There Were Caveats From Justice Simler Of The EAT!

How the Employment Tribunal Presided Over The Miscarriages Of Justice That Ruined My Life 2009 – 2019.

Maybe I should make this the subject of one of my books in line with There will be no missing the fact of my life which is an Open Book. In due course, I will make sure I am accounted for on I will, therefore, not be waiting until I am dead to be exonerated from the falsifying of my life from the past 26+ years in the UK by LEYF and cohorts. 

Daily Express Taurus 1: You’re looking for something fun and exciting. A discussion with a friend or partner will take you down a new avenue of experience. A surprising bonus will arrive just in time to settle an outstanding bill so you can relax. Taurus 2: Good news about a legal settlement, inheritance or insurance refund will lift your spirits. It will feel wonderful to indulge your love of luxury. Splash out on a new outfit, a massage or gourmet meal and enjoy some sensual pleasures. This appeared after the dream about the women from LEYF watching me. Then I found the email from the EAT. I will be at

I would advise the Honourable Mrs. Justice Simler DBE President Of The Employment Appeal Tribunal to go back and look at all correspondences to the EAT from after I attended the EAT on the 19/10/2018. Some are via email, but I safeguard myself with the additional security as proof of postings. I learned to continue my defensive practice via enhanced knowledge as a graduate of The EAT is responsible along with LEYF and cohorts of robbing me of, ten (10) years of my life from 2009 – 2019. I have no intention of wasting another moment with those like President_Office_Employment_E& that are hell-bent on making me a voiceless vulnerable victim. Because the EAT is prepared to whitewash the fact to make them whiter than white in LEYF favour. By bringing a black man as tokenism to the EAT on the 19/10/2018. I have done my research about all the judges involved. So should I start with the “Shouting HHR Judge Shanks?”

Please feel free to contact me for any further clarifications. There seems to be some in the EAT without an ounce of humanity and empathy. That’s why I have gone to track down June O’Sullivan – LEYF Nurseries She is using my intellectual property, making money, whilst at the same time engaging in radicalisation like from when she sanctioned the discrimination getting rid of employees who she viewed as threats to her incompetence. I am hoping the EAT don’t have to let me do the same about all the judges who LEYF Nurseries either pulled the wool over their eyes or brought them out?

The Employment Tribunal Services in neglecting their responsibility enshrined in the Rules of Law left me to become a target to terrorists, scammers, criminal elements and trolls practicing hate crimes. One of whom is Barrister who is just a white collar criminal hiding under the umbrella of the Employment Tribunal to terrorise vulnerable people. I used Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119 to gain access to the data that LEYF refused me access to. Refer to letter from LEYF dated 2 January 2018 when they claim not to have any data excepting that I give them in the ET Bundles. The is complicit in concealing my Medical Reports.

Is The Honourable Justice Mrs. Ingrid Simler prepared to verify how she came to the conclusion of the following? Let me put another Taurus 3: Turn a deaf ear to people who criticise your work. Your boss or a senior colleague may not have realised your talents. Now they see what you are capable of, they feel threatened by your knowledge which in some areas is greater than theirs. Taurus 4: Your boss or a senior colleague might seek your opinion about a difficult job. They may not say it in so many words but they value your knowledge. If it becomes obvious they are relying on your advice, don’t be afraid to ask for a higher salary. My CVs are at Now tell the ET and EAT bigots to go brush up on their knowledge. I was forced to learn in order that I can defend myself against the Modern Slavery thriving in the UK.

Rule 34(a) of the Judicial Conduct (Tribunals) Rules 2014 provides that: 34.   … the relevant President must dismiss the complaint, or part of a complaint, if it falls into any of the following categories – (a)  It does not adequately particularise the matter complained of:

Rule 35 of the Judicial Conduct (Tribunals) Rules 2014 provides that:  35.    The may not dismiss a complaint under the rule 34(a) unless they have given the complainant a reasonable opportunity to provide adequate details of the complaint. A complainant must provide any further details within 15 business days of the request for further details made by the relevant President to the complainant.

Let me address each point that I consider relevant. The documents supporting my arguments are with the EAT.

I consider that in its current form your complaint does not adequately particularise the matters complained of.

You, therefore, have 15 business days from the date of this letter to provide further details of your complaint about Judge Shanks. In particular, I would be grateful if you would address the following points:

Mervelee Myers Response 1: I have just completed Week 3 of Business Fundamentals: Effective Communication – Online. I am keeping myself updated because I am unable to get a job, as a result of LEYF denying me my basic Rights to my Entitlements not to be discriminated against. Let me just point out information relevant to the fact I have disabilities. “Emails should not be used to deliver messages that require an immediate answer as there is no guarantee that the receiver will receive the message and respond immediately. I would suggest that next time the writer of this email takes lessons from Email:

1.  ln relation to the complaint I have numbered 1 above, what behaviour led you to feel that Judge Shanks was biased against you? How was he rude towards you; what did he say or do?

