I Discovered The GDPR At Charity Meetup in 2018

Complaint Form to The Judicial Ombudsman 2nd February 2019. In light of the caveats imposed by the EAT Judge Simler on the 18th March 2018, I am the only one getting penalised for adhering to the Employment Tribunal Court Management Orders by Judge Baron on the 15th March 2016 and Judge Elliott 8th June 2016. If you doubt my credibility I have my Subject Access Request Data Protection Act – 117119 data.access@Justice.gsi.gov.uk. The former employer claims not to have any data for me after withholding my FILES. But they tampered with my data from the 27th March 2015 when they send me “Invitation to Disciplinary Hearing”. Later after refusing me the link to do my DBS, make an online application using my email address. The ET and EAT tried trapping with deadlines but failed to act on my concerns about the Respondent non-compliance.

4. Your complaint: Paragraph 1 Your complaint must be set out concisely (definition adj brief and to the point) on this page only. You must give specific details, illustrating exactly why you believe the JCIO, Tribunal President or Magistrates’ Advisory Committee’s handling of your complaint fell short of the standards you could reasonably expect.  Paragraph 2 The Ombudsman will investigate the issues that you provide below if he considers (v 1 regard as. 2 think about 3 be considerate of) your complaint warrants investigation. He will not be able to deal with your complaint unless you particularise (v give details about) your concerns on this form. You may provide supporting documents if necessary.  

Considering that it was Justice Ingrid Simler who sent my case to the EAT. The following are my grounds for complaint. My Bible collection now includes GDPR – How to be ready and 20 GDPR myths debunked Toni Vitale, Head of Regulation, Data & Information, Winckworth tvitale@wslaw.co.uk. Since up until that time when I acquired www.wslaw.co.uk the former employer, the ET and EAT along with Government Departments were not showing how they were preparing for the GDPR. I think it’s time the www.ico.org.uk start doing their research about the implementation of the GDPR. LEYF did not review and update the contract I signed in line with the Equality Act 2010.

1. With regards to complaint 1, I set out concisely my reasons why I consider Judge Shanks was rude to me. I sent attachments to verify my arguments. I will, therefore, do the same again as everyone seems to be using my vulnerability of having disabilities to confuse me. Maybe the only way I can further help is to act out and demonstrate the rudeness and what he said: “You are not a credible witness”. “You made up your disabilities”. “You want the case to be re-tried and the fact was use”.  All this in the presence of my elderly husband who has been affected by 4+ years of the discrimination that tore our lives apart. I will provide the documents to prove who the credible witness is. From the first time, I meet the Respondent’s Representative, Mr John Fenton www.personnelconsultancy.com. To the time the case was adjourned as attachments. What the ET & EAT done is use hate crime to make me a victim after presiding over the second miscarriage of justice.

2. (A) How did Justice Simler come to the conclusion that it is normal for the Respondent to make submissions which they consider relevant after I provided documents to the ET, EAT and the EAT President to the contrary – (Attachments)? At the same time, the ET refuse my submission of additional witness statements after information relevant came to light after the adjournment – (Attachments). See www.leyf.org.uk website for reviews. These were in the public domain during the ET case. Rashid Iqbal resigned but still attended the ET perverting the course of justice. Was he paid a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) like what Judge Hildebrand tried to trap me with?

(B) Judge Shanks failed to take note of the bundles to the EAT with fact of the case and how the Respondent was perverting the course of justice by withholding my FILE & Medical Reports – (Attachments). Concerns were raised about Mr John Fenton unprofessional conduct to http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding. (C) The Barrister was too scared and even though she tried, Judge Shanks was using intimidating tactics. Saying I am not a credible witness (Attachments – Summary of EAT. Yet to find the Barrister’s). The Respondent should not have been allowed to develop these points. This was to provoke me. They did the same from 23/07/2014 using data from my https://www.facebook.com/public/Mervelee-Myers.

3. (A) Judge Shanks made his revelations at the summing up of the case that I made up my disabilities. However, www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwark is only one (1) of the three (3) Medical Reports concealed by the ET. (B) He used every argument the Barrister put forward to say I was trying to get the case retried. I should not have had to take my case to the ET. I was passed fit for work by www.healthmanltd.com. (C) Judge Shanks put this forward as his own opinion and finding. I was treated by www.desmond-project.org.uk.

