When The World is Against You Because You Challenge Social Injustices and Inequalities to Safeguard Vulnerable Children, Young People and Adults from the Terrorism of Radicalisation. This is how they go about making one into a Voiceless Vulnerable. Dr Maria Hudson made recommendation to Acas http://acas.org.uk/researchpapers in 2012, however nothing was done. That’s why in 2017, I face another miscarriage of justice at the Employment Tribunals http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/responding? If in doubt go do the research and find my Open Letter to former Prime Minister David Cameron http://www.gov.uk/Number10, in October 2015.
I later send follow up correspondence to Prime Minister Theresa May about my treatment by the Department of Works & Pension. They done the same as http://www.leyf.org.uk, saying that I did not exist. But then Her Majesty Revenue & Customs join, in the fray saying they were not aware of me living at my address until 2015. The way they went about gathering information was in breach of the Data Protection Act. Just wondering where they think I was all this time? After all this time, I think I have come up with the answers. LEYF put me on some safeguarding list as a CRIMINAL. This happened before, at another workplace when I was blacklisted and networked against for raising concerns about safeguarding.
This was during the time I studied at the http://www.aoug.org.uk/awards. I have a DBS, registered online http://www.disclosure.gov.uk. However I am unable to get a job because of the 6 lines of reference flagging safeguarding. And you have the nerves to come say you don’t know what I want the governement to do? Well it should be clear from the judgement posted online who is libelling whom, and who is the credible witness? That’s why I am continuing my Fight4justice campaign going public.
Brief Response to Email re Petition: I will be writing in due course, requesting further clarifications for the rejections of the Petition. I am on my way to the hospital for my annual Diabetic Eye Check Lets hope I am not murdered, and it is covered up, to look like suicide before I get someone to take my concerns seriously? If in doubt, find out from the Police and Ambulance services why they responded to a malicious phone call and visited my home on Monday? PM Theresa May made a pledge to the Daily Express. Now I understand what Frank Bruno was talking about on tv. What would have happened if I didn’t open my door and invited them in my home?
——– Original message ——–
From: “Petitions: UK Government and Parliament” <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 31/10/2017 17:46 (GMT+00:00)
Subject: We rejected your petition “Review of the Employment Tribunal Laws, stopping discrimination of employees.”
Dear Mervelee Ionie Myers,
We rejected the petition you created – “Review of the Employment Tribunal Laws, stopping discrimination of employees.”.
It included confidential, libellous, false or defamatory information, or a reference to a case which is active in the UK courts.
We’ve marked this petition as confidential because of the personal information you’ve included. In any case, we can’t accept your petition because it’s not clear what action you’d like the Government or Parliament to take.
We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards:
If you want to try again, click here to start a petition:
The Petitions team
UK Government and Parliament
Mervelee’s Response to the Government Rejection of Petition
“Review of the Employment Tribunal Laws, stopping discrimination of employees“. Since I have been facing discrimination in the UK from 2004, which have had detriments on my life and as far as everyone is concerned I am a CRIMINAL, I will only have to continue with my Fight4justice.
As per usual from the discrimination started, no one was willing to listen to my concerns, until I have to literally take the law into my own hands to get justice. Let me go back to 2004, when the Banks colluded to defraud me of my money. I was left fighting the Banks involved, as they already decided I am a CRIMINAL. If I did not get the http://www.icsouthlondon.co.uk to publish my story, I would have lost every penny and my reputation. Dictionary definition 2: (V) False damage the reputation of (someone). In the interim, the Police treated me like a CRIMINAL, as did the Banks. The only reasons I got anyone to listen to me was the fact I possessed a British Passport, but I refuse to stay here and will be gone as soon as my duty of care responsibilities to my husband is completed. The husband who was told that “Mr Tomlinson, you have a small illusion that one day you can become a property tycoon”? Surely that’s discrimination, the kind of Modern Day SLAVERY Practices that I have been trying to stamp out from 2004. The pattern of discrimination continued and that’s why I started my Petition.
