Another EAT Windup Addressed By Mervelee!

Office of the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman

Postal Point 1.55, 1st Floor, The Tower, 102 Petty France, London, SW1H 9AJ. 26 January 2019. Email: Website:

Your Refrence: JC/1811/4. UKEAT/0101/18/la – Mrs M Myers v London Early Years Foundation (LEYF)

Dear Sir/Madam

Let me state that I am just seeing this email now (26/01/2019) and taking the opportunity to address it before the deadline. I am sure that the Equality Act 2010 states that if a person have disabilities they should be given additional time to deal with any issues that affect how they are able to carry out normal day-to-day activities. But since the Employment Tribunal Services colluded to conceal my Medical Reports And is using the hate crime in the reserved judgment copied from the Respondent’s Summary after five months (5) and posted online making me a victim

Then Judge Freer who I handed my Medical Reports to at London South Employment Tribunal on the 20th December 2016 stated in the Reserve Judgement that there were no other Medical Reports advised me to get CBT to find out why I react the way I do to certain situations in April 2015. LEYF hounded me despite I was passed fit to return to work. I eventually resigned with a nervous breakdown on 27th September 2015. Hence the reason I got counseling at www.slam-iapt.nhs/southwark. That’s why you will know out of Judge Freer and me, who is the credible witness. The Employment Tribunal later stated they did not receive my Reconsideration. Now I am having the same arguments from the EAT about matters to do with me asking for the return of FILES.

Eventually, I was given the run around at the Employment Appeals Tribunal having to write laying out my disabilities and progressive health conditions on advice from the Law Centre Employment Solicitor. You would think I would have been given some considerations as someone with disabilities, but no. In case you want to check go to However, you won’t find any documents for the case. You can find more information in the link below The Honourable Mrs. Justice Simler DBE was the one who sent back my case to the EAT before she was appointed President of the Employment Appeal Tribunal. She imposed caveats of which I had no knowledge the meaning until I asked the Barrister. Is the Honourable Lady now saying there is/was no merit to her sending my case back to the EAT?

I have been representing myself until Barrister Sally Robertson took on the EAT. However, I am even more confused than when I represented myself. Anyway, let me address the points raised by the Honourable Lady as the deadline has gone. And I do not agree with her finding. I have since sent additional documents to the EAT. Let me also point out that the Employment Tribunal Services seem to have a vendetta against Mervelee Myers from the first time they presided over the miscarriage of justice that ruined my career and partially destroyed my life. So once more they have only done LEYF dirty work of destroying 26+ years in the UK. I have been made a criminal and a victim so I will continue telling the world about this at The Employment Tribunal Services is party to Modern Slavery Practices. If in doubt read the reviews at and don’t tell me crap about caveat. Why am I the only one caveat applies to and LEYF can get away with terrorism of vulnerable employees?

Here are the complaints the Honourable Lady identified about Judge Shanks

  1. In the first paragraph, you write: “I felt that the judge was bias (sic – I did not write this, just another liberty taking as far as I am concerned) and rude towards me from the outset of the Hearing.”  
  2. Also in the first paragraph, you complain that the respondent’s barrister “was given time to continue perverting the course of justice, misleading the Court about the ET reserve judgment. The Judge allowed her time to repeat that I said I have a diagnosis for Parkinson’s disease.”
  3. In your email of 09 November 2018, you suggested that Judge Shanks said you made up your disabilities. 

Miscarriages of Justice by the Employment Tribunal Services

The Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal have already presided over the two miscarriages of justice that destroyed 26+ years of my life in the UK. I am having it up to the top of my head. In the past months since I appeared before Judge Shanks, I have had another meltdown. So I have been in contact with the NHS Professionals to help me manage and control my disabilities. Saving myself further stress that’s going to exacerbate my disabilities. Because I have another bereavement in the family. Let me direct you to Disclosure Team, Ministry Of Justice, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ. Email Subject Access Request – Data Protection Act – 117119. If needs be I will copy and send for you to see the data. I send what I thought was relevant documents to the Judiciary Of England and Wales. The Honourable Mrs. Justice Simler DBE President Of The Employment Appeal Tribunal. And all other relevant parties, but all I get is the run around to confuse me.