(D) Also as the case put forward by the Respondent after prompting Barrister Samantha Jones www.7br.co.uk with questions that help her to lie and perverting the course of justice. With claims that Judge Freer sent me home overnight to search for Medical Reports. The ET can adjourn the case after Ms Jones lied and made up false claims that her doctor quarantined her to stay indoors for forty-eight (48) hours. She only did this to pay time as she did not prepare any of the ET case. This was done by Mr Fenton HR Management. Why did Mr Fenton direct the ET to address correspondence to Senior HR Dilys Epton when he claimed to be out of the UK? Ms Jones firm is not mentioned on ET correspondence.

(E) There was no finding of fact made by the Employment Tribunal. Judge Freer & the Panel lied that there were no other Medical Reports. (Refer to Subject Access Requests) & If this was the case why did Justice Simler send it back to the EAT (Attachments)? The EAT continued with the contingent policies and procedures of the ET. Putting me under pressures to meet deadlines. This resulted in the exacerbation of my disabilities as can be ascertained from me having to get help from the NHS Professionals who I always relied on to manage and control my health conditions. But the Solicitors Regulation Authority www.sra.org.uk said it’s the duty of the Representative to use whatever means, even illegal to advance their client’s case. Maybe I should have done what my brother did, take the law into my own hands and sit in church waiting for the Police to come?

5. What are you hoping to achieve from your complaint? For the ET & EAT to be accountable and act about the miscarriages of justice that ruined my career and destroyed 26+ years of my life in the UK. I need compensation for the impacts on my health and emotional wellbeing and that of my husband. An apology from the powers that be for the institutional discrimination that impacted on my life and made me a victim to terrorists.

I am a Disabled Person under the definition of the Equality Act 2010. Let me first highlight the arguments that despite the Equality Act 2010 saying that people with disabilities should be allocated additional time to help in carrying out normal day-to-day activities, the EAT continues to treat me like I do not have disabilities. Hence the reason that the ET and EAT continue to hide the fact and perverting the course of justice in favour of the Respondent. The following documents are the evidence that will prove that there is/was institutional discrimination involved from the time I was contacted by Bates Wells Braithwaite www.bwbllp.com on the 24th September 2015. To my first meeting with the Respondent’s Representative Mr John Fenton www.personnelconsultancy.com on the 15th March 2016. To the time when the ET http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding was adjourned on the 21st December 2016. To the EAT LondonEAT@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk on the 19th October 2018 when Judge Shanks claimed I made up my disabilities. After disregarding the EAT bundles and allowing Barrister Samantha Jones www.7br.co.uk to continue lying and perverting the course of justice.

Attachments Complaint 1: I have been put under extreme pressures over the past years since the Respondent www.leyf.org.uk set out with the plot of using my vulnerability of having disabilities www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwark against me to trigger my childhood traumas into PTSD.

Refer to ET & EAT bundles Appendix: Raising Concerns – My letters to & correspondences from the Respondent 2014 to date: 1. BIB manager Lynne Kelly. 2. Senior HR Dilys Epton. 3. BIB Supervision. 4. Isabella Glen Investigations after BIB Allegations & Complaints. 5. Dr Laura Crawford Occupational Health Medical Report & advice to seek CBT. 6. Disciplinary/Appeal Hearings & Outcomes. 7. Training Certificates at New Cross. 8. Correspondences with Neil King & Neil Best. 9. New Cross Supervision. 10. Correspondences to New Cross. 11. Meeting 2 Professors at Middlesex University. 12. Suspension again. 13. Resignation. 14. Reviews on Respondent website. 15. Respondent letter re Subject Access Request. The Solicitors Regulation Authority provided me with some weird advice, I am just not bothering myself anymore. So since they are continuing with the indirect discrimination, I will put my correspondence in the public domain to avoid any ambiguity.

Without prejudice, the EAT continued with the hate crime in the Reserved Judgement to break me after realising the blunder of presiding over another miscarriage of justice Presidents_Office_Employment_E&W@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk. Judge Shanks behaviour was no different from what I experienced when Judge Martin strikes out my Racism Claims repeatedly. Then after the ET tried to stitch me up with the Telephone Conciliation, Judge Hildebrand tried tying me to a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). Claiming the Respondent need to protect themselves from me. Now when was I protected from the institutional discrimination by the ET and EAT? That’s why Judge Freer lied that there were no other Medical Reports, even though I handed them to him to copy from my bundle on the 20th December 2016.