It included confidential, libeleous, false or defamatory information, or a reference to a case which is active in the UK courts. I would be grateful if the powers that be could clarify this matter for a lay person to understand?
Confidential: When is the information that is posted online become confidential? Who have access to that information and what can they do with it? I am saying this because of what LEYF done to breach the contract I signed on the 7th October 2009 that was not reviewed and updated. They refused me access to my FILE with the confidential information about my disabilities. They set about changing my Confidential Data to put their discrimination of destroying me, using my vulnerability in place. Refer to http://www.slam-iapt.nhs.uk/southwark. But not only that they used my email fraudently to make online DBS application. Is it any wonder the government is unable to implement the Counter Terrorism Act 2015 to save lives?
Libeleous: Who is responsible for posting the information online? Who is this information libelious to? The Collins Dictionary meaning 1: (N) Published statement falsely damaging a person’s reputation. 2: (V) False damage the reputation of (someone). 3: (Adj). I have my Defensive Practice stating I am the one who experienced all of this and more since 2004.
False: None of the false information have anything to do with me. However I would suggest those who take 5 months to make the judgement and 3 days to post online to go back and look at the facts. I am now in receipt of correspondence from the person who done this malicious at to get revenge http://www.pechespublications.co.uk. However the Police failed to act to protect me when I reported verbal threats. Despite going to the Police Station at London Bridge on Monday to make a report, they tried convincing me it was normal for someone to make malicious allegations. I, however got Police Lulu to take my concerns seriously. He took my number to give me the reference number, I am still waiting. Or maybe the Police is waiting for the persons responsible to commit some act and blame it on the fact they reported about me being suicidal and making posts on https//www.facebook.com/public/Mervelee-Myers about self-harm?
Reference to Active Case: That’s why I need an explanation as to why the judgement is posted online. Are you telling me it is not there for everyone to use to carry out malicious acts of TERRORISM? For your information the Police & Ambulance Services was called to my home to section me under the Mental Health Act 2015. Would you agree that having access to the judgement online might have given the person ideas about taking revenge for some perceived wrong?
Marked Confidential: Maybe you could explain why you are blaming me for using the confidential information that is about me, posted online? The information that The Collins Dictionary meaning 1: (N) Published statement falsely damaging a person’s reputation. 2: (V) False damage the reputation of (someone). 3: (Adj).
Not Clear of Actions: Maybe I should refresh your memory about the PM pledge written in the Sunday Express http://www.express.org.uk, of the 29th October 2017. On Monday 30th October someone sent the Police and Ambulance Services to my home to take me away and leave my vulnerable husband on his own. I only managed to convince them not to forcibly take me away, when I showed them some of the Medical Reports and other documents from the Bundles that were used in the judgement posted online. Now if they could see the information that they used to make their judgement that the call out was a false alarm, why didn’t the https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/ms-m-myers-v-london-early-years-foundation-2300047-2016, judges?
The government is busy working at dealing with the sleaze on their hands. I am therefore requesting that something be done about this matter. I was sent to the House of Commons Nursery from th 17th – 27th March 2015. That’s in breach of the Counter Terrorism & Security Act 2015, the Modern Slavery Act 2015, the British Values Act 2014, the Mental Health Act 2015 and the Equality Act 2010. All that’s left for me to do is publish all my correspondences to the government, authories, establishments and systems showing who is the CREDIBLE WITNESS dealing with the facts of the discrimination I faced in the UK from 2004.
Maybe it’s time you look at the how Petitions meet the Standards. Because I am not sure who breached whose Human Rights and I intend to find out.
I will be making more Petitions until one meets the Standards.
Mervelee Myers FD (Open),
Basic School Teacher, Early Years Practitioner, Learning Support Assistant, Writer, Carer, Volunteer, Advocate.