I am challenging the fact that the Honourable Lady says that in the current form my complaint does not particularise the matters complained of.

Since I missed the 15 business days because I am just seeing this email, I will address each point briefly in order to catch the 28 days deadline by email. Then later I will send more by letter.

In relation to complaint 1, I was explicit in my letter about the behaviour of Judge Shanks. Maybe you can let me give a demonstration as I am unable to make it any clearer in writing. I have decided to change my life around and since counseling on the advice of I no longer let terrorist and those who radicalise me using my vulnerability against me wind me up. Because that’s what Barrister Jones and Judge Shanks were doing on the 19/10/2018.

In relation to the complaint identified as 2 above… I would like the EAT that put the caveat on me to explain why did the EAT think it was permitted for the Respondent to make submissions that I provide evidence were perverting the course of justice to the Court? If in doubt about my credibility refer to the above-mentioned Subject Access Request. Judge Shanks behaved improperly by not taking account of the evidence in the bundles. Any fool can see that, much more someone who has been forced to do my research as a result of the institutional discrimination by those involved. Including the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal. Maybe this is the question for the Barrister. I witnessed how she was doing her best to represent me and getting flustered when Judge Shanks started using intimidations by glancing at his watch and down at the Barrister. I am not sure if that’s how she saw it as she was busy trying to keep her composure. I could hear her voice quivering by this time. Who is to tell, maybe she has become another of the casualties of LEYF and the Employment Tribunal Services? I can name some of those who are.

I refuse to even attempt to answer this question 3 by the Honourable Lady. You can get the answer from the Court Transcript. I am still not sure if I got the copy of the Summary sent by the Barrister. It did not come with the attachment. She resents it again but I was having difficulties with my ICT systems that crashed.

But let me enlighten you about the disability argument. From the very beginning of the Hearing, Judge Shanks must have taken the stance. He set out to intimidate the Barrister. The only member of the Panel who asked any relevant questions to do with disabilities and the Hearing was the White Lady. As far as I am concerned the Black Man was there as tokenism. Because my Racism claims were struck out repeatedly. But the evidence, written and verbal from the 7 witnesses back my Racism Claims. And other “Protected Characteristics” under the Equality Act.

Why should I have to explain about context? I provided 6 FILES because, by the time I realised I did not understand the instructions I was given when I called the EAT, I found it easier to prepare more FILES to be on the safe side. Is the Honourable Lady telling me that Judge Shanks did not consult the Bundles, but relied on the Respondent to make submissions that are criminal offenses and in breach of the Rules of Law?

Yes, Judge Shanks was putting this forward as his own opinion after prompting Barrister Jones with questions. The Respondent could not put this forward because they refused me access to my FILE before I transferred to BIB. The Respondent later stated they have no data for me except what I give them in the bundles for the ET. This was after I made Subject Access Request.

If this was a finding of fact made by the Employment Tribunal, they have to take responsibility alongside LEYF for the hate crime from the 23/07/2014 that destroyed my life and ruined my career. There is no statement of fact here.

 I am not even expecting an answer as the EAT will come up with more crap to trap me.

Yours sincerely

Mervelee Myers.         

One thought on “Another EAT Windup Addressed By Mervelee!

  1. Tell the Judiciary Of England and Wales, The Honourable Mrs Justice Simler BDE President Of The Employment Appeal Tribunal that I know how people changed into psychopaths. Look no further than June O’Sullivan started changing as soon as she was upgraded from CEO to MBE in 2013. I have my evidence. Maybe can be my first plugger? I will write a book about the atrocities of institutional discrimination by London South Employment Tribunal and now the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Don’t bet me, because I refuse to go back to swearing. I am celebrating my mother’s DOB and becoming a grandma for the 5th time.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.