Want to deal with the fact about the credibility of those involved with https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016? Refer to Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119 from the Ministry Of Justice dated 10th April 2018 data.access@justice.gsi.gov.uk. And the Respondent https://realbusiness.co.uk/june-o-sullivan-london-early-years-foundation-leyf/ letter of 2nd January 2018. I have had enough of the EAT trying to get away with perverting the course of justice and covering up for each other.

I refuse to be drawn into allowing the EAT to continue stressing me out so I am taking my case to https://fight4justiceadvocacy.business.site where there is transparency. I am dealing with bereavement and at a time when I am having to go through the reasons for my childhood traumas with memorials of those who died or were disabled with sicknesses coming up. I was targeted by https://www.facebook.com/public/Mervelee-Myers on behalf of those colluding to discriminate against me. But I have been publishing on www.google.com and other Social Media platforms since 2010. Therefore please get the evidence from the relevant bundles. The EAT refused to return documents in the bundles I submitted. Because I did not understand the instructions I was given when I called. But upon reflections, maybe this was yet another trick to mislead me, without prejudice. I do not trust the Employment Tribunal Services to give me the justice that I rightly deserve. 

I have submitted documents to Judge Brian Doyle President of the London Central Employment Tribunal, by email and posts. I have been in contact with the ET and EAT with regards to the breaching of the Employment Law by the clerks. I got a response from a Mr John Booth who continued sending me round the bend like all the others. 

Complaint 2  I would like the EAT to explain how Justice Simler come to the conclusion she did with her emphasis on (sic)? Collins Pocket Dictionary meaning/definition sic Latin thus: used to indicate that an odd spelling or reading is in fact accurate. The definition of Sick adj. that proves my case of physically or mentally unwell, is there to be found in my bundles to the EAT. The EAT is responsible for me having another meltdown after the case on the 19/10/2018. I called www.londonambulance.nhs.uk/talking_with_us/use_your_personal_information.aspx#clinical. My husband begged me to pull myself together. I should not have had to be going through this. The Occupational Health Doctor recommended www.healthmanltd.com provided the Medical Report to the Respondent about my disabilities. The Respondent lied that they did not receive it at the Disciplinary Appeal Hearing. Another of how they breach the contract I signed with regards to the Equality Act 2010 “Protected Characteristics.”. The ET Judge Baron and Judge Elliott made Case Management Orders in March and June 2016 for the Respondent to comply with.

The ET and EAT were informed about the Respondent’s non-compliance. I had to call out the NHS Professionals to help me get over this difficult period. Why should the EAT get away with this after they were presented with additional information relevant to the case? This information has been on the Respondent website from in March 2016. The time the case came to the ET. The Respondent was perverting the course of justice and the ET and EAT covered up for them by concealing my Medical Reports and make a blunder of the Employment Law.

Justice Simler placed caveats on my case to the EAT. But the Respondent Barrister Jones was given every opportunity by Judge Shanks to pervert the course of justice further. Whilst he intimidated Barrister Sally Robertson. Is it any wonder I am yet to locate her Summary of the case despite telling her it was not attached to the email? And she claimed to have sent it again. All I am saying is I don’t function under pressure and I can’t vouch what happened to it after. The Respondent set out to use my vulnerability against me from the time they got Facebook to give them access to my account. I was used as statistics by www.hctgroup.org of 1 in 5 suicides are associated with unemployment.

I have not worked since I was given a reference flagging safeguarding by the Respondent. Yet I am part of www.acas.org.uk/researchpapers when I had my first nervous breakdown at Kings College NHS Foundation Trust when the ET presided over the first miscarriages of justice. So what the EAT is planning is for time to run out, like how http://unison.org.uk claim the case is closed. But not only that the documents will then be destroyed like how the Respondent destroyed 26+ years of my life in the UK. I will then be sent to https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/record-retention-and-disposition-schedules to further confuse me.

It has since transpired that the Solicitors that contacted me on the 24/09/2015 and again when the Reserved Judgement was posted online did not represent the Respondent. So what was their role in the radicalisation and terrorism that triggered and exacerbated my traumas into PTSD? The Respondent was only developing the points to provoke me (refer to Dr Crawford advice re CBT).

