom of expression, and privacy in cases of sexual
Analysis 2019: Justice Ingrid Ann Simler should be ashamed of herself is
all I am saying at this time. For the way she has joined in to cover up the
blatant breaching of the International law, legislation, codes of practices and
conducts. Resulting in me living on the edge of becoming a statistic of 1 in 5
of all suicides are associated with unemployment in www.hctgroup.org. The way I was brought up
is the only thing between me making the decision to continue suffering the
indignities of having my entitlements taken away after the death of my mother.
Senior HR Dilys Epton Meeting Report of 27/3/2015 stated that I told her about
my traumas. Not only that on the eve of Mothering Sunday 14/3/2015 I wrote to
her about my concerns of the ill-treatment at BIB. I was sent to HOC to be
colonised and https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards
state what is in the reserved judgment. I am participant in research www.heal-d.co.uk and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg102uOLUAY.
The ET should have added Ageism, Beliefs to the case instead of striking out
the Racism claims. Most days to save myself from going out for the 20-30 minutes’
walk down to BIB and doing what my brother did. I have to try overcoming my
fears and sit writing https://mervelee.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/?
How dare Justice Simler leave me to be a prisoner unable to function and carry
out day-today activities. Because the 26+ years that were destroyed keeps going
round in my head.
How have tribunals changed since the Supreme
Court ruled in favour of abolishing tribunal fees last year?
The system has not changed but the profile of cases being
brought to employment tribunals has changed dramatically. Whereas before the
Unison case, small claims for unpaid wages or redundancy pay (or similar) were
not being brought because of the chilling effect of fees, these cases are now
on the increase again. Claims more generally have increased in number and are
running at an annual rate approaching 100,000 claims a year. The number
of appeals is also increasing, though there is an inevitable time lag. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019: Suffice
it to say once more here is evidence of how there is one rule for me and another
for someone that can pay to help www.leyf.org.uk
get away with the discrimination ruining lives and destroying families. Because
http://unison.org.uk/ was responsible for
colluding with the NHS to ruin my career. This time its www.voicetheunion.org.uk taking fee
after I have not worked since resigning with a nervous breakdown. That’s why
Judge Hildebrand tried to tie me to an NDA. After the ET tried tricking me
about the Telephone Conciliation.
Tribunals are putting additional resource in place to deal
with the increase, but that will take some time. That is likely to mean some
delay in getting a hearing date, especially in multiday cases. Mervelee Myers Analysis 2019: Maybe
this is why the ET took 5 months to copy and paste the Respondent’s Summary? By
the way did any underhand dealings take place with www.leyf.org.uk and the Employment Tribunal?
Considering the fact that the ET adjourned the case when Samantha Rochelle
Jones of www.7br.co.uk came to court without
preparing a case. Then pulled a sickie, manufacturing a contagious disease
overnight to buy time, I am left with no other alternatives than to assume
there was bribery. What role did the ET judges have in this? Then at the EAT Samantha
Jones was allowed to continue perverting the course of justice. And judge
Shanks saying I made up my disabilities. My question to Justice Simler, since
the ET and EAT claiming they deal with the fact, what grounds did she send back
my case to the EAT under?
© Copyright Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development 2019, 151 The Broadway, London SW19 1JQ, UK Incorporated by Royal Charter, Registered Charity no. 1079797. Edited by Mervelee Myers on the 8th – 9th March 2019. All additional comments in this edited version are ‘without prejudice” the honest conclusions of Mervelee Myers of www.MerveleeConsultancy.uk for Research into how despite there are updated Rule of Laws inclusive of British Values 2014, Modern Slavery Act 2015 and Counter Terrorism & Security Act 2015. The UK is still operating Modern Slavery thriving in the UK.
Appointment of Lady Justice Ingrid Simler
The Queen has approved the appointment of three Lady
Justices and four Lord Justices of Appeal, one of whom is the current President
of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, Dame Ingrid Simler.
Dame Ingrid was born in South Africa and emigrated to London
as a child. She was educated at a grammar school in North London, becoming a
British citizen in 1981.
She was called to the bar at Inner Temple in 1987 and was
appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2006. She was appointed a Recorder in 2002 and has
been a judge of the High Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division) since 2013.
She is currently President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal
and is a High Court Liaison Judge for Diversity. In November 2016 she was
appointed by the Master of the Rolls to the Civil Executive Team providing
support to the MR for the oversight of civil justice and implementation of the
Reform Programme as it affects civil justice.
Dame Ingrid is recognised for her expertise across a range
of areas including employment law, tax litigation, public and administrative
law, and human rights.
Select an author
7 MAR 2019
When may an employer suspend an employee?
9 March 2019 Mervelee Myers Summary of Justice Ingrid Ann Simler. From my own experiences of been in the presence of Justice Simler, to argue my case. I would say she is not living in the real world and knowing what’s happening to real people like Mervelee Myers. Considering that she was born in South Africa I am assuming she was one of the privileged. And not someone like me who experienced traumas resulting from the natural causes, some of which were due to my DNA. Whilst others were due to bigots and evil persons who did not think of the consequences of their actions on the lives of people like me.
That’s why I am sending readers to www.leyf.org.uk to read the reviews about the
Modern Slavery practices that are thriving in the UK. And which www.judicialombudsman.gov.uk is
happy to cover up because of the decisions made by Justice Simler. Let me
direct readers to https://petition.parliament.uk/help#standards
31/10/2017 “It included confidential, libellous, false or defamatory
information, or a reference to a case which is active in the UK courts”. “It’s
marked confidential as not clear what action you’d like the Government or
Parliament to take”? Is it any wonder that the country is in such a turmoil
with Justice Simler not able to act like a professional in matters to do with
the life of a vulnerable employers who was targeted by the terrorist cell at
LEYF after the death of my mother from dementia? And why I have become Cancer
Research UK Race for Life www.cruk.org. Fundraiser
after the death of my brother. When l have the first nervous breakdown in a
toxic workplace in the UK.
To where I am representing at https://www.google.com sharing my lived
experiences to help others from I joined https://www.facebook.com/public/Mervelee-Myers
in 2010. Let the Judiciary Of England And Wales explain why they are
neglecting their duty of care to employees in favour of employers that are hell-bent
in treating employees like me to the treatment of the Children of Israel
travelling in the Wilderness for 40 years. I have been on this journey since
the 23rd July 2014. Why is Justice Simler making herself my jailer
and treating me like a criminal. Does this have anything to do with https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site
and the fact I refuse to be voiceless vulnerable victim?