Mervelee Myers Response 2: I am honestly shocked to get this question from the Honourable Lady. But from correspondences with the EAT from the time I applied for Reconsiderations, I am not surprised. Hopefully, someone who understand, read, write and speak English can go through the correspondences for the EAT. I did not use my Mother Tongue to write any of the information in the complaints. Therefore I would not think the EAT need interpreters like Mr. John Fenton of and Judge Freer? Hopefully, that’s enough to answer complaint number 1?

2.  In relation to the complaint identified as 2 above, it would be normal at a hearing for the Respondent to be permitted to make submissions which they consider relevant to the issues to be determined. Please explain how Judge Shanks behaved improperly by permitting the Respondent to make these submissions? Did your Barrister object when the Respondent was permitted to develop these points?

Mervelee Myers Response 3: Considering that it was Judge Simler who send my case back to the EAT, I am just appalled that she is now resorting to using Her Office to continue the institutional discrimination started by LEYF after the death of my mother. Might I refer the EAT to: Disclosure Team, Ministry Of Justice, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ. Email Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119.  Her Honour needs to explain how she comes to this conclusion about submissions that are relevant to the issues to be determined. I should not have to represent myself at the ET. Much more having to go back to the EAT based on the Bundles. And the Witnesses Statements about events from the 23/07/2014. I don’t have to take my Witness Statement into consideration.

I will therefore not be wasting my time, of which it’s precious, trying to sort out 5 years of discrimination that ruined my career and destroy my life to be explaining what’s in the public domain at The Law Society Gazette. That’s where the ET and EAT judges end up abusing their powers of authority, hiding under the umbrella of the Employment Tribunal Services Law. Please read Johnathan Freedman for the latest about the judges I come up against during my ET and EAT case with LEYF. Not to mention in respect of Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Can you understand how I ended up being on page 1 of the about the Windrush 70 celebrations at Westminster Abbey?

The Employment Tribunal at London South refused my submission of additional witness statements. But allowed the shenanigans of to happen when Barrister Samantha Jones made up a contagious disease overnight. Ms. Jones further perjuring herself saying that Judge Freer sent me home overnight to find Medical Reports. Although I am not a credible witness and I made up my disabilities. The Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119 back up my story that the Respondent’s Representative failed to comply with the ET Court Management Orders of the 15/03/2016 and 08/06/2016.

By this time the Barrister was showing signs of the harassment, subtle bullying and intimidation that I could hear her voice quivering. I know because I am unable to function under pressure as the Honourable Lady should be aware of (refer to data in my FILE 1/9/2009 to date). She presided over the EAT that sent my case back for Hearing. In my estimation, she did all she could.   

3.   In relation to complaint identified as 3 above, at what stage in the hearing, and in what context, did Judge Shanks say that you made up your disabilities? Are you suggesting that he was putting this forward as his own opinion or finding, or was he saying that was the case put forward by the Respondent, or that it was a finding of fact made by the Employment Tribunal?

Mervelee Myers Response: How about going back to the Bundles and other additional information to address the question about the stage of the Hearing and the context. I am sure there is Court Transcript. I noticed that on The Law Society Gazette the ET and EAT Judges use this for bragging about how they are the people who discriminate and not the Legal Entity. Yes, he was putting this over as his finding after prompting Barrister Samantha Jones with questioning. But Samantha Jones is a disgrace to the Legal Fraternity, and this is fact. The Respondent had no case to put forward. If in doubt go back to Judge Baron Court Management Order of the 15th March 2016. When I first meet the Respondent’s, Representative John Fenton. He is a pathological liar. Are you going to tell me that is not a hate crime? The EAT did not even look at the Bundles I supplied for Judge Shanks. As stated by the Honourable Lady, they worked from the premise that the Reserve Judgement was finding of fact by the Employment Tribunal. This cannot be the case according to the  Disclosure Team, Ministry Of Justice, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ. Email Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119. 

I was unable to address the matter within the 15 Working Days to Justice Simler

Under section 110 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, you may apply to the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman for a review of my handling of your complaints on the ground that there has been maladministration. Your application must be made within 28 days of the date of this letter.  END Mervelee Myers 27th January 2019.                 

One thought on “There Were Caveats From Justice Simler Of The EAT!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.