Complaint 3 Judge Shanks already made up his mind about what he said about me making up my disabilities from he take the case. That’s why I have to be dealing with http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/report-fraud-about-you after Barrister Ryan Clement https://www.ryanclement.com/ decided to get the scammer www.peachespublications.co.uk, he groomed to call the Police. To section me after scamming me of my husbands’ savings to represent me at the EAT. I have done my research at the Law Society Gazette about the Judges involved in the ET and EAT case. I know exactly how they behave from appearing in their courts. It was evident that Barrister Sally Robertson was terrified of Judge Shanks. I could hear the quivering in her voice.

All the EAT is doing is imposing their contingent policies and procedures on me to wear me down. Already I am forgetting the chronological orders and sequences of the events from 23rd July 2014 to now. But it’s in black and white in the bundles. I was not even aware of some of the relevance of the documents until the case ended. The EAT is now using the same tactics that the Respondent used to break me. So I am expected to give specific details and then let it hold on one sheet of paper. Just imagine if I did not have access to my computer like how the establishments and systems that the Respondent paid to target me had tried doing. I would have to write it. Then when I am under pressure and unable to function, how many particularise points could I get on the sheet?

I will end by saying the ET and EAT are responsible for putting me in this difficult position by perverting the course of justice in favour of the Respondent. They are party to defamation of my character. That’s why the Government Departments can threaten me with criminal records. When I refused from becoming a voiceless vulnerable victim they barred me at http://www.universal-credit.service.gov.uk/journal/add-journal-entry–write-content/SERVICE_ISSUES/.  

I am at https://www.youtube./watch?v=pg102uOLUAY as a participant in Mental Health research. Taking part in http://www.radar-cns.org/. Participant in www.heal-d.co.uk for diabetes. The honest truth is I am fed up of been treated like how the Respondent labeled, stereotype and tag me from the day I transferred to BIB on the 23rd June 2014 after the death of my mother. Now my life is an Open Book in cyberspace and I am known for sharing stories about my experiences to help others. So any fucking thing www.judicialombudsman.gov.uk want to do, they are welcome. As long as they know that I am putting everything in the public domain for the sake of my sanity. My Personal Experiences of Parkinson’s disease – Updated 17/8/2017 https://plus.google.com/10093913463790195264/posts/YoJDpGvhGMG.

You are all fucking doing my head in. I will not resort to taking the law into my own hands like what my bother did and waited in church for the Police. Instead, I will resort to the Passive Aggressive Behaviours that kept me one step ahead of getting me section to take away my entitlements. I told Senior HR Dilys Epton about my childhood traumas and that work keep me going on the 27th March 2015 at the prestigious HOC when she tried setting me up. The www.voicetheunion.org.uk which advised me and represented me at the Disciplinary have since sold me out to the Respondent. But taking my fees even though I have not worked since I was forced to resign. Now www.gov.uk/universalcredit and the DWP is at it again after threatening me with a criminal record. But the list is been made of those to be given the criminal records. You can find it on my website when I am sane enough to write.

Writing is therapy www.mqmentalhealth.org/Mental-Health/Mental-Illness was written when I was on Medical Suspension. I started sharing stories of my experiences to take away the taboos and stigma linked to Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND). Others were using my publications like LEYF did for their benefits. I am not benefiting but my stories can help others not to go through my ordeals from my dad was stricken with Parkinson’s disease. So with all pleasure, I will continue to unmask those to be sent to jail for perverting the course of justice.   

Yours Sincerely

Mervelee Myers.               

One thought on “I Discovered The GDPR At Charity Meetup in 2018

  1. Bob Marley like many others used his creative talents as a Reggae Artist to fulfill his vision and created legacies with his songs. One of which he sang Redemption Song. Since the powers that be are on a mission in trying to making me a voiceless vulnerable after http://www.leyf.org.uk destroyed the 26+ years I spent in the UK. I will show them why https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-year-foundation-2300047-2016 is a hate crime by the ET. I raised concerns with http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding from the outset. Now http://www.judicialombudsman.gov.uk want to restrict me to putting 5 years of discrimination concisely on one sheet of paper. And the Solicitors Regulation Authority http://www.sra.condones the breaching of the Rules of Law by http://www.personnelconsultancy.com and http://www.bwbllp.com. And for http://www.7br.co.uk to act like a Gangster’s Moll to destroy my life with her lies.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.